CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRIAL EVIDENCE.
Advertisements

Your Honor, I would just like to let you know that… Learning Goal: The student will understand what an objection is, how and why they are used, and what.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2012.
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE DOCUMENTS.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
Courtroom Roles and Responsibilities. OBJECTIVES The student will be able to: Identify career opportunities in the court systems. Examine the roles of.
Trial Information. The format of a jury trial  In a jury trial, a defendant appears before the court to determine his/her innocence or guilt.  A jury.
Common Trial Procedures United States. Opening Statements.
Mock Trial Modified by Dennis Gerl from Evidence PPT by John Ed-Bishop
CHAP RESUMED: THE RULE EXCLUDING HEARSAY – WHAT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE? P. JANICKE 2014.
TRIAL INFORMATION Steps, vocabulary.
Trial advocacy workshop
OBJECTIONS IN COURT. WHAT ARE THEY? An attorney can object any time she or he thinks the opposing attorney is violating the rules of evidence. The attorney.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
+ Rules & Types of Evidence. + Rules of Evidence During a trial, either the Crown or the defence may object to questions asked by the opposing attorney.
Basic Evidence and Trial Procedure. Opening Statement  Preview the evidence “The evidence will show”  Introduce theme  Briefly describe the issues,
The Trial. I. Procedures A. Jury Selection 1. Impanel (select) a jury 2. Prosecutors and Defense lawyers pose questions to potential jurors (VOIR DIRE)
THE TRIAL. For next time:  Read page in Pakes.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: OUT-OF-COURT DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2015.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2008.
Past Recollection Recorded. Basic Structure of a Simple Legal Rule A particular functional legal outcome results If certain facts (elements) are true.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
CHAP RESUMED: THE RULE EXCLUDING HEARSAY – WHAT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE? P. JANICKE 2008.
The Criminal Court System. The Court System Depending on the crime committed decides at what court the trial will be held. Depending on the crime committed.
Objections Criminal law – unit #3.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 1 2 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN AND CAN’T (MOSTLY)
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE Chap Authentication2 AUTHENTICATION A SUBSET OF RELEVANCE AUTHENTICATION EVIDENCE IS –NEEDED BEFORE.
CHAP RESUMED: THE RULE EXCLUDING HEARSAY – WHAT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE? P. JANICKE 2011.
The “Adversarial System” The Courts Unit 2. Adversaries “Adversaries” means 2 opposing sides or opponents.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
ARKANSAS LEGAL AID OCTOBER 17, 2013 BY MICHAEL JOHNSON AND PAULA CASEY EXHIBITS.
HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS THAT ARE LESS RELIABLE: RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2011.
CHAPTER 4, PART 3 OF 3 RULE 804: DECLARATIONS BY PERSONS WHO ARE NOW UNAVAILABLE Prof. Janicke 2014.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE Prof. JANICKE Chap Best Ev. Rule2 APPLIES ONLY TO: WRITINGS PHOTOGRAPHS RECORDINGS.
CHAP RESUMED: THE RULE EXCLUDING HEARSAY – WHAT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE? Prof. JANICKE 2015.
The Presentation of Evidence Evidence presented by both the Crown and the defence must be presented in the form of witness testimony and exhibits. All.
Intro to Law. 1. The plaintiff in a civil or a prosecutor in criminal case has their lawyer make an opening statement. This explains the case to the judge.
CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES P. JANICKE Chap. 6: Witness Competency2 MODERN VIEW NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT NEED SUFFICIENT ABILITY TO BE HELPFUL:
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
CHAP. 6: COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES Prof. JANICKE 2015.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Comparing the Inquisitorial and Adversarial Systems.
Put on your head phones! Court Proceedings for a Criminal Case Fill in your notes sheets as you follow along.
2:05 sec Today you will be learning about how to conduct and participate in a mock trial. You will become familiar with some basic courtroom procedures.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE Evid. Intro. + Chap. 12 THE SUBJECT IS: A BODY OF (MOSTLY EXCLUSIONARY) RULES, TELLING LAWYERS WHAT THEY CAN.
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 Prof. JANICKE 2016.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
The Criminal Trial Process
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
Warm Up Who is the most important person in a courtroom? Why?
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2018.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2016.
How Witnesses are Examined
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
INTRODUCTION AND CHAP. 1 P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 2: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY P. JANICKE 2011.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 4, part 1 of 3: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY Prof. JANICKE 2015.
The “Adversarial System”
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION P. JANICKE 2010.
CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE
CHAP. 4, part A: DEFINITIONAL EXCEPTIONS TO THE MEANING OF HEARSAY
CHAP. 13: AUTHENTICATION Prof. JANICKE 2019.
CHAP. 14: BEST EVIDENCE RULE
Presentation transcript:

CHAP. 3 : INTRODUCTION TO THE HEARSAY RULE P. JANICKE 2011

Chap Intro to Hearsay2 IN GENERAL: WITNESSES ARE NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY TO OUT-OF-COURT UTTERANCES –OF THEMSELVES –OF OTHERS DOCUMENTS CONTAIN STATEMENTS AND AREN’T ALLOWED IN EVIDENCE –THEY ARE WRITTEN OUT OF COURT

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay3 EXAMPLES IN GENERAL: –WITNESS CAN’T SAY WHAT HE TOLD THE POLICE –LETTERS ARE INADMISSIBLE –POLICE REPORTS ARE INADMISSIBLE

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay4 RATIONALE: WE WANT WITNESSES TO TELL US FIRST-HAND ON THE STAND WHAT THEY SAW AND DID –CROSS-EXAMINATION IS AN ADVERSARY’S RIGHT

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay5 E.G.: –CHEMIST FROM THE POLICE LAB TESTIFIES TO THE BLOOD TYPE; THE WRITTEN REPORT IS NOT ADMITTED –HOMEOWNER TESTIFIES THERE WAS AN INTRUDER; NOT WHAT SHE TOLD THE POLICE; NOT HER WITNESS STATEMENT TO THE POLICE –BORROWER TESTIFIES LOAN PAYMENTS WERE MADE ON TIME; HER LETTER TO BANK SAYING SO IS NOT ADMITTED

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay6 THE MAIN EXCEPTION TO WHAT IS HEARSAY: STATEMENTS OF OPPOSING PARTY CAN BE INTRODUCED BY THE OPPONENT, VIA ANY WITNESS WHO KNOWS WHAT WAS SAID CORPORATE DOCUMENTS (LETTERS; MEMOS) ARE ADMISSIBLE BY THE OTHER SIDE

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay7 WHAT JONES SAID

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay8 TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH BENCH (JUDGE) JONES JURY COUNSEL FOR JONESCOUNSEL FOR SMITH CLERK AND REPORTER SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) RAILING PODIUM HIGH UP

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay9 TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH BENCH (JUDGE) BYSTANDER JURY COUNSEL FOR JONESCOUNSEL FOR SMITH CLERK AND REPORTER SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) RAILING PODIUM HIGH UP

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay10 TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH BENCH (JUDGE) SMITH JURY COUNSEL FOR JONESCOUNSEL FOR SMITH CLERK AND REPORTER SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) RAILING PODIUM HIGH UP

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay11 TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH BENCH (JUDGE) SMITH JURY COUNSEL FOR JONESCOUNSEL FOR SMITH CLERK AND REPORTER SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) RAILING PODIUM HIGH UP

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay12 TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH BENCH (JUDGE) BYSTANDER JURY COUNSEL FOR JONESCOUNSEL FOR SMITH CLERK AND REPORTER SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) RAILING PODIUM HIGH UP

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay13 TRIAL IN JONES v. SMITH BENCH (JUDGE) JONES JURY COUNSEL FOR JONESCOUNSEL FOR SMITH CLERK AND REPORTER SPECTATORS ( FOR SMITH) SPECTATORS (FOR JONES) RAILING PODIUM HIGH UP

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay14 THE BASICS A PARTY CAN ALWAYS TESTIFY TO WHAT HAPPENED A PARTY’S WITNESSES CAN ALWAYS TESTIFY WHAT THE OTHER PARTY SAID PARTY X’S LAWYER CANNOT ASK ANY WITNESS WHAT X –SAID –WROTE DOWN –REPORTED BY PHONE –TOLD OTHERS ORALLY

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay15 NOTE THAT CONFESSIONS ARE STATEMENTS BY “THE OPPOSING PARTY” (DEFENDANT) HENCE NOT HEARSAY WHEN OFFERED BY THE PROSECUTION –PROS. CAN ASK A BYSTANDER WHAT D. SAID –PROS. CAN ASK A POLICEMAN WHAT D. SAID (IF HE HEARD IT) –IF D. TESTIFIES AT TRIAL, PROS. CAN ASK D. WHAT D. SAID

2011Chap Intro to Hearsay16 A VICTIM IS NOT A PARTY IN A CRIMINAL CASE –HENCE, VICTIM’S OUT-OF-COURT STATEMENTS TO POLICE OR NEIGHBORS ARE USUALLY NOT ALLOWED TO BE INTRODUCED AT TRIAL BY EITHER SIDE –VICTIM CAN OF COURSE TESTIFY TO WHAT HAPPENED, IF ASKED