Midterm Exam ReviewCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU1 Verification Project 2 Rubric for Plan/Report

Midterm Exam ReviewCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU2 Rubric  These are the general points that should be addressed in the verification plan. Description of what is being verified  The fault tolerant adder  Package fbit_logic  Package fsim_logic  For verification of each of these you do not necessarily have a single test bench. For this project it is probably best to have a series of test benches.

Verification of fbit  Overview of the package  Verify the functional correctness of the package.  Verify and characterize the error injection ability of the package. Create test(s) that will insure that the distribution of error injection is random. Midterm Exam ReviewCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU3

Verification of fsim  Overview of the package  Verify the functional correctness of the package.  Verify and characterize the error injection ability of the package. Create test(s) that will insure that the distribution of error injection is random. Midterm Exam ReviewCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU4

Verification of the SEC/DED adder  Were given a counter that helps significantly in effort.  Verify the counter (easy).  Verify the adder with no error injection.  Verify adder with only a few errors in an exhaustive run.  Verify the adder with several errors injected during the same length run. Midterm Exam ReviewCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU5

Definition of success  Needs to formally define how you will know the verification tasks is completed.  The report will detail implementation of the plan and the results from execution of the work.  The presentation will do the same. Midterm Exam ReviewCopyright Joanne DeGroat, ECE, OSU6