with thanks to MODAPS and the Atmosphere PEATE at U. Wisconsin-Madison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Robin Hogan, Richard Allan, Nicky Chalmers, Thorwald Stein, Julien Delanoë University of Reading How accurate are the radiative properties of ice clouds.
Advertisements

MODIS Atmosphere Solar Reflectance Issues 1. Aqua VNIR focal plane empirical re-registration status Ralf Bennartz, Bob Holz, Steve Platnick 2 1 U. Wisconsin,
1/26 Multisensors clouds remote sensing from POLDER/MODIS AMS Madison, J. Riedi, 14 July 2006 Cloud Properties Retrieval from synergy between POLDER3/Parasol.
A New A-Train Collocated Product : MODIS and OMI cloud data on the OMI footprint Brad Fisher 1, Joanna Joiner 2, Alexander Vasilkov 1, Pepijn Veefkind.
Science Impact of MODIS Calibration Degradation and C6+ Improvements A. Lyapustin, Y. Wang, S. Korkin, G. Meister, B. Franz (+OBPG), X. Xiong (+MCST),
MODATML2 in support of future infrastructure for custom aggregations Paul Hubanks, Steve Platnick, Steve Ackerman, Paul Menzel, Liam Gumley, Robert Pincus,
MOD06 Cloud Top Properties Richard Frey Paul Menzel Bryan Baum University of Wisconsin - Madison.
A 21 F A 21 F Parameterization of Aerosol and Cirrus Cloud Effects on Reflected Sunlight Spectra Measured From Space: Application of the.
MODIS Regional and Global Cloud Variability Brent C. Maddux 1,2 Steve Platnick 3, Steven A. Ackerman 1,2, Paul Menzel 1, Kathy Strabala 1, Richard Frey.
Spatial & Temporal Distribution of Clouds as Observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua Satellites  MODIS atmosphere products –Examples from Aqua Cloud.
Ten Years of Cloud Optical/Microphysical Measurements from MODIS M. D. King 1, S. Platnick 2, and the entire MOD06 Team 1 Laboratory for Atmospheric and.
Surface Reflectance over Land: Extending MODIS to VIIRS Eric Vermote NASA GSFC Code 619 MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting, May.
1 CALIPSO Status and Plans Dave Winker Winds Working Group, June 2009, Wintergreen, VA.
Aircraft spiral on July 20, 2011 at 14 UTC Validation of GOES-R ABI Surface PM2.5 Concentrations using AIRNOW and Aircraft Data Shobha Kondragunta (NOAA),
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
Orbit Characteristics and View Angle Effects on the Global Cloud Field
New Products from combined MODIS/AIRS Jun Li, Chian-Yi Liu, Allen Huang, Xuebao Wu, and Liam Gumley Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite.
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 GOES-R AWG Product Validation Tool Development Aviation Application Team – Volcanic Ash Mike Pavolonis (STAR)
1 Center for S a t ellite A pplications and R esearch (STAR) Applicability of GOES-R AWG Cloud Algorithms for JPSS/VIIRS AMS Annual Meeting Future Operational.
CloudSat/VIIRS CBH Validation Activities at CIRA Curtis Seaman, Yoo-Jeong Noh, Steve Miller, Dan Lindsey 10 September 2012.
Estimation of Cloud and Precipitation From Warm Clouds in Support of the ABI: A Pre-launch Study with A-Train Zhanqing Li, R. Chen, R. Kuligowski, R. Ferraro,
Cloud Top Properties Bryan A. Baum NASA Langley Research Center Paul Menzel NOAA Richard Frey, Hong Zhang CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison MODIS Science.
1 Validated Stage 1 Science Maturity Review for VIIRS Cloud Base, Nighttime Optical Properties and Cloud Cover Layers Products Andrew Heidinger September.
Rowan Galina Wind was born Monday at 5:29AM 7 lbs, 4 oz 20 inches Mother and daughter are doing well!
WATER VAPOR RETRIEVAL OVER CLOUD COVER AREA ON LAND Dabin Ji, Jiancheng Shi, Shenglei Zhang Institute for Remote Sensing Applications Chinese Academy of.
Identifying 3D Radiative Cloud Effects Using MODIS Visible Reflectance Measurements Amanda Gumber Department of Atmospherics and Oceanic Sciences/CIMSS.
Andrew Heidinger and Michael Pavolonis
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
QA filtering of individual pixels to enable a more accurate validation of aerosol products Maksym Petrenko Presented at MODIS Collection 7 and beyond Retreat.
Testing LW fingerprinting with simulated spectra using MERRA Seiji Kato 1, Fred G. Rose 2, Xu Liu 1, Martin Mlynczak 1, and Bruce A. Wielicki 1 1 NASA.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Using CALIPSO to Explore the Sensitivity to Cirrus Height in the Infrared.
Cloud Mask: Results, Frequency, Bit Mapping, and Validation UW Cloud Mask Working Group.
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
Cloud optical properties: modeling and sensitivity study Ping Yang Texas A&M University May 28,2003 Madison, Wisconsin.
1 N. Christina Hsu, Deputy NPP Project Scientist Recent Update on MODIS C6 Deep Blue Aerosol Products and Beyond N. Christina Hsu, Corey Bettenhausen,
MODIS Level 3: Future Issues and Considerations Brent Maddux MODIS Level 3: Future Issues and Considerations Brent Maddux Cloud Fraction Mean.
Steve Platnick 1 & M. D. King 1, J. Riedi 2, G. T. Arnold 1,3, P. Hubanks 1,3, G. Wind 1,3, R. Pincus 4, L. Oreopoulos 1,5 2 Laboratoire d’Optique Atmosphérique,
Using MODIS and AIRS for cloud property characterization Jun W. Paul Menzel #, Steve Chian-Yi and Institute.
MODIS Atmosphere Team Summary S. Platnick and the atmosphere team Atmosphere Team Agenda Day 1: Collection 6 – L2 Algorithm Plans/Status – L3 Discussion:
Bryan A. Baum, Richard Frey, Robert Holz Space Science and Engineering Center University of Wisconsin-Madison Paul Menzel NOAA Many other colleagues MODIS.
Cloud Optical & Microphysical Properties (M. D. King, S. Platnick, M
Initial Analysis of the Pixel-Level Uncertainties in Global MODIS Cloud Optical Thickness and Effective Particle Size Retrievals Steven Platnick 1, Robert.
0 0 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD GSFC Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Terrestrial Information System Branch (614.5) Carbon Cycle.
Aerosol Characterization Using the SeaWiFS Sensor and Surface Data E. M. Robinson and R. B. Husar Washington University, St. Louis, MO
MODIS Cryosphere Science Data Product Metrics Prepared by the ESDIS SOO Metrics Team for the Cryosphere Science Data Review January 11-12, 2006.
MODIS Atmosphere Data Products and Science Results Steven Platnick 1,2 Michael D. King, 2 W. Paul Menzel, 3 Yoram J. Kaufman, 2 Steve Ackerman, 4 Didier.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
Cloud property retrieval from hyperspectral IR measurements Jun Li, Peng Zhang, Chian-Yi Liu, Xuebao Wu and CIMSS colleagues Cooperative Institute for.
S. Platnick 1, M. D. King 1, J. Riedi 2, T. Arnold 1,3, B. Wind 1,3, G. Wind 1,3, P. Hubanks 1,3 and S. Ackerman 4, R. Frey 4, B. Baum 4, P. Menzel 4,5,
Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center, NASA/GSFC, Code 902, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA INTRODUCTION  NASA Goddard Earth Sciences.
MODIS Atmosphere Team Overview Steve Platnick, Bill Ridgway, Gang Ye, George Britzolakis, Xinmin Hua MODIS Science Team Mtg. College Park, MD 18 May 2011.
Data acquisition From satellites with the MODIS instrument.
UCLA Vector Radiative Transfer Models for Application to Satellite Data Assimilation K. N. Liou, S. C. Ou, Y. Takano and Q. Yue Department of Atmospheric.
MODIS Atmosphere Level-3 Product & Web Site Review Paul A. Hubanks Science Systems and Applications, Inc.
Steve Platnick 1, Gala Wind 2,1, Zhibo Zhang 3, Hyoun-Myoung Cho 3, G. T. Arnold 2,1, Michael D. King 4, Steve Ackerman 5, Brent Maddux NASA Goddard.
Preliminary Analysis of Relative MODIS Terra-Aqua Calibration Over Solar Village and Railroad Valley Sites Using ASRVN A. Lyapustin, Y. Wang, X. Xiong,
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
Early Results from the MODIS Cloud Algorithms cloud detection optical, microphysical, and cloud top properties S. Platnick 5,2, S. A. Ackerman 1, M. D.
Shaima Nasiri University of Wisconsin-Madison Bryan Baum NASA - Langley Research Center Detection of Overlapping Clouds with MODIS: TX-2002 MODIS Atmospheres.
Cloud Optical and Microphysical Properties Product Steve Platnick Brad Wind, Gala Wind, J. Riédi, et al. MODIS Atmosphere Group Meeting BWI Marriott
Spatial & Temporal Distribution of Cloud Properties observed by MODIS: Preliminary Level-3 Results from the Collection 5 Reprocessing Michael D. King,
NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences CERES Instantaneous Clear-sky and Monthly Averaged Radiance and Flux Product Overview David Young NASA.
SST from MODIS AQUA and TERRA Kay Kilpatrick, Ed Kearns, Bob Evans, and Peter Minnett Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science University of.
MODIS Atmosphere Group Summary Summary of modifications and enhancements in collection 5 Summary of modifications and enhancements in collection 5 Impacts.
Extinction measurements
Vicarious calibration by liquid cloud target
Remote Sensing of Cloud, Aerosol, and Land Properties from MODIS
MODIS Airborne Simulator (MAS),
Studying the cloud radiative effect using a new, 35yr spanning dataset of cloud properties and radiative fluxes inferred from global satellite observations.
Presentation transcript:

with thanks to MODAPS and the Atmosphere PEATE at U. Wisconsin-Madison Collection 6 Update: L2 MODIS Cloud Optical Properties (part of MOD/MYD06) + MYD02 Band 1/2 1km “re-registration” + L3 Atmosphere Team (MOD/MYD08) + Joint L2 Product (MOD/MYDATML2) MOD06: S. Platnick, G. Wind, N. Amarasinghe, B. Marchant, G. T. Arnold, K. Meyer, M. D. King, Z. Zhang, R. Holz, P. Yang., S. A. Ackerman MOD08: P. Hubanks, S. Platnick, B. Ridgway, R. Pincus MYD02 1km re-registration: R. Bennartz, R. Wolfe, B. Ridgway, S. Platnick with thanks to MODAPS and the Atmosphere PEATE at U. Wisconsin-Madison MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Level-2 Cloud Optical Properties (MOD06) Collection 6 MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD06 Collection 6 Change Highlights (1) Radiative Transfer New LUTs Full LUT across retrieval space/geometry (no asymptotic parameters, easier maintenance of retrieval routines) New ice cloud models: Severely roughened aggregated columns. Analytic distribution (gamma, 0.10 effective variance) + P. Yang particle scattering database. Extensive evaluation vs. IR and CALIOP retrievals by R. Holz et al. (including A. Heidinger, CALIPSO IIR and CALIOP team). LUTs include reflectance sensitivity associated with selected model parameters for use in quantifying pixel-level model retrieval uncertainties Ocean spectral surface BRDF Wind speed-interpolated Cox-Munk (3 separate LUTs) Land spectral surface albedo New gap-filled dataset derived Aqua/Terra C5 product (MCD43B3) MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Example MOD06 C6 Changes Since 2012 STM: Ice Models New ice radiative models achieve closure with IR observations of single layer cirrus C5 Ice Models C6 Ice Models analysis from R. Holz CALIOP was using incorrect lidar ratio for cirrus in their daytime retrievals. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD06 Collection 6 Change Highlights (2) Algorithm Retrievals Effective radius: absolute size retrievals derived from 1.6 and 3.7 µm bands (instead of difference relative to the 2.1 µm retrieval). Allows for L3 aggregations and improved spectral retrieval comparisons. Cloud-Top: Use new 1km MODIS cloud-top retrievals, incorporate cloud emissivity into window IR retrievals for use in optical property code. Numerous science and code performance improvements. Changes related to pixel populations and filtering Thermodynamic Phase: SWIR/VNIR ratio tests replaced w/separate ice and liquid water retrievals (CALIOP, POLDER validation). Attempt retrievals on pixels expected to be partly cloudy. Provide solution space metrics on failed retrievals (separate SDSs). Updated multilayer detection and algorithm for removal of heavy aerosol (smoke, dust) and glint from cloud population. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD06 Collection 6 Change Highlights (3) Algorithm (cont.) Pixel-level Uncertainties (not incl. deviations from 1D radiative model) Calibration uncertainty: uses new L1B scene-dependent pixel-level uncertainty indices improved for C6. New model error sources included as LUT entries (size distribution effective variance for liquid and ice cloud reflectances, wind direction for ocean surfaces) 3.7 µm band effective radius retrievals now include emission error sources (effective cloud and surface emissivity, Tcloud, Tsfc, including dependences on ancillary water vapor) MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Example MOD06 C6 Changes Since 2012 STM: Ice Models Radiative Transfer Finalized ice cloud radiative model, lowers retrieved optical thickness uses severely roughened aggregated columns analytic distribution (gamma, 0.10 effective variance) + P. Yang particle scattering database extensive evaluation vs. IR and CALIOP retrievals by R. Holz et al. (including A. Heidinger, CALIPSO IIR and CALIOP team) MOD06 file include gλ, ῶ0, λ, Qe, λ arrays for both ice and water models so users can compare/scale retrievals to their own radiative assumptions. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

C6, C5 Phase Comparisons vs. CALIOP: May 2007 CALIOP Phase = Ice (ocean, 1 km, tau<5 - w/lidar single column phase) False positive Correct Individual tests For optically “thin” ice clouds over the ocean, a very significant improvement using the new algorithm (increase from 71 to 87%) From IRS 2012

C6, C5 Phase Comparisons vs. CALIOP: May 2007 CALIOP Phase = Ice (ocean, 1 km, all tau - w/lidar single column phase) All clouds (thicker) has better skill as expected but less difference between the C6 and C5 algorithms ((increase from 88 to 91%) From IRS 2012

C6, C5 Phase Comparisons vs. CALIOP: May 2007 CALIOP Phase = Liquid Water (ocean, 1 km, all tau - w/lidar single column phase) False positive Correct From IRS 2012 Significant improvement for liquid phase over ocean (increase from 80 to 88%) Also tested for other ranges of tau, surfaces (desert, snow/ice) and the new C6 algorithm was never worse than C5 – at least not by any significant amount from what I can recall.

Example MOD06 C6 Changes Since 2012 STM: QA Algorithm No longer assign Confidence QA (2 bits) Confusing to users, source of data misuse, no consistency across products, etc. Previously used for general assessment of retrieval accuracy (replaced by pixel-level uncertainty) and QA-weighted L3 aggregations. User directed to L3 “Uncertainty of Mean” SDSs based on pixel-level uncertainty calculations. Original C6 plan was to use Confidence QA to indicate partly cloudy pixels, but anticipated user confusion. Now provided in separate SDS. For compatibility with C5 QA structure, Confidence QA remain but have trivial assignments. For potential use in assessing retrieval quality, have added band 1 and 2 250m reflectance heterogeneity information (σR/⟨R⟩) using reflectance information added to cloud mask. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Example MOD06 C6 Changes Since 2012 STM: QA Terra MODIS, 199/2001, 1530 UTC July 18 “Partly Cloudy” = I’m sure it’s not Overcast C5 vs C6 file size: Between 80 and 120Mb. Yep, *at least* double what C5 was. C5 seems to be between 30 and 60Mb or so for a complete daytime file.  “Partly Cloudy” pixels (blue=cloud edges) make up ≈ 9% of all cloudy pixels MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Example MOD06 C6: “Overcast” Retrievals liquid COT (0-30 liq. & ice color bars) CER 1.6µm ice CER 2.1µm (liq: 4-30, ice: 5-60) CER 3.7µm MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Ex. MOD06 C6: “Partly Cloudy” Retrievals liquid COT (0-30 liq. & ice color bars) CER 1.6µm ice CER 2.1µm (liq: 4-30, ice: 5-60) CER 3.7µm MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Ex. MOD06 C6: Retrieval Failures (Outside Solution Space) ~14.6% of 2.1 µm retrievals fail liquid COT failures (<5 for liq.) ice Magnitude: vector difference between meas. point and nearest LUT point in the solution space, typically 5-12% range for the water clouds in this example Failed16/(16 Succ. PCL+non-PCL) = 14.7% Failed21/(21 Succ. PCL+non-PCL) = 14.6% Failed37/(37 Succ. PCL+non-PCL) = 5.0% CER 2.1µm failures (>30µm for liq.) Failure magnitude: Distance to Solution Space rel. to measurement vector (0-20%) MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Ex. MOD06 C6: Uncertainties liquid COT Uncert. (0-30%) CER 1.6 µm Uncert. ice Successful PCL and non-PCL CER 2.1µm Uncert. (0-30%) CER 3.7µm Uncert. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Overcast vs. Partly Cloudy Distributions & Uncertainties Example MOD06 C6: Overcast vs. Partly Cloudy Distributions & Uncertainties MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Pixel Filtering: Retrieval Outcome Terra MODIS April 2005, maritime water clouds CTP ≥ 680mb, ±30° latitude Successful COT & re COT re (2.1 µm) Tau, re for each pixel population: MODIS C5: = 1st category, MODIS C6 = All Relative to the filtered pixels, there is a bias in tau and re (~15->19 µm) for the partly cloudy pixels

Pixel Filtering: Retrieval Outcome Terra MODIS April 2005, maritime water clouds CTP ≥ 680mb, ±30° latitude Successful COT & re COT re2.1 – re3.7 Larger delta re can be caused by 2D heterogeneity, but not always … refer you to Zhibo Zhang and Hyoun-Myoung Cho’s talk/poster from yesterday. Message: retrievals from edge pixels and those identified as partly cloudy by 250m observations are consistent w/breakdown of 1D cloud model. Retrievals consistent w/breakdown of 1D forward model

Pixel Filtering: Sampling Statistics Terra MODIS April 2005, maritime water clouds CTP ≥ 680mb, ±30° latitude Successful COT & re Failure (minor) Failure (major) Once again, consistent w/breakdown of 1D model “Cloudy” in this case means cloud mask – CSR=2 (~6%) Terra (April 2005): 44% of cloudy pixels are suspect (100 – SUM (row 1)), 40% of suspect pixels fail (CSR=1,3: minor + major / successful + minor + major). 26% of all pixels (all categories) fail. Aqua (July 2008): 46% of cloudy pixels are suspect, 52% of minor + major for Aqua. 33% of all pixels (all categories) fail. 44% of cloudy pixels are associated w/edges or designated as partly cloudy by the 250m cloud mask 40% of edge/partly cloudy pixel retrievals fail (simultaneous COT and re solution fall outside LUT space)

Example MOD06 C6 Changes Since 2012 STM: Zonal Means vs. MODAPS Archive Tests Ice Cloud Optical Thickness over ocean, non-PCL, Terra, March 2005 C6 test number zonal mean for baseline C5 run 6.0.06: non-asymptotic LUT 6.0.12: LUT w/Cox-Munk new LUTs w/C5 model C6 Cloud Mask COTmax increased C6 Ice LUT w/thanks to Xin-Min Hua & G. T. Arnold MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD06 C6 Processing/Memory Stats Execution time for ~70% cloudy granule. File size: C5->C6, ~2x, from ~50MB to 100MB. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MYD02 Band 1/2 Re-registration Status (1) Problem Aqua VNIR focal plane misregistered w.r.t. other focal planes (~few hundred meters, see MCST reports) Cloud mask and optical products and use bands from all focal planes. Could impact retrievals for heterogenous cloud scenes/cloud edges. Investigated empirical correlations between bands 1, 2 and SWIR bands in 2010. Significant differences found between MODIS Terra and Aqua. [Ralf Benartz] “Misregistered” Terra MODIS MYD02 1km aggregation test file resulted in noticeable differences in optical properties distributions. [Platnick, Kuiper] Re-registration history Aqua correlations improve using empirical 1km aggregation kernel for bands 1/2. [Bennartz] Been working with R. Wolfe since early 2013 and recently tested kernel based on MCST characterization (similar results). Empirical correction approach and status reported in previous MODIS cal meetings (2010/11/12). Terra test: Understand sensitivity by de-registering Terra MODIS 250m pixels (Platnick, Hubanks, Kuyper, Xiong) “Move” 250m pixel location by 2 (along-track) and 1 (cross-track) positions. Aggregate to 1km per usual. Process one month of MOD06 Level-3 data (April 2005). MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MYD02 Band 1/2 Re-registration Status (2) R. Wolfe kernel scan line 1 10 5 Correlation (bd 2 vs. 7) 9 8 7 6 4 3 2 scan pixel position old vs. new 1km agg. new – old Results from R. Bennartz April analysis of 12 days of data Interpretation: The new aggregation is better, if/when the curve on the right-hand side is above the blue line (new aggregation has higher correlation) MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MYD02 Band 1/2 Re-registration Status (3) liquid cloud means, July 2012, Bennartz kernel: vDec. 2012 corrected – uncorrected uncorrected mean Optical Thickness Effective Radius (µm) Retrieval Fraction ±2 µm ±2 ±0.05 Non-PCL Liq ret fraction increases substantially in broken regions so a different population. Have to consider this when looking at changes in mean COT and CER. MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MYD02 Band 1/2 Re-registration Status (4) In testing: Re-registered MYD02 1km –> MYD35 cloud mask –> MYD06 cloud product New MYD02 and MYD35 files used as intermediate files for cloud product processing only. TBD: Use of new MYD02 1km and/or MYD35 files by other teams Atmosphere MYD04/07 products haven’t seen any impact in previous re-registration tests. Land? Any algorithms use 1km b1/2 aggregation or MYD35 tests that use b1/2? MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Atmosphere Team Level-3 (MOD08) Collection 6 Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 Change Highlights Notable SDS Change Summary Aerosols (MOD04): Addition of 2D aerosol histograms, SDS deletions and renaming, non-pixel count multiday weightings. Cloud-top (MOD06): Addition of cloud-top stats by restricted Sensor ZA limits. Addition of sfc. type fraction. Improved bin resolution for calculation of means vs. pressure height (high, middle, low). Cloud- top height SDSs. Cloud optical properties (MOD06): Addition of cloud optical property SDSs (e.g., 1.6 & 3.7 µm-derived parameters), removal of QA SDSs. Definition of Day UTC definition results in discontinuities in tropics/midlatitudes Inconsistent with other instrument team approaches. Can impact daily gridded comparisons but makes no difference to monthly analysis. Expect to begin production after L2 code processing has begun Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) CT: sfc type = snow, gilnt, desert, … COP: PCL stats added MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 C6 SDS Change Summary Product SDSs Added/Modified SDSs Renamed SDSs Deleted Aerosol: Dark Target 19 10 24 Deep Blue 8 – Cloud-Top Properties 60 Cloud Optical Properties 54 Numerous (incl. all QA-weighted) Solar/View Geometry Stats 12 CTP: 30 of the SDSs added are 1D or 2D histograms COP: PCL stats added Each change in a file involves ~15-30 lines of code in the flle-spec * each SDS changed needs to be implemented in 4 files (tile, daily, 8-day, & monthly) MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 C6 SDS Change Summary (2) http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/_docs/L3_Statistics_Table_2013_04_13.pdf MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 QA Plans http://modis-atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/products_C006update.html MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 Change Details: Aerosol Aerosol combined Land and Ocean: completed Renamed parameters using Aerosol prefix [3 parameters renamed] Deleted some parameters [2 parameters deleted] Added Avg. Distance from the Aerosol Retrieval to the nearest Cloud [1 parameter added] Changed all Multiday averages from Pixel Count Weighted to Unweighted [3 parameters modified] Aerosol over Land: completed Renamed parameters using Aerosol prefix [2 parameters renamed] Deleted many parameters [12 parameters deleted] Added Avg. Number of L2 Pixels used in Retrieval [1 parameter added] Changed all Multiday averages from Pixel Count Weighted to Unweighted [2 parameters modified] Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) CT: sfc type = snow, gilnt, desert, … COP: PCL stats added MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 Change Details: Aerosol, cont. Aerosol over Ocean: completed Renamed parameters using Aerosol prefix [5 parameters renamed] Many parameters deleted [10 parameters deleted] Added Avg. Number of L2 Pixels used in Retrieval [1 parameter added] Added three Joint Histograms (AE1, AE2, & AODRSO) vs. AOD [3 parameters added] Changed all Multiday averages from Pixel Count Weighted to Unweighted [8 parameters modified] Aerosol Deep Blue: completed Added AOD Dark Target & Deep Blue Combined [1 parameter added] Changed all Multiday averages from Pixel Count Weighted to Unweighted [6 parameters modified] Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) CT: sfc type = snow, gilnt, desert, … COP: PCL stats added MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 Change Details: Clouds Cloud-Top: completed (95%) Added Near Nadir versions of CTP, CTT, CEE, CF, and CTH (all aggregated by Day only, Night only, and Combined Day and Night) [15 parameters added] Added Low (>680mb), Middle(680-440 mb), & High Cloud (<440 mb) separation of CTP, CTT, CEE, CF, and CTH through finely binned Histograms (for CTP) and Joint Histograms vs. CTP (for remaining 4 parameters). Note that this was done for both the near nadir aggregation as well as the heritage (full view angle) parameters. Also, all were aggregated by Day only, Night only, and Combined Day and Night [24 joint histograms added & 6 marginal histograms added] Added eleven new Surface Type Fractions and Pixel Counts in the Cloud Top Property retrieval space. [11 parameters added] Added Joint Histogram of Cloud Phase (Baum) vs. CTP Near Nadir for Day and Night. [2 joint histograms added] Added Joint Histogram of Near Nadir CTP (5 km avg) vs. CTP (1 km sampled) for Day and Night. [2 joint histograms added] Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) CT: sfc type = snow, gilnt, desert, … COP: PCL stats added MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 Change Details: Clouds, cont. Cloud Optical Properties: ongoing Delete all QA Confidence Flag related statistics from all Cloud Optical Property parameters. [many SDS's deleted] Add Partly Cloudy (PCL) versions of COT, CER, CWP, CF (for primary 2.1 µm retrieval) for Liquid, Ice, Undetermined, and Combined. [14 parameters added] Delete all Combined Effective Radius and Combined Water Path parameters. [2 parameters deleted] Change all "Cloud_Fraction_(Phase)" parameters to "Cloud_Retrieval_Fraction_(Phase)” [10 parameters renamed] Add Partly Cloudy (PCL) versions of COT, CER, CWP, CF (for 1.6/2.1 retrieval) for Liquid & Ice only. [8 parameters added] Add Standard and Partly Cloudy (PCL) versions of COT, CER, CWP, CF (for 1.6 µm retrieval) for Liquid & Ice only. [16 parameters added] Add Standard and Partly Cloudy (PCL) versions of COT, CER, CWP, CF (for 3.7 µm retrieval) for Liquid & Ice only. [16 parameters added] Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) CT: sfc type = snow, gilnt, desert, … COP: PCL stats added MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

MOD08 Collection 6 Change Details: Other Solar and Sensor Geometry: completed Added Solar and Sensor Angles aggregated using Cloud Top Properties definitions of Day and Night. [8 new parameters added] Modified the heritage Solar and Sensor Angle parameters to be a true combined D+N so comparison can be made with combined D+N products in L3. [4 parameters modified]   Water Vapor No Changes Cirrus Reflectance Atmospheric Profiles Aerosol: 3x joint histos (ex., AOD vs. angst. exp1; AOD vs. angst. Exp1; AOD vs. small mode ratio) CT: sfc type = snow, gilnt, desert, … COP: PCL stats added MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

Collection 6 Schedule MYD02 1km re-registration test w/Wolfe kernel in process Science Test 15 submitted to MODAPS All test descriptions and results posted to public site http://modis- atmos.gsfc.nasa.gov/team/pge06_test_details.html MOD06 Remaining Science Test Cloud retrieval thermodynamic phase (Science Test 16) User guide to C6 changes in development. Webinar rollout. MOD08 All SDS code updates other than MOD06 optical properties have been completed (MOD06 CT requires testing). Change in ‘Definition of Day’ algorithm determined, to be implemented MODATML2 TBD MOD06, MOD08, etc.: Platnick et al., MODIS STM, 15 April 2013

C6 Level 1 & Atmosphere Algorithm Status PGE02 L1B radiances Full reprocessing complete; running in parallel with C5 Reviewing Aqua 1km aggregation / deregistration fix PGE03 cloud mask & profiles Would be impacted if (Aqua) MYD021KM updated PGE85/55/81 clear-sky radiance C6 codes tested and ready PGE04/05 aerosols & water vapor Deep Blue ready (Aqua) ; testing continues (Terra) Dark Target final testing; 3 km product is ready PGE06 cloud properties, cirrus Cloud Top properties code tested and ready Cloud Optical properties final testing continues PGE83 L2 subsets & browse Minimal changes, parameter name updates PGE107/108 L2 global browse C6 parameter updates complete, enhancing post-processing system to produce 5-10TB C6 archive PGE69/56/70/57 Level 3 Cloud Top, Aerosol parameter updates complete Cloud Optical parameter updates in process Definition-of-day change: coding in process Browse post-processing updates in process MODIS Atmosphere Team Breakout, 15-17 April 2013 38