US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Sediment Diversion Work Plan Task 1 : Data Collection and Analysis December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mallard Island cross-sectional variability: low-flow, moderate-flow, and high-flow events SF Bay Sediment Project U.S. Geological Survey Sacramento, CA.
Advertisements

Sediment Task Force Meeting April 30, 2012 Marjorie L. Zeff, PhD., PG Gary Lemay Conowingo Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 405) Updated 2011 Bathymetric.
Entrainment and non-uniform transport of fine-sediment in coarse-bedded rivers Paul E. Grams & Peter R. Wilcock, Johns Hopkins University Stephen M. Wiele,
STREAM SEDIMENT SAMPLING
BUILDING STRONG ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Support to Gulf Coast Recovery U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal.
River Studies. Outline of Events During your river field work you will be visiting two different sites in the lower course of the river. At each site.
Hydrology: Discharge, Hydrographs, Floods, and Sediment Transport Unit 1: Module 4, Lecture 2.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
1 4 th International Symposium on Flood Defence: Managing Flood Risk, Reliability and Vulnerability, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 6-8, 2008 J. Chen, J.
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
CHRP SPATIAL SURVEYS OF DISSOLVED OXYGEN BROWN UNIVERSITY & NARRAGANSETT BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM.
ESHMC Meeting 6 May 2008 Stacey Taylor. Overview Model river representation in ESPAM 1 What data is available to make changes for the new stress periods.
Sculpting Earth’s Surface
Monthly Composites of Sea Surface Temperature and Ocean Chlorophyll Concentrations These maps were created by Jennifer Bosch by averaging all the data.
Using ROMS to Model the Distribution of Hypoxic Water in Narragansett Bay, RI USA Deanna Bergondo and Chris Kincaid University of Rhode Island Narragansett,
USGS Procedures for High-Flow Measurement using the Price AA Meter Annual Tri-Agency Coordination Meeting Memphis, TN Mark E. Smith USGS.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
David S. Mueller U.S. Geological Survey Office of Surface Water
Nancy N. Rabalais et al. Ocean Deoxygenation and Coastal Hypoxia
Page 1 CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH IN AQUACULTURE AND THE AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT A Company in the NIVA-group Methodology for Environmental monitoring of aquaculture.
Lower Saluda River Instream Flow Study TWC Study Team Workshop December 11, 2007.
Abstract Background Conclusion Stream Bed Morphology and Discharge Rates of Deckers Creek Data was collected at 5 different points along a 100 meter transect.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Two.
Sediment and Flocculation dynamics in the area of Zeebrugge Marc Sas, Alexander Breugem and Andrew Manning.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Modeling sand transport and sandbar evolution along the Colorado River below Glen Canyon Dam.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
Basic Hydrology Water Quality: Sediment production and transport.
Sediment Yield and Channel Processes. Definitions Suspend Sediment – sediment (orgranic or inorganic) which remains in suspension in water for a considerable.
Evaluating the Capabilities of the Second Generation PICS Settling Column Floc Camera in a Muddy Tidal Estuary, York River, Virginia, USA Grace M. Cartwright,
Status Report on Bottom-Tracking ADCPs & ADPs David S. Mueller Office of Surface Water.
National Consultation with TNMC 3 May 2005, Bangkok WUP-FIN Phase II – Bank erosion study.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
S. 1 Pilot study 2: Assessment of sediment traps.
US Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Engineer Research and Development Center Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment SedFlume.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
Former Channel Habitats of the Sacramento River: Physical and Ecological Processes and Restoration Potential Presented by Ingrid C. Morken By G. M. Kondolf,
Controls on Suspended Particle Properties and Water Clarity along a Partially-Mixed Estuary, York River Estuary, Virginia Kelsey A. Fall 1, Carl T. Friedrichs.
Rivers and Streams. River Systems A river or stream: any body of water flowing downhill in a well defined channel A river or stream: any body of water.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
As you know from Chapter 2, weathering is the breakdown of rocks into smaller pieces. So what is erosion? Erosion is the movement of the broken or weathered.
Research and Development US Army Corps of Engineers ACOUSTIC CURRENT DOPPLER PROFILERS (ADCP’s)
Why use Index-Velocity Methods? Traditional Sites – Stage vs Discharge is predictable.
Morphodynamics of the Madeira River in Brazil Christine Bonthius The University of Texas at Austin Department of Geography and the Environment
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
River Systems Section 2 Section 2: Stream Erosion Preview Key Ideas Parts of a River System Channel Erosion Development of River Channels Tributary, River.
RD Instruments Home of the ADCP Measuring Water in Motion and Motion in Water AVOIDING BIASED DATA DURING REAL TIME HADCP DATA COLLECTION.
Technical Support in Engineering Construction Phase of Craney Island Eastward Expansion Mac Sisson, Harry Wang, Jian Shen, Albert Kuo, and Wenping Gong.
Stream Erosion & Deposition Chapter 6 sections 1 and 2.
225 square miles 20 inches/yr rainfall From the Main Street Bridge, Ventura River: Feb. 2, 2005 (above), Oct. 2, 2004 (below) looking downstream.
Sedimentology Assessment 1 Due: Tuesday Feb 1, at midnight (Use your lecture slides and the text book) Instructions: Use text boxes to place your answers.
Robert R. Twilley 1, Edward Castañeda-Moya 1, Gregg Snedden 2, and Alex Christensen 1 1 Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences, Louisiana State.
River Stage and Bottom Elevation
Comparison of modeled and observed bed erodibility in the York River estuary, Virginia, over varying time scales Danielle Tarpley, Courtney K. Harris,
Deloffre J., Druine F., Verney, R., Lemoine, J.P., Lafite, R.
Coasts.
Chapter 9 Surface Water Runoff- water flowing downslope on Earth’s surface. Factors: Vegetation- ↓ runoff due to pore space & slows down precipitation.
Stream Erosion.
Jacob Piske, Eric Peterson, Bill Perry
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
February 2007 Note: Source:.
Results and discussion
Part 3.
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Data provided by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Data provided by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Data provided by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Presentation transcript:

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Sediment Diversion Work Plan Task 1 : Data Collection and Analysis December Thad Pratt CEERD-HF-FM

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Data Collection Trips Data collection Trip 1, March 9-12, April, 5-6 May, 2009: Multi-beam and hydrodynamic (ADCP) surveys, bed samples and suspended sediment samples. Data collection Trip 2, May, 2009: Hydrodynamic surveys, suspended sediment samples and additional bed material samples from below Cubit’s Gap to Southwest Pass Jetties. Data collection Trip 3, June 15-18, 2009: Hydrodynamic surveys and suspended sediment samples. Data collection Trip 4, July 21-23, 2009: Hydrodynamic surveys, suspended sediment samples, and bed load samples. Additional Multi-beam survey, August 2009 Data Collection Trip 5, September 23-24, 2009: Hydrodynamic surveys, suspended sediment samples and bed material samples.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Mississippi River Stage & Survey Dates

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Instrumentation Geo-Acoustics 250 kHz swath system w/ Applanix POSMV IMU RDI 600 kHz Broadband ADCP with bottom- tracking and GPS P-61 point sampler for suspended sediments Push core & bottom surface drag samplers OBS and CTD Profiler

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Multi-beam Survey Coverage

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Multi-beam Surveys of the West Bay Diversion Cut April Survey August Survey

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Transect Lines

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Survey Dates Apr May 5-6 May Jun 16-17Jul 21 Discharge North of Channel 550,738 ft3/s 500,448 ft3/s 740,062 ft3/s568,041 ft3/s ft3/s Discharge into Channel 46,514 ft3/s 42,011 ft3/s 68,373 ft3/s52,252 ft3/s31,000 ft3/s Discharge South of the Channel 509,966 ft3/s 454,715 ft3/s675,834 ft3/s485,332 ft3/s260,000 ft3/s Percentage discharge into the channel 8.4% 9.2% 10.1% Percentage of unaccounted discharge 1%-1% 1% -5%4.2% Discharges through the control volume that includes the West Bay Diversion Channel

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Discharges through the control volume that includes Cubit’s Gap Survey Dates April May June Jul 21 Discharge north of Cubit’s Gap 509,966 ft3/s 675,834 ft3/s 485,332 ft3/s 237,000 ft3/s Discharge through Cubit’s Gap 80,945 ft3/s 126,132 ft3/s 87,884 ft3/s 42,000 ft3/s Discharge south of Cubit’s Gap 443,033 ft3/s 560,997 ft3/s 378,873 ft3/s 187,000 ft3/s Percentage discharge into the channel 15.9% 18.7% 18.1% Percentage of unaccounted discharge 3% 2% -4% 3.3%

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 3D Velocity Mapping Coinciding with Suspended Sediment Samples

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 3D Velocity Mapping in Vicinity of West Bay Diversion

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 3D Velocity Mapping Inside West Bay Diversion

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 3D Velocity Mapping in Vicinity of Cubit’s Gap

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Depth Averaged Velocities April 2009

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Surface Velocity April 2009

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Bottom Velocity April 2009

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Vertical Velocity Distribution within West Bay Diversion

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Locations of suspended sediment samples, OBS measurements, and salinity measurements made on May 30, 2009.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center River Transect just North of Diversion (June 17 th )

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center May 29 th Survey Range 5.2

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Suspended Sediment Concentrations

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Size Classification for TSM Samples/ Depth WBDMR-A Depth (ft)% Sand%Silt%Clay % very fine silt % fine silt %med silt %coarse silt %very fine sand % fine sand %med sand %coarse sand

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Drag and Push Core Sediment Samples taken on March in vicinity of WB and Cubit’s Gap

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Drag and Push-core Samples taken on March 10-12, 2009 between Venice, LA and the West Bay Diversion channel.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Locations of bottom drag samples made on March 10, 2009 north of Venice, LA.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Locations of the bottom drag samples made on May 22, 2009 in Southwest Pass.

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Bottom Sediment Grain Size Distributions Right Descending Bank Above WBD Left Descending Bank Across from Drag 17

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Bed Sediment D50 Values Receiving Area

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Bed Sediment D50 Values Cubits Gap Area

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Bed Sediment D50 Values South West Pass

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 108k 0.47k 0.4k 24k 128k 0.2k 0.4k 27k 18k 170k April 22—23rd Line Total Q Sed Flux M2 (ft³/s) (Tons/Day) R , K 133 K R-2.8-RB 3, K.8 K R-3.5-RB 2, K.4K R , K 140K R-6.5-LB 4, K.7K R-6.4-RB 1, K.4K R , K 191K WBD 51, K 25k GP 81, K 50 k BCB 74, K 22 k Q and Sediment Flux for Venice to below Cubit’s Gap

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 12.6k 144k 153k May 5—6th Line Total Q Sed Flux M2 (ft³/s) (Tons/Day) R ,000* K K WBD 42,000* 12.6 K 13.1 K R ,000* K K * Multiple Transects Averaged Q and Sediment Flux Around the Diversion Cut

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Line Total Q Sed Flux M2 (ft³/s) (Tons/Day) R , K 276K R-2.8-RB 1, K.1K R-3.5-RB 2,300.09K.1K R , K 333 K R , K 355 K R-6.5-LB 7, K.5 K R-6.4-RB 2, K.3 K R , K 337 K R12.1 1,003, K 428 K CGRP 11, K 3.8 K CGBB 33,200 11K 14.8 K CGOP 17, K 4.0 K CGMP 72,000 22K 28 K WBD 72,100 33K 34 K GP 104,600 39K 44K BCB 114,000 57K 50 K Q and Sediment Flux form Venice to below Cubit’s Gap 263.5k 333 K 356k 57k 39k 0.22k 0.453k 33K 2.8k 3.7k 22k May 29—30th 11k 324k

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center 104k 145.9k 191k 23.4k 11.8k k 0.115k 14.3k 0.79k 2.4k 5.7k June 16—17th 0.9k Line Total Q Sed Flux M2 (ft³/s) (Tons/Day) R , K 101 K R , K 171 K R-6.5-LB 4, K.175 K R-6.4-RB K 0 K R , K K CGRP 7, K 1.1 K CGBB 21, K 3.4 K CGOP 9, K 1.1 K CGMP 50, K 8.6 K WBD 51, K 16.0 K GP 74, K 15.7 K BCB 72, K 18.0 K Q and Sediment Flux form Venice to below Cubit’s Gap

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Line Total Q Sed Flux M2 (ft³/s) (Tons/Day) R , K 14.3 K R , K 9.4 K R , K 13.4 K R , K 11.5 K R , K 14.2 K CGRP 2, K.1 K CGBB 5, K.37 K CGOP 2, K.07 K CGMP 24,000.9 K 1.0 K WBD 28, K 1.5 K GP 29, K 1.7K BCB 51, K 7.9 K Q and Sediment Flux form Venice to below Cubit’s Gap 14.4k 13.2 K 16.3k 2.9k 1.4k 1.8K.06k.09k.9k July 20 __ 24th.35k 12.4k

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center Observations ~45% Total Discharge is lost to the multiple cuts from Venice to below Cubit’s Gap with approximately 50% of the Suspended Sediment leaving the main Channel Bed material grain size in anchorage range from microns Suspended sediment concentrations range from mg/l in the vertical Grain size in suspended sediments range from microns w/ mean size at surface 8-9 microns and w/ mean grain size 1 foot above bed ~15 microns