Artemis project proposal round 2013 Johan Lukkien, Peter van Otterloo Monday, January 21, 2013

Agenda Brief introduction into Artemis JU Procedure Results of Match Making event Questions – continuously

Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking Artemis General goal support R & D Activities … to attract the best European research ideas and capacities in the field of Embedded Computing systems. Trends increasingly large projects: >100py implementation pilots (AIPP) + ASP exploitation focus Consortium Industry dominant, Industry lead per country: KI at most 50% ‘Tree-based’ consortia Proposal Brokerage/matchmaking event One phase: Full Project Proposal business oriented, KI mainly for knowledge Timeline 3 years duration Matchmaking: T0 FPP: T0+8 Start: T0+11 earliest Funding scheme 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment −66% national, 33% EU not enough to pay new AIOs! national funding is limited Strategy include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

2012 Call 24 eligible proposals submitted 11 below threshold (= 40 / 60) 7M available in NL (+ 3.5 in EU) funding per country distributed over projects in which that country is partaking until money runs out NL in: CRYSTAL (4.3M), HoliDes (1.3M), ARROWHEAD (0.3M), ACCUS (1.07M instead of 1.9M) TU/e in: CRYSTAL, ACCUS, COPCAMS, ??? Negotiations ongoing, start April 1

Example funding scheme 3y 50%= 190K (ok) 3y 50% = 168K (not ok) 0.7y staff 50% = 55K (fills the gap) total funding: 413K, 275K from AgentschapNL, 138K from EU Note: Effort, hence # TU/e partners / Artemis proposal is limited Artemis is an industry motivated program

Project types Artemis Sub-Programmes: ASP1: Methods and processes for safety-relevant embedded systems ASP2: Embedded Systems for Healthcare and Wellbeing ASP3: Embedded Systems in Smart environments ASP4: Embedded Systems for manufacturing and process automation ASP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems ASP6: Embedded Systems for Security and Critical Infrastructures Protection ASP8: Human-centred design of embedded systems Artemis Innovative Pilot Projects, open in 2013 call AIPP2: Innovative Integrated Care Cycles AIPP3: Seamless communication and interoperability - Smart environments: the Neural System for society AIPP5: Computing platforms for embedded systems

Selection criteria ASP: excellence of proposal AIPP: efficiency in execution less research, more development, large budget, high impact success rate until now: 100% Make a difference ‘Think big’ (100’s of my) eHealth and Cyber Security relatively low in the current clusters hence, favoured (?)

Brokerage Events JU ENIAC and Catrene (EUREKA) brokerage event Aeneas (Aeneas (the Association of R&D actors, i.e. the private part in the PPD ENIAC) Jan 23/24 fully booked Still to come: ITEA brokerage event on March 19/20

Public-Private Partnership: Joint Undertaking ENIAC General goal enhance the further integration and miniaturization of devices, and increase their functionalities while delivering new materials, equipment and processes, new architectures, innovative manufacturing processes, disruptive design methodologies, new packaging and ‘systemising’ methods. Trends exploitation focus Consortium Industry dominant, Industry lead per country: KI at most 50% Tree-based Proposal Brokerage/matchmaking event Two phases: Project Outline, Full Project Proposal Timeline 3 years duration Matchmaking: T0 PO: FPP+4 FPP: T0+8 Start: T0+11 earliest Funding scheme 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment −66% national, 33% EU not enough to pay new AIOs! national funding is limited Strategy include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

EUREKA – ‘doing business through technology’ EUREKA – from the site: Raising the productivity and competitiveness of European business through technology. Boosting national economies on the international market and strengthening the basis for sustainable prosperity an employment. EUREKA ‘Clusters’ – from the site: long-term, strategically significant industrial initiatives. usually have a large number of participants, aim to develop generic technologies of key importance for European competitiveness mainly in ICT, energy and more recently in the biotechnology sector. Since 1985

EUREKA Clusters International consortium (at least 2 countries) Rules, per country: SME, IND, KI certain division IND/SME lead International cluster label required for national funding

EUREKA ITEA2 General goal advanced pre-competitive R&D in Software-intensive Systems and Services (SiSS) Trends relatively large projects: py Consortium Industry driven, Industry lead per country: IND, SME, KI Best: tree-mode construction, Core- team writing Proposal Brokerage/Matchmaking event Three phases: Project Outline, Full Project Proposal, National proposal Technically innovative business oriented Timeline 3 years duration Matchmaking: T0 PO: T0+4 FPP: T0+8 NF: T0+12 – T0+16 Start: T0+15 earliest Funding scheme 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment not enough to pay new AIOs! national funding is limited Strategy include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding

EUREKA CATRENE General goal Technological Leadership for a competitive European ICT industry …nano-/microelectronics solutions that respond to the needs of society at large Trends relatively large projects: py Consortium Industry driven, Industry lead per country: IND, SME, KI Core-team for writing Proposal Brokerage/matchmaking event Three phases: Project Outline, Full Project Proposal, National proposal Technically innovative business oriented Timeline 3 years duration Matchmaking: T0 PO: T0+3 FPP: T0+8 NF: T0+12 – T0+16 Start: T0+15 earliest Funding scheme 50% of integral cost, including travel and equipment not enough to pay new AIOs! national funding is limited Strategy include staff in the budget to cover for holes in the funding