Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Association of American Colleges and Universities.
Advertisements

Our Institutions CSB/SJU Two schools, one academic program Liberal Arts, Residential, Catholic, Benedictine 3,900+ undergraduates 300+ FTE faculty Distribution.
Refocusing General Education: A Dialectical Interplay of Accreditation Requirements, Assessment Methods, and Student Learning Competencies Bobby L. Matthews.
GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay January 22-23,
Essential Skills Task Force Defining the Essential Skills Presented to State Board October 18, 2007.
Core Curriculum Revision Dr. Don Pratt Associate Professor Biology Chair Core Curriculum Advisory Committee.
Southwest Texas Junior College Core Curriculum Dr. Cheryl Sanchez, Dr. Mark Underwood, Dr. Renee Zimmerman, and Bobby Ayala Southwest Texas Junior College.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
General Education Reform Through the Lens of Student Success Tony Ciccone Bill Keith Jeff Merrick Dev Venugopalan.
General Education Models General Education Reform Committee Lloyd Duman Carol Lindsay Sherry Simkins Karen Ruppel Bob Vogeler Peter Zao Bob Murray.
February  Founded  Located in Crystal Lake, IL.  offers six associate's degrees and 17 Associate of Applied Science degrees.  About 400.
Defining Institutional Learning Outcomes: A Collaborative Initiative Facilitated by the Office of Academic and Student Affairs AND the College Governance.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
The Current Refocusing of General Education. Objectives for the Workshop Proposing and/or Renewing a Course Assessing the general education aspect of.
The Personal Development Plan (PDP)
Promoting Universal Values in the Face of Societal Change The Council of Europe Caryn McTighe Musil November 20, 2007 Association of American Colleges.
Dr. Timothy S. Brophy Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLANS.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Maps, Rubrics and Templates A Primer on Their Uses for Assessment in Student Affairs.
THE NEW TEXAS CORE CURRICULUM (OCTOBER 27, 2011).
Beginning in Fall “Given the rapid evolution of necessary knowledge and skills and the need to take into account global, national, state, and local.
Program Level Outcomes Jessica Carpenter Elgin Community College.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
An Integrated Model for Assessing Course and Program SLOs David A. Wood, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Professor of Astronomy San Antonio College.
Del Mar General Education Part 1: Process for establishing the 2014 Core Curriculum.
ENGAGING LEADERS FOR CHANGE AND INNOVATION ADEA CCI 2011 Summer Liaison Meeting San Diego, CA June 27-29, 2011 Janet M. Guthmiller, DDS, PhD University.
Learning Outcomes and Assessment APCC Peter Wolf April
Essential Elements of a Workable Assessment Plan Pat Tinsley McGill, Ph.D. Professor, Strategic Management College of Business Faculty Lead, Assessment.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
FACULTY RETREAT MAY 22, H ISTORY 2006 Middle States Self-Study Reviewer’s Report Recommendations: The institution is advised that General Education.
Making Sense of the Core Objectives
PEGGY MAKI, PH.D. EDUCATION CONSULTANT IN ASSESSING STUDENT LEARNING PRESENTED AT CCRI SEPTEMBER 21, 2012 Assessment at Three Levels: Institution, Program,
LEARNING OUTCOMES & SNAAP ATHE Leadership Institute Montreal, July 2015 Sally Gaskill, Director Strategic National Arts Alumni Project Indiana University.
General Education Learning Outcomes: Campus Discussion on Development & Process Sacramento City College LR 105 – 2:00-3:30 April 4 th, 2006 Facilitators:
Bonnie Paller 2013 AALC Assessment Retreat.  The charge of the Task Force is to identify the abilities and intellectual traits that all students are.
UWF SACS REAFFIRMATION OF ACCREDITATION PROJECT Presentation to UWF Board of Trustees November 7, 2003.
October 15, 2015 QEP: PAST AND PRESENT AND FUTURE.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
Faculty Driven Assessment Karla Guilford Shipp Tidewater Community College Virginia Beach, VA.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Program Assessment: What Difference Does it Make? Ross Miller, AAC&U.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Assessment at City Tech April 17, 2015 Living Lab Associate Seminar Susan Nilsen-Kupsch RDH MPA.
Lander University QEP Committee Report October 14, 2015 Committee Chair Jim Colbert.
A LEAP Toward an Educated Citizenry: The Role of Public Health APHA Washington, DC November 1, 2011 Susan Albertine Vice President Association of American.
Assessment 101: What do you (really) need to know? Melinda Jackson, SJSU Assessment Director October
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
Using AAC&U’s Learning Tools to Address Core Revision Terrel L. Rhodes Vice President Association of American Colleges and Universities Texas Coordinating.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Orientation Meeting Humanities Distribution- Cycle B Fall 2012.
Systems Wide Learning at a Community College Developments in the last five years –SACS-COC (Course Outcomes to Program Outcomes) –The Texas Higher Education.
C OLLEGIATE L EARNING A SSESSMENT Dr. Pedro Reyes, Executive Vice Chancellor for Academic Affairs January 2014.
Core Curriculum Workgroup Presentation to UEAC April 16, 2010.
The New Core Curriculum: Learning for Life UTSA Advisors’ Conference, October 19, 2012.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Director of Policy Analysis and Research
General Education Assessment
General Education Assessment
First-Stage Draft Plans for Gen Ed Revision
Institutional Effectiveness USF System Office of Decision Support
Authentic Assessment: Texas Core
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
General Education Redesign Task Force
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement

The current Core Curriculum policies and procedures will remain in effect until Fall 2014.Core Curriculum

1. Assessment methods Explanations of measures, methodology, frequency and timeline of assessment 2. Criteria/Targets Explanation of targets or benchmarks of Core Objective attainment 3. Results Evidence of attainment of the six Core Objectives 4. Analysis Interpretation of assessment information 5. Actions and Follow‐ups Use of results for improving student learning Assessment: Revising the State Core Curriculum: A Focus on 21 st Century Competencies, p. 19

Utilization of Results General education assessment: 1.) SACSCOC CS – assessment of undergraduate general education competencies 2.) THECB Texas Core Curriculum Assessment Reporting

Assessment of the new Texas Core Curriculum Timeline: Based on SACSCOC reaffirmation year, each institution submits its assessment of the Core Curriculum two years prior to the reaffirmation year. Assessment of the Core Curriculum includes only: Assessment methods; Criteria/Targets; Results; Analysis; and Actions and Follow‐ups

Implementation of 2014 Core Curriculum across Texas Timeline: Deadline of November 30, 2013: Each public institution that offers an academic undergraduate degree - design a new core curriculum that in accordance with the 2014 Texas Core Curriculum Faculty should be responsible for developing the curriculum and ensuring all Core Objectives for each of the required Foundational Component Areas have been met. Submit the institution’s new core curriculum to THECB (forms currently under development)

Implementation of 2014 Core Curriculum across Texas Timeline: Deadline of February 1, 2014: THECB staff will evaluate each institution’s submission for a new core curriculum to ensure fulfillment with the law and rules THECB staff will provide approval and/or constructive feedback if changes are required. Start of Institution’s Fall Semester – 2014 Implementation of new Texas Core Curriculum

Implementation of 2014 Core Curriculum across Texas Submission Forms will Include: A brief description of the process to ensure compliance with THECB Rules and Texas Statutes A list of institutionally-nominated courses for each Foundational Component Area (FCA) A list of any courses specified by the institution to fulfill the Component Area Option (CAO) and information about those courses as required by THECB Rules Assurances that each course includes content and learning activities that allow students to achieve an institutionally-designated level of attainment for the Core Objectives required including links to syllabi.

Amarillo College General Education Outcomes THECB Core Objectives AAC&U Essential Learning Outcomes (VALUE or LEAP Rubrics) Students will engage in creative and/or innovative thinking, inquiring analysis, evaluation, synthesis of information, organizing concepts, and constructing solutions. Critical thinking skills 1. Critical thinking; 2. Creative thinking; 3. Problem solving; and 4. Inquiry and analysis Students will demonstrate effective written, oral, and visual communication. Communication skills 1. Written communication; 2. Oral communication 3. Information literacy Students will demonstrate the ability to formulate an inquiry that is scientific or mathematical in nature, and then identify and follow an investigative process using empirical and/or quantitative reasoning to satisfy the inquiry. Empirical and Quantitative Skills 1. Quantitative literacy Students will demonstrate the ability to work effectively with others to support a shared purpose or goal and consider different points of view. Teamwork 1. Teamwork; 2. Civic knowledge & engagement – local and global Students will demonstrate the ability to connect choices, actions and consequences to ethical decision-making. Personal Responsibility 1. Ethical reasoning Students will demonstrate intercultural competency and civic knowledge by engaging effectively in local, regional, national and global communities. Social Responsibility 1.Civic knowledge & engagement – local and global; and 2.Intercultural knowledge and competence

Options for Assessment Methodologies – Institution’s Choice Outcome Examples of Assessment MethodologiesType Critical Thinking Embedded Assessment from across the College – Critical Thinking Rubric Direct Graduating Student Survey Indirect Community College Survey of Student Engagement Indirect Communication Embedded Assessment from across the College – Communication Rubric Direct Graduating Student SurveyIndirect Community College Survey of Student EngagementIndirect Empirical and Quantitative Skills Embedded Assessment from across the College – Empirical and Quantitative Rubric Direct Graduating Student Survey Indirect Community College Survey of Student Engagement Indirect Teamwork Embedded Assessment from across the College – Teamwork Rubric Direct Graduating Student Survey Indirect Community College Survey of Student Engagement Indirect

Options for Assessment Methodologies – Institution’s Choice OutcomeAssessmentType Personal Responsibility Embedded Assessment from across the College – Personal Responsibility Rubric Direct First-Year Seminar Surveys (pre & post)Indirect Community College Survey of Student EngagementIndirect Social Responsibility Embedded Assessment from across the College – Social Responsibility Rubric Direct First-Year Seminar Surveys (pre & post) Indirect Community College Survey of Student EngagementIndirect

Institutional Portfolio Model: Developed by Johnson County Community College Characteristics: Embedded, organic assignments from across the College Identifiers of students or faculty removed before assessment Rubrics assessed by faculty representatives 100 assignments of outcomes/objectives sampled per year Rubrics for 4 objectives used annually and piloting other 2 this year Rubrics

Questions?

Contact Information Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement Amarillo College Planning and Advancement web site:

Contact Information Texas Core Curriculum information: THECB Staff Contacts: 1.) Catherine Parsoneault, PhD ) Lucy Heston, M.M