EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION WITHIN CEFTA – 2006 - - EVIDENCE FROM THE MACEDONIAN EXPERIENCE Irena Kikerkova, Ph.D. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T CUSTOMS AND TRADE FACILITATION FORUM:
Advertisements

2-nd International Symposium "Shaping Europe 2020: Socio-Economic Challenges" Title: Effects of the free trade Agreements on the development of Agriculture.
CEFTA 2006 Renata Vitez Director
Update Implementation of CEFTA Renata Vitez Director
REGIONAL RURAL DEVELOPMENT STANDING WORKING GROUP (SWG) IN SEE Boban Ilic SWG Secretary General.
IFC Western Balkans Trade Logistics Project T RADE F ACILITATION ON D ANUBE AND S AVA R IVERS.
Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement RM-UE:
Customs 2013 Programme Customs 2013 is a programme which gives the national customs administrations of the EU, together with the European Commission, the.
„Macroeconomic Context and New Strategy of Competitiveness“ Kemal Kozarić, Ph.D. Governor of the Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina The 2012 SEE Management.
NON-TARIFF BARRIERS IN TRADING WITHIN THE EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY (EAC) By Monica A. Hangi Economic and Social Research Foundation (ESRF)
With the support of the European Commission 1 BILATERAL FREE TRADE LIBERALISATION MACEDONIA With the support of the European Commission.
With the support of the European Commission 1 TRADE LIBERALIZATION - SERBIA (Analyses of trade liberalization and trade issues in the framework of the.
Serbia agriculture Ministry of Agriculture, Trade, Forestry and Water Management of the Republic of Serbia
Key Policies Improving Business and Investment Climate Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić, MA.
ECONOMIC OUTLOOK TURKEY EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY Office of the Commercial Counsellor.
Zoran Bojović, PhD, Head of Multilateral Department
An emerging political system?
´´ We commit to set the Greek economy in motion΄΄.
The Impact of Syrian Trade Policies on Agricultural Trade Performance Basheer Hamwi.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU MANAGING THE CIVIL SERVICE Roles, Mechanisms and Capacities.
Jordan’s Experience…. Foreign Trade Mr. Ahmad Hammad Deputy Director, Foreign Trade Policy Directorate.
With the support of the European Commission 1 FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Goran Marijanović Ekonomski fakultet,Osijek With the support of.
Presented by: Prof. Wieslaw “Wes” Czyzowicz Ph. D. Szkola Glowna Handlowa w Warszawie HARMONIZATION OF THE POLISH CUSTOMS LAW WITH THE EUROPEAN UNION.
Country Report on Presented by: Mr. Thol Nara
Working Group III Roadmap to Decentralization Conference "EU perspectives and current standing of the countries in the region in the Stabilization and.
Subregional Capacity-Building Seminar on the Commercialization and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Skopje, FYR Macedonia, 1-3 April 2009 Prepared.
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
PEM -PAL 13th INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTERNAL AUDIT , Hotel Granit, Ohrid.
Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Initiative for South Eastern Europe DPPI SEE Seminar on Strengthening Cooperation with Candidate Countries and Western.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: REGIONAL TRADE INTEGRATION IN SOUTH EAST EUROPE: BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES BILATERAL VERSUS MULTILATERAL APPROACH TOWARDS REGIONAL.
EU ASSISTANCE IN SERBIA: FROM CARDS TO IPA With the support of the European Commission Mrs. Aleksandra Mijalkovic 19 December 2006 Belgrade Open School.
CEFTA 2006 implementation - institutional and policy perspectives d-r Silvana Mojsovska Institute of Economics - Skopje d-r Krum Efremov Ministry of foreign.
Trade in border areas: CEFTA 2006 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Rural Development Miroslav Božić, Director East Agri Annual.
1 Building the Privacy culture, starts with the youngsters and their education 20 th and 21 st June 2013 Zagreb, Croatia.
Kick-off Meeting Belgrade, 4-5 December 2008 Network of Centres for Project Development and Management.
Diagonal Cumulation – An important aspect of trade integration Nand Shani Economic and Social Development Regional Cooperation Council
International Relations Department Belgrade, September 28 TH, 2007 NBS PROJECT PROPOSALS.
Implementation of CEFTA Implementation of CEFTA Renata Vitez Director European Movement Serbia Vision of European Serbia International Conference, Belgrade.
UNECE – SIDA “ SOUTH EAST EUROPE REGULATORY PROJECT” FIRST MEETING OF REGULATORS FROM SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRIES PRESENTATIONFROM THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA.
Stabilisation & Association Process: the EU Policy for South East Europe Brussels December 2004.
INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AMONG NATIONS. CHAPTER 6: INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AMONG NATIONS LEARNING OBJECTIVES To explain the importance of GATT to international.
© The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., Irwin/McGraw-Hill Institute of Internaitonal Politics and Economics Prof. dr Hasiba Hrustić FOREIGN DEBT OF.
DIHK – CEFTA CHAMBER PARTNERSHIP PROJECT “Implementation of CEFTA in order to Improve the Internationalization of SEE Economy” Mr. Eduard Schwartz – Head.
Bulgarian Technical Legislation and Standardisation Activities Violina Panayotova Iliyana Atanasova BULGARIA June, 2004.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment Armenia: Trade and Human Development Vrej Jijyan, UNDP Armenia United Nations Development Programme.
Belgrade, Donor Coordination Meeting Belgrade, 4 th of June 2012.
Customs Administration of the Republic of Macedonia CEFTA Week 2013 Customs Facilitation of Foreign Trade Sarajevo, November 2013 Gorgi Naumovski, Dimche.
BULGARIA’S EXPERIENCE WITH REGIONAL COOPERATION IN SOUTH-EAST EUROPE Veneta Petrova National Statistical Institute of Bulgaria MGSC, March 2011,
Cooperation with Candidate Countries and Western Balkan Countries Dr Julia Fredriksson EU and International Affairs Department Swedish Rescue Services.
DIHK-CEFTA Project Partnership for strengthening Regional Cooperation Snežana Rašeta – Peković, coordinator of the Project in CCI Serbia Belgrade, 26 March.
DG Enlargement 1 The EU Enlargement Process: State of play October 2008.
Ministry of Human Rights and Refugees of Bosnia and Herzegovina Department for Diaspora Workshop on Innovation in EU-Mediterranean and Western Balkans.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 1 – Free Movement of Goods Bilateral.
Amerissa Efstathiou Aikaterini Bouzounieraki Ministry of Economy and Finance, Greece Central Liaison Office 1 NEW MODELS OF VAT EVASION EXPERIENCED IN.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 16 – Taxation Bilateral screening: Chapter.
Oleksandr V. Kubatko Sumy State University Chisinau, Moldova December 2015 DCFTA implementation in Ukraine: main opportunities and challenges.
1 M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 29 – Customs union Bilateral screening:
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development.
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA AND CEFTA -2006
Small States and European Integration
Importance of statistics data for regional cooperation
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
66 items – 70% of circulated products
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
MONITORING OF COUNTRY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BY USING OFFICIAL STATISTICS DATA - WESTERN BALKAN COUNTRIES EXAMPLE Fadil Fatić, Deputy Director of the Agency.
SEPA AND EEA, FIVE YEARS OF COOPERATION
IGO Presentation: The European Union
Statistics in the Enlargement context
Presentation transcript:

EFFECTS OF ECONOMIC INTEGRATION WITHIN CEFTA – EVIDENCE FROM THE MACEDONIAN EXPERIENCE Irena Kikerkova, Ph.D. Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Faculty of Economics - Skopje

Methodological problems on following trade exchange among CEFTA-2006 member-states Problem of unification of member-states statistical reporting: - Member-states did not accept to create a special data base and to report regularly on the trade exchange within the free trade area, with exception of Croatia and Kosovo; - Macedonia is reporting on the trade exchange of “Western Balkan countries ” ; - Bosnia and Herzegovina is reporting on “European countries in development” ; - Serbia does not report on CEFTA-2006 trade exchange of goods at all ; - All of the other member-states are reporting in euro. Only Macedonia is reporting its trade exchange with CEFTA-2006 in American dollars.

There is also a significant discrepancy in the so called mirror statistical evidence of export and import flows of the member-states which causes doubts that differences in the reported data are not a result only of differences in the statistical methodology (Handziski, 2010); The greatest obstacle for adequate analyzes of the trade exchange of goods within CEFTA-2006 is the fact that the trade statistics within the region is not fully publicly available.

Statistical evidence on the Macedonian trade exchange of goods with CEFTA-2006 countries The creation of the free trade area had an immediate positive impact on the total trade exchange of goods of the member- states which was evident until the beginning of the economic crises in 2008; Total Macedonian export to CEFTA-2006 member-states almost doubled in the period from Similar tendencies were also registered on the import side; The effect upon the Macedonian trade balance was positive, as Macedonia recorded a surplus in the trade within the region in all of the years after the creation of the free trade area; The trade surplus reached a pick at the end of 2008 with a total amount of million American dollars.

The most important traders in the region – Croatia and Serbia - were severely hit by the crises and they both tried to protect their balance of payment positions by imposing various restrictions and impediments to trade and imports of goods. In the case of Macedonia, the crises restricted the participation of CEFTA-2006 trade exchange of goods to only 20% of the total Macedonian trade exchange by the end of Trade partners from CEFTA-2006 created 37.2% of total Macedonian exports and only 11.9% of total Macedonian imports. Even under these inconvenient circumstances Macedonia realized a trade surplus of about 400 million American dollars. However, the realized surplus in the trade with CEFTA-2006 in 2009 decreased by 38.6% in comparison with the one realized in 2008.

In 2010 the situation slightly changed and there was some recovering of the trade flows of goods among member-states. However, in comparison with 2009 total Macedonian trade within CEFTA-2006 increased by only 2.8% and reached the amount of 1.64 billion American dollars, of which billion American dollars were registered at the export, while billion American dollars were registered at the import side. Most of the increment of the Macedonian trade within the region was due to the increment of the trade with Kosovo (of 41.8%) and with Montenegro (of 8.4%). At the end of 2010 Macedonian export to CEFTA-2006 member-states created 31% of the total Macedonian export.

The trade pattern of Macedonian trade exchange within CEFTA-2006 The Macedonian economy faces a continuous decrement of competitiveness of its ready-to sell products due to the weak productivity and outdated technology engaged in its processing industry; The weak capacity of the country is obvious, as it can not provide larger export to one region without diminishing its export to another region. The most important trade partners for the Macedonian economy come from two regions: the EU and CEFTA-2006; Macedonian trade flows towards EU and CEFTA-2006 trade partners fluctuate from year to year regarding the economic situation in both of the regions, as Macedonian exporters did not have the capacity to boost their total production, as well as their total exports.

For Macedonian exporters CEFTA-2006 is especially important for export of agricultural goods. More than half of total Macedonian export of agricultural goods is exported in CEFTA-2006, of which almost 1/3 consists of fresh vegetables, and the rest are confectionary products and cigarettes. Over 60% of the exported agricultural products go to Serbia (and within it in Kosovo), less to 15% go to Croatia and about 11% to Bosnia and Herzegovina.

At the same time Macedonia depends on imports of agricultural products, especially wheat and vegetable and animal oils. The import of agricultural goods from CEFTA creates around 30% of total Macedonian imports of this kind of products and the greatest Macedonian trade partners in the region are Serbia which provides more than 2/3, and Croatia with 17.8% of the total amount of this kind of imports. Nevertheless, Macedonia still realizes trade surplus in the trade in agricultural goods within the region, which for the first 9 months of 2011 amounts about 36 million American dollars.

The most important non-agricultural export items for Macedonian exporters within CEFTA-2006 are: mineral fuels and iron and steel which create more than 1/4 each of total Macedonian exports to the region, followed by much smaller participation of iron and steel products, pharmaceuticals and some electrical machinery and equipment. Macedonian imports from the region are mostly steel and iron; mineral fuels; electrical machines and equipment; plastics and paper and paper board. The most important trade partners from the region both for exporting and importing of non-agricultural products are Serbia and Croatia.

The structure of exchanged goods in the Macedonian case clearly points out that the trade pattern is still inter-industrial and is mostly unlikely to change looking from a short-term perspective. However, data on trade exchange from other members of CEFTA-2006 confirm the inter-industrial pattern, as well. The trade pattern is inter-industrial between CEFTA-2006 and the EU. All CEFTA-2006 members are oriented to export one type of raw-materials and semi-processed goods and at the same time to import another type of raw-materials or sophisticated industrial goods.

Progress in the process of economic integration within CEFTA-2006 Established a mutual trade portal a year ago to provide all relevant information not only on different export and import procedures of CEFTA-2006, but also an on-line availability of all forms and documents needed for completion of the customs procedure. Since the beginning of this year, an agreement on unification on transit procedures within CEFTA-2006 has been signed. Serbia even proposed (and Montenegro and Bosnia and Herzegovina supported the proposal) that movement of persons should be allowed only with a valid identification card, instead of a passport –not possible for Moldova;

Creation of the Interchamber CEFTA-Working Group on Insurance at the beginning of March 2011 in Belgrade in order to provide gradual liberalization of the trade regulative and abolishment of administrative barriers to providers of insurance services within CEFTA-2006 and establishment of co-insurance services among member states; Establishment of a Regional Training on Taxation with a project supported by the Ministry of Finance and implemented by the Public Revenue Office of the Republic of Macedonia.

Challenges faced by CEFTA-2006 member-states The presence of non-trade barriers - Last June the CEFTA Sub-Committee on NTBs and TBT launched the first NTBs reduction monitoring cycle on the basis of Multilateral Monitoring Framework proposed by OECD, and its results are due by the end of this year. This monitoring also would follow up the mutual recognition of national laboratories for control of quality of the products, until their full harmonization; Full implementation of the diagonal cumulation of origin - Since 1st of November 2011 the implementation of diagonal cumulation is possible for Albania, Macedonia and Serbia with EFTA countries. Also, all of the CEFTA-2006 countries have to actively participate in the revision of the Pan- Euro- Med rules;

Further trade facilitation by enhancement of customs to customs, customs to government and customs to business cooperation; Implementation of simplified customs procedures on regional level, as well as providing mutual recognition of the provided national status of authorized economic operators; Establishment of regional logistic centers.

Threats to the process of economic integration within CEFTA-2006 The Croation accession into the EU due to be realized in 2013; The jeopardy of a new economic crises in 2012; The increased indebtedness of Greece, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, but also of Italy and other EU member-states; The instability of the Euro zone and the threat of its collapse.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!