October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lecture 10: Configurations Jason Mickey For AE 440 A/C Lecture September 2009.
Advertisements

New Piper Aircraft Jet The following is an example of how Surfaces can be used to analyze an aircraft from little more than a low quality drawing copied.
Daniel Graves –Project Lead James Reepmeyer – Lead Engineer Brian Smaszcz– Airframe Design Alex Funiciello – Airfoil Design Michael Hardbarger – Control.
Weight and Balance.
Presented by Dan Shafer James Pembridge Mike Reilly
AE 1350 LECTURE #3 TOPICS PREVIOUSLY COVERED Roadmap of Disciplines “English” to “S.I.” units Common Aerospace Terminology Airplane Axes and Motion This.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Airplane Flight: X-Plane in the Classroom Wing Loading Ratio of the plane’s weight (w) divided by the surface area of the wing (s)
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
U5AEA15 AIRCRAFT STRUCTURES-II PREPARED BY Mr.S.Karthikeyan DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICALENGINEERING ASSISTANT PROFESSOR.
Aerodynamic Shape Optimization in the Conceptual and Preliminary Design Stages Arron Melvin Adviser: Luigi Martinelli Princeton University FAA/NASA Joint.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Oculus Superne. 2 System Definition Review Mission Objectives Concept of Operations Aircraft Concept Selection Payload Constraint Analysis and Diagrams.
DR2 Stability and Control Preliminary Design Review and Performance PDR October 24, 2000 Presented By: Christopher Peters …and that’s cool Team DR2 Chris.
Christopher Cottingham
March 3, Structures and Weights 2 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Dane BatemaBenoit Blier Drew Capps Patricia Roman Kyle Ryan Audrey Serra John TapeeCarlos Vergara Team 1: Structures 1 PDR Team “Canard” October 12th,
March 1, Aerodynamics 3 QDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason Tang Joe.
Aero Engineering 315 Lesson 33 GR3 Review. General strategy  Prior to class Review reading for lessons 23 – 32 Work / review problems #26 – 42 Review.
Review Chapter 12. Fundamental Flight Maneuvers Straight and Level Turns Climbs Descents.
Takeoff Performance Jet Aircraft Performance
Overview of Chapter 6 Douglas S. Cairns Lysle A. Wood Distinguished Professor.
Modern Equipment General Aviation (MEGA) Aircraft Progress Report Flavio Poehlmann-Martins & Probal Mitra January 11, 2002 MAE 439 Prof. R. Stengel Prof.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag Aerospace Engineering
AE 1350 Lecture Notes #9.
MAE 3241: AERODYNAMICS AND FLIGHT MECHANICS
 Model airplanes are sized down models of an aircraft  The calculations are easy and the importance is given to building of the plane.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Objectives Pick one final design (Only discussions crucial to design choice will be allowed to occur) Note that many exact locations for many.
2015 SAE Aero East Design Team 2015 SAE Aero Design East Team Mid-Term Status Report (3/5/2015)
Final report and briefing
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
HALE UAV Preliminary Design AERSP 402B Spring 2014 Team: NSFW Nisherag GandhiThomas Gempp Doug RohrbaughGregory Snyder Steve StanekVictor Thomas SAURON.
Design Chapter 8 First Half. Design Requirements and Specifications Payload Range Cruising Speed Takeoff & Landing Distance Ceiling.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
Aerodynamic Forces Lift and Drag.
1. Mission Statement Design Requirements Aircraft Concept Selection Advanced Technologies / Concepts Engine / Propulsion Modeling Constraint Analysis.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
Introduction to IWA. The IWA is based on a patented, next generation design called the Internal Wing Aircraft. The concept brings three separate wings.
Bridget Fitzpatrick Patrick Dempsey Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #2 October 23, 2000.
AAE 451 AERODYNAMICS PDR 2 TEAM 4 Jared Hutter, Andrew Faust, Matt Bagg, Tony Bradford, Arun Padmanabhan, Gerald Lo, Kelvin Seah November 18, 2003.
February 24, Dynamics & Controls 1 PDR Michael Caldwell Jeff Haddin Asif Hossain James Kobyra John McKinnis Kathleen Mondino Andrew Rodenbeck Jason.
1 Chapter 6 Elements of Airplane Performance Prof. Galal Bahgat Salem Aerospace Dept. Cairo University.
AE 2350 Lecture Notes #9 May 10, 1999 We have looked at.. Airfoil aerodynamics (Chapter 8) Sources of Drag (Chapter 8, 11 and 12) –Look at the figures.
Airfoils. Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Moving air Airfoil Aerodynamic force (lift)
LSA FAA definition Max gross takeoff weight = 1320 lbs Max stall speed = 45 knots Maximum speed in level flight = 120 knots.
12/11/12 Brandon Campbell & Ernesto Chairez. Purpose  Civil Transport  Large Volume  Efficient  Quiet  Long Range.
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Ground School 3.06 Weight & Balance.
VEHICLE SIZING PDR AAE 451 TEAM 4
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
Aerodynamics PDR AAE451 – Team 3 October 21, 2003
SAE AERO 2017 Joseph Zongolowicz, Kathy Hansen, Nick Montana, Marquis Ward, Frank Dixon, Thomas Houck, Gerald Short, Zhangsiwen Xiao, Kevin Schesventer,
Preliminary Wing Sizing
Airfoils and Simulation
Matching of Propulsion Systems for an Aircraft
AE 440 Performance Discipline Lecture 9
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Purdue Aeroelasticity
Airfoils and Simulation
Airfoils.
Structures PDR #1 AAE451 – Team 3 October 28, 2003
Airfoils and Simulation
STRUCTURES & WEIGHTS QDR 1
Presentation transcript:

October 28, 2011 Christopher Schumacher (Team Lead) Brian Douglas Christopher Erickson Brad Lester Nathan Love Patrick Mischke Traci Moe Vince Zander

Overview Purpose of Design Project and Requirements Preliminary Design Deliverables Areas of Analysis B+ vs. A Work Qualifications Gantt Chart Summary

Purpose of Design & Requirements Primary Secondary Roll Takeoff Distance: 1028 ft. Climb Gradient: 864 ft/ nmi Roll Landing Distance: 1141 ft. Minimum Full Fuel Payload : 180 lb Similar Loading Flexibility to the SR22 within Approved CG Limits High Speed Cruise Extended Range: 700 nmi Increased Payload: 468 lb with fuel for this mission Design a canard aircraft that is comparable to the SR22 in performance Conduct in-depth analysis on 5 areas of the aircraft Use the analysis to evaluate the preliminary aircraft design

SR22 Design Specifications MediaNewsCirrus-SR22.jpg Wing Area144.9 square ft Wingspan38.5 ft MTOW3400 lb Empty Weight2250 lb Full Fuel Load664 lb Maximum Range+1000 nmi Rate of Climb1400 ft/min Takeoff Distance1020 ft Landing Ground Roll1014 ft Aircraft Length26 ft

Preliminary Design Design Estimates Wing Area145 square ft Wingspan ft MTOW3200 ± 200 lb Empty Weight2000 ± 100 lb Fuel Approximation+550 lb Wing Loading≤ 23.5 lb/ft 2 Range+800 nmi AR8.5 L/D Ratio16 Rate of climb+1304 ft/min

Deliverable Design Groups Integrated Aircraft Design Model Landing Gear Design Wing Configuration Design Control Surface and Loading Stability Design Canard Configuration Design Grades will be based on the depth of research and analysis and not dependent on meeting the requirements

Integrated Aircraft Design Model Using values obtained through initial sizing, construct a CAD model Gather design specifications from individual groups for specific component design Use these specifications to develop an integrated model of the final aircraft

Deliverables: Aircraft Design B+ Work A Work Full exterior CAD design of the original design Full exterior CAD design of the optimized design

Landing Gear Design Process Stability Analysis based on CG and Mounting Locations Determine Loading Cases Tire Selection Stroke Calculations for Landing Gear Damping Initial Size Estimates and Stress Analysis Modeling Finite Element Analysis

Deliverables: Landing Gear B+ Work A Work Design a landing gear system Tire Selection Material Selection Geometry Selection Stress Analysis CAD Model of Landing Gear FEA of one landing gear structure Suggestions for improvement Show how it integrates to the entire design Analyze interactions with rest of aircraft

Wing Configuration Process Select a Main Wing Airfoil and Design Planform Determine All Relevant Aerodynamic Coefficients Analyze Alterations and Customize Airfoil Shape and Size for Performance Optimization Customized Sectioned Wing for Improved Stall Performance whycirrus.com/images/wing.jpg

Deliverables: Wing Configuration B+ Work A Work Design a sectioned wing Fully analyze for : Center of Pressure Moment Coefficient Lift Curve Slope Span Wise Geometry (including wash out analysis)

Controls and Loading Design Process Main goal is developing the process for analyzing weight loading and stability capabilities. Using weights, coefficients of lift, distances, and equations from individual groups to arrange the aircraft design for project requirements. Develop Matlab coding and use ‘ball and stick’ moment and force approximations to conduct analysis.

Deliverables: Controls and Loading B+ Work A Work Calculate Weights and Moments Control Surface Loading Limits Show Loading and Stability Capabilities for Initial Aircraft Design Compare Aircraft Capabilities with FAA Regulations Compare Initial Aircraft with SR22 Capabilities Show Loading and Stability Capabilities for Optimized Aircraft Design Compare Optimized Aircraft Design with SR22 Capabilities

Canard Configuration Process Determine relationship between canard and other aspects of aircraft Manipulate canard sizing to our benefit Analyze flow interactions between the canard and the main wing

Deliverables: Canard Configuration B+ Work A Work Design a Canard Analyze interactions between the canard and wing Calculate forces and moments on the canard Optimize configuration for integrated aircraft Fully Analyze: Center of Pressure Lift Curve Slope Coefficient of Lift

Gantt Chart

Summary Purpose of Design Project and Requirements Preliminary Design Deliverables Areas of Analysis B+ vs. A Work Qualifications Gantt Chart