Accreditation Update Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure, Accreditation & Evaluation Curriculum Coordinators – April 10, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Advertisements

Simpson County Schools: New Teacher Support Program A Proposal.
What it means for New Teachers
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
VISION: To have each student college ready, career ready and life ready.
SACS CASI Background Dedicated to advancing excellence in education worldwide, AdvancED provides accreditation, research, and professional services to.
1 of 43 Kansas Curriculum Leaders Accreditation Step-by-Step January 23, 2015.
Kansas Education Systems Accreditation: The Five Rs
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
1 Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Standards (OCIS) Update Holiday Inn Albany, New York October 15, 2010.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
A Bright Future A New Look at Accreditation Curriculum Leaders, Friday, Oct. 12, 2012.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Rising Star An Overview Prepared for the District 97 Board of Education By Felicia Starks Turner and Cynthia Baranowski November 27,
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Considerations for Developing a New Accountability System Nancy S. Brownell, Senior Fellow, State Board of Education.
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Committee of Practitioners ESEA Flexibility Waiver Review June 25, 2014.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Marco Ferro, Director of Public Policy Larry Nielsen, Field Consultant With Special Guest Stars: Tammy Pilcher, President Helena Education Association.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Developing a New Accountability System
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
NEW ENGLAND ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND COLLEGES NEASC.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Division of Learning Services (DLS) Brown Bag/Hot Topics October 5, 2015.
PI -34 What Every Educator Should Know R. Schemelin.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Division of Learning Services (DLS) Curriculum Leaders Update October 16, 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
District Accreditation Completing the Standards Assessment Report July 20, 2010.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. KASSP Fall Conference.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.
Standards of Achievement for Professional Advancement District 2 Career Ladder Training April 29, 2016 Ronda Alexander & Michael Clawson.
Identifying and Using Multiple Measures Bill Bagshaw.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
DLS Lunch Time/Hot Topics May 4, 2016.
What it means for New Teachers
KESA UPDATE Kansas leads the world in the success of each student.
Kansas Education Systems Accreditation
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Kansas Education Systems Accreditation
Update on KESA and Licensure
Kansas Educator Evaluation
Five Required Elements
KESA UPDATE Kansas leads the world in the success of each student.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
STAFF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT IN-SERVICE
Identifying Multiple Measures and Defining Significance
State Board of Education Progress Update
KEEP2 Training and Updates
K-12 Accreditation Update
Curriculum Leaders Meeting
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
Colorado Department of Education
Western Association of Schools and Colleges Presentation
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Accreditation Update Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure, Accreditation & Evaluation Curriculum Coordinators – April 10, 2015

Accreditation All schools will maintain their current accreditation status for the school year. Schools must complete QPA Quality Criteria Collection by June 30, 2015.

What Should We Do Right Now? 1.Familiarize all staff with State Board’s definition of College and Career Ready, including the use of the ACTE (Academic, Cognitive, Technical, Employability) acronym. 2.Familiarize all staff with the Rose Capacities.

What Should We Do Right Now? 3.Leadership begin review of the four rubrics (Rs) with calibration (IRA) in mind. 4.Familiarize all staff with the four rubrics – have them reflect on what they already do in support of CCR, ACTE, Rose Capacities, and the four rubric areas.

What Should We Do Right Now? 5.When discussing data, address its relationship (and possible use as growth evidence) to CCR, ACTE, Rose Capacities, and the four rubric areas.

What Should We Do Right Now? 7.Start using the four “R” rubrics as part of your needs assessments in planning for Relate strategic/action plans and goals to the components of the four rubrics. 9.Identify existing ACTE and 5R data points for possible use as indicators of goal and growth achievement.

New Model Adoption Timeline June 2015Submit revisions for legal review November 2015State Board ‘Receive Item’ December 2015State Board ‘Action Item’ Jan – June 2016Prepare field for implementation July 2016First cycle begins for all districts June 2017 Group 1 districts receive official ratings June 2018 Group 2 districts receive official ratings

New Model Accreditation Ratings The following ratings will be used in conjunction with the new model: Accredited Accredited – Conditional Not Accredited

New Model Non-negotiables Districts will meet all licensure, fiscal/accounting, mentoring, IDEA, and ESI statutes/regulations in order to be considered for an accreditation rating other than “not accredited.”

New Model Other Foundational Requirements STRUCTURES MUST BE IN PLACE TO ADDRESS: 1.Compliance with statutes/regs 2.Participation in school improvement/accreditation 3.Diversity and equity in education 4.Family and community engagement 5.CCR/Rose Capacities 6.Social-emotional development of all students

New Model Foundational Requirements With 100% of “Other Foundational Requirements” met, district can then be considered for rating as high as “Accredited.” Individual foundational requirements can be waived by the commissioner.

New Model Foundational Requirements Individual foundational requirements can be waived by the commissioner.

New Model – Process District meets with Outside Validation Team (can be virtual) during Year One. District meets with OVT Chair (can be virtual) during Year Three. District hosts Outside Validation Team (cannot be virtual) for formal accreditation visit in Year Five.

New Model – Process Year One Needs assessments (buildings and district) Goal area selection (District selects 2 of the Rs.) Meeting with Outside Validation Team (can be virtual) Year Two Development of goals and action plans (buildings) Development of leadership goals and action plans (district) Meeting with OVT Chair (can be virtual) Years Three-Four Implementation of action plans Year Five Post-implementation analysis OVT formal accreditation visit Application for accreditation rating