Literacy Design Collaborative Session Three Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
On-Demand Writing Assessment
Digging Deeper Into the K-5 ELA Standards College and Career Ready Standards Implementation Team Quarterly – Session 2.
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice LDC Scoring Session Puget Sound ESD - Reach Associates February 11,
Environmental Issues Presentation. Task After researching scientific and technical resources, write and present an argumentation speech that identifies.
January 2015 Teachers Session 2 1 Reach Associates 2014 # LDoELDC.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Scoring Student Work 1 K. Thiebes.
Rubric Basics. Focus Pictures of ducks Focus Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately maintains a strongly developed focus. Look for: *Thesis statement.
TUSD Scoring Extended Writing Using the PARCC Rubric as Framework September 2014.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Authentic Assessment Abdelmoneim A. Hassan. Welcome Authentic Assessment Qatar University Workshop.
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Louisiana Leadership Session 1 of 3 1 C-3 Leadership 1 Powerpoint Reach Associates Literacy.
CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT FOR STUDENT LEARNING
Assessment and Performance-based Instruction
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
You don’t have to be an English teacher to support reading and writing in CTE Linda Affholder.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
COMMON CORE Argument Paragraph Writing Unit Grade 7.
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD– Session 3 December 12,
California’s Common Core Content Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
WRITTEN RESPONSE AND PERFORMANCE TASKS Jacque Melin.
Anne Zeman, Ed.D., Director, Curriculum/Professional Learning Don Azevada, Program Specialist, History/Social Science Ray Pietersen, Program Specialist,
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 2 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 2.
1 Summer 2012 Educator Effectiveness Academies English Language Arts Transitioning to the CCSS by Making Strategic and Informed Choices in the Classroom.
Rubric Understanding. Focus Addresses all aspects of prompt appropriately maintains a strongly developed focus. A B C D.
PSSA Writing Test.
Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessments
A framework to move from common core to classroom practice Puget Sound ESD December
Revisiting LDC, Day 2 Elementary Bowling Green, Kentucky – Reach Associates November 15,
CTE Literacy Support Session 3 Using Templates for Scaffolding Student Writing Feedback and evaluation of student writing.
TNE Program Assessment Forum April 19 th, Glad you’re here!  Who’s Who… Design Team Representatives Program Assessment Team.
ELA Common Core Shifts. Shift 1 Balancing Informational & Literary Text.
An instructional framework guiding teachers to make certain decisions which support alignment with instructional shifts and demands of the Common Core.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Session 1: CCR Anchor Standards and Structure of the CCSS in ELA & Literacy ELA Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer 2011.© Maryland State Department.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Module 3: Unit 2, Session 1 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 2, Session 1.
Copyright © 2008 by Educational Testing Service. All rights reserved. ETS, the ETS logo and LISTENING. LEARNING. LEADING. are registered trademarks of.
AUTHENTIC WRITING INSTRUCTION Seward Middle School October 24, 2013 Jill Johnson, ESU Please sit with your team.
Anchor Standards ELA Standards marked with this symbol represent Kansas’s 15%
Georgia will lead the nation in improving student achievement. 1 Georgia Performance Standards Day 3: Assessment FOR Learning.
College Career Ready Conference Today we will:  Unpack the PARCC Narrative and Analytical writing rubrics while comparing them to the standards.
Using the PARCC Rubrics to Analyze Student Writing College Career Ready Conference 2015.
Day 8 Induction – Year 2 Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel Staff Developer.
April 27, 2011 Design and Implement the Task.  Goals: 1. Address the Literacy Standards in the Common Core Standards for Social Studies and Science 2.
September 26, 2013 Facilitated by: Amy Kilbridge Theron Blakeslee.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules
COMMON CORE CONTENT STANDARDS Module 1: Read and Know the Standard.
The New Face of Assessment in the Common Core Wake County Public Schools Common Core Summer Institute August 6, 2013.
Writing – CCSS Style AACRC – October 29, Prior Knowledge 1.I don’t know anything about the ELA CCSS 2.I have some familiarity with the ELA CCSS.
GOING DEEPER INTO STEP 1: UNWRAPPING STANDARDS Welcome!
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
EMS 8th grade Social Studies
Taking the TEAM Approach: Writing with a Purpose
“Unpacking” our modules-building modules that meet LDC criteria
Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics
Setting Writing Goals in Science The Living Environment
Presentation transcript:

Literacy Design Collaborative Session Three Training

Welcome to the Colorado Literacy Design Collaborative Session Three Training

Session III Outcomes Deeper understanding and skill using the LDC Rubric to score student work Construction of a carefully aligned module Reflection on areas for further development Reflection on today’s learning

Where Am I Now with LDC? Complete the hand-out, “I-Can” to self-assess where you are now At the bottom of the hand-out, list the personal goals you have for today Share with a partner Identify priorities from table to share with whole group

Improve understanding of the argumentation rubric by identifying key vocab for 2 of the elements Develop common approach and vocabulary by scoring writing samples and discussing in groups Learning Targets

Paper X Read Paper X on your own Assign a score: A, B, C, D, or F Place a post-it on the chart in the column that corresponds to your score

Speak with your group and justify why you scored the way you did

LDC Rubrics – Scoring The LDC rubric is constructed for classroom use and to provide feedback to students and teachers. It is for feedback. It is not a summative rubric, as might be used in state exams to measure a set of absolute criteria.

LDC Rubrics – Scoring It helps students know expectations before the task is completed, and where their strengths and weaknesses are after the task is completed.

LDC Rubrics – Scoring It helps teachers gauge the effectiveness of their instructional choices and delivery.

LDC Rubrics – Scoring This rubric is designed for teaching that looks for progress NOT failure. No one fails. Students use the feedback to improve - as do teachers.

Considers criteria separately giving a single score for each element Holistic Scoring Based on general quality; balances the many characteristics to arrive at an overall score Analytic Scoring

Principles of Scoring Know the rubric Trust evidence, not intuition Match evidence to language in the rubric Weigh evidence carefully – base judgment on the preponderance of evidence Know your biases- leave them at the door

Principles of Scoring Focus on what the student DOES, not what the student doesn’t do Isolate judgment- one bad element doesn’t equal a bad paper Resist seduction- one good element doesn’t equal a good paper Recognize direct copy or plagiarism Stick to the rubric

7 Scoring Elements Focus Controlling Idea Reading/Research Development Organization Conventions Content Understanding

Unpacking & Understanding the Scoring Elements of the LDC Rubric

What is the Purpose of the LDC Rubric? Common scoring tool –Common language between teachers across contents –Common language between teachers and students Feedback for students to improve literacy skills –To organize and construct meaning –Better communication of content knowledge comprehension

Defining the Elements Read the definitions of the scoring elements Discuss at your tables how these definitions add clarification to the LDC Rubric

Scoring ElementADVANCED (Exemplar) FOCUSAddresses all aspects of prompt appropriately with a consistently strong focus and convincing position. CONTROLLING IDEAEstablishes and maintains a substantive and credible claim or proposal. (L2) Develops claims and counter claims fairly and thoroughly. READING/ RESEARCH Accurately and effectively presents important details from reading materials to develop argument or claim. DEVELOPMENTPresents thorough and detailed information to effectively support and develop the focus, controlling idea, or claim. (L3) Makes a clarifying connection(s) that illuminates argument and adds depth to reasoning. ORGANIZATIONMaintains an organizational structure that intentionally and effectively enhances the presentation of information as required by the specific prompt. Structure enhances development of the reasoning and logic of the argument. CONVENTIONSDemonstrates and maintains a well-developed command of standard English conventions and cohesion, with few errors. Response includes language and tone consistently appropriate to the audience, purpose, and specific requirements of the prompt. Consistently cites sources using appropriate format. CONTENT UNDERSTANDING Integrates relevant and accurate disciplinary content with thorough explanations that demonstrate in-depth understanding.

Unpacking the Rubric Based on the description of your element, list three to five specific observable traits of what would demonstrate its presence in a written assignment. (What will you see if this element is present?) Draw a picture that represents the overall idea of the element. Each team will share: –The element –An explanation of your picture for the element –An explanation of the three specific observable traits of that element

Student Examples

Controlling Idea: Organization

Analytically Score Paper X for Controlling Idea Be aware of your thought process

Share Scores Come to agreement at your table on a score for controlling idea

Who disagreed? Who was able to come to agreement? How did you do it? What was it like to negotiate/make your case? Reflection on Scoring Process

Controlling Idea Look at the CONTROLLING IDEA element on the rubric. Highlight key vocabulary for proficient. What are the defining characteristics?

27 April 1, 2013

Organization Look at the ORGANIZATION element on the rubric. Highlight key vocabulary for proficient. What are the defining characteristics?

of the argument

Now, analytically score Paper X for organization. Share out scores at the table.

Organization: 2.5

Reflect….. What are the differences between how you arrived at the original letter grade and how you determined the scores for the two elements? What if any biases did you notice in your thinking? What type of feedback might you give to this student?

PAPER Y Controlling Idea & Organization

Scoring Anchor Papers Working individually, score the set of anchor papers you’ve been given. –Analytically for all elements –Holistic score for all elements –Be ready to share your scores with 3-4 others in your group –Discuss your differences and reach agreement –Compare your scores with the “official scores” that will be given to you when you’re done

Scoring Summary After reading the “Definitions of Scoring Elements”, the Argumentation Rubric or the Information/Explanatory Rubric, and practicing scoring, write a brief explanation regarding why it is important to use the LDC rubric as it is written and not change it.

Scoring Student Work Break into groups of three by content Score the student papers using the appropriate rubric For each element, write a description, using language from the rubric, about why you scored it as you did (e.g., why was it a 2 or 2.5 and not a 3?)

Reflecting on Practice Complete the Self-Reflection worksheet On the back, write your story of how LDC has worked for you This is your Exit Ticket for lunch

Speed-Dating with Mini-Tasks Pick the most effective mini-task from your module Write notes to yourself on the Mini-Task Template In 5 minutes, share/exchange with another person Switch pairs and share/exchange with a different person

Training Tool Is worthy of weeks of instruction Asks students to grapple with an important question or topic Provides opportunities to address text complexity & the use of informational texts as indicated in the CCSS Has students working in the most effective discourse/text structure Evolves from a rigorous text dependent question Provides for an authentic audience When Reviewing Your Teaching Task, Determine if it:

Always double-check the teaching task you have chosen to determine that it is the correct one ! A Reminder

Reviewing and Aligning Modules Goals of this session: –Review your module using the Informal Module Review/Alignment Chart –Identify changes you need to make in this module or in developing the next one so that it is aligned. –Refer to the handout, “Module Reminders!” –Refer to the Module Review and Feedback Form when needed.

Reviewing your Module Find a partner and each share your completed chart.

Writing Products Review the materials in the packet on Writing Products Examine your Teaching Task and identify what authentic product and audience you could use (not essay or report) Complete this sentence: I chose ____________(writing product) because my task requires ____________ (type of writing) in _________________ (what discipline, e.g., ELA, SS, Sci)

A Final Task After having participated in the LDC training sessions and reading the materials provided, write a “quick write” that describes what in your instructional practice will remain the same and what will be different. In addition, explain how these instructional decisions align with the expectations of the Colorado Teacher Evaluation Rubric. Cite examples from your recall of the training and materials.

Time to Work! With the time left, either: –Revise one of your existing modules to reflect what you have learned today –Select a published module from MC and “clone” it, reflecting what you have learned today –Begin a new module, reflecting what you have learned today

Self-Reflection Go back to your “I-Can” statements from this morning and rate yourself based on where you are now Your Quick Write and the completed Evaluation Form are your exit slips for today