1 SEE Public Agenda Survey January-February 2002 Organized by International IDEA and SEEDS Network Main findings of the quantitative survey 14 March 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 2008 World Bank EU8+2 World Bank EU8+2 Regular Economic Report Regular Economic Report Special Topic on Satisfaction with Life and Public Service.
Advertisements

Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against corruption and organized crime in Montenegro Ministry of Interior of Montenegro,,The Fight against.
Understand the role of business in the global economy. 1.
SECURITY STRATEGIES OF THE REGION Witek Nowosielski.
 Relatively small and underdeveloped region ◦ Less than 20 million people ◦ GDP is 68.9 billion EUR (7% of EU10, 0.5% of EU27) ◦ GDP in PPP p.c
Woodnewton Associates Communicating Europe Seminar hosted by Britain in the New Europe James Humphreys Woodnewton Associates.
South East European Environmental NGOs Network - SEEENN REPORT Sixth REReP Task Force Meeting November 7 th, 2003, Brussels, Belgium.
Organization Structure of My Country 2 BiH’s Legislative and Executive Bodies 3.
SAFER CITIES MODEL. SAFER CITIES TOOLS SAFER CITIES TRAINING MANUAL AND TOOLKIT Overall development objective is to facilitate effective strategy development.
1 Ukraine between EU and Russia Lien Verpoest Institute for International and European Policy Section Central and Eastern Europe KU Leuven.
6 August 2015 Rule of law: implementing a comprehensive and integrated approach in prevention and fight against corruption in the Danube region,
International Law and Organization Where does International Law come from and what do International Organizations do?
Ann Singleton Centre for the Study of Poverty and Social Justice Policy needs for migration research European Migration Network Helsinki 26th November.
Institutional framework for supporting civil society development in Croatia A PLAN C FOR EUROPE: CITIZENSHIP, CIVIC ENGAGEMENT, CIVIL DIALOGUE 17 September.
Middle East and Eastern Europe region World Vision’s long-term development work in the Middle East and Eastern Europe region is divided into four clusters.
Women Mayors’ Link Dina Loghin SEF Foundation Romania.
PUBLIC AWARENESS NATO & DEFENCE ISSUES. NOT ABOUT… Process Procedures Technical elements Communication and campaign „tricks”
Chapter 28.2 The United Nations. The Purpose of the United Nations Internationalism is the idea that nations should cooperate to promote common aims.
FOPER Forest Policy and Economics Education and Research.
SEE-ERA.NET Initiatives Pilot Joint Call for Research Proposals IGLO Open Session, Southeast European Era-Net Florian Gruber, Dissemination and.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Date Public opinion about individual philanthropy Serbia, December 2009.
By Zaim Prosic Ministry of Interior Una Sana Canton Bosnia and Herzegovina.
International Development Cooperation Case Study: Hungary.
Introducing and Implementing Anti-corruption Monitoring System in Bulgaria and in the SEE region International Conference “Cooperation of the National.
StrategicPuls Group Serbia | Croatia | Slovenia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Montenegro | Macedonia | Albania PUBLIC PERCEPTION AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS NGO.
With funding from the European Union DEVELOPMENT OF MONITORING INSTRUMENTS FOR JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS
Non-Formal Education and the SEE Cooperation chances What When Where Why HoW Silvia Crocitta, EuroDemos Youth Mobility NGO – Krusevo 2014.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: REGIONAL TRADE INTEGRATION IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES BILATERAL VERSUS MULTILATERAL APPROACH TOWARDS REGIONAL.
Balkan Bytes: NGO Information Networking in South Eastern Europe Gábor Heves Project Manager Funded by the Ministry of Environment of Italy, the Ministry.
1 Building the Privacy culture, starts with the youngsters and their education 20 th and 21 st June 2013 Zagreb, Croatia.
 The Balkan Peninsula (Croatia, Serbia, Albania, Montenegro) › Since the collapse of Yugoslavia, ethnic tensions have ravaged the area › Currently, Croatia.
Non-State Actors in Inter-state Systems IGOs, NGOs, and World Movements.
Institute for Development and Social Initiatives (IDIS) ‘Viitorul’ Net Alexandr
Table 17. ‘Trust in institutions’ RussiaUkraineBelgiumIreland Educational system Police Civil service Army Justice system
Small.Fragile.Interconnected. 200 nation states focusing on national Interests No easy way to learn from experience of others Slow, difficult.
Government – Civil Society Interaction Montenegro Country Case Network for Affirmation of NGO Sector – MANS, October 2002.
History Project Remember for the Future July 2004 – November 2005.
Jerker Torngren Competition in South East Europe Benefits are the same for all countries Challenges might differ from country to country.
Using Survey Research to Assess Political Risk June 2004.
SEE Public Agenda Survey January-February 2002 Organized by International IDEA and SEEDS Network Main findings of the MACEDONIA quantitative survey 14.
EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVES OF THE BALKANS: A VIEW FROM SERBIA With the support of the European Commission Dr. Jovan Teokarevic 19 December 2006 Belgrade Open.
Public perception in Serbia of the ICTY and the national courts dealing with war crimes Serbia, 2009.
Transparency and Anti- Corruption in Bulgaria Mr. Stefan Sofianski, Mayor of Sofia, Former Prime-Minister of Bulgaria Presentation at MADAGASCAR GOVERNMENT.
The ICT Sector – Key to Economic Progress and Prosperity in South Eastern Europe Michael Mozur Deputy Special Coordinator of SP New Paths for Regional.
CENTAR ZA MONITORING I ISTRAŽIVANJE Montenegro Lausanne, Switzerland, May 2015.
SEE Energy Poverty Nexus Aleksandar Kovacevic. 2 Concept of Affordable Energy compromises: Total social costs of energy that could be covered by productivity.
1 Summary of IPA Component II cross-border priorities in SEE Countries REReP regional meeting on “Energy and climate” in South Eastern Europe May
The agricultural food industry in Bosnia and Herzegovina Prof. Dr. Gordana Đurić Although the agriculture has a crucial importance for BiH economic recovering.
Bosnia & Herzegovina Gap Analysis Monitoring Country Progress Team Strategic Planning and Analysis Division Program Office E&E Bureau December 2015.
Global Accountancy Education Benchmarking Development for SEEPAD WB REPARIS, Vienna March 14, 2006 Accountancy Education in the Region Presentation by.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Report on reforms in environmental policy and reconstruction Bosnia and Herzegovina 8th REReP Task Force meeting September 23, 2005 Brussels, Belgium.
Organisational Profile.  CEDEM was founded in 1998 in Podgorica, Montenegro as a non-profit association of citizens.  CEDEM was the first organization.
About NUPI. Who are we? NUPI is a leading centre for research on international issues in areas of particular relevance to Norwegian foreign policy We.
"Europe for citizens” Programme Cécile Le Clercq DG COMMUNICATION.
MAKING ENLARGEMENT WORK FOR EVERY CHILD, EVERYWHERE.
How to counter democratic backsliding in CEE? Peter Golias INEKO Director, Slovakia June 21st 2016 Warsaw, Poland.
» State statistical offices – harmonisation with the European methodology (Eurostat) » Shell youth survey: Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo,
BATTLEGROUND XXVII.
Barometer of Public Opinion
Five years of reconstruction
Some changes in Ukraine society
BUSINESS OPINION SURVEY REGIONAL COOPERATION COUNCIL PRESENTS:
A Regional Social Development Approach
European Commission High Level Group
EU-Funding in New Member States
Grab today’s Agenda (13:6).
This project is funded by
12-13 June, Tirana Dr.sc. Helena Popovic
Bosnia-Herzegovina General background Historical context
Presentation transcript:

1 SEE Public Agenda Survey January-February 2002 Organized by International IDEA and SEEDS Network Main findings of the quantitative survey 14 March 2002

2 Objectives The aim is to conduct a research of public agenda in nine countries and territories in South East Europe, namely Bosnia and Herzegovina - Federation BH, Bosnia and Herzegovina - Republika Srpska, Bulgaria, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and Romania. The purposes of this base line study of public agenda in the region are:  To gain information on people’s attitudes, fears and expectation in the main issues that concern their ongoing life and their future;  To compare the findings between countries and territories;  To draw the conclusions relevant for policy making and strategies for regional development and democratization;  To set up a database for a longer term public agenda tracking.

3 Public Agenda In the current meaning: –Public = sum of persons entitled to vote (usually 18 years and over) –Public Agenda = Issues, fears and concerns regarding the state, society and personal position within them PUBLIC AGENDA MAIN ISSUES: –Governing the state –Economic bases of the social and individual life –Violence, crime, personal security –Politics –Corruption –Environmental issues –International institutions –Domestic institutions

4 Public Agenda Tracking A public opinion poll, conducted with the same questionnaire on independent national representative samples at regular intervals (usually 1-3 months) –Euro Barometer in Europe and associated countries ( –BOP-in Romania ( –SMMRI Omnibus –PULS Omnibus

5 Organisational structure Financed by the Norwegian Foreign Affairs Ministry and International IDEA Incepted and supported by International IDEA Driven by local researchers and think tanks who have organized themselves as the South East Europe Democracy Support Network - SEEDS

6 List of research institutes Research AreaInstitutePop/millSample BulgariaVITOSHA8.51,148 B&H- FederationPULS B&H - R.SrpskaSMMRI/B&H1.51,034 CroatiaPULS4.31,010 KosovoIS Pristina2.21,017 MacedoniaSMMRI/Skopje1.91,031 MontenegroSMMRI0.61,012 RomaniaIMAS22.51,553 SerbiaSMMRI7.81,523

7 South Eastern Europe

8 OPTIMISM vs. PESSIMISM

9 Kosovo and Serbia show greatest optimism both in relation to one year ago and in the view of the future Bulgaria seems to see the present and the future mostly in dark light

10 Right direction of the country

11 Personal economic situation: worse and better than one year ago worse

12 Personal economic situation: satisfaction with the current level satisfaction

13 Personal economic situation: one year to come

14 Personal economic situation : 5 year expectations

15 PUBLIC ISSUES

16 Public Agenda:National Issues The list with national issues on the public agenda was drafted during the Oslo Meeting (May 2000), and checked during the qualitative phase. Almost all issues look to be important for the SEE public, with notable differences. However a large gap between the political, intellectual and media elite - as they were captured during the qualitative phase - and the public are to be underlined. The elite is more focused on ethnic issues, historical disputes, and philosophical analysis, whilst the public is more concerned with unemployment, corruption, poverty, inflation and family income.

17 Public Agenda Quantitative Measurement Unemployment Corruption Poverty Crime Inflation Family income Stability of the State Drug and alcohol abuse Jobs for our children My country’s acceptance into EU and/or NATO Legal system Ethnic conflicts Lack of morality Welfare system Inadequate bureaucracy “There are many problems facing our country today. I'm going to hand you a card that lists some. Please pick and rank what you believe are the three most important issues”.

18 The three most important issues for SEE are: –unemployment, –poverty and –corruption.

19 Public Issues: Summary

20 Public Issues: Unemployment

21 Public Issues: Corruption

22 Public Issues: Poverty

23 Public Issues: Crime

24 Public Issues: Inflation

25 Public Issues: Family Income

26 PERSONAL FEARS

27 Public Agenda: Personal Fears Personal fears (or potential threats to the personal life) are usually in the field of personal health, job security, future of children, pensions etc. When personal fears are almost the same as national issues, the public believe that their personal lives are profoundly affected by national policies. That is the case in all SEE countries. “ What do you fear the most in the present?” Open answer question-top of mind answer.

28 Personal Fears: Summary

29 Personal Fears: Poverty

30 Personal Fears: Unemployment

31 Personal Fears: Bad Political Situation

32 Personal Fears: War

33 Personal Fears: Crime

34 INSTITUTIONS

35 KOSOVO ROMANIA B&H - FEDERATION MONTENEGRO CROATIA SERBIA B&H – REPUBLIC OF SRPSKA MACEDONIA BULGARIA GENERAL TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS

36 TRUST IN DOMESTIC INSTITUTIONS

37 Most trusted institutions in SEE are the Church, Army and Universities Parliaments, governments and courts are among the least trusted institutions

38

39 Trust in Institutions: Church

40 Trust in Institutions: Presidency

41 Trust in Institutions: Parliament

42 Trust in Institutions: Government

43 Trust in Institutions: Local Authorities

44 Trust in Institutions: Courts

45 Trust in Institutions: Police

46 Trust in Institutions: Army

47 Trust in Institutions: Trade Unions

48 Trust in Institutions: NGOs

49 Trust in Institutions: Universities

50 Trust in Institutions: Summary

51 STEPS FORWARD...

52 Domestic Economy vs. International Integration

53 TRUST IN INTERNATIONAL PERSONALITIES

54 Kofi Annan Awareness vs. Trust

55 George Robertson Awareness vs. Trust

56 George W. Bush Awareness vs. Trust

57 Vladimir Putin Awareness vs. Trust

58 Romano Prodi Awareness vs. Trust

59 INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

60 The four most trusted institutions in SEE are EU, UN, the World Bank and NATO

61 TRUST IN INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

62 EU Awareness vs. Trust

63 UN Awareness vs. Trust

64 WB Awareness vs. Trust

65 NATO Awareness vs. Trust

66 ICTY (The Hague Tribunal) Awareness vs. Trust

67 IMF Awareness vs. Trust

68 OSCE Awareness vs. Trust

69 STABILITY PACT

70 Stability Pact for SEE Awareness vs. Trust

71 SPSEE AWARENESS - TRUST

72 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cooperation & Threats

73 COUNTRIES PREFERRED FOR COOPERATION

74

75 COUNTRIES PERCEIVED AS A THREAT

76

77 MASS MEDIA

78 Trust in Mass Media

79 Perceived Mass Media Behaviour

80 Mass Media: Perceived Independence

81 APPRECIATION OF PUBLIC SERVICES

82 PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM

83 PENSION FUNDS

84 EDUCATION SYSTEM

85 HEATING

86 WATER SUPPLY

87 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION

88 ELECTRICITY

89 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE

90 SOCIAL CARE

91 POLICE