Doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0922r1 Submission July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 Achievable gains in AP Discovery Date: 2010-07-15 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1106r1 Submission September 2010 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 PAR & 5C Transition from FIA to Fast Initial Link Set-Up.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1125r0 Submission September 2010 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 How does the (new) Fast Initial Link Set- Up PAR address.
Doc.: IEEE /1521r2 Submission January 2012 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 AP and Network Discovery Enhancements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0269r0 March 2014 Katsuo Yunoki, KDDI R&D LaboratoriesSlide 1 Scanning Optimization By Using Reduced Neighbor Report IE Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0357r0 Submission March 2011 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 A focused path torwards TGai D1.0 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1232r3 Submission Sep 2011 Slide 1 Active Scanning Improvement Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE ai May 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, Intel, Qcomm Slide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0531r1 May 2015 Michael Fischer, FreescaleSlide 1 A Possible Solution to the Beacon Length Problem Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0550 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Kiseon RyuLG Electronics10225 Willow Creek Rd, San Diego, CA, 92131, USA +1
Doc.: IEEE /0788r1 Submission ProbeTimer of Active Scanning July 2012 Lin Cai et al, Huawei.Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/279r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide ai simulations Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1042 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang, Kyungki,
Doc.: IEEE /1510r0 Submission November 2011 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 Enablement in 5GHz for FILS Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1054r0 Submission Sep Santosh Pandey (Cisco)Slide 1 FILS Reduced Neighbor Report Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r2 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Doc.: IEEE /037r0 Submission January 2003 Ed Callaway, Motorola Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0246r0 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC Corp. 1F, 6-3 Baoqiang Road, Xindian district, New Taipei City,
Wireless LANs Prof. F. Tobagi MAC Management 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0257r1 Submission NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Giwon ParkLG Electronics LG R&D Complex 533, Hogye- 1dong, Dongan-Gu, Anyang,
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0281r0 March 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Recommendations for association Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0034r1 Submission Setting of ProbeTimer January 2013 Lin Cai et al, Huawei.Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Lin.
An Empirical Analysis of the IEEE MAC Layer Handoff Process Arunesh Mishra Minho Shin William Arbaugh University of Maryland,College Park,MD.
Submission doc.: IEEE ai March 2012 InterDigital, KDDI, Nokia, Huawei, IntelSlide 1 Proposed SFD Text for ai Passive Scanning Improvement.
Doc.: IEEE / ai Submission Nov 2011 Huawei Technologies Co. LtdSlide 1 Broadcast Probe Response in TGai Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1234r0 Submission October 2008 L. Chu Etc.Slide s Power Saving Issues Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0553r4 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Response Criteria of Probe Request Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1233r3 Submission Sep 2011 Slide 1 Passive Scanning Improvement Date: Authors:
SubmissionSlide 1Dwight Smith, Motorola Mobility Nov 2012doc.: IEEE 11-12/1332r0 Other Service Discovery Concepts Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /2215r4 Submission August 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Proposal –Radio Resource Measurement Capability Enabled.
Doc.: IEEE /2215r1 Submission July 2007 Ganesh Venkatesan, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Proposal – Supported Radio Resource Measurement Bitmask IE.
Doc.: IEEE /0788r0 Submission ProbeTimer of Active Scanning July 2012 Lin Cai et al, Huawei.Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/535r1 May 2012 Jarkko Kneckt, NokiaSlide 1 Scanning and FILS requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission July 2011 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TGai FILS Proposal Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-15/0592r0 May 2015 Eric Wong (Apple)Slide 1 More Power Save Calibration Results Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0841r0 Submission May 2011 Marc Emmelmann, Fraunhofer FOKUSSlide 1 Verification of TGai Requirements Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/1051r2 Multi-channel information for AP discovery 1 September 2012 HTC Corp. NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Jing-Rong HsiehHTC.
Doc.: IEEE /1015r1 Submission Gabor Bajko, Nokia, Canpolat, Intel, Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 Network Selection Optimization Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0042r1 Submission January 2013 Yongho Seok, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Fast Moving Scan Channel Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE af Submission Distributed Measurement Report Period for Interference Detection in af MAC Mar Chang-Woo Pyo, NICTSlide.
Doc.: IEEE /0158r0 Submission Jan 2012 Phillip Barber, HuaweiSlide 1 Proposed Additions to SFD Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1232r1 Submission Sep 2011 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 Active Scanning Improvement Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0176r0 Submission Slide 1 March 2005 Stephen Wang, et. al. Measurement Pilot Frame Steve Emeott, Walter Johnson, Floyd Simpson, Stephen.
Doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Submission January 2012 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Scanning with FILS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-12/0206r1 March 2012 Slide 1 Necessity of Probe Reduction Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0590r0 Submission May 2010 Kazuyuki Sakoda, Sony CorporationSlide 1 MAC beaconing sync comment resolution overview Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0353r1 March 2016 Hanseul Hong, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MU-RTS/CTS for TWT Protection Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0294r2 Submission March 2012 Jonathan Segev (Intel)Slide 1 Active Scanning Reply Window Date: Authors:
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
TBTT Information Field Type (TIFT) Clarification for P802.11REVmd
Wide Scanning Requests and Responses
Omission of Probe Request
WUR Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2017
AP Scanning Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
AP Scanning Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
120MHz channelization solution
OCT based 6 GHz AP Operation Discussion
FILS Reduced Neighbor Report
Fujio Watanabe, Moo Ryong Jeong, Toshiro Kawahara
Setting of ProbeTimer Authors: Name Affiliations Address Phone
Reducing the Probe Response transmission
AP Discovery Discussion
Prioritized Active Scanning in TGai
July,2011 doc.: IEEE /0985r0 July,2011 Performance Evaluation of Multiple STAs’ Authentication and Association Process Date: Authors:
Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation
Fast Active Scan Proposals
Cooperative AP Discovery
Omission of Probe Request
Pekko Orava, Henry Haverinen, Simon Black (Nokia)
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2012
July,2011 doc.: IEEE /0985r0 July,2011 Performance Evaluation of Multiple STAs’ Authentication and Association Process Date: Authors:
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 1 Achievable gains in AP Discovery Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 2 Abstract Based on the ongoing discussion in FIA SG, there requests were risen to elaborate how all phases being part of an initial link set-up could be shortened. This document presents some initial toughs on improving AP discovery. Assumptions for the calculation of the duration of AP discovery are added and resulting numbers revised. Attention: References to IEEE refer to REVmb D4.0 (before the renumbering of clauses as part of the revision process)

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 3 AP Discovery Passive scanning Active scanning No Assumptions (scan all channels), find all APs 2.4 GHz5 GHz Reduce number of channels (to 1) where APs are known to operate Enablement at 5GHz via 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz5 GHz2.4 GHz5 GHz 1100 ms Expected Mean of time spent in scanning for 2300 ms 102 msn/a 17 msn/a 100 ms Return after 1 st AP Responses (scan 1 channel) 50ms 2 msn/a 2.4 GHz5 GHz 50ms 2 ms 2 + ε ms No Assumptions (scan all channels), stop after 1 st APs is found 2.4 GHz5 GHz 550 ms1150 ms 22 ms n/a Amendment required 11k may work, But not for initial link set-up Amendment required 98% gain95% gain 99% gain 98% gain Attn.: 1 additional scan (active or passive) afterwards for joining the BSS. Assume active scanning: today: 17ms  tomorrow 2ms

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Stop Scanning after 1 st AP is found Passive scanning –Allows such behavior: “shall listen to each channel scanned for no longer than a maximum duration defined by the MaxChannelTime“ [11REVmb-D4, Cls ] –Realization is vendor specific. Currently, there is not option to the MLME- SCAN.request primitive forcing this behavior Active scanning: –Not possible right now: “…. [scan until] ProbeTimer reaches MaxChannelTime, process all received probe responses“ [11REVmb-D4, Cls ] July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Scan only a channel where an AP operates Moving from one BSS to another (note: not scope of FIA SG, but mentioned for completeness) –11k neighbor report can provide information on which channels APs operate Initial link-set up –Not possible right now (STA is not within a BSS in order to query a neighbor report) July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 5

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Enablement at 5GHz via 2.4 GHz Currently, a STA has to receive a Beacon before operation …. –Upon receipt of an MLME-JOIN.request primitive, the STA shall use the synchronization procedure described in –STA is required to receive a Beacon in order to obtain (Cls § 1): channel synchronization information (FH PHY only) TSF timer value Rules for operation under spectrum management (802.11REVmb-D4, Cls a, DFS) –Receive Beacon or Probe Response (with Spectrum Management Bit in Capabilities set to 1) –OR: STA can determine that it is in a regulatory domain that does not require DFS –OR: STA can ensure that it will meet regulatory requirements even if DFS is not employed  Legislation does not affect idea of enablement to shorten AP discovery time since STA has to receive beacon during JOIN phase July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Details on calculation of Expected Mean values July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Parameters Number of channels: 11 for 2.4 GHz; 23 for 5 GHz Beacon interval: 100 ms Idle channel Do not account for time to switch RF from one channel to another Parameters for active scanning [1]: –ProbeDelay = 0.1 ms –MinChannelTime = 0.67 ms –MaxChannelTime = 15 ms

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Passive Scanning Time to find all APs an all channels (n): –N * TBTT = n * 100ms Time (expected mean) to find first AP by scanning all channels (until AP found) –Find AP on 1 st channel: 50 ms (= ½ TBTT) 2 nd channel: 100 ms (=TBTT) + 50 ms (= ½ TBTT) 3 rd channel: 2* TBTT + ½ TBTT Nth channel: n*TBTT + ½ TBTT –Expected mean = 1/n SUM_n ( n * TBTT + ½ TBTT) = TBTT (n-1)/2 + TBTT/2 = N/2 * TBTT

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission Active Scanning The time spent in active scanning highly depends on the number of channels where at least one AP operates on. –Channel idle / no AP operating on that channel  wait for MinChannelTime and go to next channel –If at least one AP responds within MinChannelTime, wait until MaxChannelTime expires (and catch al responses within that time span) and move on Assumption: One AP –Scan all channels, find all APs: (n-1) * MinChannelTime + MaxChannelTime + n*ProbeDelay + n * time for ProbeReq. Frame transmission –Scan all channels, stop after 1 st AP found: (n-1)/2 * MinChannelTime + MaxChannelTime + n/2 * ProbeDelay + n/2 * time for ProbeReq Frame transmission Assumption: at least one AP on every channel –Scan all channels, find all APs: n* MaxChannelTime + n*ProbeDelay + n * time for ProbeReq. Frame transmission –Scan all channels, stop after 1 st AP found: MaxChannelTime + ProbeDelay + time for ProbeReqFrame Assumption: at least one AP on channel 1, 6, 11; no AP on others –Scan all channels, find all APs: (n-3) * MinChannelTime +3 * MaxChannelTime + n*ProbeDelay + n * time for ProbeReq. Frame transmission –Scan all channels, stop after 1 st AP found: (3-1)/2 * MinChannelTime + MaxChannelTime + 3/2 ProbeDelay + 3/2 * time for ProbeReq Use average of the resulting duration coming from the three assumptions per scenario July 2010 Marc Emmelmann, FOKUSSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /0922r1 Submission References [1]M. Ryong Jeong, F. Watanabe and T. Kawahara, ”Fast Active Scan for Measurement and Handoff,” DoCoMo USA Labs, Contribution to IEEE802, May 2003.