JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Today’s Nucleonic Picture of Nuclei Kim Egiyan Yerevan Physics Institute, Armenia and Jefferson Lab, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BigBite K.Egiyan Probabilities of SRC in Nuclei Measured with A(e,e / ) Reactions K. Egiyan (Yerevan Physics Institute, Yerevan, Armenia and Jefferson.
Advertisements

1 First Measurement of the Structure Function b 1 on Tensor Polarized Deuteron Target at HERMES A.Nagaitsev Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna.
Experimental Status of Deuteron F L Structure Function and Extractions of the Deuteron and Non-Singlet Moments Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University.
Disentangling the EMC effect ? Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University, Israel The EMC effect is 30 years old.
Degree of polarization of  produced in quasielastic charge current neutrino-nucleus scattering Krzysztof M. Graczyk Jaroslaw Nowak Institute of Theoretical.
Ali Hanks - APS Direct measurement of fragmentation photons in p+p collisions at √s = 200GeV with the PHENIX experiment Ali Hanks for the PHENIX.
DNP Long Range Plan January Nuclei at Short Distance Scale Ronald Ransome Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway, NJ.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University, ISRAEL Short Range Correlations and the EMC Effect Work done in collaboration with: L. B. Weinstein (ODU) D. Higinbotham,
University of British Columbia July, 2010 Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University, ISRAEL Nuclear Studies with Hard Knockout Reactions Incident electron Scattered.
BONUS (Barely Off-Shell Nucleon Structure) Experiment Update Thia Keppel CTEQ Meeting November 2007.
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
African Summer School 2012 Connecting the SRC & EMC Effects by.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 1  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation.
Does a nucleon appears different when inside a nucleus ? Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Postdoctoral Research Symposium September 11-12,
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Experimental Approach to Nuclear Quark Distributions (Rolf Ent – EIC /15/04) One of two tag-team presentations to show why an EIC is optimal to access.
Sixth International Conference on Perspectives in Hadronic Physics Hard Photodisintegration of a proton Pair May 2008 (Miramare - Trieste, Italy)
Study of hadron properties in cold nuclear matter with HADES Pavel Tlustý, Nuclear Physics Institute, Řež, Czech Republic for the HADES Collaboration ,
 4 He(e,e'p)X, April 13 and April 14, 2011, 16 hours Measured P miss at to 1.0 GeV/c, x b = 1.24, Q 2 = 2 (GeV/c) 2 Extension of SRC 2 body data.
CLAS12 European Workshop February 25-28, Genova, Italy Analyzing CLAS / Hall B Data to Extract New Results on QCD Nuclear Physics An Initiative to.
Hadrons in the Nuclear Medium. I. QCD dynamics of Hadron-Hadron Interaction I. QCD dynamics of Hadron-Hadron Interaction IV. Protons in the Superdense.
P Spring 2003 L9Richard Kass Inelastic ep Scattering and Quarks Elastic vs Inelastic electron-proton scattering: In the previous lecture we saw that.
Nuclear Forces at Short Distances and the Dynamics of Neutron Stars Nuclear Forces at Short Distances and the Dynamics of Neutron Stars.
Lecture 16: Beta Decay Spectrum 29/10/2003 (and related processes...) Goals: understand the shape of the energy spectrum total decay rate sheds.
“E at Hall A Collaboration” Tai Muangma E :Status Report Nucleon-Nucleon Short-Range Correlation (NN-SRC) on He 4 target Hall A Collaboration.
N* Production in α-p and p-p Scattering (Study of the Breathing Mode of the Nucleon) Investigation of the Scalar Structure of baryons (related to strong.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
EMC effect in few-body nuclei at large x Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory Elba X Workshop Electron-Nucleus Scattering X June 23-27, 2008.
1 Jeffery T. Mitchell – Quark Matter /17/12 The RHIC Beam Energy Scan Program: Results from the PHENIX Experiment Jeffery T. Mitchell Brookhaven.
Studying Short range Correlation in Nuclei at the Repulsive Core Limit via the triple Coincidence (e, e’ p N) Reaction PAC 31 / TJNAF Jan Proposal.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
Nucleon-Nucleon collisions. Nucleon-nucleon interaction at low energy Interaction between two nucleons: basic for all of nuclear physics Traditional goal.
Model independent extraction of neutron structure functions from deuterium data. Svyatoslav Tkachenko University of South Carolina.
Neutrino cross sections in few hundred MeV energy region Jan T. Sobczyk Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Wrocław (in collaboration with.
1 Fukutaro Kajihara (CNS, University of Tokyo) for the PHENIX Collaboration Heavy Quark Measurement by Single Electrons in the PHENIX Experiment.
Ivan Vitev & The First Precise Determination of Quark Energy Loss in Nuclei Ivan Vitev (PI), Ming Liu (Co-PI), Patrick McGaughey, Benwei Zhang T-16 and.
Effects Of Distortion On Trojan Horse Applications Rosario Gianluca Pizzone INFN – Laboratori Nazionali del Sud Catania.
L. Weinstein, Gordon The Nucleons Went Two By Two: Short Range Correlations in Nuclei Larry Weinstein Old Dominion University Theory Overview What.
Nilanga Liyanage University of Virginia For Jefferson Lab Hall A, CLAS and RSS Collaborations.
Comparison of quasi-elastic cross sections using spectral functions with (e,e') data from 0.5 GeV to 1.5 GeV Hiroki Nakamura (Waseda U). Makoto Sakuda.
Ibrahim H. Albayrak, Hampton University Group Meeting Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region. 
Crystal Ball Collaboration Meeting, Basel, October 2006 Claire Tarbert, Univeristy of Edinburgh Coherent  0 Photoproduction on Nuclei Claire Tarbert,
J-PARC でのシグマ陽子 散乱実験の提案 Koji Miwa Tohoku Univ.. Contents Physics Motivation of YN scattering Understanding Baryon-Baryon interaction SU(3) framework Nature.
Simultaneous photo-production measurement of the  and  mesons on the nucleons at the range 680 – 1500 MeV N.Rudnev, V.Nedorezov, A.Turinge for the GRAAL.
Experiment Rosen07: Measurement of R =  L /  T on Deuterium in the Nucleon Resonance Region.  Physics  Data Analysis  Cross Section calculation 
New Measurement of the EMC effect for Light Nuclei and Global Study of the A-Dependence Patricia Solvignon Argonne National Laboratory ECT 2008 Workshop.
May 2006 (Miramare - Trieste, Italy) Eli Piasetzky Tel Aviv University, ISRAEL
Comparison of GENIE with Garino Data Xin Qian BNL In collaboration with Steve Dytman 1.
 4 He(e,e'p)X, April 13 and April 14, 2011, 16 hours Measured P miss at and GeV/c, x b = 1.24, Q 2 = 2 (GeV/c) 2 Extension of SRC 2 body data.
Search for direct evidence of tensor interaction in nuclei = high momentum component in nuclei = TERASHIMA Satoru 寺嶋 知 Depart. of Nuclear Science and Technology,
Comparison of GENIE with Garino Data Xin Qian BNL In collaboration with Steve Dytman 1.
Bryan Moffit Hall A Collaboration Meeting Studying Short Range Correlations in Nuclei at the Repulsive Core Limit via the Triple Coincidence (e,e’pN) Reaction.
MINERνA Overview  MINERνA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei  Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: t Study.
Lecture 8: Understanding the form factor 30/9/ Why is this a function of q 2 and not just q ? Famous and important result: the “Form Factor.
Short-Range Correlations in Asymmetric Nuclei
John Arrington Argonne National Lab
x>1: Short Range Correlations and “Superfast” Quarks
Short Range NN Correlations (from Inclusive Cross Sections)
Flavor dependence of the EMC effect
Nadia Fomin University of Virginia
presented by Werner Boeglin Florida International University Miami
University of Tennessee
The np -> d p0 reaction measured with g11 data
Duality in Nuclei: The EMC Effect
University of Tennessee
E (“x>1”) PAC47 Jeopardy presentation John Arrington
Deuteron Electro-Disintegration at Very High Missing Momenta PR Hall C Collaboration Experiment Probe two nucleon dynamics at short space-time distances.
Presentation transcript:

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Today’s Nucleonic Picture of Nuclei Kim Egiyan Yerevan Physics Institute, Armenia and Jefferson Lab, USA

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Hofstadter's nucleonic picture of nucleus  Single particles (SP) moving in an average field  Electron elastic scattering off nuclei have been measured and nuclear radii R were obtained  It was shown that R  A 1/3  This was strong evidence that nuclei are composed from the SP, in other words, they are a bags with Fermi gas!! Nucleus e e/e/ q (low)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Other possible components  HOWEVER  Strong NN (attractive and repulsive) interaction should result in Short Range Correlation (SRC) 1.7f Nucleons Nucleus   o = 0.17

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Other possible components  HOWEVER  Strong NN (attractive and repulsive) interaction should result in Short Range Correlation (SRC) 1.7f Nucleons Nucleus   o = 0.17

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Other possible components  HOWEVER  Strong NN (attractive and repulsive) interaction should result in Short Range Correlation (SRC)  So, nuclear Hamiltonian should include H = p 2 /2M + V 2 (r 1,r 2 ) + V 3 (r 1,r 2,r 3 ) + …. the correlation terms V i 1.7f Nucleons Nucleus   o = 0.17

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Main problems  Strong NN (attractive and repulsive) interaction should result in Short Range Correlation (SRC)  Experimental problems should be addressed are:  Relative fractions of SP and SRC phases  Modification of nucleons in SRC  Properties of super-dens matter in SRC 1.7f Nucleons Nucleus   1f  o = 0.17   4  o

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Main topic of talk  Strong NN (attractive and repulsive) interaction results in Short Range Correlation (SRC)  Problems should be addressed are:  Relative fractions of SP and SRC phases  Modification of nucleons in SRC  Properties of super-dens matter in SRC  In this talk the only first topic will be discussed : Fractions of SP and SRC phases in nuclei 1.7f Nucleons Nucleus   1f  o = 0.17   4  o

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Main topic of talk  Strong NN (attractive and repulsive) interaction results in Short Range Correlation (SRC)  Problems should be addressed are:  Relative fractions of SP and SRC phases  Modification of nucleons in SRC  Properties of super-dens matter in SRC  In this talk the only first topic will be discussed : Fractions of SP and SRC phases in nuclei  What we know about SP and SRC? 1.7f Nucleus   1f

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 1. Evidence for NON-single particle states - Spectroscopic factor  In first generation of A(e,e’p)A-1 measurements the S(E i,p i ) – spectral function – the probability a finding nucleon in nuclei with momentum p i and removal energy E i has been extracted Nucleus e e/e/ q p pipi

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 1. Evidence for NON-single particle states - Spectroscopic factor  In first generation of A(e,e’p)A-1 measurements the S(E i,p i ) – spectral function – the probability a finding nucleon in nuclei with momentum p i and removal energy E i has been extracted  It was found that integral (Spectroscopic factor)  SP fractions is ≠ 1  Is SRC fraction  30%??  Measured results depend on integration limits  SRC contribution is not excluded (estimated)  FSI can affect on results  These results are impotent: they show the expected size of SRC contribution ( %) Nucleus Z ≡ 4  ∫ S(E i,p i )dE i dp i ≠ 1 (  0.7) e e/e/ q p ε F,p F pipi Z

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan What is needed?  In first generation of A(e,e’p)A-1 measurements the S(E i,p i ) – spectral function – the probability a finding nucleon in nuclei with momentum p i and removal energy E i has been extracted  It was found that integral (Spectroscopic factor)  SP fractions is ≠ 1  Is SRC fraction  30%??  Measured results depend on integration limits  SRC contribution is not excluded (estimated)  FSI can affect on results  These results are impotent: they show the expected size of SRC contribution ( %) Nucleus Z ≡ 4  ∫ S(E i,p i )dE i dp i ≠ 1 (  0.7) e e/e/ q ε F,p F To measure SRC fraction 1.the direct interaction reactions should be used, 2.at higher energy and momentum transfers (to resolve SRCs)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 2. Hall C attempt for direct SRC measurement with (e,e’p)  To suppress SP contributions the parallel kinematics was used Nucleus To resolve SRC, q ≥ 1 GeV/c (D.Rohe et al., PRL 93: (2004)) e e/e/ q p

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 2. Hall C attempt for direct SRC measurement with (e,e’p)  To suppress SP contributions the parallel kinematics was used  S(p m,E m ) – spectral function was constricted as  S(p m,E m ) = d  exp (A)/d  theor (eN / )  Certain domain in (p m,E m ) plain was chosen, where SP impact expected to be small  In that particular region and for only 12 C nucleus the 10% SRC involvement for protons has been obtained  However, the total number (probability) of SRC have not been found  Many unclear corrections-assumptions have been made (FSI, transparency, off-shell (eN / ) cross section, SP impact, p m =p i, etc) Nucleus To resolve SRC, q ≥ 1 GeV/c (D.Rohe et al., PRL 93: (2004)) e e/e/ q p

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 3. Measurement of 2N SRC relative strength in (p,2p+n) reaction (EVA/BNL)  In final state the p 1, p 2 and n were detected  p i and γ were calculated  SP contribution was suppressed using the scaling behavior of NN interaction cross section  As a signature of 2N SRC the γ > 90 o and p n > p F cuts have been used Nucleus p p1p1 q p2p2 n γ pipi A. Tang, et al., PRL 90, (2003)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 3. Measurement of 2N SRC relative strength in (p,2p+n) reaction (EVA/BNL)  In final state the p 1, p 2 and n were detected  p i and γ were calculated  SP contribution was suppressed using the scaling behavior of NN interaction cross section  As a signature of 2N SRC the γ > 90 o and p n > p F cuts have been used  Was found that for cosγ < 0  F(pn/NN) = = 0.49 ±0.12  Main conclusions are: For 12 C nucleus  SRCs were directly “seen”  The ratio of isotopic configurations (pn)/[(pn)+(pp)] is measured (if correct for neutron transparency) Nucleus p p1p1 q p2p2 n γ pipi N[(2pn(p n >p F )] N[2p]

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 4. 2N SRC momentum distribution measurement in 3 He(e,e’pp)n; Hall-B  Detection of 2 protons in final state provides a full kinematics  By certain kinematical cuts the 2N SRCs [(np) and (pp)] have been separated 3 He e e1e1 q p2p2 n p1p1 R.Niazov, L. Weinstein, PRL;92:052303, 2004 (c.m.) Q 2  1 GeV 2

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan 4. 2N SRC momentum distribution measurement in 3 He(e,e’pp)n; Hall-B  Detection of 2 protons in final state provides a full kinematics  By certain kinematical cuts the 2N SRCs [(np) and (pp)] have been separated  Two type important information was extracted:  Momentum distributions of nucleons in SRC  Momentum distribution of SRC (c.m.) itself  New data at are in analyzing  No information on strength (probabilities) of SRC are available 3 He e e1e1 q p2p2 n p1p1 R.Niazov, L. Weinstein, PRL;92:052303, 2004 (c.m.) Q 2  1 GeV 2 Q 2  3 GeV 2 Cross sec, fb/MeV + FSI (c.m.)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan These are, up to date, the published experimental data on SRC  We know about at least two experiments, ready to present a new data  From FermiLab by J. Peterson, who is planning to visit us and present data obtained with very high proton beam energies, and nuclei up to Pb  Hall A (e,e’p+n) experiment (D. Higinbotham, E. Piasetzky), measurements are finished, data are in an analyzing stage  However, probably, best way to measure the strengths of SRC is an inclusive electron scattering

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measuring the SRC probabilities with inclusive A(e,e’) scattering  There is good opportunity to measure the strengths of SRCs,  Using the electron inclusive scattering on nuclei at high Q 2 and large x B =Q 2 /2Mν Nucleus e e’ q Back to Hofstadter! but with higher momentum transfer allowing to “look” Inside the nucleus

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measuring the SRC probabilities with inclusive A(e,e’) scattering  There is good opportunity to measure the strengths of SRCs,  Using the electron inclusive scattering on nuclei at high Q 2 and large x B =Q 2 /2Mν  Inclusive scattering has a great advantage:  FSI can be excluded (see below)  However there is a big problem  Separation of (e,SRC) interaction from scattering off single nucleons Nucleus e e’ q Back to Hofstadter! but with higher momentum transfer allowing to “look” Inside the nucleus

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Separation of (e,SRC) scattering reaction Nucleus e e/e/ q SRC A-2 e e/e/ SRC q A The reaction we are searching for is

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Separation of (e,SRC) scattering reaction  Selection of (e,SRC) scattering from the large backgrounds:  Inelastic (eN) scattering (a)  Quasielastic scattering (b) Nucleus e e/e/ q SRC A-1 A e e/e/ A-2 e e/e/ SRC q q A pipi A e q pipi The reaction we are searching for is a) b) A-1 With backgrounds

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Separation of (e,SRC) scattering reaction  Selection of (e,SRC) scattering from the large backgrounds:  Inelastic (eN) scattering (a)  Quasielastic scattering (b) Nucleus e e/e/ q SRC A-1 A e e/e/ A-2 e e/e/ SRC q q A pipi A e q pipi a) b) A-1 x B >1.2 The reaction we are searching for is

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Separation of (e,SRC) scattering reaction  Selection of (e,SRC) scattering from the large backgrounds:  Inelastic (eN) scattering (a)  Quasielastic scattering (b) Nucleus e e/e/ q SRC A-1 A e e/e/ A-2 e e/e/ SRC q q A pipi A e q pipi a) b) A-1 x B >1.2 p min The reaction we are searching for is

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Separation of (e,SRC) scattering reaction  Selection of (e,SRC) scattering from the large backgrounds:  Inelastic (eN) scattering (a)  Quasielastic scattering (b) Nucleus e e/e/ q SRC A-1 A e e/e/ A-2 e e/e/ SRC q q A pipi A e q pipi The reaction we are using is a) b) A-1 x B >1.2 p min p i > p min

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Separation of (e,SRC) scattering reaction  Selection of (e,SRC) scattering from the large backgrounds:  Inelastic (eN) scattering (a)  Quasielastic scattering (b) Nucleus e e/e/ q SRC A-1 A e e/e/ A-2 e e/e/ SRC q q A pipi A e q pipi a) b) A-1 x B >1.2 p min p i > p min P min should be found The reaction we are searching for is

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Obtaining of SRC dominant momentum region  Use the high momentum WF similarity for all nuclei to obtain the onset value of p min starting from which SRCs dominate

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Obtaining of SRC dominant momentum region  Use the high momentum WF similarity for all nuclei to obtain the onset value of p min starting from which SRCs dominate  Ratios of cross section from two nuclei should scale starting from p min, where SP contribution in WF is negligible and SRC component dominates SRC region p min

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Obtain the SRC dominant region in corresponding (Q 2, x B ) space  Use the high momentum WF similarity for all nuclei to obtain the onset value of p min starting from which SRCs dominate  Ratios of cross section from two nuclei should scale starting from p min, where SP contribution in WF is negligible and SRC component dominates  For A(e,e’) scattering off SP any combination of measured Q 2 and x B allows to calculate the p min = p min (Q 2, x B ) SRC region p min pipi -p i A-1 e e/e/ q

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Obtain the SRC dominant region in corresponding (Q 2, x B ) space  Use the high momentum WF similarity for all nuclei to obtain the onset value of p min starting from which SRCs dominate  Ratios of cross section from two nuclei should scale starting from p min, where SP contribution in WF is negligible and SRC component dominates  For A(e,e’) scattering off SP any combination of measured Q 2 and x B allows to calculate the p min = p min (Q 2, x B )  Ratios of cross section from two nuclei should scale at corresponding (Q 2, x B ) combination SRC region p min Francfurt, Strikman, PR, ’81;’88

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Use A(e,e’) cross section ratios to measure SRC probabilities  Use the high momentum WF similarity for all nuclei to obtain the onset value of p min starting from which SRCs dominate,  Ratios of cross section from two nuclei should scale starting from p min, where SP contribution in WF is negligible and SRC component dominates  For A(e,e’) scattering off SP any combination of measured Q 2 and x B allows to calculate the p min = p min (Q 2, x B )  Ratios of cross section from two nuclei should scale at corresponding (Q 2, x B ) combination  In SRC model the scaling factor (SF) indicate the ratio of SRC probabilities a 2N (A 1 ) and a 2N (A 2 ) in nuclei A 1 and A 2 : SF = a 2 (A 1 /A 2 ) = SRC region a 2N (A 1 ) a 2N (A 2 ) SF p min Francfurt, Strikman, PR, ’81;’88

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan To check this idea SLAC existing data were reanalyzed  The old SLAC data were analyzed  A/D ratios were extracted for A=4,12, 27, 56  Evidence for scaling is obvious  Scaling factors were used to estimate 2-nucleon SRC probabilities in nuclei A relative to D Frankfurt,Strikman,Day, Sargsian, Phys.Rev. C ‘93

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan To check this idea SLAC existing data were reanalyzed  The old SLAC data were analyzed  A/D ratios were extracted for A=4,12, 27, 56  Evidence for scaling is obvious  Scaling factors were used to estimate 2-nucleon SRC probabilities in nuclei A relative to D However  Data for nuclei A and for D were measured in large difference of kinematics, the theoretical calculation were used to obtain data at the same Q 2 and x B for heavy nuclei and D  Absolute probabilities were no able to obtain  x B interval used was limited (<1.6)  Systematic and dedicated measurements are needed Frankfurt,Strikman,Day, Sargsian, Phys.Rev. C ‘93

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Final State Interaction in (e,SRC) Scattering  Struck nucleon interacts with other nucleon(s) from the same SRC  This interaction is much stronger since relative momenta are smaller and they are spatially closer  Interaction of nucleons with nucleons from the A-2 residual  This interaction is much weaker since relative momenta are larger and they are spatially more separated  FSI is primarily localized in SRC A A-1 NiNi NfNf e e/e/ q NiNi e e/e/ q SRC FSIs

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan More localization of Final State Interaction in SRC  In QM there is some distance (r) where FSI still can affect on (e,N i ) interaction.  At Q 2 > 1.5 GeV 2 and x B > 1.3 the maximum value r is < 1fm.  Since R SRC  r, the FSI of nucleons from the same SRC only can affect on cross section in (q,N i ) vertex!  Great advantage of ratio technique we are using is that, due to the this localization of FSI in SRC, it’s effect will cancel!! FSSD-Phys.Rev.C’93 A NiNi e e/e/ q r r max (fm) Q 2 (GeV 2 ) SRC A A-1 NiNi NfNf e e/e/ q NiNi e e/e/ q SRC FSIs

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Our experiment  Experiment has been performed at JLab with CLAS detector at beam energy 4.46 and 4.7 GeV at E2 Run  As a nucleus A 2 we choose 3 He with well known wave function, as a nucleus A He, 12 C, 56 Fe  A(e,e’) inclusive reaction was measured  Standard fiducial cuts and momentum corrections were applied  x B – dependences of per-nucleon cross section ratios for nuclei 4 He, 12 C, 56 Fe and 3 He were constructed in Q 2 = GeV 2 range, at x B at > 0.8  Obtained ratios (or cross sections) were corrected on  Acceptances  Radiative effects  Energy small difference   - contamination

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measured ratios of per-nucleon cross sections at Q 2 >1.4 GeV 2 and x B <2

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measured ratios of per-nucleon cross sections at Q 2 >1.4 GeV 2 and x B <2 r(A/ 3 He) = K(Q 2 ) 3  A (Q 2,x B ) A  He3 (Q 2,x B ) K(Q 2 ) = A(2  p +  n ) 3(Z  p +N  n ) where and takes into account the difference between (ep) and (en) cross sections For our Q 2 range K(Q 2 ) = 1.14 for 4 He and 12 C and = 1.18 for 56 Fe

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measured ratios of per-nucleon cross sections at Q 2 >1.4 GeV 2 and x B <2 Scaling exist; Observation 1 Hypotheses of Wave Function similarity in high momentum region for all nuclei Is correct see also (Francfurt, Strikman, Day, Sargsyan, PRC, 1993) (Egiyan et al., PRC, 2003)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measured ratios of per-nucleon cross sections at Q 2 >1.4 GeV 2 and x B <2 Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Observation 1 SF Observation 2

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measured ratios of per-nucleon cross sections at Q 2 >1.4 GeV 2 and x B <2 Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Observation 1 SF Observation 2 In SRC model the measured scaling factors are just a ratios of 2-nucleon SRC probabilities in nucleus A and 3 He

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC relative probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Observation 1 SF a 2N ( 4 He) a 2N ( 3 He) =1.93 ±0.02±0.14 a 2N ( 12 C) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.41 ±0.02±0.17 a 2N ( 56 Fe) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.83 ±0.03±0.18 Observation 2

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Comparison with SRC model calculations  Comparison of the experimental x B – dependences of per-nucleon cross section ratios with theoretical once calculated at several values of Q 2 in Q 2 >1.4 GeV 2 region (M. Sargsian’s code)  The agreement is very well, if take into account  10% systematic uncertainties both in theory and in experiment,

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC relative probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Observation 1 SF a 2N ( 4 He) a 2N ( 3 He) =1.93 ±0.02±0.14 a 2N ( 12 C) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.41 ±0.02±0.17 a 2N ( 56 Fe) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.83 ±0.03±0.18 Observation 2 Theoretical expectations SRC QCM Den/ratio (F-S) (Vary) (Forest)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC relative probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Observation 1 SF a 2N ( 4 He) a 2N ( 3 He) =1.93 ±0.02±0.14 a 2N ( 12 C) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.41 ±0.02±0.17 a 2N ( 56 Fe) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.83 ±0.03±0.18 Observation 2 Thus, Chances for every nucleon in 4 He, 12 C and 56 Fe to be involved in 2N SRC are 1.93, 2.41 and 2.83 times larger than in 3 He

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Scaling onsets (SO) are measured Observation 1 SF SO a 2N ( 4 He) a 2N ( 3 He) =1.93 ±0.02±0.14 a 2N ( 12 C) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.41 ±0.02±0.17 a 2N ( 56 Fe) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.83 ±0.03±0.18 Observation 2 Observation 3

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Scaling onsets (SO) are measured Observation 1 SF SO a 2N ( 4 He) a 2N ( 3 He) =1.93 ±0.02±0.14 a 2N ( 12 C) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.41 ±0.02±0.17 a 2N ( 56 Fe) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.83 ±0.03±0.18 Observation 2 Observation 3 SO measurement allows to find a 2N ( 3 He) using the wave functions of 3 He and Deuterium

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Calculation of a 2N ( 3 He) using 3 He and 2 H wave functions  a 2N ( 3 He) = x a 2N ( 2 H) a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) SF

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Calculation of a 2N ( 3 He) using 3 He and 2 H wave functions  a 2N ( 3 He) = x a 2N ( 2 H)  From the calculated ratio r( 3 He/ 2 H) SF = = 2 ± 0.1  And a 2N ( 3 He) = (2 ± 0.1) x a 2N ( 2 H) a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) SF

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Calculation of a 2N ( 3 He) using 3 He and 2 H wave functions  a 2N ( 3 He) = x a 2N ( 2 H)  From the calculated ratio r( 3 He/ 2 H) SF = = 2 ± 0.1  And a 2N ( 3 He) = (2 ± 0.1) x a 2N ( 2 H)  To calculate a 2N ( 2 H) we use  2 H Wave Function  Measured p min (Q 2 onset,x B onset ) =275±25 MeV  Integral over deuterium wave function in p i > p min region is just a 2N ( 2 H)  Thus, definition of SRC is - the relative momentum of nucleons in SRC > 275 MeV/c  a 2N ( 2 H) = ±  a 2N ( 3 He) = ± p min (4.+0.8)% Deuterium Wave Function a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) SF

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Scaling onsets (SO) are measured Observation 1 SF SO a 2N ( 4 He) a 2N ( 3 He) =1.93 ±0.02±0.14 a 2N ( 12 C) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.41 ±0.02±0.17 a 2N ( 56 Fe) a 2N ( 3 He) =2.83 ±0.03±0.18 = Observation 2 Observation 3

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Scaling onsets (SO) are measured Observation 1 SF SO a 2N ( 4 He) = 0.154± 0.002±0.033 a 2N ( 12 C) = ±0.002±0.041 a 2N ( 56 Fe) = 0.23 ±0.002±0.047 Observation 2 Observation 3

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Scaling onsets (SO) are measured Observation 1 SF SO a 2N ( 4 He) = 0.154± 0.002±0.033 a 2N ( 12 C) = ±0.002±0.041 a 2N ( 56 Fe) = 0.23 ±0.002±0.047 Observation 2 Observation 3 Every nucleon in nuclei 3 He, 4 He, 12 C and 56 Fe 8%, 15.4%, 19.3% and 23% of its life-time is “living” In SRC state with other nucleon

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 2-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Scaling exist; Scaling factors (SF) are measured; Scaling onsets (SO) are measured Observation 1 SF SO a 2N ( 4 He) = 0.154± 0.002±0.033 a 2N ( 12 C) = ±0.002±0.041 a 2N ( 56 Fe) = 0.23 ±0.002±0.047 Observation 2 Observation 3 In other words At any moment, in nuclei 3 He, 4 He, 12 C and 56 Fe can be obtained, respectively, 0.12, 0.30, 1.14 and nucleon SRCs

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan In other words  In any moment in 12 C one can be seen one 2N SRC  While in any moment in 56 Fe one can exist six 2N SRC 56 Fe 12 C

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan We measure directly a 2-nucleon SRC numbers (probabilities) Single particle (%) 2N SRC (%)3N(and moreN) SRC (%) 56 Fe ???? 23.0 ± 0.2 ± 4.7 ???? 12 C ???? 19.3 ± 0.2 ± 4.1 ???? 4 He ???? 15.4 ± 0.2 ± 3.3 ???? 3 He ???? 8.0 ± H 95.9 ± ± But it is still not enough to know a full nucleonic picture of nuclei Fractions Nucleus We need to measure 3-and-more-nucleonic SRC fraction

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Importance of measurements at x B > 2  Is not only to get the data on 3-nucleon SRC  But also to prove the interpretations of obtained data at x B < 2 by the SRC model  SRC model predicts:  Existence of “positive” step in x B – dependence of cross section ratios at 2<x B <3, due to the proportionality of a JN to the J th power of nuclear density (J is order of SRC) a jN  ∫  J A (r)dr  The step should increase with A  We measure the cross section ratios at 2 < x B < 3, for the first time

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan x B 1.4 GeV 2 and x B <3

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan x B 1.4 GeV 2 and x B < 3 Observation 1 2 nd Scaling exist; Existence of step (second scaling level) Is very strong argument for SRC model

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan x B 1.4 GeV 2 and x B < 3 Observation 1Observation 2 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; SF

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan x B 1.4 GeV 2 and x B < 3 Observation 1Observation 2 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; SF In SRC model the measured scaling factors are just a ratios of 3-nucleon SRC probabilities in nucleus A and 3 He

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC relative probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; SF a 3N ( 4 He) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 12 C) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 56 Fe) a 3N ( 3 He) = 2.33 ±0.12±0.19 = 3.05±0.14±0.22 = 4.38±0.18±0.33

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC relative probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; SF a 3N ( 4 He) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 12 C) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 56 Fe) a 3N ( 3 He) = 2.33 ±0.12±0.19 = 3.05±0.14±0.22 = 4.38±0.18±0.33 Chances for every nucleon in 4 He, 12 C and 56 Fe to be involved in 3N SRC are 2.33, 3.05 and 4.38 times larger than in 3 He itself

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 Observation 3 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; 2nd Scaling onsets (SO) are measured SF a 3N ( 4 He) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 12 C) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 56 Fe) a 3N ( 3 He) = 2.33 ±0.12±0.19 =3.05±0.14±0.22 = 4.38±0.18±0.33 SO

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 Observation 3 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; 2nd Scaling onsets (SO) are measured SF a 3N ( 4 He) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 12 C) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 56 Fe) a 3N ( 3 He) = 2.33 ±0.12±0.19 =3.05±0.14±0.22 = 4.38±0.18±0.33 SO Measurement of SO allows to calculate the a 3N ( 3 He) using the 3 He wave function

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 Observation 3 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; 2nd Scaling onsets (SO) are measured SF a 3N ( 4 He) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 12 C) a 3N ( 3 He) a 3N ( 56 Fe) a 3N ( 3 He) = 2.33 ±0.12±0.19 =3.05±0.14±0.22 = 4.38±0.18±0.33 SO = ± (M. Sargsyan’s calculations)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 Observation 3 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; 2nd Scaling onsets (SO) are measured SF SO a 3N ( 4 He)= 0.42 ±0.02±0.14 (%) a 3N ( 12 C)= 0.55 ±0.03±0.18 a 3N ( 56 Fe)= 0.79 ±0.03±0.25

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Measurement of 3-Nuclon SRC absolute probabilities Observation 1Observation 2 Observation 3 2 nd Scaling exist; 2nd Scaling factors (SF) are measured; 2nd Scaling onsets (SO) are measured SF SO a 3N ( 4 He)= 0.42 ±0.02±0.14 (%) a 3N ( 12 C)= 0.55 ±0.03±0.18 a 3N ( 56 Fe)= 0.79 ±0.03±0.25 Per-nucleon probabilities of 3N SRC are smaller then the same probabilities of 2N SRC more the one order of magnitude

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Having these data, we know almost full (  99%) nucleonic picture of nuclei with A  56 Single particle (%) 2N SRC (%) 3N SRC (%) 56 Fe 76 ± 0.2 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.03 ± C 80 ± 02 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.03 ± He 86 ± 0.2 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.02 ± He 92 ± ± ± H 96 ± ± Fractions Nucleus

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Comparisons with some theoretical predictions on SRC probabilities Single particle (%) 2N SRC (%) 3N SRC (%) 56 Fe 23.0 ± ± C 19.3 ± ± He 15.4 ± ± He 8.0 ± ± H 4.0 ± Fractions Nucleus Exp SRC Fe/C= 1.43 ±0.15 Fe/C = SRC model SRC predictions are remarkably close to experiment

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Comparisons with some theoretical predictions on SRC probabilities Single particle (%) 2N SRC (%) 3N SRC (%) 56 Fe 23.0 ± ± C 19.3 ± ± He 15.4 ± ± He 8.0 ± ± H 4.0 ± Fractions Nucleus Exp SRC QCM Fe/C= 1.43 ±0.15 Fe/C = SRC model 2. QCM model In QCM => Quark-Cluster-Model (unrealistic model in our Q 2 range) 2N SRC ===> 6q Bag; 3N SRC ===> 9q Bag QCM predictions for 2N SRC are close to experiment, while for 3N SRC almost 10 times are higher

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Having these data, we know almost full (  99%) nucleonic picture of nuclei with A  56 Single particle (%) 2N SRC (%) 3N SRC (%) 56 Fe 76 ± 0.2 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.03 ± C 80 ± 02 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.03 ± He 86 ± 0.2 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.02 ± He 92 ± ± ± H 96 ± ± Fractions Nucleus The similar data for heavier (A>56) nuclei is important, Hall C data will be available soon (J.Arrington et al.,)

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan SUMMARY  Existing experimental date indicate the presence of SRCs in nuclei, however, there are no “exact” measurements of their probabilities  Inclusive A(e,e’) scattering is effective tool for these type measurements  The ratios of per-nucleon cross sections of A(e,e’) reaction for nuclei with A = 4,12, 56 and 3 He are measured in GeV 2  Two scaling regions - at are observed  Using the measured scaling factors, in the framework of SRC model, the 2- and 3- nucleon SRC per-nucleon probabilities in nuclei with A=4,12, 56 relative to 3 He are extracted  Using the measured onsets of scaling regions, combined with the known WF of 3 He and Deuterium, the absolute per-nucleon probabilities of 2- and 3- nucleon SRC are estimated  In the framework of SRC model the nucleonic picture of nuclei with A  56 is established

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Supporting Slides

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Having these data, we know almost full (  99%) nucleonic picture of nuclei with A  56 Single particle (%) 2N SRC (%) 3N SRC (%) 56 Fe 76 ± 0.2 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.03 ± C 80 ± 02 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.03 ± He 86 ± 0.2 ± ± 0.2 ± ± 0.02 ± He 92 ± ± ± H 96 ± ± Fractions Nucleus Using the published data on (p,2p+n) [PRL,90 (2003) ] estimate the isotopic composition of 2N SRC in 12 C a pp ( 12 C)  4 ± 2 % a 2N ( 12 C)  20 ± 0.2 ± 4.1 % a pn ( 12 C)  12 ± 4 % a nn ( 12 C)  4 ± 2 %

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan The Ratios at 1<x B <2; Observation of Scaling  Analyze the ratio as a function of Q 2 and x B K takes into account differences between (e,p) and (e,n) elastic cross sections. In our Q 2 region K=1.14 and 1.18 for 12 C and 56 Fe respectively Ratios SCALE at Q 2 > 1.4 GeV 2  Onset of scaling is at x B ≥ 1.5 Scaling vanishes at low Q 2  Shown results are for 56 Fe  Results for 12 C and 4 He are similar

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Q 2 scaling of relative probabilities a 2 and a 3 in Q 2 = 1.4 – 2.6 GeV 2 region

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Calculation of a 2N ( 3 He) using 3 He and 2 H wave functions  a 2N ( 3 He) = x a 2N ( 2 H)  From the calculated ratio r( 3 He/ 2 H) SF = = 2 ± 0.1  And a 2N ( 3 He) = (2 ± 0.1) x a 2N ( 2 H) a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) a 2N ( 3 He) a 2N ( 2 H) SF

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Contributing diagrams in 2<x B <3 region Three states can contribute:  3-nucleon SRCs in “2-body” and “Star” configurations,  2-nucleon SRC, due to the c.m. motion  In x B > 2 region “2 - Body” configuration of 3-nucleon SRC dominates ( M.Sargsian et al., PRC 71, (2005) )  Experiment shows that 2-nucleon SRC contribution is significant in 2 < x B < 2.25 region p -p 2N - SRC p p p p -p 2p 3N - SRC “Star”“2- Body”

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Contributing diagrams in 2<x B <3 region Three states can contribute:  3-nucleon SRCs in “2-body” and “Star” configurations,  2-nucleon SRC, due to the c.m. motion  In x B > 2 region “2 - Body” configuration of 3-nucleon SRC dominates ( M.Sargsian et al., PRC 71, (2005) )  Experiment shows that 2-nucleon SRC contribution is significant in 2 < x B < 2.25 region only  At x B > 2.25 (p min > 500 MeV/c) only “2 - Body” configuration is contributing p -p 2N - SRC p p p p -p 2p 3N - SRC “Star”“2- Body”

JLab_Phys_Semin_Dec05 K. Egiyan Radiative Corrections 56 Fe 12 C 4 He 56 Fe 12 C 4 He 3 He