Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Advertisements

You can use this presentation to: Gain an overall understanding of the purpose of the revised tool Learn about the changes that have been made Find advice.
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric V: Quality of Technological Interactivity CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Common Core State Standards What are they? Why do we need them? What do they mean to us? Prepared by Grace Lee-Sim.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric.
WCSD ELL Department
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Open Educational Resources Sample Communications Slides for Educators and Administrators CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
School Improvement Planning A Guide to the Florida Continuous Improvement Management System.
Assessing Student Learning
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric IV: Quality of Assessments CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Design and Technology – Rain Gauge Project
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Catching Quality and Collaboration with Home Base Angel Mills Lee County Schools Kenan Fellow: Leading Educators to Home Base.
Design and Technology – Anemometer Project
Specific Considerations in Evaluating Teachers of ELLs Adam Bauchner Mid-State Regional Bilingual Education Resource Network.
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric I: Alignment to Standards CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Evaluating Self-Created Lesson/Units and Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects An Introduction to the Achieve OER & Quality Review Rubrics CC BYCC BY.
Debbie Poslosky Taken from the Common Core Standard Document.
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric III: Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
Math Practices (Part I) November 2, 2012 Maricela Rincon, Professional Development Specialist
Tri-State Quality Review Rubric & Process Mathematics Lessons/Units EQuIP Collaborative Fall 2012.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
EDU 385 Education Assessment in the Classroom
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects An Introduction to the Achieve OER Rubrics CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
A Network Approach To Improving Teaching and Learning Center Point High School Instructional Rounds in Education.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Measuring Complex Achievement
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric II: Quality of Explanation of Subject Matter CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric VI: Quality of Instructional Tasks and Practice Exercises CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
To access NCSU Wireless: Connect to “NCSU Guest” To Sign in to the Training and access the Contractor Wiki: contractortraining.pbworks.com.
June 22, 2011 CCSSO-NCSA Innovative Approaches to Statewide Writing Assessments 6/22/11CCSSO-NCSA.
FALCON Meeting #3 Preparation for Harnett County Schools Thursday, March 8, 2012.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON MIDDLE LEVEL PRINCIPALS WINTER MEETING -- JANUARY 24, 2015 Leveraging the SBAC System to Support Effective Assessment Practices.
How Much Do We know about Our Textbook? Zhang Lu.
ITEAMS is designed to provide teachers with the tools to develop inquiry-based lessons, and the opportunity to develop a deep understanding of implementation.
THREE DIMENSIONS OF A HIGH-QUALITY RUBRIC Created by Shauna Denson “Classroom Assessment for Student Learning”(J. Chappuis)
The case for scientific literacy? so pretty i never knew mars had a sun.
Common Core State Standards in English/Language Arts What science teachers need to know.
Performance Task and the common core. Analysis sheet Phases of problem sheet Performance task sheet.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
An Analysis of the Grade 3 Department of Basic Education workbooks as curriculum tools Ursula Hoadley & Jaamia Galant University of Cape Town Presentation.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Learning Objectives for Senior School Students. Failing to plan is planning to fail. / Psychology of Achievement /
Terry Reale, Reading and English Language Arts Coordinator Office of Instruction
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Equity and Deeper Learning:
California Assessment of STUDENT PERFORMANCE and PROGRESS
Illinois State Board of Education
Open Math – Open Classroom
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
DAY 1.
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
Mathematics and Special Education Leadership Protocols
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Illinois State Board of Education
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
The EQuIP Rubric (Formerly the Tri-State Rubric) A Tool To Align Lesson Plans and Units to the Common Core State Standards Illinois State Board of Education.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP)
Designing Your Performance Task Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Open Educational Resource (OER) Objects Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning CC BYCC BY Achieve 2013

2 Open : Containing an open license - no restrictions on remixing or reusing [Having no enclosing or confining barrier; not restricted to a particular group or category of participants] Open Educational Resources: [With Webster’s Definitions] O E R Educational: Used for teaching and learning [Pertaining to the action or process of educating or being educated] Resource: Object used to support an effort or task [ A source of support or aid, especially one that can be readily drawn upon when needed]

3 What are OER? OER are teaching, learning, and research resources that contain an open license. They provide extraordinary opportunities for educators to freely share knowledge and resources. They offer great potential for instructional innovation and networks for sharing best practices. There are, literally, millions of OER objects available online. Open Educational Resources (OER)

4 OER objects may include (but are not limited to): Images Applets Games Worksheets Lesson plans Original-source texts Assessments Units Textbooks Teacher/learner support materials o NOTE: Any smaller component of a more complex object, that can exist as a stand-alone, also qualifies as an “object” (e.g. a unit in a textbook, a lesson in a unit, or an activity in a lesson). Open Educational Resources (OER)

5 The Achieve OER Evaluation Rubrics How and why were the Achieve OER Rubrics created? Educators using the vast system of sharing need a method for filtering OER to meet the needs of their students. The purpose of the rubrics is to provide a structure for evaluating an online resource in a systematic, purposeful and comprehensive way. There are two ways of approaching the evaluation of a resource: o Holistically evaluating the object with a single rating, (similar to the star-rating systems used on Netflix, Yelp and Amazon) o Separately evaluating each of the components of quality, as with the Achieve OER Rubrics. The rubric criteria are based on Achieve protocols used to assist states in alignment and quality review studies. The Achieve OER Evaluation Tool, hosting the rubrics on OERCommons.org, allows a user to identify, evaluate and sort objects based on the specified essential elements of quality.

6 How do the Achieve OER Rubrics work? The rubrics represent an evaluation system for objects found within Open Educational Resources. They are hosted as an online evaluation tool on the repository, OERCommons.org, but can also be used independently. They are applied to any content area. o NOTE: At this stage only Common Core Standards for English Language Arts/Literacy and Mathematics are available in the Achieve OER Evaluation Tool. Content standards for History, Social Studies, Sciences, and technical subjects are not yet available. Each rubric is applied independently to an object. They rate the potential, not the actual, effectiveness of an object. They use a five-point scoring system to describe levels of quality. Applying the Achieve OER Rubrics

7 This presentation will focus on Rubric VII: Rubric I. Degree of Alignment to Standards Rubric II. Quality of Explanation of the Subject Matter Rubric III. Utility of Materials Designed to Support Teaching Rubric IV. Quality of Assessment Rubric V. Quality of Technological Interactivity Rubric VI. Quality of Instructional Tasks and Practice Exercises Rubric VII. Opportunities for Deeper Learning NOTE: Sometimes one or more of the rubrics may not be relevant to a particular object. In those cases, a rating of N/A is appropriate. The Achieve OER Evaluation Tool Rubrics

8 Rubric VII is applied to objects designed to engage learners in at least one of the following deeper learning skills: Think critically and solve complex problems Work collaboratively Communicate effectively Learn how to learn Reason abstractly Construct viable, logical arguments and critique the reasoning of others Apply discrete knowledge and skills to real-world situations Construct, use, or analyze models o Not applicable when an object does not appear to be designed to provide the opportunity for deeper learning, even though one might imagine how it could be used to do this. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning

9 3: An object is rated superior only if all of the following are true: At least three of the deeper learning skills from the list are required in the object. The object offers a range of cognitive demand that is appropriate and supportive of the material. Appropriate scaffolding and direction are provided. For example a superior object for deeper learning addresses peer conferencing in the process of revision of written drafts. It provides adequate scaffolding and direction for both the teacher and the student in its requirements that students work collaboratively, communicate their thinking effectively in sharing their work with peer partners, critique the reasoning of peer partners, and construct a logical argument supporting their final draft. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning

10 2: An object is rated strong if it includes one or two deeper learning skills identified in this rubric. For example an eighth grade object is considered strong in its opportunities for deeper learning since it involves solving a complex mathematical problem that requires critical thinking and abstract reasoning skills to reach a solution. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning

11 1: An object is rated limited if it includes one deeper learning skill identified in the rubric but is missing clear guidance on how to tap into the various aspects of deeper learning. For example as part of a fifth grade writing lesson, an object includes a provision for learners to collaborate, but the process and product are unclear. Since there is a suggestion to use collaboration, Rubric VII would apply but without clear explanation of how the collaboration is to take place, the object is limited in its opportunities for deeper learning. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning

12 0: An object is rated very weak if it appears to be designed to provide some of the deeper learning opportunities identified in this rubric, but it is not useful as presented. For example an object describes an activity based on poorly formulated problems and has unclear directions. It is unlikely that this activity will lead to skills like critical thinking, abstract reasoning, constructing arguments, or modeling. It would be considered very weak for Rubric VII. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning

13 N/A: This rubric is not applicable (N/A) to an object that does not appear to be designed to provide the opportunity for deeper learning, even if one might imagine how it could be used to do this. For example an object focuses on practicing long division with two-digit divisors through the use of multiple exercises. Because it does not clearly describe the process to be used in presenting the exercises, the object does not provide clear opportunities for deeper learning and Rubric VII would be not applicable. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning

Using the Achieve OER Evaluation Tool On OERCommons.org Rubric VII

o NOTE: Specific instructions for Using the OERCommons Website to search for and evaluate objects, using all of the rubrics, can be found in another slide presentation of this training package. 15 Achieve OER Evaluation Tool on OERCommons.org OERCommons.orgOERCommons.org hosts the rubrics as the Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

16 Using OERCommons.org to evaluate an object for its opportunities for deeper learning:OERCommons.org After you have evaluated an object using Rubrics I through VI, you should be ready to apply Rubric VII. Begin by clicking on the title line for Rubric VII or on at the end of Rubric VI. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

17 To view a video about Rubric VII click here… Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

18 Hover over the rating numbers to see an abbreviated version of the rating descriptors. Review the object with your focus on opportunities deeper learning and select the appropriate rating. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

19 To download a full text version of the rubrics click here: Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

20 At the bottom of Rubric VII you see options to: Leave a [+ Comment], Clear rating Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

21 Make sure you have rated all the rubrics in the Evaluation Tool. Return to any rubrics by simply clicking on the rubric title. You can tell if any are not saved by the symbols at the left of the rubric title. indicates not yet rated or rating was not saved indicates your rating has been entered and saved Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

22 When all the rubrics have been rated saved you can view the final results by clicking on [Save & View Results] for Rubric VII or on [View Results]. Rubric VII: Opportunities for Deeper Learning Achieve OER Evaluation Tool

23 After all seven rubrics have been rated and saved: You have clicked on [Save & View Results] at the end of Rubric VII, or You have clicked on [View Results] at the bottom of the Evaluation Tool You will see your ratings and the overall average ratings for all previous users. Achieve OER Evaluation Tool: Finalize Your Review

24 If you are satisfied click on [Finalize OER Review]. If you want to change any ratings you can click on [Go Back & Change Your Scores]. Always FINALIZE your results when you are finished rating all seven rubrics. Achieve OER Evaluation Tool on OERCommons.org: Rubric VII

Slides developed by Achieve: th Street, NW / Suite 510 Washington, DC 20036