November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introducing Instructional Expectations
Advertisements

Guiding Principle Five Mentoring needs to be tailored to the needs of the individual teacher and, at the same time, verifying their skills as teachers.
Providing Effective Feedback
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness A
Day 2: Learning and Teaching Session 2: Recording Evidence NYSED Principal Evaluation Training Program.
Leadership Training Module 2
Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System (TPGES) Laying the Groundwork ISLN September 2012.
Teacher Observation Training
Imagine you are in the classroom of a highly effective teacher:  What would you see?  What would you hear?  What would the students be doing or saying?
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Differentiated Supervision
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model
Observations A Mirror of the Classroom. Objectives  Gain specific strategies for communicating with teachers to promote successful teaching and learning.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
CCSS & NYS Teaching Standards ELA Training Liane Benedict Oswego County BOCES Sign in & put on a name tag Sit by grade level No more than 2 people at a.
Teacher Lead Evaluator Training Module 3 Presenters: Dr. Regina Cohn Dr. Robert Greenberg January 2013.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
PIIC Professional Development CAIU April 8, 2013 Elementary Coaches’ Network 1 Nancy Neusbaum PIIC Mentor/Curriculum Specialist CAIU.
November 29, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 3 Developed by Teaching.
Literacy Partner’s Meeting Wednesday, October 22 nd Moderated Marking: The What, The Why, The How.
Teacher Lead Evaluator Training Module 3 Presenters: Dr. Carl Bonuso Fred Cohen Dr. Valerie D’Aguanno Dr. Robert Greenberg.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Inquiry and the IB. Stuents do not learn by doing. on what they have done. Rather, they learn by and.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
EngageNY.org Session 1: Building a Change-Focused Culture November, 2013 Network Teams Institute.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
Coaching Data Teams JANE COOK LITERACY & TECHNOLOGY COACH, EASTCONN BETH MCCAFFERY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT COORDINATOR, LEARN.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Day 7 Domain 3: Instruction Year 2 Induction Pennsbury School District Maureen Gradel.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
A brief introduction to
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Citywide Expectations for
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Curriculum and Instruction: Management of the Learning Environment
QUADRANT PARTNERS VIDEO SUCCESSFUL COACHING Know contemporary views & standards Model & demonstrate effective instructional behaviors Provide.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Educator Effectiveness: The Danielson Framework Collecting Evidence.
TCRP TEACHER TRAINING TCRP Overview. Agenda Objective By the end of the session all teachers will be able to: TCRP Pverview Agenda and Objectives 2 1.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Last Updated: 5/12/2016 Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS) Teacher Overview.
MA-PAL Task 3 This task aligns with course assignments from EDC 5630 Supervision and Evaluation of Instruction.
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
INSTRUCTIONAL WALKTHROUGHS
Framework For Teaching (FFT)
The Year of Core Instruction
Social Studies 2.0: Inquiry and LCE
The Framework for Teaching
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Presentation transcript:

November 17, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4 Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Workshop Objectives: SESSION 4 Participants will: Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Priorities of the Rubrics Cognitive Engagement “Effective” = students must be cognitively engaged “Highly Effective” = cognitive engagement PLUS meta- cognition and student ownership of their learning Constructivist Learning Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of learning experiences designed to facilitate students’ construction of knowledge & connections to prior knowledge. 21 st Century Skills Effective and Highly Effective = evidence of application of 21st Century college & career-readiness skills and dispositions Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD 4

Elements With rubrics Framework Vocabulary Standard 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy A) Knowledge of content and structure of the discipline B) Knowledge of prerequisite relationships C) Knowledge of content-related pedagogy Standard 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1a. Demonstrating knowledge of content and pedagogy A) Knowledge of content and structure of the discipline B) Knowledge of prerequisite relationships C) Knowledge of content-related pedagogy Domains Components Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Indicators With rubrics NYSUT Rubric Vocabulary Knowledge of Students & Student Learning Element 1.1 Demonstrate knowledge of child and adolescent development including cognitive, language, social, emotional, and physical developmental levels. A) Describes developmental characteristics of students Knowledge of Students & Student Learning Element 1.1 Demonstrate knowledge of child and adolescent development including cognitive, language, social, emotional, and physical developmental levels. A) Describes developmental characteristics of students Standards Summary statements Elements 6 Developed by TLS, Inc. NYSUT Rubrics

Observing Practice Observe the video Collect evidence, with a focus on: Danielson = 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3e NYSUT = 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.5 Be prepared to check evidence with a partner, then sort evidence and ask clarifying questions. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Checking Evidence Use the self-check questions to review your evidence collection Have I recorded only facts? Is my evidence relevant to the criteria being examined? Whenever possible, have I quantified words such as few, some, and most? Have I used quotation marks when quoting a teacher or student? Does my selection or documentation of evidence indicate any personal or professional preferences? Have I included any opinion (in the guise of fact)? Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Observing Practice: Sorting Evidence Sort your evidence so that it aligns with the appropriate component in the rubric. Using the placemat version of the rubric, write a component (3a, 3d etc.) or Element (3.1, 3.2)next to each piece of evidence you have written down. Do on your own & discuss with a partner. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Observing Practice: Clarifying Questions With a partner, develop clarifying questions you have about the lesson you observed that you would like to have answered before you rate the teacher’s performance. Be sure to review your questions in light of the reminders. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Clarifying Question Reminders  Be sure to frame your questions to ensure that they are designed to promote a climate of professional inquiry  Consider the following: How does the question make you feel? How might the teacher respond to the question? Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Leveling Teacher Performance Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

The Evidence Cycle Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD COLLECT DATA (Evidence) SORT TO ALIGN WITH YOUR FRAMEWORK Interpret: Clarify Conclusions

Leveling Practice On your own, assign a level to the teaching performance we just watched for the following components/elements: Danielson = 2b, 2c, 3a, 3b, 3c, 3e NYSUT = 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.5 Use the rubric provided to circle or shade your chosen levels and write at least one piece of evidence for component/element you leveled. Share your levels with a partner, providing evidence to support your level choices. As a table, reach consensus on levels for the following components/elements: 2b/4.2, 3b/3.2 & 3.5, and 3c

Post-Observation Discussion Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD “[The] essential message is not, “You are broken and I am here to fix you.” Rather[the] message is “You are so valuable and worthy, our mission is so vital, and the future lives of our students are so precious, that we have a joint responsibility to one another...” Doug Reeves, from Leading Change in Your Schools

When is Feedback Most Effective?  When it…  Helps inform a professional dialogue  Is based on evidence gathered from observations and other data  Prompts self-evaluation  Deepens the teacher’s learning and professional development From: A-Z Coaching. National Union of Teachers

Teacher Reflection & Post- Conference Discussions Engage teachers in discussing how their instructional moves/decisions impacted student learning. Engage teachers in reflecting on lesson strengths and what they might change. Use “mediational questions” (see handout) to guide teachers toward reflection. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Teacher Reflection & Post- Conference Discussions Provide possible questions to teachers ahead of time (see handout – Forms D) Possibly suggest a target area for reflection/ discussion based on a particular rubric component/element (by focusing question # 7). Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Possible Format for Brief Directed Feedback  Thank you  3 “keepers” (student focused)  The students ______ because you _______  1 “polisher” (student focused)  It’s important that students __________; in order to do that, try______ c.

Providing Feedback: Keepers (3)  What: Student Focused The students ______ because you _______  Why:  3:1 ratio is critical to promoting positive and responsive school culture  Increases the likelihood that teachers will sustain effective practices  Builds rapport  Increases likelihood teacher will hear and respond to “polisher”

Providing Feedback: Polisher (1) What: Student Focused  It’s important that students __________; in order to do that, try________ Why:  Limits focus for growth to manageable number of tasks  Provides clear teacher practice to improve instruction  Provides rationale for implementing recommendation  Links rationale to student outcomes (keeps focus on students)

Written Feedback to Teacher Rubric with levels highlighted, evidence provided, and section and/or overall comments Full narrative write-up 3 Keepers & 1 Polisher in written format Lesson strengths and challenges T chart Other formats you have used? Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Share your thoughts & processes Talk with a partner about your thoughts on the ideas just presented – Collaborative discussions, “Keepers and Polishers” feedback, write-up formats Share with a partner how you currently handle: providing verbatim notes to teachers, verbal feedback, post-observation conferences, written feedback, and observation write-ups.  Finish by talking about what, if anything, you are thinking about changing. I will ask for a few volunteers to share on each topic.

Sharing Rubric Expectations with Teachers 1. Consider using the “Wow Factor” activity below, much as we did in Session 1: If you were to observe an excellent teacher, either in the classroom or another professional setting, what might you see or hear that would cause you to think that you were in the presence of an expert? What would make you think, “Wow, this is good! If I had a child this age, this is the class I would want to choose.” Write one idea per sticky note. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Sharing Rubric Expectations with Teachers 2. Consider Activity #1b:  At your table, brainstorm a list of observable behaviors associated with your assigned indicator. Have a recorder jot down the list on chart paper as you work. Ask yourselves: What are the ongoing observable behaviors of a effective teacher for this indicator? What is the teacher doing? What are the students doing?  Be prepared to share your behaviors and rationale with the whole group. Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Sharing Rubric Expectations with Teachers Other ideas, from things we have done in these sessions, or activities you have done with your teachers? Developed by Teaching Learning Solutions, Inc. FFT Rubrics-ASCD

Debrief and Closure Got It/Want It/Questions Please remember to complete the workshop evaluation in MyLearningPlan PowerPoint and Materials will be on NT website Thank you for your participation!