Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training 2007-08 Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
University of Central Missouri College of Education Office of Clinical Services and Certification.
Advertisements

Session 2.3: Skills for Supportive Supervision
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
OVERVIEW OF ClASS METHODS and ACTIVITIES. Session Objectives By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Describe ClASS team composition.
Know your Contractual Rights By The United School Employees of Pasco.
Chairing a Florida Catholic Conference Accreditation Visitation.
Training for Faculty Search Committees UAB Office of the Provost.
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Amphitheater Career Ladder Orientation
Professional Facilitation
Every day 83 million people attend 11.5 million meetings.
WRITING THE ClASS REPORT
Understanding your child’s IEP.  The Individualized Education Plan (IEP) is intended to help students with disabilities interact with the same content.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Training Requirements Virginia Department of Health Summer Food Service Program (SFSP) 2014.
Class #8 Magnificent Seventh January 1 CBO Mentor Project.
Employment Assistance Services. Registration Case Management  Assessment  Barriers  Goals and Tasks  Services  Notes Group Exercise Documenting Employment.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING
So What Can I Expect When I Serve on an NEASC/CPSS Visiting Team? A Primer for New Team Members.
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP September 4, 2012.
Class #9 Magnificent Seventh Feburary 1 CBO Mentor Project.
Orientation for New Site Visitors Site Visitor Responsibilities, Expenses, and Training.
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
Guide to Patient & Family Engagement Insert hospital logo here Become a Patient and Family Advisor: Information Session [Hospital Name | Presenter name.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Union Mentoring Program 1. 2 Today’s Agenda 9:30 to 11:30 Opening Comments and Introductions What does it mean to be a Union Leader? Mentoring Program.
AASP DC Regional Symposium Wednesday, January 21, Presenters: Gail Ferris, Paula Palhus, Michael Ross Office of Development and Alumni Relations.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CORE Principle 1 Peer Review Day LAX Westin Tuesday, April 21, 2015.
JOBTALKS Communications: Secondary Interview Business Career Planning and Placement Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D.
GARDEN CITY DISTRICT LEADERSHIP November 6, 2012.
Effective School Council Meetings School Council Forums 2009.
Learning Focused Observations BEST Leadership Roundtable February 1 st, 2012.
Implementation Overview and Orientation. Goals for today Provide an overview of the plans and goals for your Odyssey implementation Provide necessary.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Coordinated Review Effort (CRE) School Year Karen Franklin, SNS Distance Learning October 1, 2015.
REVIEWING THE COURSE SYLLABUS AND EXPECTATIONS FOR STUDENT TEACHERS ADVICE AND TIPS FOR SUCCESS Student Teaching Orientation.
APPRAISAL OF THE HEADTEACHER GOVERNORS’ BRIEFING.
How to Run an Effective Regional Board Meeting. Self-paced version Use mouse click to advance the slides.
December 8, 2010 Ensuring Educator Excellence Accreditation Handbook 2. Team Member Ethics 3. Responsibilities prior to arriving at the Site Visit.
BIR Update Sessions: General Updates January-February 2009 Ensuring Educator Excellence.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
WLUSA/OSSTF Annual Performance Review Process Human Resources & WLUSA| 2015.
Compliance Monitoring and Enforcement Audit Program - The Audit Process.
Recruitment & HR. You’ll discover:  Tips on hiring the right people  Why & how to facilitate Performance Reviews  How to Motivate Your Team  Importance.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
ISLLC Standard #6 ISLLC Standard #6 Supporting Education Reform Name Workshop Facilitator.
Program Evaluation Workshop Overview of the Site Visit Process Rita Marie Cain Professor of Business Law, Bloch School.
MT 340 Unit #7 Seminar Dr. Donald Wilson Agenda: Unit #7 Organization Culture Unit #8 HR Practices & Diversity Unit #8 Compiled Final Project Unit #9 The.
JOBTALKS The Follow-Up Interview Career Search Strategies Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D.
JOBTALKS The Secondary Interview Indiana University Kelley School of Business C. Randall Powell, Ph.D Contents used in this presentation are adapted from.
District Supervisor In-Service University of Central Missouri College of Education Office of Clinical Services and Certification.
Review visit Heli Mattisen Visit to one HEI – 1-3 days Committee has a working room where, among others, pre-requested documents/materials.
Classified Evaluation and Employment Training St. Vrain Valley Schools - HR 2016.
Training for Faculty Search Committees
Performance Feedback Training
Adult and Community Learning Services (ACLS)
End of Year Performance Review Meetings and objective setting for 2018/19 This briefing pack is designed to be used by line managers to brief their teams.
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation
PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE RENEWAL PROCESS
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Presentation transcript:

Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up and Sign-up

Job Description and Expectations Compensation: –$100 stipend per site visit –Mileage reimbursement –Substitute teacher reimbursement –Hotel reimbursement (if appropriate and prearranged with the MDE facilitator)

Job Description and Expectations Compensation notes: –Mileage and Substitute teacher reimbursement forms will be distributed on the day of the visit –All forms regarding payment arrangements must be paid promptly Payments cannot be made later than 45 days from the day the work was completed

Job Description and Expectations –Stipend payments will be made at the end of the month –Receipts are required for all hotel reimbursements and must be attached to the reimbursement form This is included on the mileage form

Job Description and Expectations Qualifications –Willing to travel to site visits –Understanding of the Q Comp legislation and policies –Background in best practices for professional development, student achievement, and teacher evaluation

Job Description and Expectations –Willing to commit to training –Committed to providing districts with quality, constructive feedback to highlight both the positives and areas for improvement –Open-minded

Job Description and Expectations Job Duties: –Attend Training –Participate in site visits Arrive promptly (try to be 15 minutes before the scheduled start time) Dress professionally Listen attentively to information provided Provide commendations and recommendations

Job Description and Expectations –Review draft reports for accuracy At the conclusion of each debriefing session the Peer Review team should review with the MDE facilitator what has been recorded to ensure accuracy on the report and the full consensus of the group is reflected in the report –Contact MDE, immediately if you are unable to attend a Peer Review visit

Norms and Confidentiality Final reports for all Peer Review visits are consensus reports reflecting the agreement among all peer reviewers Direct all questions or requests for information about Program Review to MDE

Norms and Confidentiality A final Program Review report consists of the complete Document Review results and the consensus Peer Review report –Level movement depends on meeting expectations on both parts –Only Document Review results may be changed

Agendas and an Overview of the Day Each site designs their own agenda for the Peer Review site visit. All agendas must include: –A visit to schools at each level –A district presentation –A district leadership interview

Agendas and an Overview of the Day –A career ladder teacher interview –A teacher interview –Viewing of a live or videotaped team meeting at each school visited

Agendas and an Overview of the Day Differences between agendas at each Program Review level –Level 1 More sites (at least two sites at each level for districts with multiple sites at each level) –The team will be split to attend multiple sites at the same times

Agendas and an Overview of the Day –Level 2 Only one site at each level is required –The team is often smaller as splitting into multiple groups is not necessary –Level 3 This is designed by the district’s choice

Agendas and an Overview of the Day School District vs. Charter School Agendas –Look the same, with the same requirements Charter agendas are shorter, most often only half-day Charter school’s often have such small staff numbers that the district leadership and career ladder teacher interviews will be combined Charter visits often include a tour

Interviews The interview questions have been revised this year to eliminate as much repetition as possible Remember to listen intently to all interview responses –The interview questions are designed to specifically answer each portion of the rubric

Interviews Stick to the scripted questions, unless clarification is needed in order to fully understand the answer being given –Reserve questions based on curiosity or related to your own district’s implementation for lunch or make separate contact arrangements with the district for further discussion

Interviews –For example, if an interview subject says that one of the things they do not like about Q Comp is: “It takes too much time.” A good follow-up question may be, “Why do you feel that way?” or “Could you explain more about that?” –When asking follow-up questions, keep in mind that they must be focused on clarification to understand how this places the district on the rubric

Interview District Leadership Interview –Some of these questions may have been answered during the district presentation If so, and the entire Peer Review team agrees, the question may be skipped in the interview –For example, if in the district presentation the hiring process for all career ladder positions is clearly and completely explained as are all of the career ladder positions, the first question on the Leadership interview may be skipped

Rubric All indicators for a component must be checked for a component to meet expectations All components must meet expectations for the district to advance to the next level

Rubric The final determination if all indicators in a component meets expectations must be the consensus opinion of the entire Peer Review team All team members should ensure that the correct consensus is recorded on the rubric by the facilitator before leaving the site

Rubric The Alternative Salary Schedule component is no longer included on the Peer Review rubric –This is not a topic that tends to change greatly in implementation from what is in the application –Any issues with this component are most often compliance and not growth and will be handled through a separate process by MDE

Debriefing During the final Peer Review team discussion, make sure that all of your comments are heard This is a consensus process, the entire team must agree to all comments, and ratings All notes must be turned in to the facilitator

Questions or Concerns If you have any questions or concerns about the Peer Review process, please contact: –Kristie Anderson or –John Gimpl or –Nicole Norton or –Patricia K. King or