Office of Student and School Success Action Plan Reviews Essential Question: What defines a distinguished Student and School Success Action Plan? Learning.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.

Advertisements

USING NEEDS ASSESSMENTS & CREATING ACTION PLANS September 25, 2012 Greg Lobdell, Center for Educational Effectiveness Candace Gratama, The BERC Group Travis.

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives

CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.

PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS: INCREASING CAPACITY FOR IMPROVEMENT USING THE INDISTAR ® ACTION-PLANNING TOOL June 11, 2014 OSPI’s Office of Student and School.

Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –

Indistar Summit 2014: Quality Implementation and Measurable Results Idaho Statewide System of Support Supporting districts, schools, and each other in.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

The Assistant Principal Pool Process 2014

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.

Indistar® Creating school/district plans and tasks.

Assessment in Curriculum Development Chapter 3. Role of Assessment in Standards-Based Curriculum Plays pivotal role Provides evidence of student learning.

CRAFTING S.M.A.R.T. GOALS September 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director, K-12 Education Sue Cohn, School Improvement.

Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.

ESEA Flexibility Waiver Webinar Early Childhood, Special Education, Title Program Services Kansas State Department of Education Pat Hill

Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.

Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.

Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.

1 Teacher tube- “Learning to Change and Changing to Learn” “Death of education, but dawn of learning.”

Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol

1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.

On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.

Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.

Navigating Indistar ® to Develop & Implement Your Student and School Success Action Plan Office of Student and School Success Paul Wieneke, Indistar® Program.

Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.

TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]

IDENTIFYING & PRIORITIZING PROBLEMS OF PRACTICE December 2014 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell, Director Sue Cohn, School Improvement.

Paul Wieneke, Indistar® Program Specialist Office of Student and School Success Technical Assistance: District-level Indistar Action Planning: A Tutorial.

REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.

Common Core and Essential Standards Implementation Plan.

Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.

Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.

Comprehensive achievement plans

AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.

Cohort 2 Focus School Technical Assistance Webinar Session 3 December 12, 2013 Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director Office of School Improvement.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

Thinking about Change Levels 1, 2, & 3 © Support Development Associates1.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.

Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.

Our Theory of Action and Multi-Tiered Framework are anchored in the Vision and Mission for the Superintendent of Public Instruction. Office of Student.

Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.

Paul Wieneke, Indistar® Steward Office of Student and School Success Office of Student and School Success Technical Assistance: District-level Indistar.

Webster Public Schools October 8, Goal for AYP in every subject, at every grade level, and for every subgroup. We can do this.

Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.

Kefira Philippe – Librarian Amy Wharton – Assistant Principal.

November 7, 2013 Dr. Kathleen Smith Office of School Improvement Virginia Department of Education Academic Review and School Improvement Plans.

The School Effectiveness Framework

A simple tool for a complex job INDISTAR. Learning Outcomes As a result of this training, participants will be able to… Navigate the Wisconsin Indistar.

Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.

Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,

Chapters 8 & 9 Planning for Continuous Performance-Based Assessment 8 & 9 Planning for Continuous Performance-Based Assessment C H A P T E R S.

Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.

The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.

Aligning Teacher Effectiveness to the Common Core Standards March 7, 2013 Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.

Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.

New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)

Avon Grove School District October 2009

State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Rubric

Teaching and Learning with Technology

New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017

Continuous Improvement Planning with the eCIP Tool

Administrator Evaluation Orientation

Initial Implementation Riverbank Elementary, WUSD

Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)

Presentation transcript:

Office of Student and School Success Action Plan Reviews Essential Question: What defines a distinguished Student and School Success Action Plan? Learning Outcomes: Participants will use peer collaboration as a tool for new learning Participants will assess the quality of an Action Plan

STATE-LEVEL FEEDBACK 1) PEER REVIEW Participants collaborated to develop skills in reviewing written objectives and tasks Invitation extended to: principals, district leaders, ESD Student and School Success Leads, and Instructional Leadership Coaches 2) OSPI TEAM REVIEW Participants included: Student and School Success Staff, Instructional Leadership Coaches, and Technical Assistance Contractors with Specialized Expertise

REVIEWS: ITEMS TO THINK ABOUT… Planned objectives: Are all Seven Turnaround Principles addressed? Does the goal align to the indicator? Are the goal narratives written as S.M.A.R.T. goals? What is the quality of the goal? What are the expected outcomes of implementing this goal? What resources will you need to implement? What types of evidence will be needed to Are the tasks specific, sufficient, and realistic? Are the target completion dates sufficient and realistic? Are the tasks distributed to a variety of leadership team members? Fully implemented indicators Does the evidence provided support that the team has the indicator Fully implemented?; Effectively implemented? Is the description of continued work necessary supportive of the efforts needed to sustain implementation?

SMART GOALS FORMAT S.M.A.R.T. goals/objectives articulate both the evidence supporting the strategy and measurable outcomes for students and educators. The acronym “S.M.A.R.T.” is used to describe goals/objectives that are:  Specific,  Measurable,  Actionable/Attainable,  Realistic/Results-oriented, and  Timely/Time-bound

PEER REVIEW ACTIVITY Using the S.M.A.R.T rubric and the peer review activity packet with questions, complete a sample state feedback form. (see last page of activity packet) Be sure to include: 2 affirmations about the plan 2 ‘next steps’ for the team 2 questions to drive further discussion