First National Environmental Health Survey of Child Care Centers: Lead Results Presenter: Warren Friedman, Ph.D., CIH; at CDC ACCLPP meeting March 23,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CERTIFIED LEAD-BASED PAINT RENOVATION CONTRACTOR License Requirements & Work Practice Standards.
Advertisements

October Module 5: Cleaning Activities and Checking Your Work Overview Interior cleaning techniques. Exterior cleaning techniques. How to check.
Evaluating the Effects of Lead Mitigation Policy on Childhood Lead Exposure in Rhode Island Alyssa Sylvaria & Ryan Kelly The Providence Plan - Information.
Lead Dust Standards, Window Replacement & Other Recent Developments
CDC Recommendations for Lead Poisoning Prevention in Newly Arrived Refugee Children Resettlement Worker Module U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Toledo Collaboration for Lead Safe Housing 2014 Ohio Healthy Homes Summit Matthew Currie, Esq. Advocates for Basic Legal Equality.
What Risk Assessors and Lead Inspectors need to know to be compliant with the 2012 HUD Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards.
Lead Dust Sampling Technician June Chapter 2 Visual Inspection.
NEW RESULTS IN LEAD POISONING PREVENTION: Windows, porches and dust lead standards Jonathan Wilson, Deputy Director David Jacobs, Director of Research.
What is lead-based paint?
Lead Dust Sampling Technician March Chapter 2 Visual Inspection.
January 26, 2015 CDBG Small Cities. What is Triggered under HUD Regulations? HUD Projects costing less than $25,000 When a contract specifies lead remediation.
Evaluation of Sampling Methods for Determining Dust Lead Loading on Residential Carpet Surfaces Zhipeng Bai, Junfeng Zhang, George G. Rhoads, Paul J.
Providing services for EBL children in underserved areas through local partnerships Jennifer Lowry, MD Amy Roberts, RN, BSN Ryan Allenbrand, MS, CIEC Children’s.
ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING CONDITIONS ROBINSON SCHOOL WINDOW REPLACEMENT 5/2/ Robinson School: Assessment of Existing Conditions.
Identification and Control of Lead Hazards in Housing David Jacobs, PhD, CIH National Center for Healthy Housing United States April 2010.
Preventing Child Residential Lead Exposure by Window Replacement Funded By: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Michael Weitzman, 1 David.
Lead; Renovation, Repair and Painting Program: Final Rule - April 3, 2008 Lead-Based Paint Hazard Awareness Ark-Tex Council of Governments Texarkana College.
1 Laws, Regulations, Standards Chapter 3 Lead Abatement for Workers Course.
ARIZONA CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING OFFICE OF ENVIROMENTAL HEALTH Christine Cervantez Young PREVENTION PROGRAM.
Soil Abatement & Cleanup Chapter 9 Lead Abatement for Workers Course.
1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule Presentation for NJ Lead and Beyond Conference, Edison, NJ April 16, 2010 Jeanette.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
New HUD Lead-Based Paint Regulations Prepared by Office of Lead Hazard Control U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Introduction To The Preventive Maintenance Program.
Lead-Based Paint in Your Home: What the Risks Are and What is Being Done About it About Lead-Based Paint Why is lead used in paint? Lead gives the paint.
USING LAW FOR HEALTHY HOMES Priscilla Keith, JD Dana Reed Wise Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion county Indianapolis, Indiana.
HUD’s Lead Safe Housing Rule (LSHR)
1 Identifying Lead-Based Paint Hazards Chapter 4 Lead Abatement for Workers Course.
Lead Dust Sampling Technician March Chapter 4 Selecting a Laboratory and Interpreting Results.
1 CHILDHOOD LEAD POISONING PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM.
Kentucky Department for Public Health Environmental Lead Program 275 East Main Street, HS2E-A Frankfort, Kentucky
Georgia Department of Community Affairs Housing R R & P Issues Lead-Based Paint & (Asbestos) Compliance Georgia Environmental Protection Division Lead-Based.
Are your C4 data reflective of the families you serve? Joy Markowitz, Director Jean Dauphinee, TA Specialist Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference,
Get the Lead Out! Paint Retailers Survey A collaborative project between GVSU/KCON and Calvin College Department of Nursing Principal Investigators Jean.
Lead Poisoning for Local Health Officers Identifying potential issues in homes you visit Tina Bernier, Environmental Coordinator Childhood Lead Poisoning.
October Module 2: Regulations U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Established accredited training and certification programs for workers,
January 29, 2014 Community Development. Overview of the EPA Renovation, Repair and Painting Rule (RRP Rule) as it relates to the HUD Lead Safe Housing.
1 Implementing the Lead Safe Housing Rule in Department of Housing and Urban Development: Office of Public and Indian Housing, and Office of Healthy Homes.
Why are White Nursing Home Residents Twice as Likely as African Americans to Have an Advance Directive? Understanding Ethnic Differences in Advance Care.
1 Lead Hazard Management Program Training for U.S. General Services Administration Employees presented to: American Industrial Hygiene Conference & Exposition.
An Employee-Owned Research Corporation 10/14/2015 Statistics in Environmental Epidemiology Research Robert P. Clickner Presentation at the 50th Anniversary.
Measuring Disability in school-aged children: Findings from the National Health Interview Survey PH Pastor, CA Reuben, ME Loeb NCHS Washington,
Lead Based Paint 101 September 2005 Liz Wilde X
Massachusetts 2012 Market Price Survey Review of Study & Findings October 2, 2013 Nathan Grossman, Tina Chen-Xu, Hannah Sacchini
October Module 6: Cleaning Activities and Checking Your Work Overview What is effective cleanup? Interior cleaning techniques. Exterior cleaning.
2012 Lead Workshop Healthy Homes Section Plastic ground cover.
MyLicense Website Access or
Child Care Center Job Descriptions
9/30/ Module 4 Clean-up and Check Your Work.
Pre-Renovation Education Program Jim Copeland Compliance Officer Healthy Homes Section Phone: (517) Fax: (517)
Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Madison County Community Development Alan Dunstan, Madison County Board Chairman Frank Miles, Administrator.
Interviewer Effects on Paradata Predictors of Nonresponse Rachael Walsh, US Census Bureau James Dahlhamer, NCHS European Survey Research Association, 2015.
Untangling Community (County) Data: Valuable Resources for CD Practitioners Bo Beaulieu Purdue Center for Regional Development September 2013.
The Industry Side of Certification, Enforcement, and Clearances Monica Starks GS Group LLC dba Myleadtraining.com Green Solutions Environmental Services.
9/30/ Module 1 Why Should I Be Concerned About Lead Dust?
January 28, 2016 CDBG Small Cities. Does this look lead safe?
Annick Mwilambwe, MD 1, Walter Wittich, MSc 2,3, Ellen E. Freeman, PhD 1,4 1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Montreal, 2 Department of Neurology.
Lead Poisoning Prevention Developed by the Child Care Health Consultation Program Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services with information from.
11 HUD’s Lead Safety Rules and EPA’s Lead in Renovation Rule Dr. Warren Friedman Office of Healthy Homes and Lead Hazard Control
House Layout Inspection Findings Remediation
Lead-Based Paint Council of State Community Development Agencies
FY 2017 Appropriations.
Primary Prevention/Section 8 Partnership Webinar
Informing policy, Improving programs
Families needed for SickKids research study on the genetics of reading disabilities Who can apply? Children aged 6 to 16 who struggle with reading, and.
Sources of Lead Exposure
Give Your Child A Chance: Stop Childhood Lead Poisoning
What regulations apply?
Avera St. Luke’s Therapy Addition January 2012 Update
Presentation transcript:

First National Environmental Health Survey of Child Care Centers: Lead Results Presenter: Warren Friedman, Ph.D., CIH; at CDC ACCLPP meeting March 23, Research Team: J.Y. Zhou 1, W. Friedman 1, D.E. Jacobs 1, N.S. Tulve 2, P.A. Jones 2, C.W. Croghan 2, C.J. Cave 3, J. Rogers 4, S.M. Viet 4, D. Marker 4, A. Fraser 4 1 HUD, 2 EPA, 3 CPSC, 4 Westat

Survey Rationale and Target Population Survey was recommended in 2000 Federal Strategy 100,000 institutional (licensed) child care centers in continental US serving children under 6 years 4.6 million children under 6 years in those child care centers

Survey Sample Nationally (CONUS) representative sample Random population-weighted selection from 30 primary sampling units (Metropolitan Statistical Areas or portions, or non-metropolitan groups of counties) Appx. 11 institutional (state-licensed) centers/PSU; of 334 sampled centers, 68 were not eligible for the survey Of 266 eligible centers remaining, 168 (63%) agreed to participate and completed the survey

Questionnaire, Sampling and Analysis Center Director (usually) recruited by and answered survey questions asked by CPSC staff Two classrooms, 1 multi-purpose room, exterior bare soil; randomly selected Paint tested by XRF; dust and soil samples collected Samples analyzed for lead, selected allergens and selected pesticide residues

Lead Measurements Paint (XRF measurement) Painted building components, bookshelves and cabinets in sampled rooms Exterior painted components, including play equipment Dust Wipe: Floor and window sill in sampled rooms Soil: Composite soil core in play area

Data Limitations Classification may be biased from: Sampling and measurement variation Incomplete sampling of rooms resulting in missing a room with a LBP hazard Comparison with National Survey of Lead and Allergens in Housing (HUD and NIEHS, ) indicates bias is small

Significant LBP Hazard per HUD Lead Safe Housing Rule Significant deterioration of LBP Large surfaces: 2 ft 2 interior, or 20 ft 2 exterior; Small surfaces: 10% total area of a component type Lead-contaminated dust 40 μ g/ft 2 on floor; or 250 μ g/ ft 2 on window sill Bare, lead-contaminated soil 400 μ g/g in play area; or 1200 μ g/g in > 9 ft 2 of bare soil in rest of yard

Results: Significant LBP Hazards Of 100,000 institutional child care centers nationally: 14% (9% to 22%) have significant LBP hazards

Factors Related to Significant LBP Hazards p < 0.05: Construction Year: Centers in older buildings more likely Race: Centers where majority of children are African-American as reported by Center Director more likely than those where majority of children are white 0.05 < p < 0.10: Region: Northeast/Midwest somewhat more likely than South/West Note: No urban/rural difference (both 14%)

Number of Centers with Significant LBP Hazards

Centers with Significant LBP Hazards by Construction Year

Results: Lead-Based Paint Of 100,000 institutional centers nationally: 28% (22% to 35%):some LBP 16% (10% to 24%):deteriorated LBP 11% (6% to 20%):significantly deteriorated LBP

Location of LBP

Painted Components with LBP Components most likely to have LBP: Interior trim, Exterior surfaces Components with largest area of LBP: Interior walls, Exterior walls Components with highest lead loading: Doors, Walls, Windows, Trim

LBP Deterioration vs. Construction Year

Results: Dust Lead Loading In 100,000 centers nationally: No floor samples had a dust lead loading  40 μ g/ft 2 Window sill dust lead loading is higher than floor lead loading 3% (1% to 7%) have window sill lead loading  250 μ g/ft 2 Indicates a lead dust hazard in about 2,800 child care centers

Window Sill Dust Lead Loading by Construction Year

Results: Play Area Soil Lead Of 100,000 institutional centers nationally: 4%(2 - 9%):no play area 23%( %):no play area soil 38%( %):no bare play area soil 33%(23 – 45%):bare play area soil lead < 400 μ g/g 1%(0 - 6%):soil lead hazards (bare play area soil lead > 400 μ g/g)

Summary: First National Environmental Health Survey of Child Care Centers: Lead Results Survey of 168 institutional child care centers representing 100,000 centers nationally serving 4.6 M children < 6 yr old 28% have some LBP 14% have a significant LBP hazard: 11% have significantly deteriorated LBP 3% have a dust lead hazard 1% have a soil lead hazard (and significantly deteriorated LBP) 0.3% have significantly deteriorated LBP and a dust lead hazard