1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
ABC Board of Education Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Valencia Mayfield, Assistant Superintendent Academic Services Mike McCoy, Director of Child.
Central Union High School District Board of Trustees Meeting April 16, 2013.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
RTI and Title I An Overview Facilitated by Tara Black & Dean Richards.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
1 Executive Summary Title I Delivery Model Title I Personnel Changes for English Language Arts Instructional Coaches Intervention Teachers.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Single Plans for Student Achievement Cambrian School District May 2012.
LCAP Annual Update Berryessa Union School District Staff Meeting Presentation.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Dayton’s Bluff Achievement Plus Elementary School Saint Paul, MN Presenter: Andrew Collins, Principal.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
PROPOSAL FOR REORGANIZATION OF EDUCATIONAL SERVICES Cambrian School District Educational Services May 7,
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
School Plan Updates Cambrian School District November 10, 2011.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction September 1, 2009 Webinar Fred Balcom, Director, District.
District Response to Program Improvement Accountability Sanctions and Technical Assistance in California December 1, 2011 – CERA Presentation Presented.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
District Leadership Practices that Support Instructional Coach (TOSA) Implementation and Effectiveness Presented by Lea Curcio, Director of Curriculum.
+ Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP) School Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) Cambrian School District April.
Cambrian School District Board of Education Presentation April 3, 2014 Local Educational Agency Plan (LEAP)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Edition DRAFT Academic Program Survey.
RSDSS, Region 2 Staff. At the end of this session you will be able to:  Understand the purpose of a District Site Leadership Team (DSLT)  Recognize.
District Program Improvement Update Title I Schools Board of Education Study Session August 18, 2009.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
D A I T District Assistance Intervention Team 1 Los Angeles County Office of Education September 2009 Katy Schneider and Marcia Avent, Co-Leads.
Guide to the Single Plan for Student Achievement A Handbook for Schoolsite Councils.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
1 Lodi Unified School District High Priority Schools Grant (HPSGP) Review of Progress for Live Oak, Needham, and Washington Elementary Schools Mary Camezon,
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction District Assistance Survey (DAS) An Overview of Tool.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Aligned Implementation of Title I, Title II, and Title III.
Academic Program Survey Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office RSDSS Region 8.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
“. BEAR VALLEY ELEMENTARY API: OVERALL AYP : ELA % of students scoring prof or adv on CST.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
English Learner Subgroup Self-Assessment (ELSSA) and the Title III Year 4 Plan Montague Charter Academy for the Arts and Sciences Prepared and Presented.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
Priority 1 – Teachers, Materials, Facilities
Presentation transcript:

1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum

2 Acronyms Resource List API – Academic Performance Index APS – Academic Program Survey AYP – Adequate Yearly Progress CDE – California Department of Education DSLT – District/School Liaison Team EPC – Essential Program Components HQT – Highly Qualified Teacher LEA – Local Education Agency (district) PI – Program Improvement SBE – State Board of Education SED – Socioeconomically disadvantaged SES – Supplemental Education Services SPSA – Single Plan for Student Achievement (School Plan) SWD – Students with disabilities

3 Gathering the data Academic Program Survey Teams of teachers at the 4 Program Improvement sites Teams of teachers at 3 non-Program Improvement sites Site administrators of remaining 5 school sites District Assistance Survey Cabinet Site administrators Parents CTAB representatives Classified Management

Organization of the Nine EPCs on the Academic Program Survey 4

5 Student Achievement Descriptors Benchmark – students are progressing and being successful with grade level standards within the core curriculum Strategic – students may have occasional difficulties with the curriculum on a day-to-day basis and may need additional time and instruction to support their achievement of grade level skills within the regular curriculum Intensive – students that are two or more years below grade level and need accelerated instruction to reenter the core curriculum

6 6 The APS Rubric Scale 4 - Fully 100% of the students, 100% of the time (EXPLICITLY including EL and SpEd students) 3 - Substantially –At least 75% of the… 2 - Partially – At least 50% of the… 1- Minimally – Less than 50% of the…

7 Elements included in the District Assistance Survey (DAS) A. Governance and Leadership B. Alignment of Standards-based Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment C. Fiscal Resources D. Parent and Community Involvement E. Human Resources F. Data Systems and Monitoring G. Professional Development

8 District Assistance Survey Rubric 4-Systemwide Implementation 100% 3-Partial Implementation 75% 2-Initial Planning 50% 1-No (or few) Steps Taken to Implement 25%

9 9 EPC 1: Instructional Program DAS B: Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment State Board Adopted Core Materials APS rating of 2 We have the materials DAS rating of 1 Not consistently using them State Board Adopted ELD Materials APS rating of 3 State Board Adopted ELA Intervention APS rating of 1 Grades 4-7 DAS rating of 1 State Board Adopted Math Intervention APS rating of 1 Grades 4-7 DAS rating of 1

EPC 2: Instructional Time DAS B: Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Recommended time for ELAAPS rating of 2 Recommendation for grades 1-3 is 2.5 hours Recommended time for MathAPS rating of 3 Support time for strategic studentsAPS rating of 1 Common entry and exit criteria DAS rating of 1 Within the school day Beyond the core program

EPC 2: Instructional Time DAS B: Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Recommended time for ELD - elemAPS rating of 3 middle APS rating of 1 Support time for intensive students APS rating of 1 Do not have the adopted program DAS rating of 1 Math support needs to be within the day

12 EPC 3: Lesson Pacing Guide A district-wide pacing guide that APS rating of 1 reflects the full implementation of the adopted curriculum in ELA and Math Documents common instruction APS rating of 1 and assessments in written form Calendar for common curriculum embedded assessment Current district benchmarks are paced to essential standards and follow a common calendar

13 EPC 4: School Administrator Instructional Leadership Training Professional development for APS rating of 1 Principal and Vice/Assistant Principal Focus on SBE-adopted curriculum materials EPC 5: Credentialed Teachers and Professional Development Opportunity All teachers have met the HQT APS rating of 3 requirements Professional development for teachers APS rating of 1 Focus on SBE-adopted curriculum materials

14 EPC 6: Ongoing Instructional Assistance and Support For Teachers School and district provide ongoing APS rating of 1 teacher support to implement SBD adopted materials Training Experts and Coaches EPC 9: Fiscal Support APS rating of 2 Prioritize allocation of resources for full implementation of nine Essential Program Components (EPCs) Resources aligned to the Single Plan for Student Achievement (SPSA) and the Local Education Action (LEA) plan 14

EPC 7: Student Achievement Monitoring System Timely data from common assessments APS rating of 2 aligned with the adopted materials Data types include: Entry & Exit levels Diagnostic Curriculum embedded Formative Summative EPC 8: Monthly Collaboration for Teachers Facilitated by Principal Opportunities to analyze, discuss and APS rating of 1 use results assessments 15

16 Human Resources Principal/Teacher Assignments DAS rating 2 Highly skilled principals and teachers are recruited and placed at underperforming schools Evaluations of all certificated staff are linked to curriculum, instruction and assessment Administrator and teacher support DAS rating 2 Ongoing support systems are in place especially for those new to the profession and/or placed in underperforming schools. The LEA provides competitive salaries, wages, and benefits to classroom personnel

17 Parent and Community Involvement Communication with parents and community member DAS rating 2 The LEA has systems in place for timely two-way communication about student achievement, academic expectations, accountability requirements, and how parents can help their student’s academic success Family/Parent involvement programs DAS rating 1 Parent/family involvement policies and programs are at all schools Parents/families participate in instructional program and budget decisions affecting the core and categorical programs

Governance and Leadership Vision, mission, values and beliefs DAS rating 2 The vision, policies, and priorities are focused on the academic achievement of all students The local governing board sets policies and aligns the budget to support the implementation of the LEA Plan District culture DAS rating 2 The organizational culture supportes educational reform based on research-based instructional program. A culture of shared values and norms are observed at all levels of leadership The LEA effectively uses a two-way communication system providing information to all stakeholders

19 Governance and Leadership Policies supporting EPCs DAS rating 1 LEA has policies to fully implement the State Board of Education’s approved 9 Essential Program Components Data driven decisions DAS rating 2 All schools have the infrastructure to collect and interpret student achievement data in order to establish and communicate priorities and strategies for improved student achievement

20 Strengths based on the survey results 1. Instructional Program English language development (ELD) 2. Instructional time Core math at middle schools ELD – elementary sites 5. Credentialed teachers Highly Qualified Teachers

21 Areas to consider in the LEA Addendum for action  Instructional Program State Board of Education (SBE) instructional programs for intensive students in grades 4-7 in Math and ELA  Instructional time Math support for intensive and strategic students ELD minutes at the Middle Schools  Pacing Guides Needed for adopted pacing guides aligned to SBE programs in Math and ELA

22 Areas to consider in the LEA Addendum for action  Core program professional development for site administrators Leadership training on curriculum, data, community involvement, fiscal resources  Core program professional development for teachers  Data Collection  Common curriculum embedded assessments  Entry and exit criteria for intervention and support programs  Monthly collaboration meetings  Family/Parent involvement programs