Looking for PCK in All the Wrong Places? Janet Carlson, BSCS Joseph A. Taylor, BSCS NSF DRK12 PI Meeting November 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

The Teacher Work Sample
A Guide to Implementation
PORTFOLIO.
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
LINDSAY CLARE MATSUMURA HELEN GARNIER BRIAN JUNKER LAUREN RESNICK DONNA DIPRIMA BICKEL June 30, 2010 Institute of Educational Sciences Conference Evidence.
How do you do it?-- TPCK and Understanding by Design There is a new curriculum design model that helps us think about how to make assessment part of learning.
0 Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits This sample lesson and accompanying documentation are.
TWS Aid for Scorers Information on the Background of TWS.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
MEASURING TEACHING PRACTICE Tony Milanowski & Allan Odden SMHC District Reform Network March 2009.
Building the Continuum: Beginning Teacher Research Julie Luft Arizona State University.
Exit Portfolio of Your name Area of Licensure Completion date 2011.
ETT 229 Fall 2004 Introductions & Standards. Agenda 10:00-10:40 – Introductions 10:40-11:15 – Standards presentation.
ETT 429 Spring 2007 Technology Standards. NETS-T Background International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) created National Educational Technology.
Jefferson County Public Schools University of Louisville.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
 Participants will gain an understanding of what reading, writing, and speaking looks like in practice when using evidence.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
The 5 E Instructional Model
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
Emporia State University Phil Bennett (Some Slides by Dr. Larry Lyman) Teacher Work Sample The Teachers College.
1 Our Approach to Lesson Study María E. Torres Summer, 2004.
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
Ms. Caley Hughes’s Candidate Teaching Presentation Anonymous: Anything your mind can believe, you can achieve. Believe and achieve. Website.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
ED. S. INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF WEST GEORGIA 25 APRIL 2009 Amy Dianne Cannady Electronic Portfolio.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
What is Teacher Effectiveness and How May it Be Assessed? David E. Meltzer Department of Physics, University of Washington and Seattle Country Day School.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Promise and Problems of Learning Progression-guided Interventions Hui Jin, Hyo Jeong Shin, Michele Johnson, Jinho Kim.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
Cathy Taylor Teaching children to count is good, but teaching what counts is better.
WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE SCIENCE EDUCATION PRESENTED BY GIBSON & ASSOCIATES A CALIFORNIA MATH AND SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP RESEARCH GRANT WISE II Evaluation.
WRITING A Learning Experience An Overview Daemen College Teacher/Quality Leadership Partnership Pat Loncto.
Characterizing Noyce Scholars Physics Classrooms Using RTO P Joseph L. Zawicki, Kathleen Falconer, Dan MacIsaac, Catherine Lange, Griffin Harmon SUNYBuffalo.
Evaluating the Conceptual Coherence and Rigor of Instructional Materials Florida Association of Science Supervisors 5 May 2005 Jody Bintz, BSCS Center.
PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING BICYCLE Assessing Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Future Elementary Teachers CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS PCK of future elementary teachers.
Laura Blake Candidate Teaching Summit Presentation “The shell must break before the bird can fly” ~ Alfred Lord Tennyson Website .
Summary of the International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) and NCATE's Educational Computing and Technology facilitation Standards for K-12.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
NCATE STANDARD I STATUS REPORT  Hyacinth E. Findlay  March 1, 2007.
Passport to Science MSP Science Program Indianapolis Public Schools.
N. Katherine Standard’s Exit Portfolio
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
AIM: K–8 Science Iris Weiss Eric Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Project „How to implement the topic Energy at Primary Education with Inquiry-Based Science Education Dr. Fritz Schliessmann University of Flensburg Institute.
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP. Objective 1: Design coherent instruction and learning activities collaboratively that are highly relevant to students and pedagogical.
Situating Teacher Learning in the Practice of Science and Mathematics Teaching Monica Hartman University of Michigan Pre-Oral Defense Meeting May 3, 2004.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Preparing to Facilitate Mathematics Professional Development: Aiming for Alignment Between the Program and the Facilitator Nanette Seago Karen Koellner.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
Project iSAT (Improving Science Achievement with Technology)
Melanie Taylor Horizon Research, Inc.
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP
Insert your name and a picture. Change the Design Template.
Professional Teaching Portfolio
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Project: Assessing Teacher Learning About Science Teaching (ATLAST)
INTASC STANDARDS Sharae Frazier.
Information July 15, 2015.
Presentation transcript:

Looking for PCK in All the Wrong Places? Janet Carlson, BSCS Joseph A. Taylor, BSCS NSF DRK12 PI Meeting November 2009

What are Your Experiences? Measuring PCK? What instruments? What successes? What challenges?

Project PRIME Promoting Reform through Instructional Materials that Educate Collaborative project with the Center for Research and Evaluation at BSCS and the Center for Science Teaching and Learning at NAU Funded by NSF in 2004 through the Teacher Professional Continuum (TPC) program Goal: Study PCK growth in teachers who implement highly educative curriculum materials with and without professional development. Correlate to student achievement.

PRIME Time Line Time line for Cohort 1 Summer 05 (2 wks) Spring 05 School Year Summer 06 (3 wks) School Year Time line for Cohort 2 Summer 06 (2 wks) Spring 06 School Year Summer 07 (3 wks) School Year HS biology teachers in Arizona

PRIME Research Questions 1.In what ways does Project PRIME influence participants’ development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)? 2. In what ways does Project PRIME influence participants’ Content knowledge (CK) Subject matter, Inquiry, Nature of Science Pedagogical knowledge (PK) Teaching strategies Context knowledge (CxK) Student conceptions, diverse learners 3. Is the whole of PCK similar to or different from its parts (CK, PK, CxK)? If so, how?

PRIME Research Questions 4a. How does student learning change over time? 4b. What is the relationship between participants’ PCK and their students’ learning? 5. In what ways does Project PRIME influence the development and sustainability of a professional learning community?

Where’s the PCK? Given the structure of the project, what opportunities do you think exist for measuring PCK?

Measurements 1.PCK Reflections (CK, PK, CxK, PCK) 2.Structured Interviews (CK, PK, CxK, PCK) 3.Videotapes of Classroom Instruction (CK, PK, CxK, PCK, Fidelity) 4.Major Field Test for Biology (ETS) (CK) 5.Reform Teaching Observation Protocol (CK, PK, CxK) 6.Student Achievement 7.Student Work 8.Professional Learning Community Rating Scale

Data Collection Schedule 1.Baseline, prior to program start 2.Following summer professional development 3.Following professional development and teaching the topic once or following teaching without professional development 4.Teaching followed by professional development in summer 2 5.Following professional development and teaching the topic twice or teaching in year 1, followed by professional development and teaching in year 2

Topics for PCK Reflections Arizona StandardReflection Topic The CellTransport mechanisms HeredityProtein synthesis InterdependenceCarrying capacity EvolutionNatural selection Matter, Energy, and Organization Photosynthesis

Studying the Scoring Rubric 1.Review your assigned page of the rubric. Consider this question: –What evidence would you expect to see in a video or written reflection to rate it “advanced”? 2.Share your thoughts with the large group.

Looking at the Evidence – Baseline 1.Read the baseline reflection on the yellow sheet. 2.Score it on the rubric by placing a “B-DR” in each appropriate box. 3.Discuss your scores with the others at your table. 4.Read the baseline reflection on the green sheet. 5.Score it on the rubric by placing a “B-DS” in each appropriate box. 6.Discuss your scores with the others at your table.

Context for Video

Looking at the Evidence – 1 st Reflection Post Intervention (PD and teaching) 1.Watch the video of Dwight. 2.Score it on the rubric by placing a “PDT-DR” in each appropriate box. 3.Discuss your scores with your group. 4.Watch the video of Donna. 5.Score it on the rubric by placing a “PDT-DS” in each appropriate box. 6.Discuss your scores with your group.

Looking at the Evidence – Last Reflection 1.Read the last reflection on the yellow sheet. 2.Score it on the rubric by placing a “PDTT-DR” in each appropriate box. 3.Discuss results with your group. 4.Read the last reflection on the green sheet. 5.Score it on the rubric by placing a “PDTT-DS” in each appropriate box. 6.Discuss results with your group.

Discussion Questions What challenges did you find working with the data? What challenges did you find using the rubric? How did the data in the form of written reflection compare to seeing data in video format? What promises do you see for measuring PCK? What questions do you have now?

Thank you To contact us –Janet Carlson –Joe Taylor Slides are available at bscs.org/sessions (click on the link for “previous BSCS sessions”)bscs.org/sessions Paper reviewing biology curriculum materials is available at Beyer, C., Delgado, C., Davis, E.A., and Krajcik, J.S. (April, 2006). Investigating high school biology texts as educative curriculum materials: Curriculum review process. Report commissioned by Project PRIME