Chapter 407 Article _____ TND and TOD Proposed Amendments Board of County Commissioners June 25, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Liberty District Workshop Sacred Cowshands off! Significant historic structures Mildred Terry Library The Liberty Theater Places of Worship Ma Rainey.
Advertisements

City of Gulf Breeze Land Development Code Update
General Provisions Affordable Housing Signs Transfer of Development Rights 2009 ULDC Update September 8,
First step in the City Parking Study Changes.
Presentation to Suburban Councillors February 2015.
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) ARTICLE City of Columbus
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as collector roads and.
Jamesburg VPS Generating a Shared Vision for the Future JAMESBURG, NJ Public Meeting Visual Preference Survey.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Using LDRs to Implement Ped/Bike Change. LDRs – Land Development Regulations The collection of laws and regulations that govern the use of land, zoning,
Draft Zoning Code City Council Work Session June 21, 2007.
Community Development Department CP AND HG RESIDENTIAL LOTS, LLC AND CITY OF PALM COAST Settlement & Development Agreement.
Indian Trail Town Council Planning Board January 17, 2012.
City Council and P&Z Commission Joint Workshop Discussion of TOD Code April 2, 2009.
& Community Design LSU Green Laws Research Project Green Laws Louisiana Department of Agriculture & Forestry EBR Parish Tree And Landscape Commission Louisiana.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
PERFORMANCE & CODE ANALYSIS TIMBer Inc. ·Brooke Fedder · Marie Rottschaeffer· Izzie Molinuevo· Tena Pettit·
PC Meeting July 1, 2015 CUP 15-02/DR 15-06/DR
PALM COAST COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL CENTER – PHASE Application No. SP-MAJ
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
February 24, 2015 First Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15 
NBOZ Northlake Boulevard Overlay Zoning District Village of North Palm Beach Landscape Element Requirements.
Draft Zoning Code Planning Commission Work Session June 20, 2007.
SITE. Parcel will go from Medium Density Residential to medium high Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office/Business.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester July 9, 2012.
September 24,  Preliminary Development Plan  Location: North side of NW 39 th Avenue in the 8300 to 9099 block  Zoning Districts: R1-B, HM, PD,
ZOM Major Amendment to Arbor Greens PD. Overview Arbor Greens PD site +/- 152 ac Amendment request summary –Extension of buildout date from 2014.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
March 10, 2015 Second Public Hearing 1.  Workshop proposed ULDC changes: 1/27/15  Request to Advertise: 1/27/15  First Public Hearing: 2/24/15  Second.
ZOM Newberry/122 nd St. PD. Applicant Request Applicant is requesting a rezoning from RE-1 (single-family residential) to PD (non-residential planned.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
F O R W A R D L A P O R T E What are the city’s top 3 economic development priorities? n=300.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
RR Farms, LLC Presented by James Stowers, Esq. Wright, Casey & Stowers, P.L. --- Pioneer Square --- Pioneer Square.
Amendments to the Unified Land Development Code Section Multifamily Residential Requirements Section (d) – Planned Developments with Transfer.
June 9, 2015 Public Hearing 1.  NUE Urban Concepts, LLC on behalf of Celebration Pointe Holdings, LLC  Amendments to Chapter 404 Use Regulations Article.
Planning Commission Public Hearing: SUB Proposed 6-lot Subdivision at Bland Circle December 2, 2015.
Board of County Commissioners Second Public Hearing August 10, /10/
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER DRAFT MASTER PLAN Board of County Commissioners January 22, 2008.
Complete Streets Training
City of Dunnellon Comprehensive Plan Amendment  Future Land Use Element  Conservation Element  Concurrency Management System.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
City of Redmond: Northwest Redmond & U.S. Highway 97 Plan - October 11, 2006 What Makes a Great Neighborhood.
Community Meeting May 22, 2013 City of Richmond Department of Planning & Development Review.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
City of Ormond Beach Planning Board Workshop June 18, 2012 PMUD : Ormond Crossings Planned Mixed Use Development Rezoning.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus ALBRIGHT OFFICE PARK Planned Development PD Architecture and Site S Environmental.
The Planning & Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment Joint Workshop May 24, 2010 May 24, :00 P.M. 6:00 P.M.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Public Hearings D10, E11, F12 March 26, Today’s Public Hearings D C-TRAN-2 Comprehensive Plan amendment adoption E C-TRAN-1 Comprehensive.
Community Development Department Ryan’s Landing Planned Unit Development Application No
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
AR-315 BUILDING CODES & BYE LAWS
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
Creating Streetscapes With Conventional Zoning
Board of County Commissioners
Land Use 101: What is Zoning?
Section 8: SIGNS.
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 407 Article _____ TND and TOD Proposed Amendments Board of County Commissioners June 25,

Amount of Non-Residential Section (d) c. Allow TNDs in Urban Service Area to have up to 250 sq.ft. of non- residential per dwelling unit c. For TNDs within an urban service area, a maximum of 250 square feet per dwelling unit. Section (d)2. c. Allow TODs in USA to have up to 500 sq. ft. of non-residential per dwelling unit. c. For TODs within an urban service area, a maximum of 500 square feet per dwelling unit. 2

Residential Density for TODs Table Residential (Dwelling Units per Acre) 1,2 Village Center Minimum10 Maximum24 Maximum in USA48 Transit Supportive Area (outside Village Center) Minimum7 Maximum24 Outside Transit Supportive Area Minimum4 Maximum Maximum allowed under Future Land Use or 24 dwelling units per acre in non- residential Future Land Use designations 1.TODs less than 20 acres shall provide a minimum of 200 residential units 2.Up to fifty twenty-five percent (5025%) of the minimum required residential units may be met with rooms in a hotel. 3

Amount of Non-Residential  Section (f)  The number of rooms in a hotel and the number of bedrooms in student housing with separately rented rooms and shared living space may be used in calculating allowable non-residential square footage. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy

Table Village Center Dimensional Standards Standards Retail Use Non-residential, Mixed Use, or Multi-family Civic Use Other Non-residential, Hotel, Mixed Use, or Multi-family Build-to Line (ft.) Height, min (stories) Height, max (stories) Single Tenant Building footprint, max (sq ft) 50, ,000 40,000 1.The build-to line shall be established from the back of curb of a public or private street or pedestrian circulation areas where a building fronts a plaza, square of other open civic space. 2.If only 1 story, building façade shall use architectural features to enhance the vertical scale of the building. 3.Additional stories above the fifth shall be stepped back to enhance the pedestrian scale of the street. 4.Except as permitted by Section (d)2 5. Up to an additional 15’ may be added to the build-to-line to accommodate outdoor seating for uses such as cafes, bistros, coffee shops or restaurants. 5

Table Transit Supportive Area Dimensional Standards Standards Retail UseNon-residential, Mixed Use, or Multi- Civic Use Other Non-residential, Hotel, Mixed Use, or Multi-family Build-to Line (ft.) Height, min (stories) Height, max (stories) Single Tenant Building footprint, max (sq ft) 50, , ,000 1.The build-to line shall be established from the back of curb of the public or private street or pedestrian circulation areas where a building fronts a plaza, square of other open civic space. 2.If only 1 story, building façade shall use architectural features to enhance the vertical scale of the building. 3.Additional stories above the third shall be stepped back to enhance the pedestrian scale of the street. 4.Except as permitted by Section (d)2 5. Up to an additional 15’ may be added to the build-to-line to accommodate outdoor seating for uses such as cafes, bistros, coffee shops, restaurants. 6

Proposed Retail Language Section (d). 2.A single-tenant retail non-residential building may be allowed to exceed 50,000 square feet by providing one of the following: a. Separate liner buildings oriented toward the street on at least 3 sides of the building, with the rear of either fronting parking or lined by buildingsparking to the rear of the building or the rear of the building lined by other liner buildings; or b. Vertical mixture of uses with at least one story above the ground floor; or c. Multiple floors with a maximum of 50,000 square feet per floor; or d. Parking on the top, under or completely enclosed within the building; or e. Parking in front of the building provided all off-street surface parking and the side and rear of the building are screened from adjacent streets by liner buildings; or. f. A parking structure with at least one level above surface parking directly adjacent to the building and within the same block. Proposed changes are not consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy

Examples of Blocks with Large Retail picture 8

Examples picture 9

Allowed Non-Residential 1. Residential Areas in TNDs and TODs (a)Mix of Uses 1. A maximum of 10% 5% of the total approved non-residential square footage, not to exceed 100,000 square feet, may be located outside the Transit Supportive Area (TSA). 2. Civic uses (such as places of worship, libraries, schools, etc.) and live-work studios located outside the TSA shall be counted toward the maximum non- residential square footage of a development and toward the 105% allowed outside the TSA. 10

Table Residential Area Dimensional Standards Standards Single-family detached Single-family attached Multi-family and Non- residential Setbacks Front, minimum (ft.)10 5 Front, maximum (ft.) Side, interior (ft)5 N/A 10 Side, street (ft)10 Rear (ft)10 15 Building Standards Maximum lot coverage (%)70 80 Height, maximum (ft) Building footprint, max (sq ft) N/A 65,000 50,000 Single retail tenant size max (sq ft) N/A 25,00050,000* *Retail buildings may be allowed to exceed 50,000 sq.ft. consistent with § above. 11

Parking Structures Parking structures must comply with the architectural standards of this article and are encouraged to provide for active uses on the ground floor. Parking structures shall be designed to allow for commercial, office, civic or residential uses lining the structure on the ground floor where the parking structure abuts a street. The parking structure shall be designed to integrate seamlessly with surrounding development and shall provide pedestrian oriented design on the ground floor abutting a street Not consistent with FLUE Comprehensive Plan Policy that requires non-residential on the first floor of a structure. 12

Off-Street Parking Section (c) Parking 1. Off-street surface parking shall be located to the rear of buildings and interior central to the block. A minimum of 75% percent of the perimeter block length shall be lined by buildings, excluding access to off-street surface parking. Along any portion of a block not lined by buildings, off-street surface parking shall be located at least 4025feet from the back of curb. To screen the parking, between the back of curb and off-street parking, there shall be a sidewalk and a plaza with lighting, seating, architectural features, landscaping, low impact development techniques and 50 percent mature tree canopy at 20 years. 13

Picture of 25 feet from back of curb 14

Transitional Parking Applicant proposal: Up to three transitional parking spaces for TODS over 50 acres Transitional parking: an off-street parking lot that does not meet the design requirements of 75% of the block being lined by buildings. 50% of the street frontage of the initial transitional off-street parking area shall be lined by buildings prior to construction of the second and third transitional off-street parking area. Only one transitional parking area allowed by Future Land Use Element Comprehensive Plan Policy g 15

Staff’s Proposal TOD more than 100 acres in size allowed the one transitional parking area plus: one block with parking interior per every 100 acres where the block face is lined by buildings on 50% or greater of the block so long as there are buildings on 3 sides of the block face and at least one of the structures on the block is multistory. Off- street surface parking shall be setback at least 25 feet from the back of curb. To screen the parking, within the setback there shall be a sidewalk and a plaza with lighting, seating, architectural features, landscaping and 50 percent mature tree canopy at 20 years. Consistent with the Comprehensive Plan policy 16

Roadway Network Design Section (d) Roadway Network Design 1. e. Innovative traffic calming techniques, except along roadways identified on the Future Highways Functional Classification Map of the Comprehensive Plan, are allowed along roadways and at intersections within the development. Techniques may include raised intersections, woonerfs (streets where pedestrians and cyclists have legal priority using techniques including shared space, traffic calming and low speed limits), shared multi-modal spaces with reduced markings and signage in addition to other innovations that enhance pedestrian and bicycle mobility. For publicly-maintained roadways projected to carry more than 7,500 daily trips, traffic calming techniques shall be limited to horizontal deflections. 17

Table Bike Lanes 3. Bike lanes not adjacent to parallel parking may be reduced to 4’. Bike lanes are optional for nonthrough collector or arterial roadways between 2,500-7,500 ADT that are less than ¼ mile in length or interrupted with stop control at every intersection and are located within a TOD. 4.On-street parking is optional, but must be provided on the majority of streets. Provision of on-street parking shall be adequate to serve the proposed intensity of development in order that the required clearances for public safety vehicles are maintained. Angled parking is allowed on all roadways. Where on-street parallel parking is provided it must be marked at the width indicated in the table or greater. The gutter pan of curbs can be used to meet the minimum on-street parking widths. 5.Roadways with dedicated transit facilities located within the right-of-way shall be designed on a case-by-case basis and shall provide bicycle and pedestrian facilities and where practical, on-street parking. 18

Table Bike Lanes Staff’s proposed change to Note #3: 3. Bike lanes not adjacent to parallel parking may be reduced to 4’. Bike lanes are optional for roadways between 2,500-7,500 ADT that are less than ¼ mile in length or interrupted with stop control at intersections spaced no more than 660 feet apart and are located within a TOD 19

On Street Parking Section (d) Roadway Network Design 4.On Street Parking a. Defined on-street parking shall be provided on the majority of block faces within the Transit Supportive Area, and is allowed throughout the rest of the development. Bulb-outs and curb extensions shall be provided at a maximum interval of feet. For block faces less than 200 feet, a bulb-out shall be provided at both ends of the block face mid-block. 20

Utility Placement Section (d) Roadway Network Design 6. Utilities a. Underground utilities are to be compressed to minimize right- of-way width, allow adequate space for street trees and provide for the visual definition of the street. Appropriate utilities shall be allowed to be placed in joint trenches. b. All above ground utility access, transfer and conveyance points such as panels, boxes, meters, and valves shall be screened from the street and sidewalks through architectural features and / or landscaping c. Pressurized lines are allowed to be placed under roadways not shown on the Future Highway Functional Classifications Map of the Comprehensive Plan and on roadways projected to carry less than 15,000 daily trips 21

Alternative Buffering on I-75 Applicant proposing to allow: Separate buffering for non-residential uses to include either a 25 foot wide medium density buffer or stormwater management areas designed as open space Street trees on an adjacent road or trail can count towards the buffer Current Code requirement meets purposes of COSE Policies 5.3.3, 5.3.4, 5.3.5, all under Objective 5.3 Scenic Quality 22

Staff’s Proposed Buffering All TNDs and TODs shall provide a 25 foot wide Medium density buffer along the entire project boundary adjacent to the I-75 right-of-way consistent with §407.43(a). Screening shall not be required. Existing natural vegetation and street trees provided within an adjacent roadway or along a multi-use trail may be used to fulfill the landscaping requirement where such existing natural vegetation is of sufficient height or can be augmented to reach a sufficient height and opacity to provide an effective visual buffer. 23

Mitigation for Tree Canopy Required Plant Materials, Installation, Irrigation, and Maintenance a.All TODs and TNDs shall meet the requirements of § through § of this Chapter, except as provided in (b), (c), (d) and (e) below. b.Developments that sets aside areas for permanent conservation shall receive credit for the tree canopy saved in instances where a mitigation fee is required per ULDC (c). Credit shall be given only for tree canopy saved above the minimum required to be preserved per the mitigation requirements of ULDC (a) 3. Credit shall be determined either by a tree survey or at a rate of 55 inches per acre conserved. c.Developments shall have the right to spend 20% of the mitigation fee per ULDC (c) on vegetation used in conjunction with LID techniques within conservation areas, roadway medians, along multi-use paths, tree islands, open spaces or parking areas. Invoices shall be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect and the cost of vegetation shall not exceed industry standard. 24

Mitigation for Tree Canopy d.Developments shall have the right to spend 20% of the mitigation fee per ULDC (c) on vegetation used on green roofs within the development for buildings designed to be LEED certified. Invoices shall be signed and sealed by a registered landscape architect and the cost of vegetation shall not exceed industry standard. e.For multi-phase projects tree mitigation per ULDC per shall be achieved prior to proceeding to the next phase consistent with the phasing schedule adopted as part of an approved preliminary development plan. For development within the last approved phase, tree mitigation shall occur in accordance with ULDC (c). 25

Recommendation Approve the ordinance amending Chapter 407, Article 7 Traditional Neighborhood Development and Transit Oriented Developments with amendments as proposed by staff found in Exhibit A of the ordinance. 26