Voting Review Material

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Which units are you most interested in covering? Unit A –Management Science Unit B – Growth Unit C – Shape and Form Unit D – Statistics.
Advertisements

Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Voting Methods Continued
1.3 Borda, Condorcet, Approval 1 Borda, Condorcet, and Approval Section 1.3 Stick animation.
IMPOSSIBILITY AND MANIPULABILITY Section 9.3 and Chapter 10.
Chapter 1: Methods of Voting
Mathematics The study of symbols, shapes, algorithms, sets, and patterns, using logical reasoning and quantitative calculation. Quantitative Reasoning:
VOTING SYSTEMS Section 2.5.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express.
 1. The majority criterion  2. Condorcet’s criterion  3. independence of irrelevant alternatives criterion  4. Monotonicity criterion.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics Sixth Edition
The Plurality Method The Borda Count Method
1.1, 1.2 Ballots and Plurality Method
What is your favorite food?. Preference Schedule A Preference Schedule is a way to represent the order in which people like (prefer) certain items. The.
Fair Elections Are they possible?. Acknowledgment Many of the examples are taken from Excursions in Modern Mathematics by Peter Tannenbaum and Robert.
Plurality with elimination, Runoff method, Condorcet criterion.
1.5 - Two Summary Examples1 Two Summary Examples Section 1.5.
CRITERIA FOR A FAIR ELECTION
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.2, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
MAT 105 Spring  We have studied the plurality and Condorcet methods so far  In this method, once again voters will be allowed to express their.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 15 Section 2 - Slide Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
Ch Voting Preference tables E, F, G, and H are running for math club president If everyone is asked to rank their preferences, how many different.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Voting theory: application of methods that affect the outcome of an election. Sec 1: Preference Ballots and Schedules.
© 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved. CHAPTER 14 Voting and Apportionment.
Chapter 15 Section 1 - Slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. AND.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Math for Liberal Studies.  We have seen many methods, all of them flawed in some way  Which method should we use?  Maybe we shouldn’t use any of them,
Let’s take a class vote. How many of you are registered to vote?
Voting Methods Examples of Voting Methods (other than majority rules) –Plurality –Borda Count –Hare System –Sequential Pairwise –Approval Voting.
Section 1.1, Slide 1 Copyright © 2014, 2010, 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Section 11.1, Slide 1 11 Voting Using Mathematics to Make Choices.
Copyright 2013, 2010, 2007, Pearson, Education, Inc. Section 15.1 Voting Methods.
Why We Should Use the Plurality with Elimination Voting Method.
Fairness Criteria and Arrow’s Theorem Section 1.4 Animation.
Warm-Up Rank the following soft drinks according to your preference (1 being the soft drink you like best and 4 being the one you like least)  Dr. Pepper.
The Mathematics of Voting Chapter 1. Preference Ballot A Ballot in which the voters are asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. 1. Brownies.
14.2 Homework Solutions Plurality: Musical play Borda count: Classical play Plurality-with-elimination: Classical play Pairwise Comparison: Classical play.
The mathematics of voting The paradoxes of democracy.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting 1.1Preference Ballots and Preference.
Chapter 9: Social Choice: The Impossible Dream Lesson Plan Voting and Social Choice Majority Rule and Condorcet’s Method Other Voting Systems for Three.
Excursions in Modern Mathematics, 7e: 1.Conclusion - 2Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 The Mathematics of Voting CONCLUSION Elections, Fairness,
Review of Common Test #1 Mistakes. Plurality versus Majority Plurality winner = candidate with more first place votes than any other Majority winner =
Fairness Criteria Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system to satisfy.Fairness Criteria: properties we expect a good voting system.
My guy lost? What’s up with that….  In the 1950’s, Kenneth Arrow, a mathematical economist, proved that a method for determining election results that.
1.
Voting: Does the Majority Always Rule?
Voting and Apportionment
1 The Mathematics of Voting
Impossibility and Other Alternative Voting Methods
1.
Plurality with elimination, Runoff method, Condorcet criterion
Chapter 10: The Manipulability of Voting Systems Lesson Plan
8.2 Voting Possibilities and Fairness Criteria
Impossibility and Other Alternative Voting Methods
1.3 The Borda Count Method.
Let’s say we have a town of 10,000 people electing a mayor using the Plurality with Elimination Voting Method. There are 4 candidates, candidate A, candidate.
Homework (day 2): p , 4, 6, 10, 12ab, 16, 18abc, 24, 26
Warm Up – 1/23 - Thursday How many people voted in the election?
Social Choice Theory [Election Theory]
Classwork: p.33 (27abc run off, 29ab run off, 31, 33ab run off)
Section 15.2 Flaws of Voting
5-2 Election Theory Flaws of Voting.
Voting systems Chi-Kwong Li.
Voting Preference Ballots and Preference Schedules
Plurality with Elimination
p.33 (28 run off, 30 run off, 32, 34ab run off)
Warm Up – 1/27 - Monday Who wins by Plurality with Elimination?
Quiz – 1/24 - Friday How many people voted in the election?
Homework (day 1): p , 4, 6, 10, 12ab, 16, 18abc, 24, 26
Section 14.1 Voting Methods.
Flaws of the Voting Methods
Presentation transcript:

Voting Review Material

Walking

How many people voted in this election? 13 35 45 55 Can’t tell 13 9 12 11 A B C D #3 0 of 30 Voting - Review

How many different preference ballots are there for an election with 6 candidates? 21 36 120 720 None of the above #5 0 of 30 Voting - Review

A preference schedule can have a row in which the same candidate appears twice True False Can’t tell 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

What’s wrong with this preference schedule? 5 2 3 A B C Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Nothing 0 of 30 Voting - Review

“Plurality” means Most number of votes 50% of the votes More than 50% of the votes More votes than most of the candidates 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Who wins using Plurality? 13 9 12 11 A B C D A B C D 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Who wins using IRV? 13 9 12 11 A B C D A B C D 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Who wins using Hare? A B C D 13 9 12 11 A B C D 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Who wins using Borda? A B C D 13 9 12 11 Pts A B C D 3 2 1 0 of 30 A B C D 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Who wins using Condorcet? 13 9 12 11 A B C D A B C D 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Who wins using Approval? (Voters approve of the candidates in RED) B C D 13 9 12 11 A B C D 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Jogging

An election involves three candidates An election involves three candidates. The preference schedule has two columns. So, there must be a majority winner. True False Can’t tell 0 of 30 Voting - Review

A Plurality winner Must be a majority winner Can be a majority winner Cannot be a majority winner 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

The greatest flaw of Plurality voting is Time consuming A small plurality could win Encourages voter apathy Costly Difficult to carry out 0 of 30 Voting - Review

The greatest flaw of IRV is A strong 3rd place finisher would be eliminated on 1st round A small plurality could win Time consuming Costly Difficult to explain 0 of 30 Voting - Review

An IRV winner always winds up with A plurality A majority Neither 0 of 30 Voting - Review

If there are three candidates in an election IRV and Hare Never choose the same candidate Sometimes choose the same candidate Always choose the same candidate 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Suppose that A is favored by a majority of the voters Suppose that A is favored by a majority of the voters. Then the IRV method Must choose A May not choose A Cannot choose A 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Suppose that A is favored by a majority of the voters Suppose that A is favored by a majority of the voters. Then the Hare method Must choose A May not choose A Cannot choose A 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

On each re-tally, the Hare method eliminates the candidate with 13 9 12 11 A B C D The least number of first place votes The most number of last place votes Neither 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Suppose that A is favored by a majority of the voters Suppose that A is favored by a majority of the voters. Then the Borda method Must choose A May not choose A Cannot choose A 1 0 of 5 Voting - Review

The Condorcet Method Never produces a winner Always produces a winner May not produce a winner Can produce two different winners 3 0 of 5 Voting - Review

Using the Condorcet method, if A beats B, and B beats C, then A must beat C A can’t beat C A may beat C 2 0 of 5 Voting - Review

In the Approval method you Can vote for any number of candidates Cannot vote for all candidates Must vote for at least 2 candidates 1 0 of 30 Voting - Review

Some voters exhibited irrational behavior when voting using the Approval method. How many columns contain highly suspicious entries? 1 column 2 columns 3 columns 4 columns None 13 9 12 11 A B C D 0 of 5 Voting - Review

Who wins? A B C D Can’t tell 13 9 12 11 A B C D 0 of 5 Voting - Review

Running

A student club has 10 members A student club has 10 members. They will use the Borda method (3 – 2 – 1 – 0) to elect A, B, C, or D president. A gets 19 points, B gets 20, and C gets 18. How many points does D get? 3 6 9 15 Can’t tell 0 of 30 Voting - Review

The Borda method will pick the same winner regardless of how the points are assigned to each preference level True False 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

To show that Approval voting violates the Majority Criterion we must show If a candidate wins using Approval, that candidate has a majority If a candidate has a majority that candidate wins using Approval 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

To show that Hare voting violates the Condorcet criterion we must show There is a Condorcet winner but Hare doesn’t pick that candidate The Hare winner is not a Condorcet winner. 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

To show that Borda violates the Irrelevant Alternative criterion we must show that C wins the 1st election but H wins the 2nd C wins the 1st election but Me wins the 2nd Me wins the 1st election but H wins the 2nd 2 0 of 30 Voting - Review

End

A candidate having a majority of the votes may not win using Plurality and IRV Plurality and Hare Borda and Approval Borda and Condorcet 0 of 30 Voting - Review