MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNCT Planning Process in post crisis context DOCO training November 2008.
Advertisements

Site-Based Decision Making Campus Planning. Restructuring A process through which a district or school alters the pattern of its structures (vision, rules,
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Achieve Benefit from IT Projects. Aim This presentation is prepared to support and give a general overview of the ‘How to Achieve Benefits from IT Projects’
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Session Four: M&E System for AfT bankable projects UNITED NATIONS Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA) Expert Group Meeting on Monitoring.
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Action Writing Action Statements Writing action statements is the first step in the second (action) stage of the public health nutrition (PHN) intervention.
A Human Rights-Based Approach to Monitoring Session 6 (cont.)
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Developing the Logical Frame Work …………….
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Lesson 5 – Logical Framework Approach (LFA)
Results-Based Management
May 12 th Monitoring and Project Control. Objectives Anticipated Outcomes Express why Monitoring and Controlling are Important. Differentiate between.
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
May 8, 2012 MWP-K Learning Event Monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) framework for the Millennium Water Program, Kenya.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
INTRODUCTION TO PROJECT PLANNING AND APPRAISAL LOGICAL FRAME WORK PREPARED BY GEORGE BOTCHIE.
Alaska Staff Development Network – Follow-Up Webinar Emerging Trends and issues in Teacher Evaluation: Implications for Alaska April 17, :45 – 5:15.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
LIBERIA THE BIG PICTURE Can the Agency tell the truth about results? Can the participants tell the truth about results?
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK by Lorelyn T. Dumaug.
UNDAF M&E Systems Purpose Can explain the importance of functioning M&E system for the UNDAF Can support formulation and implementation of UNDAF M&E plans.
Promising Ideas and Issues to Consider in Reaching Reading and Literacy Goals Logistics of supervision, training, support to teachers Sakil Malik Director.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
SUB-MODULE 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK RESULTS BASED LOG-FRAME TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2 )
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Monitoring and Evaluation
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Advanced Engineering Projects Management Dr. Nabil I El Sawalhi Associate Professor of Construction Management 1AEPM 4.
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
Evaluation design and implementation Puja Myles
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
What is Impact Evaluation … and How Do We Use It? Deon Filmer Development Research Group, The World Bank Evidence-Based Decision-Making in Education Workshop.
Session 2: Developing a Comprehensive M&E Work Plan.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Session 1 S3.1 session day 5 4 training delivered by lead partners Habitat for Humanity, RedR and Shelter Centre on 2 nd to 9 th July 2011 in Thailand.
Logical Framework Approach to PSIP formulation By Edward Joshua (Chief Economist, EP&D) Presentation 10 : 2015 PSIP Process Review Workshop 1.
ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDIT IN STRATEGY MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Project monitoring and evaluation
M&E Workshop for Full Proposal
Monitoring & Evaluation Processes A A walkthrough of the whole process
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Measuring Outcomes of GEO and GEOSS: A Proposed Framework for Performance Measurement and Evaluation Ed Washburn, US EPA.
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
CATHCA National Conference 2018
Project Management Training
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)

Monitoring & Evaluation Is a management tool for ensuring or determining effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability. It has continuously been improving over time From traditional M&E to Results based M&E In Kenya, M&E was pursued in Ernest from 2004 during the ERS period and now in the vision 2030 period

Definations Monitoring- Is a Continuous function, Uses systematic methods for collection of data on specified indicators Evaluation - Systematic and objective assessment of an on-going or completed project, programme or policy (including its design, implementation and results).

Foundation for M&E For M&E to be effective, it must approach issues by a specific logic Is this basic logic that allows the tool to identify facts possibly hidden to a casual eye and allow directing on what should be. This is the logic that we intended to get effected through technology.

(Logframe) Is a tool for improving the planning, implementation, management, monitoring and evaluation of policies, programmes and projects. It is a way of structuring the main elements and highlighting the logical linkages between them. It helps to identify the expected causal links in the results chain, i.e., inputs + processes – outputs – outcomes - impact

What can we use it for? Improving quality of project and program designs by: ■ Summarizing design of complex activities. ■ Assisting the preparation of detailed operational plans. ■ Providing a base for activity review, monitoring, and evaluation. ADVANTAGES: ■ Ensures that decision-makers ask fundamental questions and analyze assumptions and risks. ■ Calls for increased engagement of stakeholders in the planning and monitoring process. ■ When used dynamically, is an effective management tool to guide implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

Cont’ DISADVANTAGES: ■ If managed rigidly, stifles creativity and innovation. ■ Training and follow-up are often required. NOTE: Presentation of the Logframe is usually in a vertical and Horizontal flow

Vertical Logic Tests whether the sum of activities and lower level results is sufficient to achieve the higher level results. i.e Are all the activities listed under a particular output statement sufficient to achieve the output? Will all outputs listed under a particular outcome be sufficient to achieve the planned outcome? Will the outcomes listed under a strategic result (Goal) be sufficient to achieve the strategic result?

Risk in Vertical logic There remains a risk that our assumptions at planning stage could be wrong, e.g. for a conference, Invite 50 people, book a venue, bring facilitators etc does this really mean we have achieved the target of holding a conference!. ……….. Why? The Log frame identifies such critical planning assumptions in order to reduce the risk of failure.

Example Logframe Narrative Summary Indicator s Means of Verification Assumption s/ Risks GoalSample survey Purpose/objectiv e /Outcome Improved transport system Interviews Outputs Standard Gauge railway line constructed Observation. Interview

Cont’ Narrative Summary Indicators Means of Verification Assumptio ns/ Risks Activities 1.Laying rail tracks Resources

Main Benefit When used dynamically, is an effective management tool to guide implementation, monitoring and evaluation. Only a complete causal analysis will lead to a results framework that would ensure results are achieved and that development partners can identify their roles.

Application of Logframe in the system The M&E Module In view of the need to monitor the realization of outcomes at the national level, and by fact that this are closely related to implementation of projects a relation is established between the projects and the targets set at various levels of results i.e output and outcome levels as illustrated.

Outcome Outcome indicator TargetProject Project weight in relation to the target e.g Improved quality of Education Pupil :teacher ratio 43:1i30% ii25% iii45% Textbook: pupil ratio 1:3 lower primary i ii 1:2 higher primary i ii

Data Entry - M&E Application

Reports from the System Locatio n Outcome or output IndicatorbaselinetargetAchiev’.