ESTIMATING THE RETURNS OF INVESTING IN RMNCH Malcolm Bryant and Susan Foster
Overview Why calculate ROI Overall approach Developing a framework for policy-makers How it will work Challenges 2
Why calculate returns on investment for RMNCH? Economic benefits of investing in health have been calculated for a range of populations and diseases Identification of the economic benefits of investing in HIV, TB, malaria—presented persuasive cases Financing agencies understood these arguments, and as a result, increased funding RMNCH have not benefitted from the same form of detailed analysis Country-level decision-makers require tools to understand and support RMNCH 3
Overall approach Review and list the RMNCH challenges faced by women and their children in low-income environments Identify the major health, social, and other impacts of each challenge Identify the economic impact of each challenge 4
Creating a framework Identify the most important costs associated with each impact Use an expanded cost-of-illness approach; Capture direct and indirect costs; Individuals Households Healthcare systems Societies 5
Populate the framework What data is required to estimate each cost at the national level? What are the possible sources of such data in typical country settings? Current burden of morbidity and mortality Unit costs to estimate the cost of illness Estimate current costs of providing RMNCH interventions and services Identify data needed to calculate productivity losses 6
How will it work? 1. What are the RMNCH challenges? All common maternal, neonatal, and childhood illnesses and conditions! How to make sense of them? The Continuum of Care 7
8
Adolescence and before pregnancy Stage/EventChallengesOutcomesImpacts Menarche and before Rituals – e.g. FGM Pain, shame, fear, psychological and mental illness, dyspareunia, perineal tears during labor Burden on health system Marital discord+/- divorce Neonatal deaths and asphyxia, postpartum hemorrhage and death MenstruationPain, inconvenience Early marriage Lost days at school, lost days at work, Decreased female literacy; increased child mortality; Lost productivity Early Sexual Activity Unwanted pregnancy, STI, HIV/AIDS Social rejection, dystocia in young girls, Infertility, divorce, early end of schooling Burden on health system Neonatal death and asphyxia, decreased female literacy, increased child mortality 9
Selecting priorities RMNCH is infinitely complex (it makes HIV, TB, and Malaria seem simple). We have to make rational choices about which impacts to address Proposed Criteria: Must be proven interventions to address impact Feasibility Political visibility Attractive to politicians and can be understood by them Evidence of cost-effectiveness 10
Possible criteria that could be used Health services costs averted Lives saved – RMNCH is unique in being able to save more than one life with one treatment episode, e.g. a mother and the baby Long term sequelae of birth injuries, e.g. asphyxia - need for lifetime of care, low or no income earning, etc. Long term sequelae of maternal injuries e.g. fistula – divorce, stigma Indirectly, loss of a mother often means poor survival of remaining children Increasing under five survival has a disproportionate effect on national life-expectancy Societal costs – low morale, fatalism, orphans, widowers 11
Who is our target audience International funding agencies? Politicians and policymakers at national level Ministry of Finance Ministry of Health National medical and nursing staff and thought leaders Local politicians and funding groups in decentralized settings 12
How closely to link with health and non- health solutions Where does female education fit in with this? 13
Next Steps Link RMNCH challenges to health, social, economic and other impacts Estimate the costs to the individual, household, community, health system, and country of each impact Create a simple tool that can be used to estimate the costs Simple is key. Methodological soundness is required, but a balance must be maintained between the perfect and the practical 14