Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Advertisements

Madison County Travel Demand Model Challenges and Innovations Diane B. Zimmerman, PE.
What is SBCAG? Voluntary council of governments Established in 1966 under a JPA executed by local governments 13 member Board of Directors: – 5 County.
ISTEA is Now 20 Years Old and We are Still Searching for the Land Use-Transportation Connection. Actually, Analysis of that Connection Has Been Sought.
GIS at PSRC GIS data collection & travel demand modeling ESRM 250 February 4, 2010.
Comparing Aggregate Trip- Based and Disaggregate Tour-Based Travel Demand Models: Columbus Highway Results.
The SoCoMMS Model Paul Read Dan Jones. The Presentation Outline of the Study The Modelling Framework Accessibility Model.
What is the Model??? A Primer on Transportation Demand Forecasting Models Shawn Turner Theo Petritsch Keith Lovan Lisa Aultman-Hall.
Implementing the FHWA Quick Response Freight Model in the Twin Cities Steve Wilson and Jonathan Ehrlich SRF Consulting Group, Inc. SRF Consulting Group,
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
Chapter 4 1 Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply 1.List the four steps of transportation demand analysis 2.List the four steps of travel.
Session 11: Model Calibration, Validation, and Reasonableness Checks
Sequential Demand Forecasting Models CTC-340. Travel Behavior 1. Decision to travel for a given purpose –People don’t travel without reason 2. The choice.
CE 2710 Transportation Engineering
TxDOT Project Developing Freight Highway Corridor Performance Measure Strategies in Texas.
Lec 20, Ch.11: Transportation Planning Process (objectives)
Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate the number of travelers or vehicles that will use.
Planning Process ► Early Transport Planning  Engineering-oriented  1944, First “ O-D ” study  Computational advances helped launch new era in planning.
Framework for Model Development General Model Design Highway Network/Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) Development of Synthetic Trip Tables Development of.
Miller Road Feasibility Study & Reconstruction Project Information and Kick-off Meeting Presented by: The Corradino Group of Michigan, Inc. ROWE INC. Genesee.
Regional Travel Modeling Unit 6: Aggregate Modeling.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
Implementing a Blended Model System to Forecast Transportation and Land Use Changes at Bob Hope Airport 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 10 Traffic (Trip) Assignment Trip Generation Trip Distribution Transit Estimation & Mode.
Validate - A Nationwide Dynamic Travel Demand Model for Germany Peter Vortisch, Volker Waßmuth, PTV AG, Germany.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNING. TOPICS 1.ROADS AND PUBLIC GOODS 2.RATIONALE TO JUSTIFY ROAD BUILDING 3.URBAN PLANNING AND TRAFFIC CONGESTION (UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES)
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Talking Freight Seminar presented by Richard Margiotta Cambridge Systematics, Inc. September 21,
Keir Opie National Center for Transportation and Industrial Productivity (NCTIP) New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT) Paramics North American User.
June 15, 2010 For the Missoula Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Modeling
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
Performance Analysis Presentation to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board (NCR-TPB) November 28, 2012 Adopted: July 18, 2012 Item.
2007 TRB Planning Application Conference D ELDOT S TATEWIDE E VACUATION M ODEL.
Simpson County Travel Demand Model Mobility Analysis November 7, 2003.
Transportation Planning 599 Cooltoolsfor successful transportation projects Troy Hearn Division of Planning.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Integration of Transportation System Analyses in Cube Wade L. White, AICP Citilabs Inc.
Improvements and Innovations in TDF CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Chapter 12.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco’s Dynamic Traffic Assignment Model Background SFCTA DTA Model Peer Review Panel Meeting July.
TRANSPORT The Cambridge Futures response to the Draft Structure Plan Dr Tony Hargreaves, Cambridge Futures.
Traffic Parameters for use with MOBILE6 in Ky. - Update by Jesse Mayes, P.E. Division of Multimodal Programs July 22, 2003.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Model: Working Model Calibration Part 1: Process Greg Erhardt Dan Tischler Neema Nassir.
The Iowa Travel Analysis Model Civil Engineering 451/551 Fall Semester 2009 Presented by: Phil Mescher, AICP Office of Systems Planning, Iowa Department.
Incorporating Traffic Operations into Demand Forecasting Model Daniel Ghile, Stephen Gardner 22 nd international EMME Users’ Conference, Portland September.
Challenges in Using Paramics in a Secondary Plan Study – Case Study of Downsview, Toronto Paramics Users Group Meeting October 5, 2009.
Integrated Travel Demand Model Challenges and Successes Tim Padgett, P.E., Kimley-Horn Scott Thomson, P.E., KYTC Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., KYOVA IPC.
Calibrating Model Speeds, Capacities, and Volume Delay Functions Using Local Data SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting February 6, 2009 Dean Lawrence.
Tri-level freight modeling: A simulation of trucks going near and far Rolf Moeckel Parsons Brinckerhoff Sabya Mishra University of Maryland TRB Planning.
Statewide Modeling and Corridor Management CE 451/551 A good reference:
Tennessee Statewide Model Subarea Model Development and Analysis Tennessee Model Users Group Meeting October 24, 2007 Presented by: Dean Munn Senior Transportation.
Transportation Forecasting The Four Step Model. Norman W. Garrick Transportation Forecasting What is it? Transportation Forecasting is used to estimate.
November 28, 2006 CCOS On-Road Allocation Factors Page 1 Spatial & Temporal Allocation of On-Road Emissions CCOS Technical Committee November 28, 2006.
1 Methods to Assess Land Use and Transportation Balance By Carlos A. Alba May 2007.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Putting the LBRS and other GIS data to Work for Traffic Flow Modeling in Erie County Sam Granato, Ohio DOT Carrie Whitaker, Erie County 2015 Ohio GIS Conference.
Florida’s First Eco-Sustainable City. 80,000+ Residential Units 10 million s.f. Non-Residential 20 Schools International Clean Technology Center Multi-Modal.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
CE Urban Transportation Planning and Management Iowa State University Calibration and Adjustment Techniques, Part 1 Source: Calibration and Adjustment.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
Travel Demand Forecasting: Traffic Assignment CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Transportation Planning: An Introduction CE331 Transportation Engineering.
SMOKE-MOVES Processing
Sustainable Urban Transport Strategies for Metro Cebu
Chapter 4. Modeling Transportation Demand and Supply
United States Census Bureau Data in various forms has been used as part of the current update to the Kentucky Statewide Traffic Model (KYSTM). The goal.
Johnson City MPO Travel Demand Model
Ventura County Traffic Model (VCTM) VCTC Update
Presentation transcript:

Simpson County Travel Demand Model July 22, 2003

BACKGROUND WSA started working on KY 1008 Pre-Design Scoping Study in November 2002 Currently, there is ¾ of a Bypass (KY 1008) around Franklin, Kentucky Planning project aimed to determine need (if any) for full bypass Traffic would be important in justification of new segment As a result, the KYTC made the decision to develop travel demand model to coincide with study

BACKGROUND (CONT.) Project coordinated through the Divisions of Planning and Multimodal Programs KYTC decided to build full travel demand model for Simpson County for future uses Air quality analysis (non-attainment) Other transportation improvements

BACKGROUND (CONT.)

STUDY AREA

Roadway Coverage / Network Traffic Analysis Zones Model Development Trip Generation Trip Distribution Traffic Assignment MODEL DEVELOPMENT

ROADWAY COVERAGE Roadway Coverage includes: All state-maintained roads in Simpson County I-65 (North / South) US 31W (North / South) KY 100 (West / East) Many local roads County Roads City Streets

ROADWAY COVERAGE

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ZONES Traffic Analysis Zones were based upon: Census Blocks / Census TAZs The highway network Socioeconomic Data included: Census Bureau Dun & Bradstreet Employment Data Franklin-Simpson Industrial Board KYTC District 3

3-STEP MODEL Automated using GISDK User Interface Trip Generation (Quick Response Method) Trip Distribution (Gravity Model with Gamma Function) Traffic Assignment (User Equilibrium)

GISDK USER INTERFACE Originally developed for the Madisonville UATS Easily moved from model to model Simplified each model run Included Error-Prevention Strategies

RESULTS Very good initial runs Particular consideration given to calibration in Franklin and areas near bypass Met FHWA calibration requirements Overall RMSE < 30% RMSE requirements achieved for all functional classifications Also, met RMSE requirements for volume groups

FRANKLIN BYPASS EXTENSION The calibrated base year model was used to forecast traffic patterns for the Future Year 2025 As mentioned, the number of vehicles expected to utilize new bypass extension was very important Result ranged from 6,500 – 7,000 vehicles per day on the bypass (Year 2025)

TRUCK COMPONENT E-E truck trips are a major source of truck trips in the study area along major north/south routes (I-65/US 31W) External-External (E- E) truck trips were simulated for this project based on existing truck counts Internal truck trips is currently being developed

BPR CURVE Speed Estimation has been important topic recently for the KYTC KYTC asked to use updated BPR function parameters: a = 0.05 (signalized); 0.2 (other) b = 10 Currently, conducting sensitivity analyses to study the difference between default BPR (a=0.15; b=4) parameters and updated BPR parameters

MOBILITY ANALYSIS Another important topic for KYTC is Mobility Analysis Currently, researching TTI methodology for computing congestion using: Travel Time Index Travel Rate Index Result will be an overall value (or index) for quantifying congestions for an urban area (or other specified area)

Questions?