SECONDARY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED MARKING RUBRIC FOR COGNITIVE SKILLS IN WRITING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Modelling with expert systems. Expert systems Modelling with expert systems Coaching modelling with expert systems Advantages and limitations of modelling.
Advertisements

H IGHER O RDER T HINKING Q UESTIONS Lesson Plan Review.
Level 1 Recall Recall of a fact, information, or procedure. Level 2 Skill/Concept Use information or conceptual knowledge, two or more steps, etc. Level.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
Understanding Depth 0f knowledge
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Reviewing the Cognitive Rigor Matrix and DOK Tuesday September.
Seminar /workshop on cognitive attainment ppt Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Dr Charles C. Chan 28 Sept 2001 Assessing APSS Students Learning.
Chapter 2 Critical Thinking Learning Outcomes. 2 | 2 Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Solve a given problem using the decision-making.
6 th Grade 2013 INTRODUCTION TO BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
Coach J. What’s the big deal?  Learning takes place when you produce knowledge not re produce it.  Recognize a higher-level thinking question: Colleges.
EDU 550 Assignment 7.
Differentiating the Curriculum Bloom’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain (Benjamin Bloom) Elements of Depth and Complexity (Sandra Hall Kaplan)
Bloom’s Taxonomy How will it impact in your classroom?
Socratic Seminar “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Depth of Knowledge (DOK)
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies
What Do the Data Say? Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy: A Tool for Rigor and Curriculum Alignment.
Taxonomies of Learning Foundational Knowledge: Understanding and remembering information and ideas. Application: Skills Critical, creative, and practical.
Depth of Knowledge A HEAP of Complexity. BLOOM’S TAXONOMYBLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY KNOWLEDGE “The recall of specifics and universals, involving little.
3 January 2007 To think, or not to think? That is the question !
Critical Thinking: The Who, What, How, & Why Department of Psychology Professional Development Workshops January 15, 2004.
Bloom's Taxonomy: The Sequel (What the Revised Version Means for You!)
The Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy (RBT): Improving Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment in an Accountability-Driven, Standards-Based World Developed and.
The Taxonomy Table (Anderson and Krathwohl, 2001) Knowledge Dimension The cognitive Process Dimension Remember Understand ApplyAnalyseEvaluateCreate Factual.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Ferris Bueller: Voodoo Economics Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4Voodoo_Economics_Anyone_Anyone. mp4.
Dillon School District Two Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Developing Assessments for and of Deeper Learning [Day 2b-afternoon session] Santa Clara County Office of Education June 25, 2014 Karin K. Hess, Ed.D.
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
The New Bloom Folwell Dunbar, Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis Synthesis Evaluation BLOOM 1956.
Making an Impact in a Diplomas Now Mathematics Classroom.
Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy. What is it??? Bloom’s Taxonomy is a chart of ideas Named after the creator, Benjamin Bloom A Taxonomy is an arrangement of ideas or.
Scaling the Pyramid: The pursuit of higher order thinking skills Presented by Nathan Groff.
Blooms Taxonomy Margaret Gessler Werts Department of Language, Reading, and Exceptionalities.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Bloom’s Critical Thinking Questioning Strategies A Guide to Higher Level Thinking Adapted from Ruth Sunda and Kyrene de las Brisas.
Video 5: Mapping the Terrain: What Should They Know About It and How Deeply?
ORGANIZING LEARNING LEARNING TAXONOMIES. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY ORIGINAL FORMAT Uses six levels in a hierarchy Each level depends on those preceding in the.
Mrs. Kenny Sophomore Seminar February 2011 Name: ____________________________.
Current State of the Research –Use summarizing, defining, argumentation, analytical skills Recommended Future Research –Mainly analytical skills Analysis.
Higher Level Thinking Skills
Bloom’s Taxonomy The Concept of “Levels of Thinking”
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Direction Words: Definitions. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.8 | 2 Prove or give reasons.
Question: How many days are in the week?. Question: Why do we need to label and structure time?
© 2001 Laura Snodgrass, Ph.D.1 Experimental Psychology Introduction.
GCSE Business Studies Exam help Command Words Unit 3: Building a Business.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
POWERPOINT PRESENATTION BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Presented by Ms
Definitions & Examples
Questions and Questioning Strategies
Bloom Taxonomy Hamburger Analogy.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy.
Higher Level Thinking Skills
Outcome Based Education
Taxonomies Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives: Cognitive Domain (Bloom & Krathwohl, 1956) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision.
Critically Evaluating an Assessment Task
BBI3420 PJJ 2009/2010 Dr. Zalina Mohd. Kasim
Assessments for “Remembering” Outcomes
Bloom’s Taxonomy Higher Order Thinking HOT
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Synthesis Evaluation Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge
Presentation transcript:

SECONDARY SCHOOL RECOMMENDED MARKING RUBRIC FOR COGNITIVE SKILLS IN WRITING

COLLEGE / UNIVERSITY LEVEL RECOMMENDED MARKING RUBRIC FOR COGNITIVE SKILLS IN WRITING

CREATE NO INPUT REMEMBER UNDERSTAND APPLY ANALYZE EVALUATE SKILL Absent; NO INPUT Can reproduce exact ideas, words, & structures. DEFINITIONS, FACTS, PROCESSES Can REPRODUCE EXACT IDEAS & explain them in OWN WORDS and OWN STRUCTURES. Can USE ideas IN OTHER SITUATIONS (e.g., to solve a problem or answer a question) Can IDENTIFY PARTS + EXPLAIN HOW they are RELATED, DIFFERENT, WORK TOGETHER Can USE THEORIES (or standards) to justify a DECISION, CHOICE OR OPINION Can use ideas to CREATE a NEW IDEA, PROCESS, or VIEWPOINT PROOF F E D C B A A* MARK

GRADUATE SCHOOL LEVEL WRITING MARKING RUBRIC FOR COGNITIVE SKILLS IN WRITING

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate Factual Knowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge

Types of Cognitive Processes RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate Factual Knowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes RememberUnderstandApplyAnalyzeEvaluateCreate Factual Knowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes Remember WHAT Understand WHY (CREATE MEANING) Apply HOW (IMPLEMENT, USE) Analyze HOW & WHY CONNECTED Evaluate WHICH ONE JUDGE CHECK CRITIQUE Create REORGANIZE OR ADD VALUE Factual Knowledge Conceptual Knowledge Procedural Knowledge Metacognitive Knowledge

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes Remember WHAT Understand WHY (CREATE MEANING) Apply HOW (IMPLEMENT, USE) Analyze HOW & WHY CONNECTED Evaluate WHICH ONE JUDGE CHECK CRITIQUE Create REORGANIZE OR ADD VALUE Factual Knowledge FACTS LISTS DEFINITIONS Conceptual Knowledge RELATIONSHIPS DIFFERENCES SIMILARITIES CONNECTIONS Procedural Knowledge STEPS METHODS PROCESSES Metacognitive Knowledge LEARNING HOW TO LEARN

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes Remember WHAT Understand WHY (CREATE MEANING) Apply HOW (IMPLEMENT, USE) Analyze HOW & WHY CONNECTED Evaluate WHICH ONE JUDGE CHECK CRITIQUE Create REORGANIZE OR ADD VALUE Factual Knowledge FACTS LISTS DEFINITIONS Conceptual Knowledge RELATIONSHIPS DIFFERENCES SIMILARITIES CONNECTIONS Procedural Knowledge STEPS METHODS PROCESSES Metacognitive Knowledge LEARNING HOW TO LEARN

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes Remember WHAT Understand WHY (CREATE MEANING) Apply HOW (IMPLEMENT, USE) Analyze HOW & WHY CONNECTED Evaluate WHICH ONE JUDGE CHECK CRITIQUE Create REORGANIZE OR ADD VALUE Factual Knowledge FACTS LISTS DEFINITIONS Conceptual Knowledge RELATIONSHIPS DIFFERENCES SIMILARITIES CONNECTIONS Procedural Knowledge STEPS METHODS PROCESSES Metacognitive Knowledge LEARNING HOW TO LEARN A*A*AABBCCDDEE A*A*AABBCCDDEE A*A*AABBCCDDEE A*A*AABBCCDDEE

Types of Knowledge Types of Cognitive Processes Remember WHAT Understand WHY (CREATE MEANING) Apply HOW (IMPLEMENT, USE) Analyze HOW & WHY CONNECTED Evaluate WHICH ONE JUDGE CHECK CRITIQUE Create REORGANIZE OR ADD VALUE Factual Knowledge FACTS LISTS DEFINITIONS Conceptual Knowledge RELATIONSHIPS DIFFERENCES SIMILARITIES CONNECTIONS Procedural Knowledge STEPS METHODS PROCESSES Metacognitive Knowledge LEARNING HOW TO LEARN A*A*AABBCCDDEE A*A*AABBCCDDEE A*A*AABBCCDDEE A*A*AABBCCDDEE USUAL GRADES OF AVERAGE LEARNERS USUAL GRADES (MARKS) OF AVERAGE LEARNERS

END OF PRESENTATION 13 September 2013

INTERCONNECTIONS OF THE COGNITIVE LEVELS General Rule: One should use lower level cognitive skills to support higher- level skills. In writing: Analysis requires evaluating and applying. Applying requires understanding and analyzing. Understanding requires remembering and applying. Creating requires all six cognitive levels to be present in writing.

INTERCONNECTIONS OF THE COGNITIVE LEVELS