DRIs After 360. Transportation Methodology § 380.06(7) PREAPPLICATION PROCEDURES.— The levels of service required in the transportation methodology shall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mission: Mission: To protect human health and the environment Primary services: Expertise DEC brings to the ACMP Primary services: Expertise DEC brings.
Advertisements

Introduction to Concurrency Management. What is Concurrency? Chapter , F.S. requires Comprehensive Plans to adopt a concurrency management system,
Smart Growth Update VCARD May 23, Growth Management & Schools during 2005 Volusia County Council adopts new school impact fee. School Board of Volusia.
Proposed Second Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning School Board of Broward County, Florida Presented By: The Growth Management.
Alternatives to Financing Lake Development Infrastructure in Mississippi Public Improvement Districts and Tax Increment Financing February 4, 2009 Lucien.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DECEMBER 11, 2012 CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS.
House Community & Military Affairs Subcommittee Presented by: Mike McDaniel, Chief of Comprehensive Planning, Division of Community Development Tuesday,
Alachua County Board of County Commissioners CPA Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Public School Concurrency & Update of Interlocal Agreement for.
Location Hammock Dunes DRI – Includes: -Hammock Beach -Ocean Hammock
How We Shall Live in Volusia County? Florida Department of Community Affairs June 16, 2007 Charles Gauthier, AICP.
Southwest Florida Water Management District Rule Development Workshop Water Use Permitting May 2013.
Code Comparison Changes 2012 IBC to 2012 NPFA 101 Developed for the Florida Department of Business And Professional Regulation Building Codes and Standards.
THE ABCs OF CRAs THE PLAN CHAPTER 163 REQUIREMENTS.
CARI ROTH Bryant Miller Olive CLAY COUNTY TRANSPORTATION FUNDING.
Community Development Department DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT (DRIs) Summary.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT Working With Transportation Concurrency Management Systems Florida Department of Transportation Companion to the Booklet “Working with.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
Sustainable Emerald Coast Advisory Committee Susan Poplin, Florida Department of Community Affairs November, 2006.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
Planning for Economic and Industrial Development Managing Your Update Bruce Hunt Planners Forum 2014.
Community Development Department Neoga Lakes – Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Planned Development (MPD) Rezoning Application.
Water and Wastewater Certification 1 Water & Wastewater Reference Manual.
BCC Public Hearing for consideration of an Agreement to Offer Donation of Real Property -and- a Solid Waste Management Permit Renewal APPLICANT: Hubbard.
Youth entrepreneurship as a tool for growth Pro-Youth International Conference Tallinn, Domina Inn Ilmarine Conference Center speaker: Imbesi.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT The New Growth Management Statute Transportation Proportionate Fair Share.
1 Impact Fees in Virginia Virginia Municipal League Annual Conference October 15, 2007 Jeffrey S. Gore Hefty & Wiley, P.C.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING January 5, 2010.
 From a Regional Perspective Recent Growth Management Legislation.
Economic Incentive Plan and Impact Fee Update Board of County Commissioners Work Session February 7, 2012.
From Mandate to Smart Growth: The Evolution of Growth Management in the United States Jesse J. Richardson, Jr. Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Community Development Department ISLAND WALK MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION #2648.
Amendment A-2-1 (Long and Scott) Compliance Agreement and Ordinance Approving Remedial Language June 21, 2011.
Oregon and Washington: A Comparison of State Mandated Land Use Planning Programs Presented by: Richard H. Carson, director Clark County Department of Community.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING September 1, 2009.
Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011.
Sacramento LAFCo Agriculture - Open Space Preservation Policy Workshop November 1, 2006.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION SERVICE TO UNINCORPORATED COMMUNITIES GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION August 30, 2007.
Community Development Department FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT SMALL-SCALE LU-MIN & ZONING MAP AMENDMENT RZ-OTH
Centre Region Council of Governments. 150 Square Miles 83,000 Population *Includes Students.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public Hearing May 19, 2009 Orange County’s Comprehensive Policy Plan Adoption Public.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
Economic Incentive Plan Board of County Commissioners Public Hearing March 6, 2012.
Regional Planning CCRPC Board Training March 21, 2012.
S.B Municipality Fees. S.B – Environment Budget Reconciliation Bill Enacted during the 2011 regular legislative session and becomes effective.
School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012 School Concurrency and the CEA Process Discussion Item August 28, 2012.
What’s Happening in the Legislature Gary Hunter and David Childs FAPA Public Policy Workshop Tallahassee, Florida February 3, 2016.
ANNEXATION Statutory Overview July 19, 2011 David L. Yearout, AICP, CFM.
Appeal of School Concurrency Vested Rights Denial Vested Rights Denial Case: DRCA Bridgewater West Apartments a/k/a Parcel CB-9 Stillwater Crossings.
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element (Annual Update) September 25, 2007.
FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTS Workshop on Senate Bill 239 (Hertzberg) July 21, 2016 Nevada LAFCo – Presented by P. Scott Browne, Counsel.
BUDGET PROCESS & REVENUE & EXPENSE INFORMATION For FISCAL YEAR 2011.
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
Division of Waste Management
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
CAPITAL PROGRAM OVERVIEW
MPO School Transportation Working Group
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
Board of County Commissioners
Presentation transcript:

DRIs After 360

Transportation Methodology § (7) PREAPPLICATION PROCEDURES.— The levels of service required in the transportation methodology shall be the same levels of service used to evaluate concurrency in accordance with s

OTTED Projects If a use is exempt from review as a development of regional impact under paragraphs (a)-(s), but will be part of a larger project that is subject to review as a development of regional impact, the impact of the exempt use must be included in the review of the larger project, unless such exempt use involves a development of regional impact that includes a landowner, tenant, or user that has entered into a funding agreement with the Office of Tourism, Trade, and Economic Development under the Innovation Incentive Program and the agreement contemplates a state award of at least $50 million. § (24)

Buildout Date Extension (1)…. [I]n recognition of 2009 real estate market conditions, any permit issued by DEP or a water management district pursuant to part IV of chapter 373, Florida Statutes, that has an expiration date of September 1, 2008, through January 1, 2012, is extended and renewed for a period of 2 years following its date of expiration. This extension includes any local government-issued development order or building permit. The 2- year extension also applies to build out dates including any build out date extension previously granted under s (19)(c), Florida Statutes. (2) The commencement and completion dates for any required mitigation associated with a phased construction project shall be extended such that mitigation takes place in the same timeframe relative to the phase as originally permitted. Sec. 14, Chapter , Laws of Fla.; also Note 3 to §

New Port-Related Exemption Expansions to port [facilities]; and facilities determined by the Department of Community Affairs and applicable general-purpose local government to be port-related industrial or commercial projects located within 3 miles of or in a port master plan area which rely upon the use of port and intermodal transportation facilities shall not be designated as developments of regional impact if [where] such expansions, projects, or facilities are consistent with comprehensive master plans that are in compliance with this section. § (3)

Exemptions for Dense Urban Land Areas (“DULAs”) Where does the exemption apply? What happens to new projects? What happens if a DULA thins out? What happens to existing DRIs?

A DULA is: A municipality that has an average of at least 1,000 people per square mile of land area and a minimum total population of at least 5,000; A county, including the municipalities located therein, which has an average of at least 1,000 people per square mile of land area; or A county, including the municipalities located therein, which has a population of at least 1 million (34)

DULAs are listed at: dcp/Legislation/2009/Counties Municipalities.cfm

Where does the exemption apply? Within a municipality that qualifies as a DULA. §380.06(29)(a)1.

Where does the exemption apply? In a county that qualifies as a DULA, within an urban service area adopted in the comprehensive plan. §380.06(29)(a)2. "Urban service area" means built-up areas where public facilities and services, including, but not limited to, central water and sewer capacity and roads, are already in place or are committed in the first 3 years of the capital improvement schedule. § (29)

Where does the exemption apply? "Public facilities" means major capital improvements, including, but not limited to, transportation, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, potable water, educational, parks and recreational, and health systems and facilities, and spoil disposal sites for maintenance dredging located in the intracoastal waterways, except for spoil disposal sites owned or used by ports listed in s (9)(b). § (24)

Where does the exemption apply? In a county that qualifies as a DULA, within an urban service area adopted in the comprehensive. §380.06(29)(a)2. In addition, areas identified in the … comprehensive plan as urban service areas or urban growth boundaries on or before July 1, 2009, are also urban service areas under this definition. § (29)

Where does the exemption apply? In a county that qualifies as a DULA, within an urban service area adopted in the comprehensive. §380.06(29)(a)2. In addition, for counties that qualify as dense urban land areas under subsection (34), the nonrural area of a county which has adopted into the county charter a rural area designation … [is] also [an] urban service area[] under this definition. § (29)

Where does the exemption apply? Within a county, including the municipalities located therein, which has a population of at least 900,000, which qualifies as a dense urban land area under s , but which does not have an urban service area designated in the comprehensive plan. §380.06(29)(a)3.

Where does the exemption apply? I n a municipality that is NOT a DULA, within any of the following areas designated in the comprehensive plan: Urban infill as defined in s ; Community redevelopment areas as defined in s ; Downtown revitalization areas as defined in s ; Urban infill and redevelopment under s ; or Urban service areas as defined in s or areas within a designated urban service boundary under s (14).

Where does the exemption apply? In a county that is NOT a DULA, within any of the following areas designated in the comprehensive plan: Urban infill as defined in s ; Urban infill and redevelopment under s ; or Urban service areas as defined in s

Where does the exemption apply? BUT NOT: Within the boundary of any area of critical state concern; Within the boundary of the Wekiva Study Area; or Within 2 miles of the boundary of the Everglades Protection Area.

Where does the exemption apply? BUT: A development that is located partially outside an area that is exempt from the development-of-regional-impact program must undergo development-of-regional- impact review pursuant to this section. § (29)(d)

What happens to new projects? Local governments must submit by mail a development order to the state land planning agency for projects that would be larger than 120 percent of any applicable development-of regional-impact threshold and would require development-of-regional- impact review but for the exemption from the program under paragraphs (a)-(c). For such development orders, the state land planning agency may appeal the development order pursuant to s for inconsistency with the comprehensive plan adopted under chapter 163. § (29)(f)

What happens if a DULA thins out? If a local government that qualifies as a dense urban land area under this subsection is subsequently found to be ineligible for designation as a dense urban land area, any development located within that area which has a complete, pending application for authorization to commence development may maintain the exemption if the developer is continuing the application process in good faith or the development is approved. § (29)(g)

What Happens to a Pending DRI Application? A pending application for development approval shall be governed by s (2). § (29)(e) A development with an application for development approval pending, pursuant to s , on the effective date of a change to the guidelines and standards, or a notification of proposed change pending on the effective date of a change to the guidelines and standards, may elect to continue such review pursuant to s At the conclusion of the pending review, including any appeals pursuant to s , the resulting development order shall be governed by the provisions of subsection (1). § (2)

What Happens to a Pending DRI Application? A development that has a pending application for a comprehensive plan amendment and that elects not to continue development-of-regional- impact review is exempt from the limitation on plan amendments set forth in s (1) for the year following the effective date of the exemption. § (29)(e)

What happens to existing DRIs? This subsection does not limit or modify the rights of any person to complete any development that has been authorized as a development of regional impact pursuant to this chapter. § (29)(h) [A]ny previously approved development-of- regional-impact development orders shall continue to be effective, but the developer has the option to be governed by s (1). § (29)(e)

What happens to existing DRIs? The development shall continue to be governed by the development-of-regional- impact development order and may be completed in reliance upon and pursuant to the development order unless the developer or landowner has followed the procedures for rescission in paragraph (b). § (1)(a)

What happens to existing DRIs? Any proposed changes to those developments which continue to be governed by a development order shall be approved pursuant to s (19) as it existed prior to a change in the development-of-regional-impact guidelines and standards, except that all percentage criteria shall be doubled and all other criteria shall be increased by 10 percent. § (1)(a)

What happens to existing DRIs? The development-of-regional-impact development order may be enforced by the local government as provided by ss (17) and § (1)(a)

What happens to existing DRIs? If requested by the developer or landowner, the development-of-regional- impact development order shall be rescinded by the local government having jurisdiction upon a showing that all required mitigation related to the amount of development that existed on the date of rescission has been completed. § (1)(b)