Status of Candidate Processes (Part 1) OptionPhaseOrderDateComments FV core00Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Dilute parcel01Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Convection02Fall 2007CAM.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An overview of recent CAM developments Contributors: Chris Bretherton, Bill Collins, Andrew Conley, Brian Eaton, Andrew Gettelman, Steve Ghan, Cécile Hannay,
Advertisements

Simulating cloud-microphysical processes in CRCM5 Ping Du, Éric Girard, Jean-Pierre Blanchet.
Boundary Layer Clouds & Sea Spray Steve Siems, Yi (Vivian) Huang, Luke Hande, Mike Manton & Thom Chubb.
1D Dice Experiment at Meteo-France and LES preliminary result E. Bazile, I. Beau, F. Couvreux and P. Le Moigne (CNRM/GAME) DICE Workshop Exeter October.
Evaluating parameterized variables in the Community Atmospheric Model along the GCSS Pacific cross-section during YOTC Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
WMO International Cloud Modeling Workshop, July 2004 A two-moment microphysical scheme for mesoscale and microscale cloud resolving models Axel Seifert.
The Problem of Parameterization in Numerical Models METEO 6030 Xuanli Li University of Utah Department of Meteorology Spring 2005.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Aggregated Convection and the Regulation of Tropical Climate Kerry Emanuel Program in Atmospheres, Oceans, and Climate MIT.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
The Non-Local Scheme in CAM3 Michael A. Brunke. introduction surface layer outer layer free atmosphere h 0.1h 0 z PBL.
ARM Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program. 2 Improve the performance of general circulation models (GCMs) used for climate research and prediction.
Why are we here, at the UCLA Conf. Center in June 2005? What is the best way of representing the physics of the atmospheric PBL in weather and climate.
Clouds and Climate: Forced Changes to Clouds SOEE3410 Ken Carslaw Lecture 4 of a series of 5 on clouds and climate Properties and distribution of clouds.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
The Hurricane Weather Research & Forecasting (HWRF) Prediction System Next generation non-hydrostatic weather research and hurricane prediction system.
Observational Needs for Testing Global Model Parameterizations Andrew Gettelman, NCAR Thanks to: J. Kiehl, W. Collins, P. Rasch.
Science Perspective and Status William D. Collins Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory ACME Chief Scientist And the ACME Project Team.
Jerold Herwehe 1, Kiran Alapaty 1, Chris Nolte 1, Russ Bullock 1, Tanya Otte 1, Megan Mallard 1, Jimy Dudhia 2, and Jack Kain 3 1 Atmospheric Modeling.
NCAR’s CFMIP/COSP contact
Predictability of Seasonal Prediction Perfect prediction Theoretical limit (measured by perfect model correlation) Actual predictability (from DEMETER)
Introduction to Atmospheric Climate Modeling (CAM within CCSM) Phil Rasch.
Marine organic matter in sea spray Nd vs. SO4, binned into low-OM, intermediate OM, and high-OM groups Adding marine organic matter as a source into ACME.
CAM 4 Update Phil Rasch The plan – What is happening over the next 2.5 days – Review of progress over last year – What remains to be done before CAM4 –
Progress on Application of Modal Aerosol Dynamics to CAM Xiaohong Liu, Steve Ghan, Richard Easter, Rahul Zaveri, Yun Qian (Pacific Northwest National.
Arctic Cloud Biases in CCSM3 Steve Vavrus Center for Climatic Research University of Wisconsin.
CCSM3.5+ Coupled Experiments Rich Neale Phil Rasch, Cecile Hannay, Jon Wolfe, Steve Yeager.
Aerosols in WRF-CHEM Eric Stofferahn George Mason University _07:00:00 (UTC)
© Crown copyright Met Office The Role of Research Aircraft in YOPP Chawn Harlow, YOPP Summit, WMO, Geneva 13 July 2015.
Morrison/Gettelman/GhanAMWG January 2007 Two-moment Stratiform Cloud Microphysics & Cloud-aerosol Interactions in CAM H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR),
State of the Community Climate System Model Peter Gent Chairman CCSM Scientific Steering Committee.
CCSM Tutorial CCSM Software Engineering Group June
AMWG Breakout, CCSM Workshop June 25, 2002 Overview of CAM status and simulations Bill Collins and Dave Randall National Center for Atmospheric Research.
Scientific Plan Introduction –History of LBA Background –Definition of Amazon –7 Themes with achievements Motivation for Phase II –Unresolved questions.
A Global Atmospheric Model Joe Tribbia NCAR Turbulence Summer School July 2008.
© Crown copyright Met Office Uncertainties in the Development of Climate Scenarios Climate Data Analysis for Crop Modelling workshop Kasetsart University,
Yuqing Wang and Chunxi Zhang International Pacific Research Center University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Physical Feedbacks Mike Steele Polar Science Center University of Washington Steve Vavrus Center for Climatic Research University of Wisconsin Co-Chairs:
Andrew Conley¹², Mike Iacono¹³, Bill Collins¹², Brian Eaton², Phil Rasch², Francis Vitt², Pat Worley², Jean-Francois Lamarque¹², And Many Others ¹ Supported.
Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment, Part II: Multi-layered cloud GCSS.
Using WRF-Chem to understand interactions between synoptic and microphysical variability during VOCALS Rhea George, Robert Wood University of Washington.
Module 6 MM5: Overview William J. Gutowski, Jr. Iowa State University.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Cloud Object Analysis and Modeling of Cloud-Aerosol Interactions and Cloud Feedbacks with the Combined CERES and CALIPSO Data Kuan-Man Xu NASA Langley.
Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM and MIRAGE Steve Ghan Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Jean-Francois Lamarque, Peter Hess, and Francis Vitt, NCAR.
Update on progress with the implementation of a new two-moment microphysics scheme: Model description and single-column tests Hugh Morrison, Andrew Gettelman,
The Third Indirect Aerosol-Cloud Effect: Global Model Sensitivity and Restrictions Hans-F. Graf and Frank J. Nober EGS-AGU-ESF meeting Nice, April 2003.
CCSM AMWG Meeting June 25, 2003 Status of CAM Bill Collins and Leo Donner National Center for Atmospheric Research and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory.
To Connect to Wireless Network Boot up with wifi enabled, no encryption Open browser, go to or
12 th annual CMAS conference Impact of Biomass Burning Aerosols on Regional Climate over Southeast US Peng Liu, Yongtao Hu, Armistead G. Russell, Athanasios.
WG 3: plans for next year COSMO General Meeting 23 September 2005 Marco Arpagaus.
(Very) Last updates of the Liu-Penner parametrization in Hirlam. (and of the KF -scheme) Karl-Ivar-Ivarsson, Aladin/ Hirlam all staff meeting Norrköping.
Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM A. Gettelman (NCAR), F. Vitt (NCAR), P. Hess (Cornell) H. Morrison (NCAR), P. R. Field (Met Office), S.J. Ghan (PNNL)
Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,
Status of CAM, March 2004 Phil Rasch. Differences between CAM2 and CAM3 (standard physics version) Separate liquid and ice phases Advection, sedimentation.
Ronald J Stouffer October 2015
Putting the Clouds Back in Aerosol-Cloud Interactions
SEASONAL PREDICTION OVER EAST ASIA FOR JUNE-JULY-AUGUST 2017
H. Morrison, A. Gettelman (NCAR) , S. Ghan (PNL)
Discussion of Radiation
Multiscale aspects of cloud-resolving simulations over complex terrain
Chemistry-Climate Working Group Update
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
Latest Development on Modal Aerosol Formulation and Indirect Effects
Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG.
A. Gettelman, X. Liu, H. Morrison, S. Ghan
Short Term forecasts along the GCSS Pacific Cross-section: Evaluating new Parameterizations in the Community Atmospheric Model Cécile Hannay, Dave Williamson,
Recent CCSM development simulations: Towards CCSM4
CAM 4 Update Phil Rasch The plan Agenda and minor changes
Presentation transcript:

Status of Candidate Processes (Part 1) OptionPhaseOrderDateComments FV core00Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Dilute parcel01Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Convection02Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Revised def of sfc albedo03Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Conv Mom. Trans04Fall 2007CAM 3.5 Predicted Greenhouse Gases1Safe, a little more expensive Morrison /Gettelman Microphysics 1* if we ignore AIE Interaction with UW, Indirect effect, and ice are remaining areas to be resolved, AIE depends on aerosol module choice. New Bulk Aerosols (predicted or prescribed) 1Safe, but may be replaced by modal aerosols, influences the AIE Flux Averaging1Safe, no brainer Polar Filtering1Minimal effect I hope Phase 1: Could be “finished anytime” Phase 2: absolutely critical Phase 3: should wait till phase 2 issues resolved

Status of candidate processes (part 2) OptionPhaseOrderDateComments UW Shallow+PBL2Need for explicit coupled testing Revisions to Condensation/Evaporation 2Discussed here Modal Aerosols2Discussed here Predicted/prescribed RRTM2Aerosols, Ice, Remaining software engineering nearing completion Gravity Wave Tuning3Whenever Necessary 20m Surface layer3Now possible, but we havent demonstrated climate improvement yet Modified Holtslag scheme3Minimal effect Resolution3 Revisions to Ice Microphysics3Discussed here

Uncertain, probably need to wait until after phase 3 Merging of HB and UW PBL PDF based Cloud Fraction Alternate Subgrid Column Generators Alternate Convection formulations

Towards CAM4 MG Modal +emissions Macrop Ice UW PBL GW Starting configuration RRTM +optics +interface BAM +emissions 3 or 4 candidates by July 30 Each tested coupled

Task Teams? Indirect effect –Andrew G, Hugh, Steve, Xiaohong Ice –Andrew G, Hugh, Xiaohong, David RRTM –Phil, Mike, Andrew C, Bill C. BAM –Phil, J-F, Peter, Andrew G, Andrew C Modal –Steve, Xiaohong, UW –Sungsu, Phil, Chris, Andrew G, Hugh,