Illinois Brand Study 2014 LINDA OWENS & SOWMYA ANAND SURVEY RESEARCH LABORATORY University of Illinois at Chicago www.srl.uic.edu.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
QPSC Overall KDA Based on Q38 – Intention to Leave.
Advertisements

Energy Efficiency & Canadians National Opinion Research for CEEA April 12, 2013.
In-Game Advertising Review FOX: JUMPER DVD. 2 July 2008 July-2007 July 10, 2007 July 2008 Jumper DVD In-Game Advertising Effectiveness.
Best Practices in Fundraising Identification – Cultivation – Solicitation - Stewardship Presentation and Moderation by Jay Ornellas Panel & Group Discussion.
ATTITUDES TOWARD AFTERZONE Presented by Dr. Julie Pokela February, 2010.
PYA2 – Stress Sources of Stress. Stressors – Life Changes, Hassles and Uplifts BATs Distinguish between life events and daily hassles. Describe the strengths.
Arizona’s Cultural Heritage Tourism Study. Purpose  The purpose of the study was to generate information about cultural heritage tourists in Arizona.
Westmont College Alumni Survey April 2015 The Alumni Office and the Provost’s Office conducted a survey of Westmont alumni who graduated in the past 20.
Critical Choices: Alcohol, Drugs and University Life Annorah S. Moorman, Ph.D. Assistant Dean of Students/Director of Counseling & Consultation Services.
Project “LIBRARIES FOR INNOVATION”: Goal, Activities and Impact Stanislavas Zablockis Financial manager Project “Libraries for Innovation” Martynas Mažvydas.
The financial practices and perceptions behind separate systems of household financial management Dr Katherine Ashby, Faculty of Law and Social Sciences,
Terry Eddy Cody Havard Lori L. Braa Session # - 10:25–10:55am.
Westmont College Alumni Survey April 2015 The Alumni Office and the Provost’s Office conducted a survey of Westmont alums who graduated in the past 20.
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
VOCATION AS CALLING: THE ROLE OF GENDER IN VOCATIONAL DISCERNMENT AND ACTION AMONG FIRST-YEAR COLLEGE STUDENTS Cindy Miller-Perrin Don Thompson Research.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
Under the guidance of Mr. K. Bhaskar, MBA. Assistant Professor Submitted by S. Mujeebur Rahaman 095P1E0064.
Cultural Diversity Awareness in Kansas Universities This cultural diversity awareness study observes and compares the cultural diversity awareness in relation.
COLORADO LOTTERY 2010 IMAGE SURVEY Prepared By The Howell Research Group.
2007 ENA Membership Needs Assessment Presentation of Key Findings and Strategic Implications Prepared and Presented by Stuart Meyer, Marketing Membership.
Presented by: Meredith Curry Preparing and Planning after Your Junior Year of College May 18, 2012.
Client Satisfaction Survey what’s possible Belgrade, July 2010 Report on the findings of the CSAI Success Grants Applicants’ Satisfaction with the Grant.
Structural Assessment of a Community Service Network 1 Leah Steimel MPH 1, Melissa Roberts MS 2, Daryl Smith MPH 1 1 University of New Mexico, Office of.
SmartRate Best Practices and Lessons Learned
SCHOOL HISTORY Founded in 1875 Located in Mt. Pleasant, Utah Current enrollment 148 –81% boarding students –19% local students Faculty and staff.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Satisfaction with the quality of the sporting experience survey (SQSE 3) Results for: Swimming July 2011 Creating sporting opportunities in every community.
1 Spartan Experience Questionnaire Selected Results Spring 1999 Office of Institutional Research September 1999 UNCG Planning Council September 22, 1999.
Nicholas Strong Illinois State University Problem Most of the literature on adolescent work focuses on the experience in relation to adolescents’ academic.
NAU ALUMNI What Do We Know About Them & What Are They Telling Us?
Comparative Alumni Research: What Matters in College AFTER College.
BUILDING A PROGRAM TO REDUCE ANTI-SOCIAL BEHAVIORS Nataša Privošnik and Greta Bratovš The Institute for Developing Personal Quality Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Community Telephone Survey Public Preferences and Behaviors PREPARED FOR City of West Linn February
2009 Jamestown Park Golf Course Survey Results 25 August 2009 By R. E. Pifer, Ph.D. Meaningful Analytics.
>  Slide 1 Coaching Insights Coaching statistics and analysis 2015/16.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc Chapter Seventeen Correlation and Regression.
Institutional Learning Outcomes: Assessing Community and Global Responsibility Convocation – Fall 2015 College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill & Dave Bazard.
Rappahannock-Rapidan Regional Visioning Process Counties and Towns of Culpeper, Fauquier, Madison, Orange and Rappahannock Bruce Dotson Tanya Denckla Institute.
Put the gloss on your campaign New research shows that inserting catalogues and brochures into newspapers can deliver strong campaign results for advertisers.
Sashelle Thomas-Alexander, Cleveland State University OCTEO Conference Fall, 2010 Examining Interns’ Perceptions of Their Mentor Teachers: A Critical Component.
◦ 125 adolescents (56% girls; 75% Caucasian) and their mothers from the Adolescent Adjustment Project (AAP) ◦ Adolescents’ mean age = (SD=.70) ◦
Institute for Financial Literacy © Three Elements to a Successful Financial Literacy Education Program Leslie E. Linfield, Esq. October 29, 2008.
Results by Oversampled Geographies June SURVEY OVERVIEW.
C ULTURE & C LIMATE S URVEY. Sample Employee Survey Report Findings ACME Widgets.
Focus ABCI Evaluation Possible Threats to Integrity Variations in age of students may result in skewed, invalid, or unreliable data. Agendas of participants.
To Work or Not to Work: Motivation for work after reaching retirement age Zdeňka Šímová, National Observatory of Employment and Training, National Training.
Copyright © All rights reserved to Student Insights. 1 Student-View ™ Report Level Two July, 2007 SAMPLE REPORT.
THE 4-H STUDY OF POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT:
China Buys A CrowdSurvey Production Imported Milk Purchases Findings of a survey conducted April 30, 2014.
Fall 2008 Alumni Survey Assessment Day Presentation Office of Alumni and Development Fitchburg State College.
EDTECH Module 7 Technology Survey by J.D. Winterhalter.
The Satisfied Student October 4 th, Today’s Presentation  Present data from Case’s Senior Survey and the National Survey of Student Engagement.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
The effects of Peer Pressure, Living Standards and Gender on Underage Drinking Psychologist- Kanari zukoshi.
SADDLEBACK COLLEGE COMMUNITY BENCHMARK REPORT PRESENTATION Saddleback College Onsite Meeting November 2013, Mission Viejo, CA Pam Cox-Otto, Ph.D. - Interact.
Chapter Thirteen Marketing: Helping Buyers Buy Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
1 Correlation and Regression Analysis Lecture 11.
Citizen of Edmonton Findings: Edmonton Public School Board Preference Measurement April 14, 2008 Public Presentation EPSB Board Meeting.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Does Your Pitch Need a Little Punch? Authentic Networking in the Technological Age.
The Moderating Effect of Brand- inertia on the Relationship Between Switching Cost and Loyalty Hsiu-Yuan Tsao Takming University of Science and Technology.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
D. Randall Brandt, Ph.D. Vice President Customer Experience & Loyalty The Customer Experience Trust Factor Do You Know How Well Your Employees Are Delivering.
1 The Sexual Objectification of Women in Advertising: A Contemporary Cultural Perspective Author: Amanda Zimmerman & John Dahlberg Instructor: Kate Chen.
The Value Builder System TM is a statistically proven method for increasing the value of a company by 71%. The Sellability Tracker
Tomahawk School District Community Survey Results
Anatomy of the Campaign for SDSU.
Law Society of Scotland, Annual Members Survey 2018 Report by Mark Diffley Consultancy and Research Ltd.
Presentation transcript:

Illinois Brand Study 2014 LINDA OWENS & SOWMYA ANAND SURVEY RESEARCH LABORATORY University of Illinois at Chicago

Study Methodology 2 Study Populations Alumni of Illinois Parents of Illinois students Residents of Cook, DuPage, and Lake Counties in Illinois Methods Three separate online questionnaires invitations to alumni and parents Letter invitation to IL residents to complete online

Response Rates 3 Total in sample Total s or mail delivered# completedResponse rate Alumni parents4,6593,4191, % Non-alumni parents11,6238,3962, % Chicago alums5,9855, % Other alums3,9903, % IL residents4,0043, % Overall response rate 24%

Questionnaire 4  Number of questions varied by group  Ratings on 5-point scales and some 3-point scales  Select one or multiple from list  Open-end questions  Can group items into 6 main themes  Connection to Illinois  Value of an Illinois education  Quality of an Illinois education  How well Illinois reaches out to alumni/parents/residents  Sources of information about the university  Attitudes and intentions regarding giving

Questionnaire 5  Examples  Connection to Illinois  How often do you attend events held by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  At this time, how strong is your connection to the university?  Value of an Illinois education  How would you evaluate the value for money you get from the educational programs & services provided by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  Quality of an Illinois education  How well does the education provided by the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign train students for a specific career or profession?

Questionnaire 6  Examples  How well Illinois reaches out to alumni/parents/residents  How much does the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign value its relationship with alumni/parents/residents?  How close a connection does the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign maintain with alumni/parents/residents?  Sources of information about the university  How much information do you get about what is happening at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  In the past 3 months, have you seen any advertisements featuring the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?  Attitudes and intentions regarding giving  Of the following, which motivates you the most to make a charitable gift to the university?  In the next 5 years, how likely are you to make a financial contribution to the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign?

Alumni Results R 2 = 0.290, F (5, n = 1,315) = , p < Alumni who feel connected more likely to intend to make a financial contribution in the next five years 7 Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients tSig. BStd. ErrorBeta (Constant)– – Connect Value Change since R attended Outreach Age

Alumni Results Feeling connected also strongly associated with past contributions 8 Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients tSig. BStd. ErrorBeta (Constant)– – Connect Quality Change since R attended Respondent age R 2 = 0.173, F (4, n = 1,308) = , p <

Alumni Results Unfortunately, connection to Illinois is not very strong 9 Not strong at all (1) Slightly strong (2) Moderately strong (3) Very strong (4) Extremely strong (5)Total At this time, how strong is your connection to the university? , %28.4%26.0%11.5%4.5% 100.0% Mean 2.3

Alumni Results 10 NortheastMidwestSouthWest Not strong at all (1) %27.1%38.0%31.0% Slightly strong (2) %28.3%27.3%32.7% Moderately strong (3) %26.4%24.8%27.4% Very strong (4) %12.6%9.1%7.1% Extremely strong (5) %5.5%0.8%1.8% Total 531, % Mean χ 2 (12, n = 1,335) = , p = At this time, how strong is your connection to the university?

Alumni Results However, there is opportunity to strengthen alumni connections 11 Decrease greatly/ somewhat (1) Stay the same (2) Increase somewhat (3) Increase greatly (4)Total Would you like your current level of connection to the university to increase, decrease, or stay the same in the future? , %39.5%46.9%10.4% 100.0% Mean 2.6

Alumni Results 12 ChicagolandElsewhere Decrease greatly/somewhat (1) %3.5% Stay the same (2) %47.1% Increase somewhat (3) %41.5% Increase greatly (4) %7.9% Total % Mean χ 2 (3, n = 1,311) = , p = Would you like your current level of connection to the university to increase, decrease, or stay the same in the future? Chicagoland based alumni would like to increase connection

Alumni Results 13 How Much the University Values Its Relationship with Alumni χ 2 (3, n = 1,335) = 9.237, p = But, Chicagoland based alumni also have less positive perceptions ChicagolandElsewhere Not at all (1) %2.2% A little (2) %13.3% A moderate amount (3) %33.0% A lot (4) %38.4% A great deal (5) %13.1% Total % Mean3.33.5

Alumni Results 14 ChicagolandElsewhere Not well at all (1) %1.4% Slightly well (2) %4.8% Moderately well (3) %20.4% Very well (4) %47.2% Extremely well (5) %26.2% Total % Mean χ 2 (4, n = 1,415) = , p = How Well “World-Class Educational Institution” Describes the University

Alumni Results 15 ChicagolandElsewhere Not at all/to a small extent (1) %1.3% To some extent (2) %16.3% To a large extent (3) %36.7% To a great extent (4) %45.7% Total % Mean How Much Illinois Research Impacts the World χ 2 (3, n = 1,307) = , p =

Alumni Results 16 How Much the Educational Experience Provided by the University Helps to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking and Analytic Skills χ 2 (3, n = 1,309) = , p = ChicagolandElsewhere Does not help at all/helps a little (1) %5.8% Helps a moderate amount (2) %17.8% Helps a lot (3) %40.1% Helps a great deal (4) %36.4% Total % Mean2.93.1

Alumni Results 17 How Much the Education Provided by the University Improves Students’ Future Earning Potential χ 2 (3, n = 1,335) = 9.237, p = ChicagolandElsewhere Not at all/a little (1) %4.1% A moderate amount (2) %21.1% A lot (3) %38.8% A great deal (4) %36.0% Total % Mean2.93.1

Parent Results 18  Very similar results for parents stratum  Strength of connection lower among non-alumni parents,  Yet group expresses a slightly greater preference for increasing their connection.

19 Questions?

Thank you! 20