YODEN Shigeo Dept. of Geophysics, Kyoto Univ., JAPAN August 4, 2004; SPARC 2004 Victoria + α - β for Colloquium on April 15, 2005 1.Introduction 2.Internal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Decadal Variation of the Holton-Tan Effect Hua Lu, Thomas Bracegirdle, Tony Phillips, Andrew Bushell DynVar/SNAP Workshops, April, 2013, Reading,
Advertisements

Ocean’s Role in the Stratosphere-Troposphere Interaction Yulia A. Zyulyaeva Moscow State University P.P.Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, RAS, Moscow 1/17.
Annular Modes of Extra- tropical Circulation Judith Perlwitz CIRES-CDC, University of Colorado.
REFERENCES Alexander et al (2008): Global Estimates of Gravity Wave Momentum Flux from HIRDLS Observations. JGR 113 D15S18 Ern et al (2004): Absolute Values.
Spring Onset in the Northern Hemisphere: A Role for the Stratosphere? Robert X. Black Brent A. McDaniel School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences Georgia.
Enhanced seasonal forecast skill following SSWs DynVar/SNAP Workshop, Reading, UK, April 2013 Michael Sigmond (CCCma) John Scinocca, Slava Kharin.
1. Temperature trends in IPCC 20 th century runs v. radiosondes 2. Volcanic signals 3. Effects of volcanic eruptions on trends? Melissa Free John Lanzante.
YODEN Shigeo Dept. of Geophysics, Kyoto Univ., JAPAN Highlights for SPARC Temperature Trend Meeting at Tabard Inn in Washington DC April 12-13, 2007 Seasonally.
How to move the gravity-wave parameterization problem forward? Some thoughts Ted Shepherd Department of Physics University of Toronto NCAR TIIMES Gravity-Wave.
YODEN Shigeo Dept. of Geophysics, Kyoto Univ., JAPAN March 3-4, 2005: SPARC Temperature Trend Meeting at University of Reading 1.Introduction 2.Statistical.
1 Influences of the 11-year sunspot cycle on the stratosphere – and the importance of the QBO Karin Labitzke, Institute for Meteorology, F.U. Berlin Germany.
28 August 2006Steinhausen meeting Hamburg On the integration of weather and climate prediction Lennart Bengtsson.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
Solar Forcing on Climate Through Stratospheric Ozone Change Le Kuai.
Regional Impacts of day-to-day changes in the large scale Pacific North America (PNA) pattern: observations and prospects for skillful 7-14 day lead-time.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Princeton, NJ Evolution of Stratospheric.
Solar Variability and Climate: From Mechanisms to Models
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Solar Influence on Stratosphere-Troposphere Dynamical Coupling Isla Simpson, Joanna D. Haigh, Space and Atmospheric Physics,
The case of polar lows Hans von Storch 13 and Matthias Zahn 2 1. Institute of Coastal Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Germany. 2. Environmental.
Influence of the stratosphere on surface winter climate Adam Scaife, Jeff Knight, Anders Moberg, Lisa Alexander, Chris Folland and Sarah Ineson. CLIVAR.
Using GPS data to study the tropical tropopause Bill Randel National Center for Atmospheric Research Boulder, Colorado “You can observe a lot by just watching”
Interactions between volcanic eruptions and El Niño: Studies with a coupled atmosphere-ocean model C. Timmreck, M. Thomas, M. Giorgetta, M. Esch, H.-F.
By Anthony R. Lupo Department of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Science 302 E ABNR Building University of Missouri Columbia, MO
A Comparison of the Northern American Regional Reanalysis (NARR) to an Ensemble of Analyses Including CFSR Wesley Ebisuzaki 1, Fedor Mesinger 2, Li Zhang.
UNESCO Extreme Meeting, Paris, G.C. Leckebusch Quantitative assessment of wind storms and extreme extra- tropical cyclones under climate.
The effects of solar variability on the Earth’s climate Joanna D. Haigh 2010/03/09 Pei-Yu Chueh.
Extra-tropical climate and the modelling of the stratosphere in coupled atmosphere ocean models. E Manzini Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia.
C20C Workshop ICTP Trieste 2004 The Influence of the Ocean on the North Atlantic Climate Variability in C20C simulations with CSRIO AGCM Hodson.
SPARC SOLARIS & HEPPA Intercomparison Activities: Global aspects of the QBO modulation of the solar influence on the stratosphere WCRP Open Science Conference.
Stratospheric temperature trends from combined SSU, SABER and MLS measurements And comparisons to WACCM Bill Randel, Anne Smith and Cheng-Zhi Zou NCAR.
Diagnostics, Special Projects and Phenomena of Interest Review of 2 nd C20C Workshop for 3 rd C20C Workshop ICTP, Trieste, Italy, 21 April 2004.
Shigeo Yoden Department of Geophysics Kyoto University Japan ESF-JSPS Frontier Science Conference Series for Young Researchers « Climate Change » Nynäshamn.
Past and Future Changes in Southern Hemisphere Tropospheric Circulation and the Impact of Stratospheric Chemistry-Climate Coupling Collaborators: Steven.
Predictability of stratospheric sudden warming events and associated stratosphere-troposphere coupling system T. Hirooka, T. Ichimaru (DEPS, Kyushu Univ.),
REFERENCES Alexander et al (2008): Global Estimates of Gravity Wave Momentum Flux from HIRDLS Observations. JGR 113 D15S18 Ern et al (2004): Absolute Values.
A Statistical Analysis on the Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupled Variability by Using Large Samples obtained from a Mechanistic Circulation Model Yoko NAITO.
13 March 20074th C20C Workshop1 Interannual Variability of Atmospheric Circulation in C20C models Simon Grainger 1, Carsten Frederiksen 1 and Xiagou Zheng.
How do Long-Term Changes in the Stratosphere Affect the Troposphere?
© Crown copyright Met Office The stratosphere and Seasonal to Decadal Prediction Adam Scaife, Sarah Ineson, Jeff Knight and Andrew Marshall January 2009.
Climate Model Simulations of Extreme Cold-Air Outbreaks (CAOs) Steve Vavrus Center for Climatic Research University of Wisconsin-Madison John Walsh International.
2.There are two fundamentally different approaches to this problem. One can try to fit a theoretical distribution, such as a GEV or a GP distribution,
Ko pplung von Dy namik und A tmosphärischer C hemie in der S tratosphäre total ozone fluctuations related to different influences Global Maps Mechanisms.
Stratosphere-Troposhere Coupling in Dynamical Seasonal Predictions Bo Christiansen Danish Meteorological Institute.
Preferred Modes of Variability and Their Relationship with Climate Change The Pennsylvania State University Department of Meteorology Seok-Woo Son and.
Interannual Time Scales: ENSO Decadal Time Scales: Basin Wide Variability (e.g. Pacific Decadal Oscillation, North Atlantic Oscillation) Longer Time Scales:
Dynamical Influence on Inter-annual and Decadal Ozone Change Sandip Dhomse, Mark Weber,
Rossby wave breaking (RWB) Definition Detection / Measurement Climatology Dynamics – Impact on internal variability (NAO / NAM) – Impact on surface turbulent.
Tendencies of change for different characteristics of extratropical cyclones in the Northern Hemisphere Mirseid G. Akperov and Igor I. Mokhov A. M. Obukhov.
An Interpretation of Non-Gaussian Statistics in Geophysical Data Climate Diagnostics Center/University of Colorado and.
BASIC STATISTICAL CONCEPTS Statistical Moments & Probability Density Functions Ocean is not “stationary” “Stationary” - statistical properties remain constant.
Mukougawa, Hitoshi 1, Yuhji Kuroda 2 and Toshihiko Hirooka 3 1 Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University, JAPAN 2 Meteorological Research.
Prepare For The Apocalypse. The largest coronal mass emission (CME) ever detected by scientists breaks off from the sun and hurtles toward the Earth. With.
Reducing Uncertainty in Fatigue Life Estimates Design, Analysis, and Simulation 1-77-Nastran A Probabilistic Approach To Modeling Fatigue.
The ENSO Signal in Stratospheric Temperatures from Radiosonde Observations Melissa Free NOAA Air Resources Lab Silver Spring 1.
The impact of solar variability and Quasibiennial Oscillation on climate simulations Fabrizio Sassi (ESSL/CGD) with: Dan Marsh and Rolando Garcia (ESSL/ACD),
Dynamical control of ozone transport and chemistry from satellite observations and coupled chemistry climate models Mark Weber 1, Sandip Dhomse 1, Ingo.
The impact of lower boundary forcings (sea surface temperature) on inter-annual variability of climate K.-T. Cheng and R.-Y. Tzeng Dept. of Atmos. Sci.
Intraseasonal, seasonal, and interannual variations of the Arctic temperature in paleoclimates, present, and future experiments in CMIP5 model outputs.
Impact of abrupt stratospheric dynamical change on Tropical Tropopause Layer Eguchi, N. 1, K. Kodera 2,3 and T. Nasuno 4 1: Kyushu University, 2: Nagoya.
Makoto INOUE and Masaaki TAKAHASHI (CCSR, Univ. of Tokyo)
Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, NCAR
WCRP Workshop on Seasonal Prediction
Bo Christiansen Downward propagation from the stratosphere:
Prepare For The Apocalypse
Hydrologic Forecasting
Sampling Distribution
Sampling Distribution
Analysis of Southern European Cold Spells via a
Strat-trop interaction and Met Office seasonal forecasting
Korea Ocean Research & Development Institute, Ansan, Republic of Korea
Presentation transcript:

YODEN Shigeo Dept. of Geophysics, Kyoto Univ., JAPAN August 4, 2004; SPARC 2004 Victoria + α - β for Colloquium on April 15, Introduction 2.Internal variability obtained in large ensemble experiments 3.Experiments on the QBO effects on the S-T coupled variability 4.Experiments on the spurious trends due to finite-length datasets 5.Concluding Remarks Large Ensemble Experiments on the Interannual Variability and Trends the Interannual Variability and Trends with a Stratosphere-Troposphere with a Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupled Model Coupled Model

1. Introduction Causes of interannual variations of S-T coupled system (Yoden et al., 2002; JMSJ ) ENSO

Labitzke Diagram (Seasonal Variation of Histograms of the Monthly Mean Temperature; at 30 hPa) South Pole (NCEP) North Pole (NCEP) North Pole (Berlin) courtesy of Dr. Labitzke Length of the observed dataset is 50 at most 50 years. numerical experiments Only numerical experiments can supply much longer datasets to obtain statistically significant results, although they are not real but virtual.

The Earth Simulator R&D Center  Advancement of computers ENIAC

 Hierarchy of numerical models Hoskins (1983; Quart.J.Roy.Meteor.Soc.) “Dynamical processes in the atmosphere and the use of models” OBSERVATIONS DYNAMICAL MODELS COMPLEX MEDIUM SIMPLE EVOLVING CONCEPTIAL MODELS A schematic illustration of the optimum situation for meteorological research

 Our research activity for these two decades LOM: Low-Order Model  Yoden (1987a,b,c) stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs)  Yoden and Holton (1988) quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO)  Yoden (1990) seasonal march in NH and SH MCM: Mechanistic Circulation Model  Taguchi, Yamaga and Yoden (2001) SSWs in S-T coupled system  Taguchi and Yoden (2002a,b,c) internal S-T coupled variations  Naito, Taguchi and Yoden (2003) QBO effects on coupled variations  Nishizawa and Yoden (2005) spurious trends due to short dataset GCM: General Circulation Model  Yoden, Naito and Pawson (1996) SSWs in Berlin TSM GCM  Yoden, Yamaga, Pawson and Langematz (1999) a new Berlin GCM

 3D global MCM: Taguchi, Yamaga and Yoden (2001)  an atmospheric GCM  simplified physical processes parameter sweep experiments long-time integrations (max. 15,000 years) 2. Natural internal variability obtained in large ensemble experiments with an MCM

 Labitzke diagram for 1000-year integrations Taguchi and Yoden (2002b) reliable PDFs (mean, std. deviation, skewness,...) Monthly mean temperature (90N, 2.6 hPa)

 Use of reliable PDFs to evaluate the rarity of September 2002 in the SH Hio and Yoden (2005, JAS Special issue, 62-3, ) 02 zonal-mean zonal wind (45S, 20hPa, Oct.1-15) (45-75S, 100hPa, Aug.16-Sep.30) upward EP flux

Monthly mean temperature (90N, 2.6 hPa) Frequency distribution [%] x Mean U 45S,20hPa Gaussian x T&Y(Feb.)

3. Experiments on the QBO effects on the S-T coupled variability with an MCM  Perpetual winter integrations Naito, Taguchi and Yoden (2003, JAS, 60, ) Naito and Yoden (2005)  “QBO forcing” in the zonal momentum eq.: : prescribed zonal mean zonal wind of a particular phase of the QBO  Assessment of the atmospheric response to a small (or finite) change in the external parameter by a statistical method.

10,800-day mean fields of zonal-mean zonal wind [m/s] 75m/s50m/s 55m/s 45m/s

Time series of zonal-mean temperature [K] at φ=86N, p =2.6hPa for 2,000 days Total: 1,153 events

 Statistical significance QBO effects on the troposphere a large sample method  A standard normal variable:  The probability that Z reaches 40.6 for two samples of the same populations is quite small ( < ) E1.0W1.0 Frequency distributions of zonal-mean temperature [K] (86N, 449hPa, days)

 Observational fact Naito and Yoden (2005, SOLA, 1, 17-20) QBO effects on the polar troposphere W (2250 days) E (1800 days) Frequency distributions of zonal-mean T (90N, 200hPa, DJF for )

4. Experiments on the spurious trends due to finite-length datasets with internal variability  Nishizawa and Yoden (2005, JGR in press) Linear trend  IPCC the 3rd report (2001)  Ramaswamy et al. (2001) Estimation of spurious trend  Weatherhead et al. (1998) Importance of variability with non-Gaussian PDF  SSWs  extreme weather events We do not know  PDF of spurious trend  significance of the estimated value

 Linear trend We assume a linear trend in a finite-length dataset with random variability  Spurious trend We estimate the linear trend by the least square method We define a spurious trend as N = N = 50

 Moments of the spurious trend Mean of the spurious trend is 0 Standard deviation of the spurious trend is Skewness is also 0 Kurtosis is given by standard deviation of natural variability kurtosis of natural variability + Monte Carlo simulation with Weibull (1,1) distribution

 Probability density function (PDF) of the spurious trend When the natural variability is Gaussian distribution When it is non-Gaussian  Edgeworth expansion of the PDF  Cf. Edgeworth expansion of sample mean (e.g., Shao 2003)

 Cooling trend run 96 ensembles of 50-year integration with external linear trend  -0.25K/year around 1hPa Small STD Dev. Largest STD Dev.

 Application to the real atmosphere data 20-year data of NCEP/NCAR reanalysis application of the model statistics -0.1K/year -0.5K/year +0.1K/year t-test >99% >90%

Necessary length for 99% statistical significance [years] 87N 47N  How many years do we need to get statistically significant trend ? - 0.5K/decade in the stratosphere 0.05K/decade in the troposphere

50-year data 20-year data [K/decade] [K/decade]  How small trend can we detect in finite length data with statistical significance ?

Recent advancement in computing facilities has enabled us to do some parameter sweep experiments with 3D MCMs Very long-time integrations give reliable PDFs (non-Gaussian, bimodal,.... ), which might be important for nonlinear perspectives in climate-change studies Atmospheric response to small change in an external parameter (e.g., QBO, solar cycle, …) can be statistically assessed by a large sample method 5. Concluding Remarks