SANRAL Overload Damage Quantification Louw Kannemeyer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Contract Management and Regulation Vickram Cuttaree The World Bank St. Petersburg – May 24, 2008.
Advertisements

Institute for Road Construction and Maintenance - Vienna University of Technology ISTU O PTIMIZED P AVEMENT D ESIGN W ITH R ESPECT TO Q UALITY AND E CONOMY.
LOW VOLUME ROAD DESIGN EMPIRICAL APPROACH.
Environmental Sustainability RPF May Slide 2 © CSIR Resolution: RPF Nov 2007 That an RPF working group be established to develop.
Aspects of Current MLS APT Activities in southern Africa Fred Hugo Road Pavement Forum 7 November 2006.
Pavement Design Session Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Pavement Design CE 453 Lecture 28.
By Mr.Surasak Kaewdee Transportation Engineering Dr. Kunnawee Kanitpong (Adviser) Asian Institute of Technology ANALYSIS OF TRAFFIC LOADING CHARACTERISTICS.
Canadian Truck Size & Weight Harmonization New Brunswick Department of Transportation Subcommittee on Highway Transport Portland, Maine June 6-9, 2010.
Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitation Pavement Structures By Matt Mason.
SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL ROADS AGENCY LTD Pavement Research
Vehicle and Traffic Consideration CEE 320 Steve Muench 5/9/ Highways Airports.
University of Minho School of Engineering Territory, Environment and Construction Centre (C-TAC) Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de.
Business and organization model Market consultation information meeting September 10 th, 2012.
Feedback on road budgets RPF November Contents  Background  Process  Information requested  Information obtained  Issues  Current data  Road.
AXLE LOAD CONTROL IN TANZANIA Regulations and Operations
Commercial Vehicles and Freight Mobility Mark Newland Deputy Commissioner of Traffic Management Indiana Department of Transportation.
Calculating the Cost of Road Wear on Local Roads Mark Bondietti Riaan Burger October 2013.
TRB AFK10 Committee on General Issues in Asphalt Technology Update on NCAT Test Track and Other Research Results April 24-26, 2006.
ARISTOTELION UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI SCHOOL OF TECHNOLOGY FACULTY OF RURAL AND SURVEYING ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING.
Highways: free or toll?. In the past, roads were considered a public good Now it is possible to make people pay: should roads be produced by the private.
Using ESAL method.  Pavement damage depends on weight distribution.  Weight distribution depends on: ◦ Number of axles ◦ Weight on each axle ◦ Spacing.
Interim Guidelines: The Design and Use of Foamed Bitumen Treated Bases Fenella Long Road Pavements Forum November 2001.
HDM-4 Applications. 2 Project Appraisal Project Formulation Maintenance Policy Optimization Road Works Programming Network Strategic Analysis Standards.
Local Government Sector Education Training Authority PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON ENERGY DATE: 6 NOVEMBER 2012.
Ultra Thin Continuously Reinforced Concrete - Modelling &Testing under APT Louw Kannemeyer (SANRAL) Bryan Perrie (C&CI) Pieter Strauss (Consultant) Louw.
Status Report on Standard Specifications and Codes of Practice Department of Transport RPF November 2004.
COTO Road Materials Committee (RMC) Towards National Specifications Road Pavement Forum 07 November 2006 Elzbieta Sadzik.
Extending Asphalt Pavement Life Using Thin Whitetopping Mustaque Hossain, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering Kansas State University.
Road Pavements Forum Structural Design Working Group Revision of the South African Flexible Pavement Design Method 7 November 2006 Pretoria H L Theyse.
Technical Recommendations for Highways No 12 TRH 12
AAPA 2010 Study Tour – Accelerated Pavement Testing & Equipment Observations and Recommendations Accelerated Pavement Testing & Equipment.
WHY WEIGH AXLES ? THE ANSWERS AND SOLUTIONS FROM.
THE WAY FORWARD or WHO SAID RESEARCH WAS EASY ?. Relationship between variables  x Y = (say) roughness after 5 years Poor Good Expectation for acceptable.
Ohio River Bridges Project
Maintenance & Rehabilitation Strategies Lecture 5.
1 the effect of heavy vehicle composition on design traffic loading calculations (E80s)
ROAD PAVEMENTS FORUM, ROODE VALLEI COUNTRY LODGE, PRETORIA, 14 – 15 NOVEMBER 2001 Vehicle Overloading Management in Gauteng.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
JC VAN DER WALT.  Who is SANRAL?  Functions  Network  Budget Allocation  Western Region Projects for 2011/12.
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGESAND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BYTRUCKS RATE OF DETERIORATION OF BRIDGES AND PAVEMENTS AS AFFECTED BY TRUCKS Terry Swygert South.
Road Pavement Forum Technology in Practice: Status Report HEAVY VEHICLE ACCREDITATION SCHEME Presentation: 8 November 2006 Nico Pienaar.
The Use of PAVEDAT for the District-wide Truck Enforcement Plan June 20, 2012 Mark Berndt Eulois Cleckley.
1 Presentation MIT November 14, 2011 Metering Issues Taskforce (MIT) Elimination of Time Error Correction Potential Impact on Wholesale Settlements.
CSIR RPRAC WORKING GROUP: THIN-LAYER CONCRETE RPF, 23 November 2005.
Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:. for better or for worse? Potential Implications of NAFTA Truck Traffic:
Public Hearing on Water Pollution and Water Challenges Date: 04 th June 2008 Venue: Ground Floor, NCOP Building.
International Concrete Conference: International Workshop on Best Practices for Concrete Pavements, Recife, Brazil Organised by mainly: –ISCP (Dan Zollinger),
CSIR Pavement Design Task Group Feedback RPF meeting 23 November 2005.
Roadex meeting 2016, Oslo Challenges and activities with low volume roads management in Estonia Taavi Tõnts Estonian Road Administration / Leading engineer.
Sand Mining Road Impacts Committee of the Board February 7, 2012 This presentation is available at the Winona County website under.
CE UNIT 1  Maintenance is the act of keeping something in good condition by checking or repairing it regularly.
How safe are our highway structures? Optimised assessment of bridges Aleš Žnidarič Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute.
Chip Seal Best Practices by: Larry Galehouse, P.E., P.S., Director National Center for Pavement Preservation.
Co-ordination & Harmonisation of Advanced e-Infrastructures for Research and Education Data Sharing Research Infrastructures Grant Agreement n
Framework for Introducing OPRC Christopher R. Bennett Sr. Transport Specialist EASTE.
European Asphalt Pavement Warranties Scan
Transportation Engineering-II
Outline Phase I Literature Review and Synthesis
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING II
Budget (thousands) Regulation and Safety R1,413,542 Roads
Pavement Design  A pavement consists of a number of layers of different materials 4 Pavement Design Methods –AASHTO Method –The Asphalt Institute Method.
NMi WIM standard Cock Oosterman NMi Certin
Calculating Dimensions for a Typical Pavement Section using 1993 AASHTO Flexible Pavement Design Guide.
USE OF WIM IN SOUTHERN AFRICA
Flexible pavement design
PRESENTATION TO THE PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT
EXPERIENCES FROM LONG-TERM
Victor Dolcemascolo – DGITM* Bernard Jacob - IFSTTAR**
Presentation transcript:

SANRAL Overload Damage Quantification Louw Kannemeyer

Slide 2 Pavement Damage Non-Traffic Associated Damage Rainfall (Moisture) – Materials Strength Reduced Ultra Violet Radiation – Ageing of Surface Materials Traffic Associated Damage Axle Loads - Overloading Tire Pressure – New Tire Technology

Slide 3 Axle Loads Legal Limits Effective Enforcement Network of Traffic Control Centers Operated 24 hours 365 days a year Zero Tolerance to offenders RTMC Mantsole TCC – N1 North of Pretoria 9,0 Tons 7,7 Tons TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED DAMAGE Axle Loads - Control

Slide 4 Tire Pressure Not Practical to Specify Legal Limits Technology Improvements Driven by Quest for Economic Efficiency Improved Design Procedures & Materials Through Research Accelerated Pavement Testing (APT) Stress-In-Motion (SIM) Stress In Motion HVS VI+ TRAFFIC ASSOCIATED DAMAGE Tire Pressure

Slide 5 Toll Concessions - Background The risk associated with the damage caused by overloaded axles remain with the Implementing Authority – SANRAL Additional damage caused by overloaded axles impacts the concessionaire as follow: Time-shift Costs: planned maintenance and rehabilitation actions have to be performed earlier than originally planned due to the higher number of axles applied, this results in the concessionaire having to secure funding earlier, which results in interest payments over longer period than originally planned, Additional Strengthening Costs: the additional axles due to overloading consume pavement structural life, resulting in additional strengthening required to ensure pavement lasts for the concession period.

Slide 6 Overload Damage - Cost Recovery Load P Legal portion Overloaded portion Actual field condition Damage Determined by P and pavement sensitivity Cost Cost recovery Compensation Toll

Slide 7 Methodology The approach is based on comparing the without overloading to the with overloading scenario, taking into consideration the load sensitivity of the specific road pavement structures on these road sections – based on published results - field observations will introduced complex construction related variables, Based on collaboration between various parties involved: Concessionaires with his Technical Specialists CSIR Africon Prof Christo van As SANRAL

Slide 8 Equivalent Damage Calculation: With Overloading Axle load interval Axle counts Legal axle load n1n1 n2n2 nini nknk nlnl Axle load interval LEF Legal axle load LEF 1 LEF 2 LEF i LEF k Axle load histogramLoad equivalency x LEF l AASHTO METHOD: Published values of load sensitivity for generic road pavement types according the AASHTO procedure used internationally, SOUTH AFRICAN MECHANISTIC DESIGN METHOD (SAMDM): Mechanistic-empirical modelling using the South African Mechanistic Design Method

Slide 9 Equivalent Damage Calculation: Without Overloading Axle load interval Axle counts Legal axle load n1n1 n2n2 nini nknk nlnl Axle load interval LEF Legal axle load LEF 1 LEF 2 LEF i Axle load histogramLoad equivalency x LEF l Axle Load Histogram: Based on the actual measured traffic axle load data obtained to date using Weigh–- In-Motion (WIM) technology.

Slide 10 Time Shift Costs No Overloading With Overloading

Slide 11 Additional Strengthening Cost

Slide 12

Slide 13

Slide 14

Slide 15

Slide 16