Height Recommendations September 25, 2008 Zoning Commission Case No. 08-06-01 The District of Columbia Office of Planning’s Comprehensive Review of Zoning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advisory Committee Meeting #3 July 17, :30 p.m. Downtown Livability Initiative.
Advertisements

WHAT DOES THE CITY of New Orleans ZONING ORDINANCE DO?
First step in the City Parking Study Changes.
TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT (TND) ARTICLE City of Columbus
22 Elevations Chapter Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Objectives List features that should be.
IBC 2006 Chapter 5 Building Height and Areas After determining occupancies, the code analysis determines what height and areas are allowable for the occupancy.
Pre-Application Presentation To Village of Glendale Planning Commission February 2, 2015 Village Gate Subdivision.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
City of Rehoboth Beach Managing Impacts of Current Development Trends on Residential Neighborhoods: Issues and Possible Solutions City of Rehoboth Beach.
PERFORMANCE & CODE ANALYSIS TIMBer Inc. ·Brooke Fedder · Marie Rottschaeffer· Izzie Molinuevo· Tena Pettit·
Land Use Study for the Community of Winchester May 21, 2012.
Draft Zoning Code Residential Focus Neighborhood Meeting May 8, 2007.
Shireen Abdelrahman Lecture 5. Individual development projects - new construction, expansion, or renovation - can affect the surrounding environment in.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
DC Zoning Review Low/Moderate Density Residential Working Group DC Office of Planning Meeting 1 March 24, 2008.
JUNE 19, 2012 BCC APPEAL HEARING ON BZA #SE , April 5, 2012 APPLICANT/APPELLANT: TONY RAHBANY.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Subcommittee on Heights, Massing, and Alternate Standards    Third Report – January 20, 2009 Planning & Zoning Commission.
 Introduction by the Chair  Confirmation of public notice  Municipal overview of planning applications  Public comment  Council & public questions.
New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting March 21, 2006 Public Hearing: Special Use Permit (06-004) for a porch addition at th Avenue NW.
Northwest Quadrant Draft Zoning Ordinance NWQ Draft Zoning Ordinance Planning Commission Review February 21, 2006 Phil Carlson, AICP DSU Planning Consultant.
ADOPTION PUBLIC HEARING DONATION BIN ORDINANCE Zoning Division June 24, 2014.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments December 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Design Standards in Saint Paul Proposed Design Standards Zoning Amendments October 16, 2009 Department of Safety & Inspections / Department of Planning.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
Places of Assembly December 5, 2006 Open Discussion.
Introduction to BIM Module 04 – Interiors and Circulation.
Secondary Dwelling Units Orchard Park/Sherwood Forest Ratepayers Association Community Meeting January 29, 2014.
Presenter: Tushar Solanki GIS Workshop Subdivision Design in the City of Wilmer.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
NORTH 40 SPECIFIC PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting #6 November 3, 2011.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Historic Landmarks Commission Type II Appeal of Approval LU HDZ –
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
Planning & Community Development Department 3202 East Foothill Boulevard (Mixed Use Project – Space Bank) City Council May 16, 2016 Predevelopment Plan.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone City Council April 25, 2016.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT REGULATIONS ZOA Tuesday, October 9, 2012.
The Planning & Zoning Commission and Zoning Board of Adjustment Joint Workshop May 24, 2010 May 24, :00 P.M. 6:00 P.M.
Christopher Brown, Planner II December 4th, 2014 Case No. 14ZONE1036 La Grange Road Office Louisville Metro Planning Commission Public Hearing.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
206 THIRD STREET DR/TRP Appeal of. Planning Commission Hearing March 12, 2014, P/C approved a Design Review Permit: - Demolition of the existing.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Design Commission Land Use Review LU DZ Arthouse.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Presented by Kelsey Lang, Planning Associate June 27, 2016
Presentation Preview Introductions Purpose for Zoning Code Rewrite
8/23/2016 Luis N. Serna, AICP David, Healey, FAICP
Proposed Zoning Ordinance
CFT Gateway Center ( E. Foothill Blvd
Residential Building Height Standards
City Council September 18, 2017
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
E Properties & Development Holy Family Project Community Report Back Meeting August 7, 2012 St. Mary’s Lyceum – 6pm.
GCSE Construction & The Built Environment
Drawing & Building Names
83 North Lake Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
MarketStreet Advisory Committee Updates
Zoning Bylaw No Committee of the Whole October 2, 2017.
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
City Council Meeting April 23, 2018
City Commission Workshop
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
Article XIII – Form Districts Community Meeting
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
Section 8: SIGNS.
Presentation transcript:

Height Recommendations September 25, 2008 Zoning Commission Case No The District of Columbia Office of Planning’s Comprehensive Review of Zoning Regulations DC Zoning Review1September 25, 2008

Height Regulation Background 1910 Height Act – Height measured by width of street District Zoning Regulations: – Height measured by zone – May be more restrictive than Height Act Both documents are interpreted by the Zoning Administrator DC Zoning Review2September 25, 2008

Height Topic Area Review Process Working Group Taskforce Public Review Zoning Commission DC Zoning ReviewSeptember 25, 20083

Make Consideration of Height in Zoning Regulations Clearer and More Predictable Acknowledge Ambiguities in Regulation of Height Resolve Potential Differences by Balancing: – Previous Interpretations and Precedent – National Symbolism of Skyline and Tradition of Horizontality – Physical Factors – Sustainability Considerations – Impact on Development Potential DC Zoning Review4September 25, 2008 GOALS OF HEIGHT REGULATION PROPOSALS

1. Determining a Building’s Maximum Permitted Height 2. Measuring a Building’s Height 3. Understanding the Types and Heights of Structures Permitted Above a Roof DC Zoning Review5September 25, 2008 MAJOR TOPICS CONSIDERED

– Appropriate Heights for Particular Zones or Locations – Whether the Height Act Should be Changed DC Zoning Review6September 25, 2008 TOPICS NOT CONSIDERED HERE

Ambiguities Architectural EmbellishmentsMeaningful Connection Building DefinitionMeasuring Point Business StreetNatural Grade Federal Reservations or Open Space: Buildings Confronting, and Streets Interrupted Residential Street Exterior WallsRoof Structures Permitted Above Height Act Limits Front/Frontage DC Zoning Review7September 25, 2008

A.DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT Rec. 1: Streets with multiple frontages Rec. 2: Streets fronting on open space Rec. 3: Business vs. Residence streets Rec. 4: Single vs. Multiple Buildings B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT Rec. 5: Location of Bottom Measuring Point Rec. 6: Elevation of Bottom Measuring Point Rec. 7: Natural Grade Rec. 8: Top Measuring Point C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF Rec. 9: Structures Permitted Atop a Roof Rec. 10: Height, Width, Massing Rec. 11: Roof Structure Setbacks Rec. 12: Exterior Walls DC Zoning Review8September 25, 2008 RECOMMENDATIONS

Rec. 1:Frontage on Multiple Streets Any street abutting a building’s property line may be used to determine the maximum height. There should be no requirement for the presence of an door or entrance. Consistent with current practice. Clarifies that a building may draw height from any side regardless of the presence of a door. A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 9

Rec. 2: Buildings Confronting Federal Reservations or Open Space Clarify what R-O-W may be used to determine height May use “A”, “B”, “C” or “D” but not “E” or “F” May not add two R-O-W or include reservation A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 10

Rec. 2: Potentially Affected Federal Reservations or Open Space A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 11

Rec. 3: Residence & Business Streets A “Residence street” would be a) any block face that contains any residential property located in a low to moderate density zone district; or b) any block face entirely made up of properties of any existing residential zone. A “Business street” would mean any other block face. As with Recommendation 1, a property adjacent to both a commercial and a residence street could choose its frontage. A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 12

Rec. 3: Residence & Business Streets A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 13

Rec. 4: Single Building or Multiple Buildings? A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 14

Rec. 4: Single Building or Multiple Buildings? Existing regulations: – do not recognize connections below ground – imply connections must be above ground – provide no definition of above ground connection There is little consistency in existing practice Applicant burdened with proving undefined “meaningful connection” A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 15

Rec. 4: Single Building or Multiple Buildings? OP Recommends: Distinction between single & multiple buildings needs to be clarified To be considered single, a building must have a.The presence of an enclosed connection that permits passage by building users on at least one floor And/or b.Common usable space accessible by all occupants of the building A. DETERMINING MAXIMUM PERMITTED HEIGHT 16

Rec. 5: Location of Bottom Measuring Point Clarify the location of the measuring point for building height when a building faces more than one street. B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT 17

Rec. 5: Bottom Measuring Point Option 1: The street chosen to determine the maximum allowable height must also be used to determine the point from which building height is measured. – New approach that ensures that height on at least one frontage is based on street width – Could decrease amount of square footage developable on through block sites with significant elevation changes – Potentially makes dozens of downtown buildings non- conforming B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT 18

Rec. 5: Bottom Measuring Point Option 2: Any abutting street may be used to determine the measuring point regardless of which street is used to determine maximum allowable height. – Follows over 50 years of precedent – Would not affect existing or planned projects – Preserves existing development potential within the Height Act B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT 19

Rec. 6: Elevation of Bottom Measuring Point OP Recommends: – Measure from the front of the building based on the elevation of the curb plus a slope for drainage. Height Act says sidewalk Zoning Regulations say curb B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT 20

Rec. 7: Natural Grade Clarify definition of natural grade and measuring point for elevated or depressed areas Natural grade is the ground elevation prior to issuance of first permit needed for new building construction. Where street frontage is affected by an artificial elevation, height is measured from the logical continuation of the surrounding street grid B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT 21

Rec. 8: Top Measuring Point Buildings shall be measured to the top of the roof including any parapet on exterior walls, or any other continuation of the exterior walls. Buildings below the Height Act may add a 4’ parapet B. MEASURING A BUILDING’S HEIGHT 22

Rec. 9: Structures Permitted Atop a Roof Organize and modernize the list of structures allowed on the roof. Ornamental features limited to spires, towers, domes, pinnacles, and minarets, that are aesthetic, primarily vertical elements of a building, even if used to cover/hide/mask utilitarian or amenity features; C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 23

Rec. 9: Structures Permitted Atop a Roof Organize and modernize the list of structures allowed on the roof. Utilitarian features including, but not limited to, mechanical equipment, safety railings, stairwell access, elevator penthouses, and building components or appurtenances dedicated to the environmental sustainability of the building; and C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 24 Utilitarian Ornamental

Rec. 9: Structures Permitted Atop a Roof Organize and modernize the list of structures allowed on the roof. Amenity features such as structures accessory to communal outdoor recreation space, communal pergolas, communal enclosed recreation space, and structures limited to providing individual unit access to private, unenclosed space atop a roof. C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 25

Rec. 10: Height, Width and Massing of Structures Atop a Roof Remove roof structures from FAR calculation and allowed to occupy up to 40% of roof area Remove uniform height & single enclosure requirements Utilitarian and amenity features may not rise more than 20’ above the roof Ornamental features: – 30’ limit – may contain utilitarian or amenity features Special Exception relief allowed for all of these requirements C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 26

Rec. 11: Setbacks for Structures Atop a Roof Utilitarian and amenity features shall be set back 1 to 1 from: (a)exterior wall (Rec. 12); (b) wall set back from and facing a side lot line; (c) lot line wall when taller than adjacent building Special Exception relief allowed for these requirements Additional Study is needed for setbacks atop rowhouses and single family homes C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 27

Rec. 11: Setbacks Atop a Roof C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 28 A B C

Rec. 12: Exterior Walls An exterior wall is any wall facing a public street or alley Decades of precedent have not considered alley facing walls to be exterior walls. Recommendation would not consider party walls or other side walls to be exterior walls BZA would not be able to grant setback relief from exterior walls above level of Height Act. C. STRUCTURES ABOVE A ROOF 29

Next Steps Public Comments Guidance from Zoning Commission Drafting Proposed Zoning Text Further Public Comment & Commission Consideration DC Zoning ReviewSeptember 25,