Malcolm Bell Head of VisitCornwall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Tourism Department of Tourism NTSS DRAFT REVIEW FRAMEWORK NTSF MEETING 17 SEPTEMBER 2014.
Advertisements

Best practice partnership models
In Europe, When you ask the VET stakeholders : What does Quality Assurance mean for VET system? You can get the following answer: Quality is not an absolute.
Harvard E -118 November 17,  UNWTO Initiative Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations (2004) Indicators of Sustainable Development.
SEEA: A progress report with an emphasis on EGSS Sokol Vako United Nations Statistics Division/DESA.
ECVET WORKSHOP 2 22/23/24 November The European Quality Assurance Reference Framework.
Moving to a Unified Grants Process and a Single Monitoring Framework Jim Gray Acting Head of Community Planning, Corporate Services Dept, Glasgow City.
“Draft Agora Strategy for Sustainable Tourism Development in the Baltic Sea Region” Agora - Network Sustainable Tourism Development in the Baltic Sea Region.
Networks GDITS Grandi Destinazioni Italiane per il turismo sostenibile Workshop on ETIS Milan, February 13, 2015 Cinzia De Marzo European Commission,
Communication on "Land as a Resource" Jacques DELSALLE Head of sector Land & Soil European Commission, DG Environment FoEE Conference "Putting resource.
Learning Objectives Demonstrate the critical importance of tourism policy to the competitiveness and sustainability of a tourism destination Outline the.
Wenxin Zhang Department of Civic Design University of Liverpool
Erica Allis United Nations Environment Programme Eleventh Caribbean Conference on Sustainable Tourism Development May 9 th -13 th St. Michael, Barbados.
The Knowledge Resources Guide The SUVOT Project Sustainable and Vocational Tourism Rimini, 20 October 2005.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
Inspireco Training How to become a Ecotourism Destination Herbert Hamele/ ECOTRANS Egirdir, June 2014.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
Definition of Ecotourism  Ecotourism Kenya defines Ecotourism as, “the involvement of travelers in environmental conservation practices that address.
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool and Suggested Structure for Assessment United Nations Statistics.
A Common Immigration Policy for Europe Principles, actions and tools June 2008.
Sustainable Tourism development
Ioannis Ch. Saridakis Chemical Engineer ELOT, Hellenic Organization for Standardization Initial meeting, Athens, 11 May 2010 AgriTourNet /ELOT May 2010.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General Sustainable Tourism in Europe: Chances & Challenges Podgorica 26 May Edward Tersmette.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General An agenda for a sustainable and competitive European tourism Dia Mundial del Turismo Jerez.
TORINO PROCESS. TORINO PROCESS 2014 THE TORINO PROCESS 2 THE TORINO PROCESS IS a participatory process leading to an evidence-based analysis of VET policies.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
The importance of a collective approach in delivering a thriving visitor economy Jason Freezer, Destinations Manager.
EQARF Applying EQARF Framework and Guidelines to the Development and Testing of Eduplan.
JOINT STRATEGIC NEEDS ASSESSMENT Rebecca Cohen Policy Specialist, Chief Executive’s.
Local Transport Plan 3 Vision and Issues. The Local Transport Plan Will replace LTP2, which expires 31 March must have LTP3 approved and operative.
Part 1 Unit 1 Introduction and Overview Risk Management and Strategic Planning.
An Education for Sustainable Development and Global Citizenship Toolkit for WBL Providers in Wales Katie Elmer, Associate WSP Environmental 25 th June.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
INTEGRATED ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 1 Click to edit Master title style 1 Analysis of the planning process Why and how? Session.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Dinaric Arc Parks Sharing nature, sharing values ….Helping to establish a positive regional identity built on shared values, personal contacts and joint.
JOINING UP GOVERNMENTS EUROPEAN COMMISSION Establishing a European Union Location Framework.
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on New Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Applied Research.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Corporate Social Responsibility LECTURE 25: Corporate Social Responsibility MGT
EUROPEAN SOCIAL FUND EQUAL - The European Perspective EQUAL Initiative EQUAL The European Perspective Dublin - 25 September 2003 Ian Livingstone European.
Key Principles for Preparing the DCSD Community Plan 1.Integration – Social, Economic, Environmental Well-being focused on outcomes and people centred.
Training Resource Manual on Integrated Assessment Session UNEP-UNCTAD CBTF Process of an Integrated Assessment Session 2.
Copyright  2005 McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd PPTs t/a Australian Human Resources Management by Jeremy Seward and Tim Dein Slides prepared by Michelle.
Sample Codes of Ethics in Adventure Tourism
Special Interest Tourism Nicos Rodosthenous PhD 29/10/ /10/20131Dr Nicos Rodosthenous.
COLBOURNE COLLEGE PRESENTED BY SADEKE SMITH SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
Chapter V. RURAL DEVELOPMENT Ing. Barbora Milotová, PhD. Department of Regional Development
European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General The agenda for a sustainable and competitive European tourism DestiLink – Conference Tourism.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
GLOBAL PARTNERSHIP ON MARINE LITTER.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
W w w. a u d i t 0 6. f i ENERGY AUDIT ’06 International Conference on Energy Audits Timo Husu Head of Unit, Energy Efficiency Motiva Oy, Finland.
1 First Nations Economic Development Readiness Questionnaire Presented By: Ontario First Nations Economic Developers Association and Ministry Of Economic.
Attraction of investments into tourism sector in the EU member states The existing practice of special economic regime of natural resources management.
TD MANAGEMENT PG PLANNING THE NETWORK Future Needs for Performance Indicators & Road Data.
Herbert Hamele ECOTRANS e.V., Saarbrücken TAIEX, Brussels, 27 March 2012 Using Ecolabels for mainstreaming Sustainable European Tourism RolesStakeholders.
Convention of the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Developing a guidance on water and climate adaptation for the.
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
Presenter: DR. RAY MUTINDA, UNECA SRO-EA ……………………………………………………………………. UNECA REGIONAL TOURISM MEETING FOR EASTERN AFRICA 1 ST -3 RD JUNE, 2016 Kigali, Rwanda.
Tourism Master Plan A master plan for tourism destinations usually incorporates concerns that includes all aspects of Tourism development process. Factors.
Projects, Events and Training
Malcolm Bell Director South West Tourism
Monitoring and Evaluation of Sustainable tourism
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
How the proposed new delivery model for the CAP will provide the ground for the further development of Smart Villages’ approaches? Beata Adamczyk European.
Addressing the challenge of water scarcity and droughts
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
7th Environment Action Programme to 2020 Living well, within the limits of our planet Evaluation - COM (2019) May 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Malcolm Bell Head of VisitCornwall

Background and Depth of The Indicators Influenced by: Concept of sustainable development based on 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development’s Agenda 21 - a comprehensive plan of action adopted by 178 governments. EC reported on basic orientations for the sustainability of European tourism (2003) UNWTO and UNEP identified an agenda of 12 aims for sustainable tourism (2005) EU Sustainable Development Strategy (SDS) developed three key objectives given above activities: economic prosperity; social equity and cohesion; and environmental protection.

Work to Date Tourism Sustainability Group (TSG) set up by EC (2004) to address: Importance of tourism Aims to make tourism more sustainable & challenges to achieve aims Recommended processes to overcome challenges Create a framework for action (indicators) and initiatives to be taken Mandate for action with stakeholders included providing guidance for local Destination Management Organisations (DMOs) to use indicators and monitoring systems Considerable work into the development of the TSG indicators since 2007 Testing feasibility in NECSTouR and EDEN destinations (2010) NECSTouR evaluation and report EDEN evaluation and report by University of Barcelona Improvements made by TSG

EC Tourism Sustainability Group Established in 2004 Representatives from Industry, Stakeholders and Destinations 2004-2007 Development of Sustainable and Competitive Tourism Report 2007 adoption at Algarve European Tourism Forum 2009 Working Groups – W/G A Sustainable Tourism Indictors

Indicators - The Challenges Gaining Agreement on which indicators are core Ensure they cover all three pillars Establishing which are practical and achievable Can procedures be developed for those that do not exist yet Gaining partners to pilot Evaluating application and results etc

The Prize To set Destination level targets Use for Regional/National Bodies A Benchmarking system Measuring progress Trend analysis possible Assist in the justification of public investment in tourism management

Sources of Data Official Statistics/source Visitor Surveys Business Surveys Host Community Surveys New techniques

The Indicators Tourism Volume and Value Tourism Enterprise Performance Customer Satisfaction Community and Social Impact Quantity and Quality of Employment Gender Equality Equality and Accessibility

The Indicators Reducing Transportation Impact Climate Change Sustainable Tourism Management Practices Solid Waste Management Water Management Energy Usage

The Indicators 14. Sewage Treatment 15. Landscape and Biodiversity Protection 16. Light and Noise Management 17. Inclusive Management Practices 18. Development Control 19. Tourism Supply Chain 20. Protecting and enhancing local cultural identity and assets

Study to assess the feasibility of a European Tourism Indicator System for Sustainable Management at Destination Level The SUSTAIN System SUStainable Tourism And INdicator system St Ives 6th September 2012

Work to Date Tourism Sustainability Group (TSG) set up by EC (2004) to address: Importance of tourism Aims to make tourism more sustainable & challenges to achieve aims Recommended processes to overcome challenges Create a framework for action (indicators) and initiatives to be taken Mandate for action with stakeholders included providing guidance for local Destination Management Organisations (DMOs) to use indicators and monitoring systems Considerable work into the development of the TSG indicators since 2007 Testing feasibility in NECSTouR and EDEN destinations (2010) NECSTouR evaluation and report EDEN evaluation and report by University of Barcelona Improvements made by TSG

The purpose of this project …is to investigate the feasibility of a Europe-wide system of tourism indicators for the sustainable management of destinations and To make recommendations to European stakeholders for its implementation.

The importance of this project This is a key element of the work of the European Commission to promote an internationally competitive tourism industry and to enhance the sustainability of destinations across Europe.

Benefits to Your Destination General Creates vision and guidelines for destination sustainable tourism development; Creates framework for benchmarking, communications & good practices learning exchange Economic Identifies resource and financial savings (e.g. energy, waste, water, etc.) Identifies data supported resource reallocation needs based on destination goals Protects destination as a tourist attraction Develops opportunities for funding Enhances branding, marketing and communications Social Improves quality life for locals; Improves relations between residents and tourists Supports LT well-being of residents by informing policy / management decisions (E.g. resource reallocation for bringing tourists from resort to rural areas) Environmental Preserves ecological integrity of destinations; Emphasises value and conservation of natural and cultural resources

The importance of the Workshops Purpose : To introduce you to the SUSTAIN process and indicators To test the SUSTAIN system Part of an exclusive group of European pilot destinations Outcomes: General stakeholder understanding of SUSTAIN and the process Generate feedback the project team can use to refine the system Launch a process that is ongoing and crucial for your destination Receive data response from destinations 2 weeks after workshop

To develop the SUSTAIN System we have: Researched 35 indicator systems from across the world; Narrowed down to 20 systems and analysed 8 in depth for EU relevance Included GSTC (future consideration) Assessed TSG indicators based on expert experience Assessed NECSTouR and EDEN feasibility reports Interviewed a sample of NECSTouR and EDEN DMOs Integrated lessons learned and made recommendations to EC (TSG) based on above assessments for improvements and final Toolkit Result given significant destination support - a comprehensive system including process and methodology rather that just list of indicators - SUSTAIN

The SUSTAIN System – Key Principles Flexible Inter-sectoral Integrated approach Comes with a toolkit Simple - with a concise core of indicators Driven by the Destination Management Organisation (DMO) working with a group of stakeholders

SUSTAIN: The 7 Steps Step 1. Raise Awareness Step 2. Create a Destination Profile Step 3. Bring together a Stakeholder Working Group Step 4. Allocate Roles and Responsibilities Step 5. Collect and Record Data Step 6. Results Analysis and Benchmarking Step 7. Ongoing Development and Continuous improvement

“Destination” Definition One of the first things your Stakeholder Working Group will need to do is determine the geographical boundaries of your destination. For the purposes of this study, a destination can be defined as: A geographic area that is currently or potentially attractive to visitors/tourists. A place/area which is recognised and can easily be defined as a visitor destination and has a range of facilities and products in place for tourism purposes. A place/area which is promoted as a destination and has management processes for visitor related and tourism purposes. A place/area where it is possible to measure the supply of and demand for tourism services i.e. the visitor economy. A place/area where the visitor management process usually includes a range of public and private sector stakeholders together with the host community

The SUSTAIN Process Steps 1,2 & 3 STEP 1: Raise Awareness Get involved Spread the message STEP 2: Create a Destination Profile Provides a snapshot of your destination An overview for you A summary for those less familiar STEP 3: Bring together a Stakeholder Working Group (SWG) Invite stakeholders from relevant sectors Convene a participatory workshop Identify core issues and indicators

The SUSTAIN Indicators Divided into 4 categories based on the Global Sustainable Tourism Criteria (GSTC) A - Sustainable destination management B - Economic value C - Social and cultural impacts D - Environmental Impacts Approach Clear and simple Tailor the System to your destination through selecting optional indicators Start with what you can and build up. Lack of data for some indicators is not a problem but shows where work is needed.

Some Examples of Core Indicators Section A: Destination Management Core Indicators A.1 Sustainable Tourism Public Policy Indicator A.1.1 Percentage of the destination with a sustainable tourism strategy/action plan, with agreed monitoring, development control and evaluation arrangement Section B: Economic Value Core Indicators B.1 Tourism Flow (volume & value) at Destination Indicator B.1.1 Number of tourist nights per month Indicator B.1.2 Daily spending per tourist (accommodation, food and drinks, other services) Section C: Social and Cultural Impact Core Indicators C.1 Community/Social Impact Indicator C.1.1 Number of tourists/visitors per 100 residents Section D: Environmental Impact Core Indicators D.1 Reducing Transport Impact Indicator D.1.1 Percentage of tourists and same day visitors using different modes of transport (public/private and type)

Some Examples of Optional Indicators Section C: Social and Cultural Impact Core Indicator: C.1.1 Number of tourists/visitors per 100 residents Reason for measuring The density of tourists/visitors in comparison to residents offers a suitable indicator for understanding the social impact of tourism on residents. This is referred to as the ‘penetration ratio’. Optional Indicators you could also consider: Optional Indicator C.1.1.1 Percentage of residents who are satisfied with tourism in the destination (per month/season) Optional Indicator: C.1.1.2 Number of beds available in commercial accommodation per 100 residents Optional Indicator: C.1.1.3 Number of second/rental homes per 100 homes

Group Exercise To start to form a picture of the indicators most relevant to your destination, stakeholders will be dived into groups and asked to undertake the following exercise: Identify all the optional indicators relevant to your destination Of those identified as relevant, prioritise which you would most like to see included

The 7 Steps (continued) STEP 4: Establish Roles and Responsibilities Responsibility is shared so no one is over-burdened Members collect indicator data according to role DMO acts as central point of contact for data collation STEP 5: Collect and Record Data Members have an allocated amount of time to obtain the data for the indicator they are responsible for Feed data and any comments back to DMO

The 7 Steps (continued) STEP 6: Results analysis and benchmarking Toolkit has built-in Dataset to collect and store results Results will show up areas of concern Agree priorities, benchmarks and a plan of action to achieve them. STEP 7: Ongoing Development and Continuous Improvement Meet regularly to review progress against targets Make longer-term plans, with timelines and agree responsibilities

Next Steps… Responsibility for relevant data collection will be allocated by DMO Data should then be collected and passed to DMO DMO collates and records data to generate results for destination Stakeholder Working Group can meet again and set benchmarks - aim for continuous improvement Feedback Form should also be returned to DMO Your collective feedback will be used to develop and refine the final SUSTAIN system for a launch next year.

Thank You Malcolm Bell Malcolm.Bell@vistcornwall.com