Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Judicial Systems 2002 Facts and figures on the basis of a survey conducted in 40 Council of Europe Member States.
Advertisements

Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries.
The judicial system in Albania The judicial power is exercised by the courts of first instance, the courts of appeal and the High Court. Courts may be.
AGENCY FOR PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION AND COORDINATION OF FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION mr.sci. Vladica Babić - Assisstent.
Identification of critical success factors for implementing NLLS, through collaboration and exchange of expertise IDENTIFY LLP-2008-RO-KA1-KA1NLLS.
Judicial reform in Montenegro in the scope of the European Union integration process The road forward and the steps taken Ms. Branka Lakočević Deputy Minister.
© 2006 Rule of Law and Fair Trial Federal Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Austria Rule of Law and Fair Trial.
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
Jasminka Dzumhur, Ombudsperson of BiH “Role of national human rights institutions” Ljubljana, 1. December 2014.
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools. CEPEJ Guidelines.
European developments in judicial systems Pim Albers Special advisor of the CEPEJ Council of Europe.
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe.
Kosovo (Under UNSCR 1244) Statistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 6, October 7 th, – Overview of the Criminal Justice System and.
1 ENISA’s contribution to the development of Network and Information Security within the Community By Andrea PIROTTI Executive Director ENISA Cyprus, 28.
Tasks:  analyse the judicial systems in member states  identify the difficulties they meet  define concrete ways to improve the functioning of these.
CEPEJ Activities on Court Performance. Activities of CEPEJ in the field of… Evaluation of Judicial Systems Evaluation of Judicial Systems Judicial time.
Indicators for Criminal Cases Management in Bulgaria Public Hearing: Improving Criminal Justice Systems in Europe: The Role of E-Tools and Performance.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SECURITY AND CITIZENSHIP JUSTICE
University of Warsaw The Office for Quality of Education 11th of December th of December 2008.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Judicial component.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
With funding from the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FOR JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS
The judge in the European Judicial Area: Civil and Commercial matters. (9 th edition )
Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 9, November Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics – Publication of results,
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
1 Seminar on 2008 SNA Implementation June 2010, Saint John’s, Antigua and Barbuda GULAB SINGH UN Statistics Division Diagnostic Framework: National.
The European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice and evaluation of legal systems (Council of Europe) Dr. Pim Albers Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands.
1 EU LAW WEEK 3 INSTITUTIONS OF THE EU. 2 INSTITUTIONS Institutions of the EU Principal Institutions Advisory Institutions 1.European Parliament 2.The.
Corruption, Democracy and justice Pim Albers Special advisor European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ)
Bosnia & Herzegovina Statistical Training Prosecution / Courts Session 4, November 22nd Overview of the Criminal Justice System and Statistics – Recording.
Silence in this Lecture Switch OFF mobile telephones Take notes If you wish to ask a question raise your hand …
Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Serbia Implementation of the third pillar of the Aarhus Convention - Access to.
The Court of Justice of the European Communities.
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA The Reform of the Judicial System in the Republic of Macedonia Warsaw, June 2005.
The Court of Justice of the European Union and its case law in the area of civil justice European Commission specific programme “Civil Justice” project.
1 Report on European judicial systems Presentation of the main results Edition 2012 (data 2010)
1 OSCE ODIHR and international /regional human rights law and related case-law Tina Gewis, Chief of Rule of Law Unit, ODIHR Strasbourg, 20 October 2015.
Rapporteurs: Jean-Paul JEAN (France) Ramin GURBANOV (Azerbaijan) Strasbourg, 10 December 2015.
Trends and Successes in Improving Access to Justice Dr. Pim Albers Special advisor.
PROGRAMMING OF INTERNATIOAL ASSISTANCE Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Justice 25 th September, 2007.
UNEP EIA Training Resource ManualTopic 14Slide 1 What is SEA? F systematic, transparent process F instrument for decision-making F addresses environmental.
1 Quality of justice and courts Checklist Checklist for promoting the quality of justice and the courts.
MINISTRY OF FINANCE Counsellor, docent, Dr Tuomas Pöysti1 The Constitutionalisation and Evolution of Penal Law and Control Policy in the European.
Study session: evaluating activities of courts and judges Moderator: Frans van der Doelen Plenary meeting CEPEJ 7 December 2011.
1 Report on European judicial systems Presentation of the main results Edition 2010 (data 2008)
Strategic Targeting of Recidivism through Evaluation And Monitoring (STREAM) Rob Canton Workstream 4.
Joint Programme Enhancing judicial reform in the Eastern Partnership countries Conseil de l'EuropeUnion européenne Council of EuropeEuropean Union.
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool Agnes von Maravic Children’s Rights Division Council of Europe Based on slides prepared by Gerison.
International Family Mediation A global Programme International Social Service General Secretariat 4th April 2016, Melbourne.
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW. Ahmed T. Ghandour.. HUMAN RIGHTS IN EUROPE II. OTHER INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES.
Citizenship and Human Rights Education Assessing progress with the help of the Council of Europe Charter.
Linguistic Diversity An indisputable feature of the nations history and contemporary life.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
European Judicial Training Network - Judicial training
Monitoring social and economic rights
CEPEJ IN TURKEY Ismail Aksel CEPEJ Member of Turkey
Council of Europe Child Participation Assessment Tool
OSCE ODIHR and international /regional human rights law and related case-law Tina Gewis, Chief of Rule of Law Unit, ODIHR Strasbourg, 20 October 2015.
Measuring quantitative indicators Courts performance
European judicial training
Experiences and improvement plans
CEPEJ European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice Council of Europe Dear Excellencies, Dear Colleagues and guests!
CEPEJ Guidelines, Studies and Evaluation Tools
Albanian Situation Marsida Xhaferllari and Brunilda Kadi
Conseil de l'Europe Union européenne
A Proactive Role for Court Presidents
Presentation transcript:

Bosnia Statistical Training Prosecution/Courts Session 8, November 23, 2010 European Commission on Efficiency of Justice

What is CEPEJ? The CEPEJ is the European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice sponsored by Council of Europe which BiH is part of Its aims are: – to analyse the results of judicial systems – to identify the difficulties they meet – to define concrete ways to improve, on the one hand, the evaluation of their results, and, on the other hand, the functioning of these systems – to provide assistance to member States, at their request – to propose to the competent instances of the Council of Europe the fields where it would be desirable to elaborate a new legal instrument.

How does it work? To carry out these different tasks, CEPEJ collects and analyses data, prepares benchmarks, defines instruments of measure and means of evaluation, adopts documents (reports, advices, guidelines, action plans, etc), develops contacts with qualified personalities, non- governmental organisations, research institutes and information centres, organises hearings, promotes networks of legal professionals.

What has it done so far? The Council of Europe has started to review the efficiency of justice and adopted recommendations which contain ways to ensure both its fairness and efficiency The establishment of CEPEJ, under the Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, shows the intention of the Council of Europe not only to create international legal instruments but also to promote a detailed knowledge of the judicial systems throughout Europe and of the different existing tools which enables it to identify any difficulties and facilitate their solution. The CEPEJ will have, among other duties, the task of continuing the on-going research into the potential offered by new information technologies (IT) to improve the efficiency of justice.

Chairman’s objectives ‘ There can be no such thing as the rule of law without an independent, impartial judiciary, and one that is accessible and understood and accepted by the public. For it is not enough to have judged to have judged properly. It is for that reason that, in keeping with the core principles defined by the Council of Europe, the CEPEJ is also interested in the processes and mechanisms of trials and the parties involved. It is a question of devising pragmatic tools and methods focusing on public justice policies and how they operate on a day-to-day basis, and addressing both public policy makers and legal practitioners in the 47 Council of Europe member states.’

Data collection Questionnaire ( every two years) – Resources on the justice system – Staff, Costs – Workload of justice system – Structure of justice system – Details process questions Bosnia’s national correspondent is Rusmir Sabeta, HJPC, 2010 Bosnia Report is very complete - 58 Pages and available on

Recent activity - I CEPEJ published its 4th evaluation report on European judicial systems in Ljubljana (Slovenia) at the end of October The report presents quantitative and qualitative data from 45 member states, providing the Council of Europe with a detailed picture of the daily operations of courts in Europe. The number of subjects and states that are addressed make it unique.

Recent Activity - II The report enables policy-makers, the judicial community and researchers to make liable analyses on the basis of meaningful comparisons of the development of judicial systems. Statistical series have made it possible to measure the main trends in Europe on the evolution of judicial systems and reform processes. The report contains comparative tables and comments on public expenditure devoted to the judicial system, the legal aid system, mediation, organisation of jurisdictions and the court network, judicial staff, case-flow management in courts and length of procedures.

Importance of CEPEJ 1.Encourages each country to compile the data requested 2.When each country has completed its report it can see if it implies any need for policy change 3.The compendium of national reports includes many tables and commentary of comparative data 4.These show where BiH is when related to other states. 5.We will give some examples of where BiH has turned out.

Position of BiH - I % GDP spent on prosecutors – BiH spends the most in all Europe (0.017%) % GDP spent on courts – BiH is highest in Europe. BiH has quite a low spend on legal aid. At 2.4 per 100,000 population BiH has a quite high number of court locations BiH has one of the lowest rates of accredited mediators in Europe.

Position of BiH - II BiH has three times the rate of qualified judges than England, and well above the European average. BiH has the highest rate of professionalism among its judges On average each prosecutor received 254 cases in 2006 and prosecuted 66 of those in the courts. There are 1.47 lawyers per professional judge in BiH, one of the lowest ratios in Europe.

Discussion of 2010 Report Are people familiar with the contents of the report? How useful does the report seem to BiH? Has collecting the data caused BiH to consider what these data mean for your country? Has reading the comparator report caused you to ask any questions What improvements should be made to BiH’s response to CEPEJ questionnaire What improvements should be made to the questionnaire itself?