Washington State E VALUATION D ATA C OLLECTION 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
I NSTRUCTIONAL L EARNING C YCLE. P ART 1: P RE -A SSESSMENT P LANNING D IALOGUE.
Advertisements

By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
Using Home Base/Schoolnet to Deliver Assessments CTE Summer Conference July 14, 2014.
CONSOLIDATED PROGRAM REVIEW COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR TITLE I, PART C, MIGRANT EDUCATION PROGRAM MEP STATE CONFERENCE AUGUST 2013.
Title I, Part C Migrant Education Program Webinar April 26, 2013.
A Step by Step Guide for Teachers Information from the WSWHE BOCES Assessment Development Workshop Presented August 23, 2012 by Katie Jones and Christine.
W ASHINGTON S TATE T ITLE I, P ART C, M IGRANT E DUCATION P ROGRAM Webinar January 25, 2013.
Paul McCold, Ph.D. Migrant, Bilingual and Native Education OSPI Webinar Friday May 10, :30 – 11:30 am 1.
Assessment Policies 1 Implementation and Monitoring American Institutes for Research February 2005.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program May 7, 2013.
S CHOOL I MPROVEMENT Q UARTERLY R EVIEWS SIP Forum, August 12, 2014.
Math TLC Tutor Lab Overview: All sections of Math 010 and 110 are taught in a single, dedicated, technology-enhanced classroom that is adjacent to a.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing the Accountability of Teachers to Reach all Students and their Needs Raymon J. Smith References.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
1 Review of Toolkit Amber Gove RTI International Session 3.4.
Information on Grades 3-8 Testing Steven Katz Director Office of State Assessment.
1 Literacy and Numeracy Gains Webinar February 3, :00 am - 11:00 am.
\ Training of Trainers May 12-13, 2014 Yakima, WA.
Wren High School The Power Of ICU.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Evaluation 101: After School Programs February 1, 2007 Region 3 After School Technical Assistance Center Conference.
P arent I nvolvement A nalysis? The Parent Involvement Analysis is designed and developed by Academic Development Institute What is.
The WASL : What do Our 10th Graders Think about It? Washington Educational Research Association 22nd Annual Washington State Assessment Conference December,
Introduction & Step 1 Presenter:. Training Overview Introduction Participation requirements FET Tool Orientation Distribution of username & passwords.
Master Teacher Program Presenters:Ginny Elliott Winifred Nweke.
Robert Barnoski (Barney) Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
I NSTRUCTIONAL L EARNING C YCLE. P ART 1: P RE -A SSESSMENT P LANNING D IALOGUE.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 5 Pre-Evaluation Conference Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
 Share draft PD Plan for SY Development Process District Priorities Draft District Learning Plans for 4 core content areas  Allow time for small.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
CAYEN TRAINING May 25, 2012 Setting Up Calendar for The New Year.
Principal’s Mid-Year Report Shelley Jusick Napoleon Middle School Math Goal.
Division of Accountability & Research EXPLORE/PLAN ® Administration Training PACESetters! 1.
Using Data in the Goal-Setting Process Webinar September 30, 2015.
+ Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Erie 1 BOCES Staff Development - AM SESSION Facilitator: Andrea Tamarazio, Erie 1 BOCES March 22, 2013.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
INTRODUCTIONS A TIME FOR SHARING Hello and Welcome back !
Program Compliance Session VI.  Review what is compliance monitoring.  How monitoring occurs in Washington State.  Review monitoring components and.
Utilizing Peer Tutoring to Minimize Deficiencies in Students Dr Eddie Thompson University of Memphis 2012 Martin Institute
Medford Public School District Math Intervention Program Elementary Level K-4.
Research and Evaluation Team Lines of Work Andy Porter, Director Building a Partnership – Susan Millar District Case Studies – William Clune Targeted Studies.
NRS JEOPARDY! The Adult Education Community’s Favorite Quiz Show.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Certified Evaluation Orientation Principal Professional Growth & Effectiveness System LaRue County.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Gathering Evidence to Achieve Results.  ALL CSD students and educators are part of ONE proactive educational system.  Evidence-based instruction and.
MIGRANT LITERACY NET GUIDE FOR TEACHERS: USING TUTORIALS November
PDSA/Fractal Data 8 th Grade Math. Steps to Identify Areas of Need Decided to focus on 8 th grade students in 8 th grade math Determined that I would.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Adult Education Assessment Policy Effective July 1 st, 2011.
TESTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY DEPARTMENT New Hanover County Schools September 2012 EXPLORE.
Mobile County School District SPED 6-9 End of Year Consultative Session
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES AKA: PROGRAM MONITORING.
Welcome. Outcomes  Learn to analyze growth as a catalyst for change  Understand the process to evaluate the effectiveness of instructional interventions.
21 st CCLC APR System Webinar Tanya Morin Gary Sumnicht Alison Wineberg April 25 and 26, 2016.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Roanoke Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
I NTRODUCTION TO E VALUATION CSU Evaluation Team.
Using Data to Improve Student Achievement Summer 2006 Preschool CSDC.
Bridge to College Courses Funded by College Spark Washington Washington Bridge to College Project: Setting a Context for Principals Dr. Kathe Taylor Assistant.
Performance Goals Samples (Please note, these goals are not proficient- they are for training purposes) What do you think?
BUILDING BLOCKS TO EVALUATE MEASURABLE PROGRAM OUTCOMES
Welcome Wildcat Families!
Standards Based Grading
Utilizing the LOGIC MODEL for Program Design and Evaluation
An Introduction to the “Big Picture”
Washington Reading Corps Site Applicants
GOOD EVENING Y6 INFORMATION EVENING.
Welcome Wildcat Families!
Presentation transcript:

Washington State E VALUATION D ATA C OLLECTION 1

 How will the district and OSPI evaluate progress toward meeting the Math MATTERS/MASTERS student and parent outcomes?  What data reporting is required for Math MATTERS/MASTERS?  What is due? When? To whom? W HAT WE WILL COVER TODAY.. 2

S TUDENT O UTCOME (K-6)  80% of Washington State migrant students enrolled in grades K-6 Math MATTERS or Math MASTERS curriculum during the summer of 2014 in grades K-6 with both a pretest and posttest will increase their scores by at least 9% from pretest to posttest on the Math MATTERS curriculum-based assessments. 3

S TUDENT O UTCOME R EPORTING PRETEST SCORES  Teachers administer pre-assessments for their grade band, being careful to give the correct grade level test. If a student arrives after the pretest has been given, the test should be given to them on their first day.  Teachers score their assessments and record the pre-test scores in the item analysis spreadsheet, saving it on computer for later.  Teachers review the pretest analysis to identify areas that may require extended focus. 4

I TEM A NALYSIS This form has several purposes: 1) to help teachers target instruction, 2) to report data to the MSIS, and 3) to help the CAT design reliable assessment items. 5

S TUDENT O UTCOME R EPORTING POSTTEST SCORES  Teachers administer the posttest at the end of the summer session making sure to use the same grade level test used for the pretest. Note, if a student leaves before the end of the summer, the posttest is administered on the student’s last day.  Teachers score their assessments and record the posttest scores in the item analysis spreadsheet, saving it electronically.  Teachers review the pre/post gains to see if their students met the student outcome. 6

T EACHERS R EPORT TO A DMINISTRATOR  Teachers send the electronic item analysis with pre and posttest scores to the summer school administrator on the last work day.  Teachers give the original pre and post tests to the summer school administrator (at the same time as their item analysis).  Administrator keeps a copy of the item analyses and sends a copy to the migrant records clerk for recording on the MSIS 7

R ECORDS C LERK R EPORTING  Migrant Records Clerk records in the MSIS: 1. Summer school enrollment in grade level just completed in June 2. Raw score and date of pre test 3. Raw score and date of post test 4. Supplemental services in Math for each student (also showing the total instructional minutes of summer school) 5. Student attendance (days attended vs days enrolled) 8

REPORTING P RE /P OST T EST S CORES Teachers administer pre-assessments for their grade band (being careful to give correct grade level test) Teachers score their assessments and record the pre- test scores in the item analysis spreadsheet Teachers 9

REPORTING P RE /P OST T EST S CORES 10

Any QUESTIONS? 11

P ARENT O UTCOME  80% of the returned surveys will rate 75% or more of the activities for evidence-based strategies of math learning in the home as useful* on a parent survey administered near the end of the summer program. *Useful = level 3 or higher on the 4 point scale on the Math MATTERS Parent Involvement Survey 12

P ARENT S URVEY  Different from last year—survey will only be given once toward end of program (not twice pre and post)  We suggest it be given face to face during a parent event at the end of program.  Return sample size should be as many as migrant parents as possible but no less than 10% of the enrolled students’ parents. 13

P ARENT S URVEY  There are 4 questions rated on a 4 point Likert scale.  We expect that 3 out of the 4 (25%) are scored at a level 3 or above to meet the outcome standard.  The outcome is that 80% of the surveys returned and tallied will have at least 3 out of the four questions scored at level 3 or above. 14

S ITE D IRECTOR S URVEY  List parent involvement activities related to Math MATTERS  List professional development for instructional staff related to Math MATTERS  Enter numbers served by grade level. 15

E VALUATION S UMMARY 1. All MSIS Reporting 1. iGrant summer EOY report (form package 249) 2. Send Site Director Survey to OSPI 3. Send Parent Surveys to OSPI 16 Immediately following end of program Mid-September August 29, 2014

R EFLECTION 17 Jot down in your MM notebook anything you want to especially remember to emphasize about EVALUATION and REPORTING during your regional training…