Florida Interim Assessment Item Bank and Test Platform (FL IBTP) Scoring Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

Evidence & Preference: Bias in Scoring TEDS-M Scoring Training Seminar Miami Beach, Florida.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
MYP Personal Project January 2015 How’s it going? At this stage in your project, you should be: Close to the completion of your final product (if not.
Reliability for Teachers Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1 Reliability = Consistency.
Florida Interim Assessment Item Bank and Test Platform (FL IBTP)
Designing Scoring Rubrics. What is a Rubric? Guidelines by which a product is judged Guidelines by which a product is judged Explain the standards for.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Writing B. Finco. A little light reading! B. Finco.
Scoring Open-Ended Literacy Items
The New York State Education Department Demystifying the Holistic Scoring Process in Social Studies : Regents Examinations in Global History and Geography.
Holistic Scoring in Social Studies Curriculum, Instruction, and Instructional Technology Team New York State Education Department Albany, NY 2005.
WARNING: Making, carrying, or using overhead transparencies for every item in this training packet poses a significant physical and mental health hazard.
Classroom Assessment FOUN 3100 Fall Assessment is an integral part of teaching.
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 9 Subjective Test Items.
Essay Assessment Tasks
State Assessment Website Address: NYSESLAT The NYSESLAT will be administered annually for five grade clusters: K-1,
Collaborative Data Teams
Teleconference Information To ensure you hear today’s presentation, please dial into the teleconference by using the following telephone number and conference.
Holistic Scoring: The Grade 8 Intermediate- Level Social Studies Test Curriculum, Instruction, and Instructional Technology Team New York State Education.
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
MYP Personal Project January 2014.
Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 6- Quality Assurance & Form Reviews.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Who in the World Develops and Writes the MI-Access Items? OEAA Conference 2007 – Day 2 MI-Access Coordinators.
© Copyright 2014 Milady, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible.
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION. Copyright Keith Morrison, 2004 ITEM TYPES IN A TEST Missing words and incomplete sentences Multiple choice.
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Common Assessment Development Series Rubrics and Scoring Guides.
Field Testing Performing Fine Arts Assessment Project.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
An Overview of Virginia Standards of Learning Item and Test Development.
Rubrics. What is a Rubric? A rubric is a set of guidelines for scoring performance against criteria. Performance is described along a scale of quality.
Holistic Rating Training Requirements Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division ©2010 TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
4-Day Agenda and Expectations Day 2 Building Formative Assessments linked to deconstructed content and skills Building Formative Assessments linked to.
EQAO Assessments and Rangefinding
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2008 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Milkovich/Newman: Compensation, Ninth Edition Chapter 6 Person-Based.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Testing and Documentation Part II.
Summer Scoring Training Smarter Balanced Mathematics Deborah J. Bryant September 18, 2015.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 7: Guide Papers for 8 th Grade Two Point Question.
WITH THE NAME OF ALLAH THE MOST MIGHTY AND MERCIFUL. 1.
Project management Topic 8 Quality Review. Overview of processes Prepare for Quality Review Questions list Meeting Agenda Review Meeting Sign-off Product.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Development of Training and Procedural Manuals Section B 1.
MAVILLE ALASTRE-DIZON Philippine Normal University
Michigan Assessment Consortium Common Assessment Development Series Module 16 – Validity.
FCAT Reading & Mathematics Performance Task Responses Strategies for getting a top score Division of Performance Accountability Department of Assessment.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Evaluation of Distributed Scoring with the Texas Assessment of Knowledge.
Welcome Parents! FCAT Information Session. O Next Generation Sunshine State Standards O Released Test Items O Sample Test.
Lessons Learned. Communication, Communication, Communication Collaborative effort Support of all stakeholders Teachers, Principals, Supervisors, Students,
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. DEVELOPING AND USING TESTS – Chapter 11 –
April 2011 Division of Academics, Performance and Support Office of Assessment High School Testing – Scoring Best Practices May 24, 2011 CFN 201.
Get Better Results GCSE Religious Studies 2009 Spring 08.
Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Scoring Welcome and Introductions 1.
Designing Scoring Rubrics
C H A P T E R 3 Rubrics Chapter 3 Rubrics.
QV Training August 2017: Report-writing
Reliability & Validity
Video 4: 2-Point Holistic Rubric
The Letter Imagine that the Board of Trustees at school are discussing whether Cambridge High should continue to offer outdoor activities, as they are.
Teacher Hand Scoring System for Interim Assessments
Teacher Hand Scoring System
Video 2: Holistic Scoring
Teacher Hand Scoring System
Deputy Commissioner Jeff Wulfson Associate Commissioner Michol Stapel
Developing a Rubric for Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Florida Interim Assessment Item Bank and Test Platform (FL IBTP) Scoring Overview

Agenda Overview of scoring process –Identifying and using anchor sets –Identifying and applying calibration sets –Scoring to a rubric –Working with exemplars –Avoiding bias in scoring Panel discussion 2

Approach to Scoring Score supportively. Look for what is correct and done well in the response, as opposed to what is incorrect or done poorly. View each response as a snapshot of the student’s ability to respond to the item; look at the response strictly for what it is. 3

The Scoring Process 4

Anchor Sets The anchor set is an item-specific guide to help the scorer identify the correct score point for each response. Determine which group of specialists in the district will identify the anchor sets. Manage logistics of anchor set development: How many responses will be in each set? How many copies are required? How will security be maintained? Who will store the anchor sets? 5

Anchor Sets Diagram 6

Determining Anchor Sets Establishing anchor sets is often called range-finding. The goal is to –Select from available student responses examples that best match the description of each score point in the rubric. –Demonstrate a range of student performance within each score point. Scorers will compare each live paper to the corresponding anchor set responses to determine the best-fit score for the live response. –Maintain historical scoring standards for similar items. 7

Using Anchor Sets Use anchor sets to train scorers, explaining how each anchor response illustrates that score point in the rubric. Encourage scorers to compare each response to the anchor responses. 8

Calibration Sets Like anchor sets, calibration sets are groups of papers for which the scores have been agreed upon previously by a select group of specialists. Responses in a calibration set are clear representatives of one score point in the rubric. Calibration sets level-set teams of scorers and ensure inter-rater reliability throughout the scoring process. 9

Calibration Sets Diagram 10

Using Calibration Sets Ongoing training during scoring Distributed to scorers without being identified as anything but additional responses to score Correct a drift in scoring Clarify or provide further training 11

Scoring to a Rubric The rubric is a set of predefined criteria that delineate the important characteristics on which responses will be scored. The rubric allows each scorer to remove subjectivity from his or her scoring and reduces the variation in scores created by individual biases and personal preferences. Traits not mentioned by the rubric must not affect the score a response receives. 12

Assign a response to the score point where that response best fits. It may not fit perfectly into any one score point. Focus on the broad fit of each response to a score point. Do not get caught up in the small details. Remember that many different types of responses may be grouped into the same score point. 13 Applying a Rubric

Using Exemplars The rubric allows for a general or generic description of the level of understanding shown at each score point. The exemplar defines those levels of understanding in an item-specific manner. The exemplar is a representative response chosen to clarify the rubric, similar to an anchor response. The exemplar will not show all possible correct answers. The top score responses need not be perfect. Each score point, even the top score, shows a range of understanding. 14

Bias Guard against biases, assumptions, preferences, and pre-conceived expectations when scoring. Look holistically for the parts of the response that can receive credit. 15

Assumptions Student identity Gender Socioeconomic class Regional location Student personality Sensitive or emotional content 16

Expectations Handwriting Response length Regionalism Five-paragraph essay Alternate approaches Subject-matter expertise 17

18 District Experiences with Scoring

Panel Discussion District sharing Project overview – Managing scoring logistics – Developing scoring policies – Developing and maintaining protocols Questions from the audience 19

Thank You NOTE: These materials were developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education. However, the contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal Government. Copyright © 2012 Florida Department of Education. All rights reserved. 20