Division Action Plans in Student Affairs Putting Student Learning First.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Assessment – Support Services Andrea Brown Director of Program Assessment and Institutional Research Dr. Debra Bryant Accreditation Liaison.
Advertisements

Presentation Outline Center Overview Guiding Principles Mission Achievement Goal Achievement Current Initiatives FY2013 Goals.
Arlene Paxton Advanced Training 2014
STUDENT SUCCESS CENTERS : WORKING BETTER TOGETHER TO ENSURE STUDENT SUCCESS.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Update on Goals 1 and 2 Curricular Domain Curricular Domain – accomplishments to date Developed baseline information about current level of faculty.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Strengthening Institutions Programs Title III
1 Vision Area of Focus Success Metrics* * All success metrics to be completed by Spring ’08. Commitments to ActionStatus Provide access to quality and.
An Assessment Primer Fall 2007 Click here to begin.
Academic Advising Implementation Team PROGRESS REPORT April 29, 2009.
SEM Planning Model.
Autism Support Team “Putting the Pieces All Together”
Academic Assessment Workshop: A Review of the Student Satisfaction Inventory Implementation & Implication Liz Baldizan, Ed.D., Assistant Dean, Academic.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
The SACS Re-accreditation Process: Opportunities to Enhance Quality at Carolina Presentation to the Faculty Council September 3, 2004.
HELPFUL TIPS FOR UNIT PLANNING Office of Institutional Effectiveness.
SAU #53 Serving the School Districts of Allenstown, Chichester, Deerfield, Epsom, and Pembroke Action Plan
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
NAVIGATING THE WATERS: USING ASSESSMENT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE Amy Harper, Area Coordinator, Fordham University Greer Jason, PhD, Assistant Dean of Students,
Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.
Strategies for Effective Advising in a Constantly Changing Environment Presented by: Maureen Bell-Werner and Shannon Hennessey.
State of Maine: Quality Management and National Core Indicators.
© 2003 IBM Corporation July 2004 Technology planning for not-for-profit organizations IBM volunteer name Title, organization.
Closing the Loop in Assessment.
Technology Leadership
NASPA Presentation Practical Tools for Building Division-wide Assessment Capacity Adrienne Dumpe, Graduate Assistant, VPSA Katie O’Dair, Director of Assessment.
Indistar Summit – Coaching with Indistar February 2012 Presenters: Yvonne Holloman, Ph.D. Associate Director, Office of School Improvement Michael Hill.
Performance Management  Performance Management Cycle  Organizational Success  Shared Responsibilities  Setting Goals and Expectations.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Achieving the Dream: Assessing Implementation CCPRO February 20, 2007.
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
1 Seminar on 2008 SNA Implementation June 2010, Saint John’s, Antigua and Barbuda GULAB SINGH UN Statistics Division Diagnostic Framework: National.
Managing Organizational Change A Framework to Implement and Sustain Initiatives in a Public Agency Lisa Molinar M.A.
Learning Together Phoenix College’s Journey of Transformation.
FloridaRtI.usf.edu A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Intervention Mapping.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Program Framework Review November 2011 Pamela Miller, Ph.D. AVP for Learning.
ELearning Committee Strategic Plan, A Brief History of the ELC Committee Developed and Charged (2004) CMS Evaluation and RFP Process (2004)
Building Balanced Scorecards Thompson Leadership Team May 20, 2010 Annette Overton, Quality Performance Department.
By Monica Y. Peters, Ph.D. Coordinator of Institutional Effectiveness/QEP Office of Quality Enhancement.
CCC Planning & Assessment “Wrap Up” Findings & Recommendations By: Diane Drebin, Kate Gray and Judy Redder (a.k.a.“The Wrappers”) 06/02/08.
Integrating Teaching, Learning and Assessment: A Programmatic ePortfolio Process AAEEBL Conference, Boston, MA - July 28, 2011 Karen Stein, Faculty Director,
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Assessment for Student Learning Kick-Off: Assessment Fellows Assessment Coordinators Pat Hulsebosch Ex. Director-Office of Academic Quality August 28,
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Universal Design of Student Services Applying Universal Design to Student Services Departments on Campus.
Ohio University Vernon R. Alden Library Strategic Planning From Idea to Vision May 2013.
Connect2Complete Theory of Change Development for Colleges and State Offices November 10, 2011 OMG Center for Collaborative Learning.
Strategic and Business Planning for Ensuring of Cooperatives Sustainability Dr. Hakkı Çetin TARIS Union of Olive and Olive Oil Agricultural Sale Cooperatives.
Assessing the Operations at Your Institution: Purposes + Planning + Processes = Performance Arizona Assessment Conference Yavapai College, Prescott, Arizona.
Communicating Actionable Regulatory Intelligence João Duarte Regulatory Intelligence Strategy Leader H. Lundbeck A/S.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Texas Woman’s University Academic Degree Program Assessment
Learning Without Borders: From Programs to Curricula
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
How an Assessment Framework helped revitalize Program Review at JCCC
Best Practices in Assessment in Sport Management Education
Assessment & Evaluation workshop
“Where Learners Become Leaders!”
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
PRESENTATION TITLE Faculty Enhancement and Instructional Development (FEID) Proposal Support Sharon Seidman, Ph.D. (HHD) and Erica Bowers, Ed.D. (Director,
Cynthia Curry, Director National AEM Center
Presentation transcript:

Division Action Plans in Student Affairs Putting Student Learning First

Agenda Student Affairs Assessment Plan; Measurement of Students’ Experience and Learning Departmental Unit Plans – Annual Staff Objectives – Data Collection – Review, Report and Revise

Assessment; A “new definition” The gathering of information about results, the comparison of those results with the results of the past, and the open discussion of the meaning of those results, the ways they have been gathered and their implications. The Dance of Change; the Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations, Peter Senge

Student Affairs Assessment Plan Due to the breadth and depth of the work of “student affairs”, it is useful to consider assessment/evaluation from three different perspectives. Each type of assessment needs a timeline and a cycle that is reasonable to balance the work and its continual improvement. Measures of effectiveness and efficiency Measures of students’ experiences Learning Assessments (Students and staff)

Student Affairs Assessment Cycle Based on Shared Vision; College Strategic Plan; Data Student Affairs Division Plans Departmental Unit Plan; Departmental Goals Individual Staff Developmental Plans and Objectives Assess, Review, Report, and Plan Again

Assessment Cycle Our Guiding Principles The Big Ideas: Strategic Plans effectiveness-planning/strategic- plan/documents/StrategicPlanBrochure.pdf

Our Department: Planning and Working Together Collaborative planning and work session: What were we trying to do? How will we know that it’s complete? From the data, where do we still see work to do? Begin again….

It all depends on how you look at it! – Build the assessment to get the information you want, not necessarily the answers you want.

Survey Student Survey Students’ self report regarding how they found our office. 72 students indicated that they found the OSD through “other” means.

Decisions made by data A common response (26%) was that students learned about OSD from a professor, often identified by name or discipline. Based on these data we set a new goal for the following year… to reach out and strengthen our communication to faculty.

Departmental Plan Based on the data from the Student Survey we established the goal for the next year’s plan – In order to increase student’s access to our services we set a goal to strengthen communication with faculty – Faculty Resource Guidelines/ Bookmark – Submit Articles to the Faculty Newsletter – Have greater presence in Open House/Faculty Welcome Back opportunities

Faculty Survey

Review, Report, and Revise Data drives decisions And revisions

Plan 1. Goal-principal purpose of plan (include how this relates to serving students or increasing student success or supporting LifeMap) Building upon feedback from staff and faculty survey, the OSD strives to increase retention and graduation of students registered with the OSD through enhanced advising and targeted communication strategies. 2. Objectives-what will be accomplished and measured 1. OSD will develop an intentional plan for advising based on LifeMap and Proactive advising models; this will include a curriculum for the initial advising session and a communication plan for case management follow-up. 2. OSD will research, develop, and/or implement more integrated software to improve access for students and to enhance the advising experience. 3. OSD will increase communication with faculty and staff regarding safety issues, classroom accommodations, and OSD resources.  Write at least 3 articles for the Security offices college wide.  Continue a project to include faculty in the accommodation of interpreted tests.  Pilot a program to increase communication of the need for accommodations (NTI) for selected students. 3. Measures and Findings – How specifically measures will be conducted. How will we know the objective has been achieved? To establish a baseline, I have requested data from the IR regarding retention and graduation rates for students also registered with the Office for Students with Disabilities. While the success and impact of the objectives above may take more than one year to measure, we will continue to track the data. 1.Our proactive advising model will be evaluated via a student services pre and post assessment regarding student’s satisfaction with the advising available in the OSD. 2.OSD will research the in-house Valencia Visits as well as other software advising systems that might be available to us to determine a most effective tool for the advising/OSD process. Once implemented, the OSD will elicit feedback from the OSD advisors regarding the effectiveness and usefulness of the new system. 3.OSD increased communication will be measured by faculty and staff feedback. The faculty survey will be resent to a select group of faculty and staff who have been our targeted audience. These selected respondents will be representatives from each of the projects: Security, Faculty with students who are Deaf, and students who request to have their faculty notified via . This objective will be achieved when respondents indicate that the improved communication helped them to serve students more effectively. 4. Action Plan – what is the implementation plan? 1. a. The coordinators have been tasked with developing a curriculum for intake and registration based on the developmental Life Map advising philosophy. This curriculum will be a tool used by the advisor during the intake process. b. OSD will develop a communication plan to assist students through crucial points in the semester. Relative templates will also be developed and sent to students according to the communication plan. 2. OSD staff will research various software options to determine what the most effective tool is for the OSD advising process. The research and selection process will be complete by the end of the planning year and necessary funds and/or purchase will be made the following year in consultation with the Office for Information Technology. 3.a. OSD staff will provide three informational articles to the offices of Security regarding students with disabilities. b. The Assistant Director will implement the faculty communication piece regarding interpreted testing. She will also gather feedback from students and faculty regarding the implemented process. c. OSD staff will pilot a program to increase communication of the need for accommodations (NTI) for selected students by ing faculty for selected voluntary students.

Summary

Questions and Thanks! Deb Larew, Ed.D. Office for Students