Leadership Academy May 30 / 31.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CIC Conference Getting Instruction Up to Code Through Observation & Feedback Presenters: Jacqueline Rivers, Clare Newton, & Kristina McCalip.
Advertisements

Chad Allison May 2013  1-2 Formal Classroom Evaluations  Drop-in Visits.
Marshal Hurst LDC/MDC Coordinator Professional Development (501)
Explicit Instruction: when, where, and how?
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Creating Highly Effective Building Leadership Teams 18 critical components to help you identify your Building Leadership Team’s level of implementation.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
February 9, 2012 Session 1: Observing Lessons NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
Evaluating Teacher Performance: Getting it Right CPRE Annual Conference November 21-23, 2002 Charlotte Danielson
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Maximizing Academic Learning Time Direct Interactive Instruction.
“Fail to plan… plan to fail”
Differentiated Supervision
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Tools for Instruction and Assessment for the Maryland College- and Career-Ready Standards Time to Revisit Tools that will Inform Instruction.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
Support for Students with Diverse Learning Needs
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Prevention to Avoid Intervention Tier 1: the most important tier!
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Three: March 3, 5, 6, 8, 10, 2014.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
CVUHSD Linked Learning Summer Institute 2015 Direct Interactive Instruction (DII) and Behaviors of learning and Teaching (BLT)
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
English Language Arts ERPD September 19, Welcome, Celebrations, & Norms Begin and end on time. Keep the train of thought “on the track”. Actively.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Supporting and Coaching Classroom Facilitators Oudete Taylor August 13, 2015.
Academy of Pacesetting States Indicators of Effective Instruction Larry Kugler July 20, 2009.
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
EngageNY.org Providing Feedback and Support. Purpose of this Session Participants will be able to  Identify the various settings for teachers and leaders.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Welcome! March 2013 ELA Network
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Category 1 Category 2Category 3Category.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
TREND DATA In order to enhance the quality of feedback provided on our new forms and ensure inter-rater reliability and calibration, we developed “WALK-
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
The Common Core August 14, 2012 Unpacking. Goals and Objectives of this Training Participants will:  Become more familiar with the Common Core Standards.
NM Teacher Evaluation Planning & Preparation Creating an Environment of Learning Professionalism Teaching for Learning Evaluation.
BTSA Induction Quarterly Seminar April 11 th and April 14 th April 11 th and April 14 th WELCOME WELCOME.
LITERACY-BASED DISTRICT-WIDE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aiken County Public School District March 4, 2016 District Purpose The mission of the Aiken County.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
Professional Development Academic Literacy Together, we can make a difference.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
1 John E. Batchelor 2021 Brassfield Road Greensboro, NC cell fax
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Mathematics at Tiger Academy Eureka Math
SUSD Teacher Induction Program
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Instructional Rounds Peninsula School District
Georgia Department of Education
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Saskatchewan Reads for Middle Years
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Information July 15, 2015.
Unpacking the Common Core August 14, 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Leadership Academy May 30 / 31

Today’s Objective The instructional leaders of SUSD will review, observe, and identify components of a standard SUSD model of the implementation of DII based on the Blueprint for Student Achievement. Kirk (1 min)

Agenda Review the Blueprint for Student Achievement Review the components of DII “Game Film” Analysis Practice application of Implementation Form and Rubric Kirk (1 min)

Blueprint for Student Achievement Kirk (8 min)

High Performing Districts Believe… All students can learn Reversing the paradigm Success breeds success Successful students are rewarded through successful instruction Student Achievement Data as a result of DII We control the conditions of success Redefining the District instructional standard Kirk (2 min) first two bullets only

2010 2011 An SUSD teacher 31 3 17 11 2 1 ELA CST # Total Students # of Advanced Students # of Proficient Students # of Basic Below Basic Students # of Far 31 3 (1)7(6) (5)11(5)(1) (2)6(4) (1)(1)(1)(1)4 2011 Kirk (5 min) 17 11 2 1

Norms Reward the “Risk-Takers” Actively Participate – be open-minded, engage within group discussions (silently or verbally) Practice Collegial Respect – different opinions from today are heard and respected Demonstrate Professionalism – limited/no side conversations, actively listening, phones silent/off (no texting) Assume positive intent by avoiding the deficit model Parking Lot Kirk (2 min)

Components of DII As a table group, complete the handout List the 4 components of DII. Explain each component. Identify what the 4 circles in the middle represent. Discuss as a table group, how the circles and the components impact the Success Rate. 5 minute activity Dan (2 min) Handout – Blank DII 4-square Participants have 5 minutes to complete as a table group

Standards & Measurable Objectives 3 C’s – content, context, competence Posted and referenced throughout the lesson Students can restate and explain how they will demonstrate their learning Student work is posted and reflects standards, difficulty, and complexity Core curriculum is used appropriately Dan (2 min) Hear from a participant walk through bullet points

Lesson Structure and Sequence Lesson is “chunked” Lesson proceeds sequentially Activate prior knowledge Input/Model – I do Structured Practice – We do Guided Practice – You do with support Independent Practice – You do Closure Students demonstrate their learning at the end of the lesson Dan (2 min) Hear from a participant walk through bullet points

Proactive Classroom Management Minimal “stop-start”, smooth transitions Frequent lesson orientation and alerts to next steps Low profile controls Praise-prompt-leave Frequent physical proximity and eye contact maintained with all students. Dan (2 min) Hear from a participant walk through bullet points

Student Engagement, Correctives, and Feedback Continuous multi-level feedback Pre-correctives are utilized A variety of interaction strategies are used Leveled questions are employed All students are continuously and intentially engaged Dan (2 min) Hear from a participant walk through bullet points

Direct Interactive Instruction Standards and Measurable Objectives Lesson Structure and Sequence AvailableTime Allocated Time Engagement Rate Direct Interactive Instruction Success Rate Dan (2 min) Hear from a participant walk circles Student Engagement, Correctives, and Feedback Proactive Classroom Management Adapted from ALS – DII Day 1 2011

Dan (2 min) How will we use this tool to change reality?

Rubric & Implementation Tools for Today Mark & Michele (1 min) Handout: DII Character Rubric

Rubric & Implementation Tools for Today Mark & Michele (1 min) Handouts: DII Implementation Tools Packet

Standards & Measurable Objectives Review the rubric for Standards & Measurable Objectives Use the DII Implementation Tool Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing. Mark & Michele (1 min) Reference Poster

Standards & Measurable Objectives Gordon Mark & Michele

Standards & Measurable Objectives Discussion Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? What evidence supports the score? Mark & Michele (5 min) Hear from participants and validate

Lesson Structure & Sequence Review the rubric for Lesson Structure and Sequence Use the DII Implementation Tool Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing Kirk & Eba (1 min) Reference Poster

Lesson Structure & Sequence Discussion Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? What evidence supports the score? Kirk & Eba (5 min) Hear from participants and validate

Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives Review the rubric for Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives. Use the DII Implementation Tool Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing Nancy (1 min) Reference Poster

Student Engagement, Feedback, and Correctives Discussion Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? What evidence supports the score? Nancy (5 min) Hear from participants and validate

Proactive Classroom Management Review the rubric for Proactive Classroom Management. Use the DII Implementation Tool Record evidence that shows what the teacher and students are doing Robert (1 min) Reference Poster

Proactive Classroom Management Discussion Is this piece of the lesson considered a 3 or 4 on the rubric scale? What evidence supports the score? Robert (5 min) Hear from participants and validate

Your Turn Video of DII Implementation tool to observe lesson through the lens of DII One component for each table Record evidence that supports why this lesson receives a rubric score of 3 or 4. Mark (5min) Assign rows to different components Ensure that groups know the task at hand

Reflect/Discuss 5 minutes to discuss evidence with your table Share out 1 or 2 pieces of evidence that represents a rubric score of 3 or 4 Standards & Measureable Objectives Lesson Structure & Sequence Student Engagement, Correctives, and Feedback Proactive Classroom Management Mark (15 min) 5 min to talk as tables and share notes 2 min to hear from each group

Today’s Objective Revisited The instructional leaders of SUSD will review, observe, and identify components of a standard SUSD model of the implementation of DII based on the Blueprint for Student Achievement. Kirk (1 min) What we set out to do today was this…

High Performing Districts Believe… All students can learn Success breeds success We control the conditions of success Kirk (2 min)

Closure & Next Steps.. A year in review August 1 & 2 - Principal & AP Advance Topics: Blueprint 2012-13 DII & Implementation Systematic Monitoring Observation and Evaluation Motivational Video Kirk (2 min)

Go Forth and Change the World Kirk