The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAC Meeting May 20, 2008 Computer Modeling of Impacts.
Advertisements

Radiation Protection Legislation Stephen McCallum
David Copplestone (University of Stirling). Whats the issue? Obtaining air concentrations for noble gases Estimating doses to wildlife from noble gases.
Juan Carlos Mora, Beatriz Robles, David Cancio Departamento de Medio Ambiente, CIEMAT, Avenida Complutense 22, Madrid CROM CODE Código de cRiba para.
Integrated Assessment Working group or coordinated activity?
David Copplestone CEH Lancaster 1 st – 3 rd April 2014.
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board EMRAS II – Working.
Dose Assessments for Wildlife in England & Wales.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Risk-Based Regulation.
PROTECTFP Terrestrial Assessment Comparison of human and non human dose assessments for prospective new nuclear power stations.
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl European Commission DG Energy and Transport.
RADIOACTIVE DISCHARGES CONTROL JE Jan Horyna State Office for Nuclear Safety Czech Republic September 2009 Vienna.
PROTECTFP Work Package 1:- results from questionnaire and overview of tools for chemical assessment.
PROTECTFP CEH, UK (Co-ordinator) SSI, Sweden IRSN, France NRPA, Norway EA, England & Wales.
Experiences from testing the ERICA Integrated Approach Case study application of the ERICA Tool and D-ERICA.
Environmental Health XIV. Standards and Monitoring Shu-Chi Chang, Ph.D., P.E., P.A. Assistant Professor 1 and Division Chief 2 1 Department of Environmental.
History of waste disposal. 2 J.H. Saling and A.W. Fentiman, “Radioactive Waste Management,” Second Edition, (Taylor & Francis, NY  London) 2002.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
30 September 2008BRMF & SAFESPUR, Radioactive v Non-Radioactive Contamination 1 Regulatory Framework for Contaminated Land on Nuclear and Other Radioactively.
Environmental Protection Waste Safety Section, Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety Department of Nuclear Safety and Security.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Workshop on the Safe Disposal of Low Level Radioactive Waste WG3 debriefing.
Introduction to the ERICA Tool Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
Working Group 1 Reference and Graded Approaches for Assessing the Impact of Radioactive Discharges.
We are the Environment Agency. It’s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place – for you, and for future generations. The Environment.
Safety Assessment Methodologies and Implementation of Monitoring and Control Programmes Dr. Japie van Blerk AquiSim Consulting (Pty) Ltd Wednesday, 24.
THE OFFSHORE SITUATION IN GREECE Municipality of Corfu.
International Atomic Energy Agency IX.4.5. Control of effluents Approach to regulatory control, establishing authorized discharge levels.
Comparison of Risk Assessment for Radioactive and Chemical Contaminants Similarities, Differences and Scope for Comparison BRMF/SAFESPUR Workshop, 30 September.
TREE project, Challenges and Future Updates Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Roger Seitz Addressing Future Human Actions for Safety Assessment Summary from CSM on Human Action And Intrusion.
The Contaminated Land Regulations – Consolidated Review 21 September 2005 Craig Edwards.
IAEA Technical Meeting on Future Human Actions at Disposal Sites IAEA, Vienna, Austria September 24-28, 2012 Overview of NRC Approach to Human Intrusion.
BIOPROTA Biosphere modelling for waste repositories This presentation Objectives Participation and management What it has done and publications Projects.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations Assessment and Response during Radiological Emergency Dose Assessment Overview Lecture IAEA.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Legislation.
Centre for Radiation, Chemical and Environmental Hazards Radiation Protection Division formerly the National Radiological Protection Board Environmental.
Intervention for Chronic and Emergency Exposure Situations General Principles and Types of Events Prolonged (Chronic) Radiation Exposure Lecture IAEA Post.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
Regulation of Discharges of Nuclear Facilities in Ukraine Iurii Bonchuk Radiation Protection Institute Kiev, Ukraine EMRAS II - Reference.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Regulations Part III: Radiation Protection Performance Requirements Day 8 – Lecture 5(3)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Dr. Abraham Gregorio de Rosa,Sp.Rad Radiologist in HNGV Dili, Timor Leste 2 Perspectives on regulatory models.
Modelling noble gases Radiation Protection of the Environment (Environment Agency Course, July 2015)
DOE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP BIOTA PROTECTION Stephen L. Domotor (202)
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on the Demonstration of Operational and Long Term Safety of Predisposal Management Facilities.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 1.3. The role.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
EAN NORM Workshop European ALARA Network for NORM November Dresden Effluents in some Italian NORM industries Flavio Trotti, Elena Caldognetto.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM Technical Meeting to Discuss Human Intrusion and Future Human Actions in relation to Disposal of Radioactive.
PROTECTFP Recommendations of Work Package 1 David Copplestone.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Radiation protection of the public IAEA Regional Training Course on Radiation Protection of patients for Radiographers,
THE RADIATION SAFETY IN A “DAILY LIFE” Introduction Volodymyr Berkovskyy.
Radiological impacts from nuclear industrial facilities on the public and the environment : Their magnitude and the next 50 years forecast Sylvain Saint-Pierre.
EUROPEAN ALARA NETWORK
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
 Progress with the revision and consolidation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive Stefan Mundigl, Vesa Tanner European Commission DG Energy.
The European Union Basic Safety Standards on Natural Radiation Sources
Update on New Federal Guidance for Dose and Risk Assessment
Basic Safety Standards Directive (BSSD)
The pathological effects of ionising radiation
SAFETY AND SITTING ASSESSMENT FOR NPPs DEPLOYMENT IN INDONESIA
Sellafield Discharges and Environmental Monitoring 2017
Introduction: IAEA activities / Documents on human intrusion
Presentation to the Environmental Health Sub-committee – November 2015
Presentation to the Environmental Health Sub-committee – November 2016
Presentation to the Environmental Health Sub-committee – November 2013
Safety requirements for predisposal management
Presentation transcript:

The UK Approach - the Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Laura Newsome Scientist – Environment Agency September 2009

Structure Background to UK situation The Environment Agency’s responsibilities Summary of Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Answers to questions

Who does what in the UK?

Legislation for UK regulation Radioactive Substances Act 1993 Euratom Basic Safety Standards Directive 1996 Ionising Radiation Regulations 1999 Radioactive Substances (Basic Safety Standards) (England and Wales) Direction 2000 Principles document 2002

Summary of criteria for public exposure Public dose limit future and historical discharges and future direct radiation from the site and other sources excluding medical and natural 1.0 mSv/yr Site constraint future discharges from a site with more than one operator 0.5 mSv/yr Source constraint future discharges and future direct radiation from a facility or group of facilities 0.3 mSv/yr Threshold of optimisation future discharges and future direct radiation from a facility 0.02 mSv/yr Potentially of no regulatory concern future discharges and future direct radiation from a facility <0.01 mSv/yr

Who do we regulate?

How do we regulate discharges? Use of permit system under RSA 93. Part of permit determination involves radiological assessment Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology is used to complete prospective assessments and set authorisation limits Spreadsheet based tool Easy to use Cautious but consistent assumptions PC CREAM used for detailed site assessments

Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology 100 radionuclides Critical Group – members of the public Seven different groups of the public Four age groups (offspring, infant, child, adult) Releases via air, estuary/coastal water, river/stream, public sewer

Example model – release to air Exposure Group Exposure PathwaysDefault model assumptions Release to air Local resident family Inhalation of radionuclides in the effluent plume Release at ground level Local resident is located 100m from the release point Food is produced at a distance of 500m from the release point External irradiation from radionuclides in the effluent plume and deposited on the ground Consumption of terrestrial food incorporating radionuclides deposited to the ground

Initial Radiological Assessment Methodology Dose Per Unit Release (DPUR) Assessment of continuous uniform releases Dose assessed in 50 th year of release Ingrowth of progeny included if significant ingrowth likely to occur in 50 year period Also includes assessment to non-human biota

Initial Radiological Assessment Tool

Critical group <0.02 mSv/yr Critical group >0.02 & <0.3 mSv/yr Critical group <0.02 mSv/yr Critical group >0.02 & <0.3 mSv/yr Critical group >0.3 mSv/yr Step by step method Refine assessment or undertake site specific assessment Further refinements or site specific assessment Initial source assessment - simple & cautious assessment of critical group dose Refine assessment more realistic by using scaling factors and habits data Permit may be acceptable on RP grounds. Permit unlikely to be acceptable on RP grounds Critical group >0.3 mSv/yr No further assessment required on Radiation Protection grounds. Permit likely to be acceptable. Critical group >0.02 & <0.3 mSv/yr

Limitations Inflexible - fixed locations and critical groups Conservative approach – overestimation Not suitable for < 1yr releases Does not apply to the disposal of radioactive waste to land or discharge to lakes Dose Per Unit Release factors are not appropriate for the direct external radiation dose pathway

Answers to questions that I haven’t yet covered Transfer co-efficients Databases of PC CREAM Standard compilations such as IAEA TRS & ICRP publications Other robust compilations Scaling, analogues, one-off analytical calculations Atmospheric modelling DPUR for atmosphere derived using PC CREAM Gaussian plume model Most parameters fixed

Thank you