Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
METAL COIL SURFACE COATING MACT OVERVIEW 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006.
Advertisements

DRAFT IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT FACILITY INSPECTIONS 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART EEEEE.
METAL CAN SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June CFR PART 63, SUBPART KKKK June 2006 June 2006.
METAL FURNITURE SURFACE COATING MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
METAL COIL SURFACE MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE 40 CFR PART 63, SUBPART SSSS May 2006 May 2006.
Compliance Dates The final rule was published on January 25, 1995,
IRON & STEEL FOUNDRY MACT COMPLIANCE ASSURANCE
GEORGETOWN COUNTY STORMWATER DIVISION Breakfast Series #3 How to Prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan January 14, 2009.
Compliance From The Ground Up September 18, 2013 Earlene Gibbons Director, Operational Technology.
Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
Air Permitting and Compliance Smithfield Foods Environmental Conference Chicago, IL July 2013.
APAI Environmental Workshop FESOP Recordkeeping/Plans James (Jim) Heim, C.T.C., E.P. Bruce Carter Associates, L.L.C February 9, 2012.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) Panel Peter Westlin, EMC Barrett Parker, EMC.
GEORGIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION DIVISION SMALL BUSINESS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM.
Implementation and Management of Leak Detection and Repair Programs – New Rules and Other Considerations Nebraska Ethanol Safety & Environmental Coalition.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
2015 NCMA EPA Enforcement Policies and How They Affect Your Facility Michael Pjetraj, P.E. DAQ Stationary Source Compliance Branch Supervisor.
Lecture 8. Quality Assurance/Quality Control The Islamic University of Gaza- Environmental Engineering Department Environmental Measurements (EENV 4244)
New Template of Environmental Compliance Approval with Limited Operational Flexibility Environmental Approvals Branch Presented to Air Practitioners’ Group.
Compliance Update NCMA 2015.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
ISO Standard is based on the management model of plan – do - check – act. Today we all be discussing the elements of the standard that deal with.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures. Objective In this module, you will learn: u How to define verification u What functions are part of HACCP plan verification.
Huzairy Hassan School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
IN FOCUS LEGAL AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS RECYCLER QUALIFICATION OFFICE MARCH 2014.
Introduction to Equipment
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Module 7: Construction Phase
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Inspection Issues in the Analytical Laboratory: An FDA Perspective Yvonne McKnight Chemist US Food and Drug AdministrationPhone: x
1 Title V Permitting and CAM Planning Title V Permitting and CAM Planning APPA E&O Technical Conference April 19, 2005 Robert M. Iwanchuk, C.C.M. ENSR.
Where to find Information About Facilities. Overview of Title V Permits.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
FRANKLIN engineering group, inc. Start-up Shutdown Malfunction Plan Development and Implementation Duncan F. Kimbro
Our Vision – Healthy Kansans living in safe and sustainable environments.
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of the Rules and Applications Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Guidance on Establishing Monitoring to Comply with CAM and Other Title V Requirements A Summary of Technical and Policy Materials Barrett Parker, EPA,
TBT 14: Permit Compliance HILLS’ ETHOS: IMPROVEMENT ENGAGEMENT PREVENTION ACCOUNTABILITY PROGRESSIVE FRONT FOOT ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES HWS – Toolbox.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Compliance Assurance and Title V Monitoring A Summary of Rules and Permitting Issues Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
Control of Emissions of Sulfur Dioxide – LAC 33:III.Chapter 15 Dustin Duhon Air Permits Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality March 23,
Validation | Slide 1 of 27 August 2006 Validation Supplementary Training Modules on Good Manufacturing Practice WHO Technical Report Series, No. 937, 2006.
Compliance Assurance Monitoring (CAM) November 24, 2009.
Method 203 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems (COMS)
1 City of Shelby Wastewater Treatment Division Becomes State’s Second Public Agency to Implement a Certified Environmental Management System CERTIFICATION.
CABLING SYSTEM WARRANTY REGISTRATION. PURPOSE OF CABLING REGISTRATION.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
A N N I S T O N A R M Y D E P O T Clean Air Act Implementation Through an Environmental Management System April 2004.
Permit Application Information and Work Group Exercises Peter Westlin, EPA, OAQPS.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
Cooling Tower Audit Nathan Maple City of Marion. Why do we undertake an audit and sampling? Regulation 15 South Australian Public Health (Legionella)
Pollution Prevention & Management DentalBMPs. Overview Amalgam in POTW New EPA Guidelines City of Tulsa Dental BMPs.
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
World Health Organization
Chapter 10 Verification Procedures.
What is the UL QFCP? FCIA Webinar Presenters:
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Nonconformity Writing
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Louisiana Department of EnvironmentalQuality LDEQ CAM Plan Overview LDEQ’s 27 th Annual Conference on the Environment Cajundome Convention Center Lafayette, Louisiana March 3 and 4th, 2005

Overview Example Sugar Mill Boiler CAM Plan Submittal Specific 40 CFR 64 CAM Requirements Requirements that do not need to be modified [Left in black] Requirements that need to be modified [Shown in Green, Some text in Red] Requirements as modified [Blue Text] Upcoming changes

Old Tom’s CAM Plan MULTICYCLONE AND SCRUBBERS FOR PM CONTROL OLD TOM’S SUGAR FACTORY Background Emissions Unit Description: Raw Cane Sugar Factory Identification: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3, 4, 5, 6 Facility: Old Tom’s Sugar Factory, Old Tom’s Sugar Company New Iberia, Louisiana

Old Tom’s CAM Plan Applicable Regulation, Emission Limits, and Monitoring Requirements Regulation No.: V2 Emission Limits: Opacity: 20% Particulate Matter: 0.6 lb/MMBtu Monitoring Requirements: Visible Emissions (VE) Scrubber water pressure Inspection and maintenance program

II.Indicator Range The indicator range is an opacity less than 20% (6-min. average). Excursions trigger an inspection, corrective action, and a reporting requirement Table 1. Monitoring Approach Indicator I.Indicator - Visible Emissions Measurement Approach - Method 9, observations performed daily.

Performance Criteria A. Data Representativeness Observations are performed on the boiler stack when the boilers are operating. B. Verification of Operational Status N/A C. QA/QC Practices and Criteria Observer is certified semi annually. D. Monitoring Frequency Daily 6-min. observation of each stack. E. Data Collection Procedures Method 9 observations are conducted by a certified RM9 observer. F. Averaging Period 6 minutes. Table 1. Monitoring Approach

1 Specific QA/QC Procedures: Calibrate, operate, and maintain instrumentation using procedures that take into account manufacturer's specifications. [40 CFR 64.3(b)(3)] 1 Specific QA/QC Procedures: Observer shall maintain certification by completing the semi- annual qualification procedure specified in Method 9. [40 CFR 64.3(b)(3)] 2 Comply with the submitted implementation plan and schedule for installing, testing and performing any other appropriate activities prior to use of the monitoring, if any of the approved monitoring in this permit requires installation, testing, or other necessary activities prior to use of the monitoring for purposes of 40 CFR 64. Implement monitoring as expeditiously as practicable after approval of the monitoring pursuant to 40 CFR 64.6, but in no case shall the period for completing installation and beginning operation of the monitoring exceed 180 days after approval of the permit. [40 CFR 64.4(e)] Tempo Specific Requirements

3 Equipment/operational data monitored by technically sound method continuously. [40 CFR 64.6(c)(1)] Which Months: All Year Statistical Basis: None specified 3 Opacity monitored by 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, Method 9 daily using a trained observer. [40 CFR 64.6(c)(1)] 4 An excursion or exceedance is defined as XXXXX. [40 CFR 64.6(c)(2)] 4 An excursion or exceedance is defined as Opacity > 20 percent verified by using 40 CFR 60 Appendix A Method 9. An excursion is also any missed daily opacity reading that is not due to weather conditions. [40 CFR 64.6(c)(2)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

5 Submit Notification: Due at the DEQ upon the establishment or reestablishment of any exceedance or excursion level, for purposes of responding to and reporting exceedances or excursions under 40 CFR 64.7 and [40 CFR 64.6(c)(2)] Which Months: All Year Statistical Basis: Daily maximum 5 Left the Same 6 Equipment/operational data recordkeeping by electronic or hard copy continuously. [40 CFR 64.6(c)(4)] 6 Opacity recordkeeping by manual logging upon measurement. Observations shall consist of 24 consecutive readings at 15 second intervals. The average of the 24 readings shall be the daily opacity record. [40 CFR 64.6(c)(4)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

7Schedule for installation, testing or final verification of operational status: ^. [40 CFR 64.6(d)] 7 Deleted 8 Comply with the recordkeeping requirements specified in 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(ii). [40 CFR 64.9(b)(1)] 9 Conduct the monitoring required under 40 CFR 64 upon issuance of a part 70 or 71 permit that includes such monitoring, or by such later date specified in the permit pursuant to 40 CFR 64.6(d). [40 CFR 64.7(a)] 10 Maintain the monitoring required under 40 CFR 64 at all times, including but not limited to maintaining necessary parts for routine repairs of the monitoring equipment. [40CFR 64.7(b)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

11 Conduct all daily opacity monitoring required under 40 CFR 64 in continuous operation (or collect data at all required intervals) at all times that the pollutant-specific emissions unit is operating, at all times that the boiler is operating, except for, as applicable, monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, and required quality assurance or control activities (including, as applicable, calibration checks and required zero and span adjustments). Do not use data recorded during monitoring malfunctions, associated repairs, and required quality assurance or control activities for purposes of 40 CFR 64, including data averages and calculations, or for fulfilling a minimum data availability requirement, if applicable. Use all the data collected during all other periods in assessing the operation of the control device and associated control system. cyclone dust collector control device and associated wet scrubber control system. [40 CFR 64.7(c)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

12 Restore operation of the pollutant-specific emissions unit (including the control device and associated capture system) to its normal or usual manner of operation as expeditiously as practicable upon detecting an excursion or exceedance, in accordance with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Minimize the period of any startup, shutdown or malfunction, and take any necessary corrective actions to restore normal operation and prevent the likely recurrence of the cause of an excursion or exceedance (other than those caused by excused startup or shutdown conditions). [40 CFR 64.7(d)(1)] 13 XXXXX is the threshold limit of excursions or exceedances at which implementation of a QIP is required. [40 CFR 64.8(a)] 13 Threshold Limit: A Threshold limit is defined as six excursions or exceedances of the opacity limitation during any twelve month consecutive period. Upon exceeding the threshold limit, develop and implement a Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) as expeditiously as practicable. [40 CFR 64.8(a)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

14 Submit written notification: Due to the Office of Environmental Compliance within 30 days upon identifying a failure to achieve compliance with the ^ LAC 33:III.1101.B emission limitation or the ^ LAC 33:III.1313.C standard for which, after approval of monitoring under 40 CFR 64, the approved monitoring did not provide an indication of an excursion or exceedance while providing valid data, or the results of compliance or performance testing document a need to modify the existing indicator ranges or designated conditions. If necessary, submit a proposed modification to the part 70 or 71 permit to address the necessary monitoring changes. [40 CFR 64.7(e)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

15 Submit report: Due on and after the date specified in 40 CFR 64.7(a) by which the owner or operator must use monitoring that meets the requirements of 40 CFR 64. Submit monitoring reports to the DEQ in accordance with 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii). Include in a report for monitoring under 40 CFR 64, at a minimum, the information required under 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii) and the information specified in 40 CFR 64.9(a)(2)(i) through (a)(2)(iii), as applicable. [40 CFR 64.9(a)] 16 Monitoring data recordkeeping by electronic or hard copy continuously. Maintain these records for a period of at least five years. [40 CFR 64.9(b)(1)] 16 Opacity Monitoring data recordkeeping by logbook at the approved frequency. Maintain records of observer logbooks for a period of at least five years. [40 CFR 64.9(b)(1)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.)

17 Equipment/operational Monitoring data recordkeeping by electronic or hard copy continuously. logbook as needed. Maintain records of monitor performance data, corrective actions taken, any written quality improvement plan required pursuant to 40 CFR 64.8 and any activities undertaken to implement a quality improvement plan, and other supporting information required to be maintained under 40 CFR 64 (such as data used to document the adequacy of monitoring, or records of monitoring maintenance or corrective actions). Maintain these records for a period of at least five years. [40 CFR 64.9(b)(1)] Tempo Specific Requirements (Cont.).

Upcoming changes LDEQ shall develop a team consisting of Industry representatives and LDEQ personnel Industry shall develop a set of standardized CAM Submittal Plans for the most typical control devices. LDEQ shall develop a standardized set of TEMPO CAM requirements based on each standardized CAM Plan submittal