Literacy & Our Solution MaxPhonics Max Pre-K Phonics MaxReading MaxMusic MaxBios MaxPlaces MaxVocab.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Florida 3rd Grade Promotion/Retention Law The Florida State Legislature passed a law in 2002 that affects the promotion /retention of students in 3rd.
Advertisements

Thinking Ahead about High School Graduation (Elementary Perspective) Created by the Elementary Education Dept.
March 12, ALL third grade students, including those classified as students with disabilities and/or ELL (ESOL) MUST take the FCAT.
* Princeton Public Schools State School Performance Report Interpretive Guide *Based upon data.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
Building Level Benchmark Data This represents the percent of students who demonstrated the following proficiency levels on benchmark assessments. AP-Advanced.
Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.
Clark County School District
Learning Disabled or Curriculum Casualty? The importance of phonemic awareness in reading.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
BARROW COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM NEEDS ASSESSMENT ANNUAL PLANNING FY 2016 Title I Title II-A Title III Professional Learning.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Summary of the District English Language Learner (ELL) Plan The ESOL Program Lee County School District
Providing Leadership in Reading First Schools: Essential Elements Dr. Joseph K. Torgesen Florida Center for Reading Research Miami Reading First Principals,
Dual Language Programs: Implementation, Expectations and Benefits Simona Montanari, Ph.D. Field Elementary School, Pasadena, CA November 20, 2013.
IMPROVING ACHIEVEMENT AND CLOSING GAPS BETWEEN GROUPS: How Can Researchers Help? IES June, 2006.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
Project MORE Independent Evaluation Completed by The Center for Evaluation Services Bowling Green State University Updated 11/12.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.
Slide 1. slide 2 slide 3 Risk to Ready begins with the Early Development Instrument Developed in Canada in 1998 and expanding across US since 2009 through.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
The Case of Paul: A Third Grader with Reading Difficulties.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Florida’s K-12 Education: The Next Generation Presented by: Dr. Frances Haithcock.
Minnesota FAED Project Survey Deaf Education Summit April 22, 2010.
1 Project MORE Report for Your School Insert Picture here by Going to Insert then Picture then choose a picture that you have placed on your.
0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.
NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.
Closing the Gap: Improving Student Achievement from Miami-Dade and Beyond A team from Miami-Dade County Public Schools: Dr. Reginald Johnson, Administrative.
ESI: Education Statistics Investigations Sarah McKenzie PhD TOSA: Data and Assessment Fayetteville Public Schools.
Evaluation and Eligibility Using RTI Crook County School District February 26, 2010.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Project MORE Evaluation Results Independent Evaluation conducted from 2001-to present by Center for Evaluation Services at Bowling Green State.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.
Project PASS: A Model System for Early Prevention of Reading and Behavioral Failure.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010.
N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.
Office of District and School Accountability and Program Management Larry Smith and Taylor L. Young, Ph.D. 1.
K-12 Balanced Literacy Selling it as an Investment.
DPS students post nation-worst science scores among large urban cities BY CHASTITY PRATT DAWSEY 9:46 AM, Feb. 24, 2011 DETROIT FREE PRESS
School Improvement Plan for North Elementary Pat McCoy, Principal Tuuli Robinson, Assistant Principal Lynn Thomas, Reading Coach Patti Leach,
School Improvement Plan
Assessment For Today’s Classrooms™ Module 1 Assessment Fundamentals Assessment For Today’s Classrooms, Module 1.
The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.
1 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts Results Student Growth Tracked Over Time: 2006 – 2009 Grade-by-grade testing began in The tests and data.
IMPACT OF READ NATURALLY SUMMER AND FALL 2013 ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT AND EDU604 CULMINATION PROJECT DOANE COLLEGE SUE SCHLICHTEMEIER-NUTZMAN, PH.D. By.
First/Second Grade Report Card Addendum More detailed information for Teachers, Students, and Parents By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com November.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Student Achievement Data Mount Olive Township Public Schools Winter 2016 RESULTS.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Policy Recommendation Best Practices in Reading Achievement to Address Reading Failure Roxanne Boyd Walden University.
Romeo High School School Improvement Literacy Goals  Close and Critical Reading – Universal Goal  Mark It Up-Universal Goal  Language Arts.
K-12 Reading Plan.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004
An Inefficient System According to the District Court’s ruling in the ongoing trial: A “disastrous” 14 – 25 percent of students fail to graduate from high.
2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade
Bursting the assessment mythology: A discussion of key concepts
Anderson Elementary School
Legislative Council Study Committee on the Identification and Management of Dyslexia Dee Pettack, Legislative Liaison Barb Novak, Literacy Consultant.
Anna Keating and Devin Koehne
Data Overview April 2014 Sweetwater Elementary
EDN Fall 2002.
Mayra Perez, Ed. D. October 10, 2016
Snowshoe Elementary School $109,762
Presentation transcript:

Literacy & Our Solution MaxPhonics Max Pre-K Phonics MaxReading MaxMusic MaxBios MaxPlaces MaxVocab

Literacy is a serious problem facing the United States. 37% of 4 th graders & 27% of 8 th graders cannot read at the basic level. (National Assessment of Education Progress, The Nation’s Report Card: Reading 2011) In low-income urban areas, up to 70% of all students read below grade level. (G. Reid Lyon, PhD, International Dyslexia Association Quarterly Periodical, Perspectives, 29:3, 2003.

Nation’s Report Card, 2011,

Student: LRS, grade Reading Comprehension Content ScoresNo. correct / no. questions No. correct / no. questions Literary10 / 1816 / 18 Informational9 / 1815 / 18 Functional7 / 1817 / 18 Initial Understanding6 / 1211 / 12 Interpretation8 / 2018 / 20 Critical Analysis7 / 1210 / 12 Strategies5 / 109 /10 Subject ScoresNational Percentile Rank FCAT ScoreFCAT Level

Results indicate that students using MaxScholar software* for 40 or more hours o made significantly greater gains on FCAT than students who did not participate in the program (46 students) (2012 – 2013) 67% improved (average of 1.1 FCAT levels) 11% regressed (average of 1.07 FCAT levels) 23% showed no change Students with Level 2, 64% improved to Level 3 Students with Level 1, 72% improved to Level 2 o included positive results for various subpopulations often considered at risk for reading difficulties (all students qualified for free or reduced-price lunch) African-American Latino-American Haitian-America English Language Learner Special education Learning disabled *MaxScholar software includes MaxReading, MaxVocab, & MaxMusic

Year# of Students% completing program % making learning gains Average % gain 2008 – %82% 1 38% 2009 – %92% 2 60% 2010 – %91% 2 44% %80% 3 39% Average 45% Results obtained using the MaxScholar Software for students attending Miami-Dade County Public Schools who were provided 20 hours of tutoring. (All students attended Title 1 Schools and qualified for free or reduced-price lunch.) 1 District Administered Interim Tests 2 Comprehensive Assessment of Reading Strategies (CARS) 3 SAT-10, administered by District

Grade# of Students Hours of Tutoring using MaxScholar software % making learning gains % making >15% learning gains Average % gain over baseline 5 th %*56%*63% 5 th** %*5%*11% Results obtained using the MaxScholar software for students in the “I Have a Dream Foundation” program * District Administered Interim Tests **Did not use the software

Grade# of Students Hours of Tutoring using MaxScholar % making learning gains % making >15% learning gains Average % gain over baseline 5 th (SED) %*46%*52% 5 th** (SED) %*5%*3% Results obtained using the MaxScholar software for students at a Miami-Dade County Public School, “DL K8 School” * District Administered Interim Tests **Did not use the software

Results obtained using the MaxScholar software for at risk students attending a Miami-Dade County Public School (SIBK8) * District Administered Interim Tests **Did not use the software Grade# of Students Hours of Tutoring using MaxScholar % making learning gains % making >15% learning gains Average % gain over baseline 3rd %56%*48% 4th %33%*60% 5 th** %16%*4%

Results obtained using MaxScholar software students with specific learning disabilities P.S. 75 Emily Dickinson School New York, NY Grade# of students Hours of Tutoring using MaxScholar % showing learning gains* % making 2 or more levels of improvement Average gain over baseline 4 th %66%4.6 5 th %59%4.7 *Results using Running Record exam

Results obtained using MaxScholar software students with specific learning disabilities P.S. 163 Alfred E. Smith School New York, NY Grade# of students Hours of Tutoring using MaxScholar % showing learning gains* % making 2 or more levels of improvement Average gain over baseline 5 th %86%5.72 Control 5 th (no MaxScholar) 65None45%11%1.07 *Results using Running Record exam

Results obtained using the MaxScholar software for students attending Levy Learning Center* *Levy Learning Center is a private learning center for special education students. (These include students with Dyslexia, Specific Learning Disabilities, ADHD, CAPD, ASD) (55% Caucasian, 28% African-American, 17% Latino-American) ** GORT-4 or WRAT4 Grade# of Students Hours of Tutoring using MaxScholar % making learning gains** % making >15% learning gains** Average Grade level improvement** K % 1gr, 1 mon % 2 gr, 2 mon % 2 gr, 8 mon % 3 gr, 5 mon

Results of 110 K Students who Received Decoding Instruction (MaxPhonics) Orton-Gillingham

Results of 644 Students (grades 2 -5) who used MaxScholar software Average beginning level of all students = 1.8 Average ending level of all students = 3.5 Average beginning level of all students = 0.9 Average ending level of all students = 3.2

Results of 218 Students (pre-K) who used MaxScholar Pre-K Phonics software