Presentation for Master students, UIO April 25th , 2007

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GENERAL INSURANCE POLICIES
Advertisements

Marine Cargo Loss Payment (Partial Loss)
GLOBAL RISK GLOBAL COVERAGE
AIDA XIV World Congress 2014 Rom, 30 th September 2014 Marine Insurance WP “Sue and labour expenses – H&M on German terms or P&I?” Dr. Maximilian Guth,
Completion Outstanding work and Remedying Defects In order that the Works and Contractor's Documents, and each Section, shall be in the condition required.
Virtual Arrival an Initiative by Shipping to reduce GHG emission Singapore 8 may 2012 Senior Manager Research & Projects INTERTANKO.
Subrogation under Japanese Law
NEGLIGENCE AND THE CASUALTY How relevant in the real world? NIGEL CHAPMAN 28th October 2005.
Insurance Law CHAPTER 19.
1 Keys for Chapter 5 Keys for Chapter 5 1. Do you think the insurance company should pay the claim to the insured? Why? Yes, the insurance company should.
York Antwerp Rules 2004 Progress or problems for Underwriters and Shipowners? Tim Madge FAAA - Partner Mediterranean Average Adjusting Company Marine Law.
RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE SHIPPING INDUSTRY M Jagannath 11 th May 2015.
Click your mouse anywhere on the screen to advance the text in each slide. After the starburst appears, click a blue triangle to move to the next slide.
Fair Premiums, Insurability of Risk and Contractual Provisions
Costs, Revenue and Cashflow
IAS 2 - INVENTORIES. 2 Objective and Scope OBJECTIVE: The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment for inventories. SCOPE:
P A R T P A R T Property Personal Property and Bailments Real Property Landlord and Tenant Estates and Trusts Insurance Law 5 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Business.
RISK MANAGEMENT FOR ENTERPRISES AND INDIVIDUALS Chapter 9 Fundamental Doctrines Affecting Insurance Contracts.
SHIP AND LIABILITY – an introduction to Norwegian Maritime Law
Marine Builders’ Risks –
Reinsurance By Roar Rasten Gard AS
9 - 1 COPYRIGHT © 2008 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Ltd Chapter 9 – Protecting Your Property.
Maritime Claims An Underwriter ’ s Perspective Eamonn Magee LLB. BL.
Recent Hull Claim Trends The cause of recent claim trends: Crew, congestion and harder trade, or purely a matter of inflation? Astrid Seltmann CEFOR Analyst/Actuary.
P&I AND MARINE INSURANCE
QUE:- policy conditions, premium calculation and marine losses.
Follow the Fortunes Clauses in Reinsurance Law – Practical Problems in Ensuring their Effectiveness Ralph Fearnhead.
Svein Bergstad Director of Risk & Insurance, Seadrill Management
TITLE of the Slide UNITAS ISM Code Module IV Training Material.
Dublin International Marine Claims Conference - 29th September / 1st October 2004 INTERNATIONAL MARINE CLAIMS CONFERENCE CLAIMS HANDLING FRENCH MARKET.
Energy Loss Scenario based on the Nordic Marine Insurance Plan 2013 London 13 July 2015.
Loss of Hire Anna F. Erlandsen – Norwegian Hull Club Oslo, 8th November 2013 The Nordic Association of Marine Insurers.
The Norwegian Marine Insurance Plan
LOSS OF HIRE Presentation for Master students, UIO March 28th, 2007 Advokat Haakon Stang Lund.
Copyright © 2004 McGraw-Hill Ryerson Limited 1 PART 5 – SPECIAL CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS  Chapter 25 – Insurance Law Prepared by Douglas H. Peterson,
Is It Worth It? The Cost of Insurance. Insurance Terms Premium Deductible Underwriting.
MARINE INSURANCE.
IMCC Dublin 2015 Scandinavian approach to large casualties By Ivar Brynildsen, VP Gard AS.
Dr Özlem Gürses University of Southampton
INSURANCE FOR HOUSEHOLDS MR. KEANE. INSURANCE COMPANY LOGO QUIZ
DUTY OF THE ASSURED Prepared by: Ms. Norazimah Mazlan.
ANNUITIES AND POLICY CONDITION OF LIFE INSURANCE.
What happens next An educational comedy in one act 1.
MEMBER MEETING 13 & 16 DECEMBER 2014 OSLO & BERGEN.
Marine Claims – Loss of Hire NMIP Chapter 16 By Sveinung Måkestad, Vice President, Gard AS The Nordic Association of Marine Insurers 1.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 17/10/12 HULL & MACHINERY INSURANCE LECTURER: MR ZARIR YUSOFF.
Copyright  2003 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd. PPTs t/a Fundamentals of Business Law 4e by Barron & Fletcher. Slides prepared by Kay Fanning. Copyright.
Lars Carlsson Athens, 25 October Shipowners role in the Safety Chain.
Market Structure The Nordic Association of Marine Insurers.
1 Introduction to Risk and Insurance. 2 Basic Terminology Risk Risk - not just uncertainty of financial loss; - possibility of deviation between actual.
-CHARTERPARTIES- INTRODUCTION
SHIPPING COMPANY EONOMICS Costs and revenues from running a ship Marina Zanne, M.Sc.
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR INTEREST IN A SALE CONTRACT Focus on what you “get” when you sign!
Costs, Revenue and Cashflow
Chapter 2 Insurance and Risk
Part II: Insurance in Business
Questions to Consider What is the difference between Insurance and assurance? Please use an example in your answer. Explain the 5 principles of insurance?
The Standard Club P&I Cover for Offshore Operations 25 October 2016.
Eastern Mediterranean University
GLOBAL RISK GLOBAL COVERAGE
NEGLIGENCE AND THE CASUALTY
Carriage of goods by sea - framework
nordic plan: insuring the special needs of MOUs and their construction
HULL & MACHINERY INSURANCE LECTURER: MR ZARIR YUSOFF
general average Dr. Iva Savić
Chapter4 MARINE INSURANCE.
GLOBAL RISK GLOBAL COVERAGE
The Sue and Labour Clauses – intention to save the subject matter insured Dr Özlem Gürses University of Southampton.
Data source: LRFairplay
7. Measures to avert or minimize loss
Presentation transcript:

Presentation for Master students, UIO April 25th , 2007 LOSS OF HIRE Presentation for Master students, UIO April 25th , 2007

”Experience is something you don’t get until just after you need it”

Risk assessment Protection of Income. Financial peace of mind. How vulnerable to off hire is your organisation? Trade and c/p Fleet size, vessel type Clients, reputation Financing Damage to the vessel and loss of earnings is easily identified. Total costs will be much higher. LOH helps to minimise your total exposure to an accident.

If only… M/V “Sorry Sailor” Collision, 75% liability. No LOH cover Potential recovery with LOH: Off hire: 90 days Deductible: 14 days Net claim: 76 days 76days @ USD 20 000 = USD 1 520 000

Choice of cover? Basic covers e.g.14/90/90; 14/120/120; 14/270/270. Minimum deductible is 14 days (21 for passenger and cruise vessels). Excess covers – more catastrophic e.g. 45/90/90, 104/180/80 etc. The risk appetite of the buyer together with prevailing market conditions will determine the preferred basis of cover. Additional deductible days against machinery damage are common for older vessels e.g. 14(21)/90/90.

Minimising “off hire time” The assured and the insurer have a common interest in minimising time “off hire”. In order to reduce “off hire time” we will work closely with the assured and seek workable solutions based on: Experience and knowledge from similar cases. Creativity and innovation.

Use of available resources Gas carrier Towage by Offshore supply vessel Towage from Bahamas to El Ferrol 10-29 April

Crude oil tanker – 159.000 dwt, double hull Grounding in Suez Crude oil tanker – 159.000 dwt, double hull The Canal cross-sections are trapezoidal in shape, having side slopes of 3/1. Width between buoys: 222 mts Abt. 40 mts from port bank

Repair at Daewoo (Mangalia) Shipyard in Romania, arr. 31. 03 Repair at Daewoo (Mangalia) Shipyard in Romania, arr. 31.03.04 Steel price USD 2,75 / kg – 48 days repair Web frame Longitudinals

The bill.. H&M: ( 100% ) USD 3.200.000 LOH: ( 60-14 days @ 40 000) USD 1.840.000

Example 2005 built UCC, 91.410grt, Collision ”Difficult to get dry dock…….due to draft restrictions and stricter yard policy” Estimated repair days 152 D.I. $30.000; basis 14/120/120 Substitute vessel D.I. $40.000……

Example 1996 built TCR, 156.852grt, Grounding Challenge to find available yards in the FE for final repairs. Severe damages to bottom hull after the grounding incident. 4 months is calculated for completion of repairs. D.I.$50.000; basis 60/120/120

Example LNG Carrier (1973) damage to main gear vulnerable and vital trade the assured urgently needs the ship back in trade

The challenge Old LNG (1973) – No new main gear in stock One year production time LNG urgently required for trade

NMIP §16-11 – The solution provider Buy an old tanker, take out the gear and use it as a spare part. Charter an Antonov transport airplane and bring the gear from US West Coast to Europe as quick as possible. Pay bonuses and overtime to working staff at yard in order to further reduce “off hire” time “Costs incurred in order to save time”

M/T VLCC – Lack of docking facilities (2006/2007) July 2006 . Grounded Dalian, China Fully loaded with crude oil 276.110 t crude Repairs completed Singapore 10th December 2006 Off-hire days 137 days Loss of income USD 13.700.000,- Repair period Singapore 51 days (USD 5.100.000,-)

Lack of docking facilities WW&FE June 2006 Explosion / fire in cargo tank South China Sea

§ 16-1 Blocking and trapping The insurance also covers loss due to the ship being wholly or partially deprived of income: … (b) because it is prevented by physical obstruction (other than ice) from leaving a port or a similar limited area,

LOSS OF HIRE INSURANCE NORWEGIAN MARINE INSURANCE PLAN 1996 ”THE PLAN”

THE PLAN MARINE INSURANCE CONTRACT CONTAINS ALL MAJOR MARINE INSURANCE TYPES, EXCEPT P&I AGREED DOCUMENT INTERNATIONALLY ACCEPTED BUILT ON ”ALL RISK” PRINCIPLE

THE PLAN - CONTENTS PART 1: GENERAL CLAUSES PART 2: HULL & MACINERY CLAUSES PART 3: OTHER MARINE INSURANCES LOSS OF HIRE – CHAPTER 16 PART 4: OTHER INSURANCES BUILDING RISKS, OFFSHORE ETC.

INVOLVED PARTIES SHIPOWNER LOSS OF HIRE UNDERWRITER BROKER

IMPORTANT ISSUES FOR OWNERS Duty of disclosure - §3-1 Alteration of risk - §3-8 Classification Clause - §3-14 Trading limits - §3-15 Safety Regulations - §3-22 Measures to avert loss - §§3-29 – 3-31 Notification of claims - §5-23 Main rule: 6 months time bar

Claims And Claims Leader Chapter 5 deals with settlement of claims Chapter 9 deals with the claims leader’s role and power to bind the co-insurers In the Norwegian market the claims are dealt with directly between the assured and the claims leader who normally prepares the adjustment The role of the broker

HULL & MACHINERY VS.LOSS OF HIRE POLICY Independent policy INSURED PERILS SCOPE OF COVER LOSS OF HIRE POLICY Independent policy REF. THE PLAN §16-1 AND THE POLICY WORDING

HOW IS LOSS OF HIRE TRIGGERED? HULL & MACHINERY POLICY Main policy SETS OUT THE SCOPE OF COVER LOSS OF HIRE POLICY Subsidiary policy FOLLOW ACTUAL H&M SCOPE OF COVER

§16-1 Scope of Insurance The insurance covers loss due to the vessel being wholly or partially deprived of income as a consequence of damage to the vessel which is recoverable under the terms of the Plan.……… Reference to Plan chapter 10-12 can be waived by way of written agreement by the insurer, and be replaced by the provisions of the actual H&M conditions.

What Is Covered? Time loss as a consequence of damages which are recoverable as per the actual H&M conditions Level of deductible is irrelevant for the question of cover Exceptions from the condition of damage: If the vessel has stranded Prevented by physical obstructions……other than ice As a consequence of measures taken to salvage or remove damaged cargo

§16-2 Total and Compromised Total Loss No loss of hire will be compensated: In total loss situations Constructive total loss situations

§16-3 Main Rule for Calculating Allowable Time Loss of time – The time the vessel has been deprived of income Daily amount - Net loss of income per day Normally assessed daily amount Calculation - Lost time x daily amount per day Time start running earliest at the time of damage Ballast voyage before commencement of the laden voyage a damage occur is not recoverable

§16-4 Calculation of the Loss of Time Days, hours and minutes Partially loss of time: To be converted into corresponding total loss of income

Other relevant issues Daily amount - §16-5 Assessed daily amount - §16-6 Deductible period - §16-7 Survey of damage - §16-8 Choice of repair yard - §16-9

§16-10 Removal to the Repair Yard Time lost during removal of the vessel to and from repair yard, shall be attributed to the class of repairs that necessitated the removal Important: A main rule principle apply to the removal time No apportionment in the deductible period

Example of removal time VLCC sustain main engine damage on laden voyage from Sullom Voe to Canada. Towed to Rotterdam for repairs. Removal time from damage position to yard 8 days. Repair time 28. ” of which Owners work 10 days. and damage repair work 28 days. Removal time from yard to damage position 4 ”__. Total time lost 40 days. Conclusion: The removal time will be paid by LOH in full.

Example of removal time 2) VLCC on ballast voyage from Japan to AG deviate to Bahrain for maintenance work. At the same time deferred damage repairs are being carried out. Removal time from deviation position to yard 1 day. Repair time 28. ” of which Owners work 10 days. and damage repair work 16. ” Removal time from yard to deviation point 1. ” Total time lost 30 days. Conclusion: The removal time will be paid by Owners in full.

§16-11 Costs incurred to save time Extraordinary costs or extraordinary measures taken for the purpose of preventing loss of time covered by the insurance, is paid by LOH if such costs are not paid by H&M Must be extraordinary - and must save time Owners must carry pro rata share of costs, if time is also save for the Owner Example: Repair time 16 days reduced to 12 by way of overtime With a deductible of 14 days do Owner / LOH share the overtime cost 50/50 In this respect is LOH subsidiary to H&M

§16-12 Simultaneous Repairs What is simultaneous repairs? Two or more classes of work are carried out at the same time Contrary to a main rule principle, this clause establish an apportionment principle

§16-12 Simultaneous Repairs In legal terms a special rule of causation As a starting point a rule to split time equal between Owners and LOH underwriter Owners work are put into three categories: a) Classification work b) Work necessary for the seaworthiness of the vessel, or carried out to fulfil contractual obligations, or reconstruction work c) Other Owners work that necessitate a separate stay at the yard Work under a) and b) above share time 50/50 with recoverable time, but c) only share days in excess of 30 days.

Simultaneous repairs § 16-12 7 14 21 28 35 Compensation Maintenance Owners Class Work Average work Deductible

Case Study – Gas Al Kuwait 21.09.99: Rudder damages – Repairs at Keppel, Singapore Damage repairs 30 days Deductible 14 ”_ Time in excess of deductible 16 days Common repairs for Owners class / Seaworthiness related work 8 ”_ Recoverable time paid by LOH underwriter 8 days

§16-12, 1. Subparagraph

§ 16-12, 2. Subparagraph Two casualties are being carried out simultaneously If the deductible period run parallel for the two cases, then the period thereafter is being covered equal 50/50 If deductible periods do not run parallel, the rule of simultaneous repairs should apply when only one deductible still run, i.e.. 50/50 Owners and LOH

§16-12, 2. Subparagraph

§16-12, 3. Subparagraph Two Casualties – Two Policies

§16-12, 3. Subparagraph Two Casualties – Two Policies Plus Class

§16-12, 4. Subparagraph When calculating time as if carried out separately Counts from the day the work started All work is consider to start upon the vessels arrival at the repair yard – except when: Damage occur in the dock Unknown damage is being discovered in dock What is the situation when the various classes of work interfere with each others? Example…….

§16-12, 4. Subparagraph, Last Sentence

§16-13 Loss of time after completion of repairs Main rule: No recovery 3 exception: Time lost until the vessel can resume engagement under freight contract in force at time of casualty Liner service in fixed schedule Removal to first port to take cargo fixed before the casualty occurred.

§16-14 Repairs Carried Out After Expiry of the Insurance Period Time limit to carry out repairs is 2 years after expiry of the policy period Actual loss is being recovered if repairs commence after expiry of the policy period, ref. §16-5

§16-16 Rule of Subrogation LOH have the right of subrogation: Against Owners for costs to loss of time and operating costs paid by H&M underwriters Similar costs allowed in general average

Casualty Examples Vessel Basis D.I. Incident Days Off Hire Claim 1992 TCR 153.000grt 14/60/60 $80.000 Main Engine Breakdown 45 $2.480.000 1994 BBU 76.000grt $40.000 Grounding 22 $320.000 1999 BBU 87.000grt $25.000 34 $540.000 1999 GGC 13.000grt 14/90/90 $28.000 57 $1.596.000 1996 OSY 3.700grt NOK125.000 Fire 48 NOK4.250.000 2000 UCC 65.000grt $26.000 24 $260.000 2001 TCR 136.000grt $50.000 $500.000 2003 LNG 91.000grt 14/300/300 €77.000 Cargo Tank Insulation 63 €3.773.000