Special Education for Adolescent Latino Students with Limited Formal Schooling: Issues, Stories, and Perceptions of Students and Their Teachers Diane Staehr.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Language Policy for Lansdowne School Beliefs At Lansdowne, we believe that language is a vehicle for transdisciplinary learning. The strands of language.
Roger S. Baskin, Sr. George Mason University April 21, 2010 Perceptions of Central Office Administrators Regarding the Achievement Gap.
M eeting the Needs of All Students in a Collaborative Model: Co-Teaching The School District of Philadelphia A Collaborative Effort Office of Empowerment.
LeGare For Parents Step by Step Process
Help! They Don’t Speak English:
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Heather J. Hendry University of Pittsburgh
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson 1b: Demonstrating Knowledge of Students 1 5/29/2013.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Student Empowerment and School Culture: Perceptions of Adolescents and Their Parents/Guardians Dirk Erik Skogsberg.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
ESOL/HILT Programs and Services WORKSHOP FOR PARENTS September 2011 Arlington Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Joan Hughes The Role of Teacher Knowledge and Learning Experience in Forming Technology- Integrated Pedagogy Jessica Barron and Adam Wasilko.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT for teachers of English Language Learners.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Strategies for Writing Meaningful, Measureable IEP Goals Presented to all Davis School District Related Service Providers November 2011 Based on a presentation.
Susan Brown Purposes of Assessments Assessments serves three important purposes: Identification and program placement of students in need of special.
Home, school & community partnerships Leadership & co-ordination Strategies & targets Monitoring & assessment Classroom teaching strategies Professional.
ALTERNATE ACCESS for ELLs 1 Alternate ACCESS for ELLs ™ Participation Criteria The Alternate ACCESS for ELLs was initially developed by a team led by Craig.
CRIOP Professional Development: Program Evaluation Evaluatio Susan Chambers Cantrell, Ed.D. Pamela Correll, M.A. Victor Malo-Juvera, Ed.D.
Professional development for mainstream teachers of ELLs: Project GLAD ® and Beyond Theresa Deussen March 10, 2014.
ED 315 Inclusive Practices for Students w/ Learning Problems.
ESOL/HILT Programs and Services WORKSHOP FOR PARENTS September 2010 Arlington Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Chapter 2 Observation and Assessment
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
UNICEF’s work and planned activities for the production of data on children with disabilities Claudia Cappa, Data and Analytics Section, UNICEF, NY.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series.
Students with Learning Disabilities Assessment. Purposes of Assessment Screening Determining eligibility Planning a program Monitoring student progress.
Academic Practicum Winter Academic Practicum Seminar2 Agenda 4 Welcome 4 Burning ??’s 4 Routines & Organizational Systems 4 Overview of Academic.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
Summative vs. Formative Assessment. What Is Formative Assessment? Formative assessment is a systematic process to continuously gather evidence about learning.
Presented by Julie A. DeCook ELL Program Support Teacher School District of Janesville WITESOL Conference October 9, 2009.
RTI stands for Response to Intervention. It is a four tiered process designed to meet the needs of struggling students. W HAT IS RTI??
Assessing Learners with Special Needs: An Applied Approach, 6e © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1: An Introduction To Assessing.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. THE.
Inclusive Practices: Co- Teaching Indiana IEP Resource Center.
Family Presentation Hamilton Public Schools February 24,
Special Education Module #1 : Legislative Overview.
Assessment Of Exceptional Students Part One: Chapter Two.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Specific Learning Disability Proposed regulations.
Addressing Learning Problems in Elementary School Ellen Hampshire.
Baltimore County Public Schools’ Office of Equity and Assurance in collaboration with: Department of Professional Development World Languages Special Education.
Collaboration & Integrated Content-Based Instruction.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Teaching Students with Mild and Moderate Disabilities: Research-Based Practices Second Edition © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
International Student Registration Hall County Schools.
Instructional Practice Guide: Coaching Tool Making the Shifts in Classroom Instruction Ignite 2015 San Diego, CA February 20, 2015 Sandra
Individual Family Service Plans vs
Information for Students and Parent(s)/Guardian(s)
Scaling up EBPs and HLPs
Online Adjunct Higher Education Teachers’ Perceptions of Using
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant
Chapter 13 Career Development Services for K-12 Students
SPE 574 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
SPE 574 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
Assessment of Exceptional Students
Pinpoint Math.
Assessing Student Learning Heather Holshouser CUR 528 September 19, 2015 University of Phoenix Siddeeqah Johnson.
Chapter 1 Special Education Assessment.
Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Multicultural and Bilingual Aspects of Special Education
How to stay under the 1% December 12, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Special Education for Adolescent Latino Students with Limited Formal Schooling: Issues, Stories, and Perceptions of Students and Their Teachers Diane Staehr Fenner February 16, 2006

Introduction Metro Public Schools Demographics Dual Language Assessment Topic of this study

Purposes of This Study Personal purposes Practical purposes Intellectual purposes

Research Questions 1. What was the nature of adolescent Latino students with Limited Formal Schooling’s school and family experiences before entering special education? 2. What issues did teachers and students express as relative to students with LFS’ placement in special education? 3. What influenced how students with LFS were being provided English literacy instruction in their special education classrooms?

Review of the Literature Identification and Placement of ELLs in Special Education History of ELLs in Special Education Representation of ELLs in Special Education Definition and Purpose of Early Intervention or Pre-Referral Process Testing Considerations for ELLs Special Education Services for ELLs

Review of the Literature (2) ELLs’ Academic Progress ELLs’ Patterns of Literacy Typical Literacy Instruction for ELLs Students with Limited Formal Schooling Teacher Preparation

Gaps from the Literature and Researcher’s Experiential Knowledge of the Topic What happens to students with LFS once they have been placed in special education Absence of students with LFS’ own voices on perceptions of placement in special education Special education teachers’ perceptions of working with adolescent students with LFS How English literacy is taught to students with LFS in special education classrooms What influences how English literacy is taught

Research Design: Overview Multiple case design 3 schools: each was one case 5 students 4 teachers 3 special education 1 ESOL – special education itinerant Within-case analysis Cross-case analysis

Data Collection: Sources of Data 5 student interviews 4 special education teacher interviews 1 90 minute classroom observation per student IEPs ESOL assessment folders Entry assessment information Dual language assessment reports

Selection of Student & Teacher Participants Students Criteria: High School Latino Limited Formal Schooling “Literacy” ESOL level In special education Teachers Special education/language arts teachers of selected students

Students, Teachers and Schools

Students Chosen for Study NameAgeYears of schooling in country When came to USA, Original grade, Year enrolled in US school When found eligible for special education Oscar177 but “probably missed 2” 8/2001Grade 9, Julieta20IEP: 3 yrs.1999Gr. 9, Luz1729/15/98Gr. 5, Lorena2012/17/97Gr. 7, Francisco198 (with gaps)10/2000Gr. 9,

Data Analysis How Transcriptions Data displays Codes Memos NVivo software

Presentation of Findings Each student’s story - What happened prior to placement in special education - What happened after placement in special education Within-case analysis (including narrative analysis) Cross-case analysis

Case 1 Teachers: Ashley, Bridget Students: Oscar, Julieta Oscar’s Story Julieta’s Story

Within-Case Analysis: Case 1(Lincoln HS) Teachers: Ashley, Bridget Students: Oscar, Julieta Challenges in Teaching Students with LFS Beneficial Aspects of Special Education for LFS English Literacy Instruction

Case 2 Teacher: Keisha Student: Luz Luz’s Story

Within – Case Analysis: Case 2 (Central HS) Teacher: Keisha Student: Luz Keisha as Mother Figure Cultural Understanding Special Education as “Dumping Ground”

Case 3 Teacher: Tina Students: Lorena, Francisco Lorena’s Story Francisco’s Story

Within-Case Analysis: Case 3 (Poole Center) Teacher: Tina Students: Lorena, Francisco “Use It or Lose It” Families Navigating the System “Your Kids” vs. “My Kids”

Cross Case Analysis: RQ1RQ1 Conflicting Stories About Students’ Prior Experiences School-Based Issues Personal Issues

Cross-Case Analysis: RQ2RQ2 Assessments to Determine Special Education Eligibility Teachers’ Beliefs About Placement of Students in Special Education Providing Ongoing ESOL Assessment Knowing Where to Begin Teaching Students Classroom Behavior Teachers’ Perception of Students’ Response to Instruction Teachers’ Expectations for Students ESOL Support Students’ Perceptions of Being in Special Education

Cross-Case Analysis: RQ3RQ3 Collaboration between ESOL and Special Education Classroom Instruction of English Literacy

Discussion Summary of the nature of Adolescent Latino students with limited formal schooling’s school and family experiences before entering special education Summary of issues teachers and students expressed as relative to students with LFS’ placement in special education Summary of what influenced how students with LFS were being provided English literacy instruction in their special education classrooms

Implications: Practice Previous History Obtaining Information on Students Home-School Connection High Expectations Content of Instruction English Literacy Instruction Opportunities for Using English

Implications: Research How Students are Taught L1 Literacy Alternate Programs Difference vs. Disability Effective Teaching Methods Efficacy of L1 Support

Implications: Policy Counseling Assessment for disabilities Ongoing assessment Teacher training L1 support Collaboration

Limitations Students’ ESOL level Small sample size/generalizability Data gathered primarily through interviews & a few observations

Final Thoughts Positive aspects of special education for students with LFS Areas that could be improved

For More Information Office: (703)