Update on Historic Bridges MaryAnn Naber Federal Highway Administration June 17, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Review and Discussion of Draft Scope of Work for Study of Issues Associated with Increasing Transportation.
Advertisements

More Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Beth Vargas Duncan Certification Program Manager Local Government Section January 8, 2011.
Initiated in 2007 with a study population of bridges are considered historic and eligible or listed on the National Register 111 Bridges are.
The Highway Bridge Program An Overview of the Program Details for Federal Agencies Edgar P. Small, Ph.D. Senior Structural Engineer FHWA - Office of Bridge.
Contract and Grant Provisions and Administration Section 105 (Page 30) Title I The Act.
Update on FHWA/FTA Proposed Rulemaking. MAP-21 Requirements Section 1318(a)(3) o Solicit requests from state DOTs, transit authorities, and MPOs, for.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
(a) Amount of funds provided: The amount of funds provided under the terms of the contract shall NOT be less than the Secretary would have provided for.
NEW PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION AGREEMENT A WORK IN PROGRESS… ODOT—Office of Environmental Services Environmental Update Meeting20 November 2014.
January 8, 2014 FMATS College Road Corridor Study FMATS Technical Committee Update.
HOPE VI Main Street Grants Contact Lawrence Gnessin Office of Public Housing Investments, Washington, DC
The Ohio Department of Transportation’s work to preserve low-volume bridges in place or to move to trails (and thereby avoid a Section 106 Adverse Effect)
Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing Program FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
NEPA and Property Acquisition May 19, 2014 Elizabeth Patel Environmental Protection Specialist FTA Office of Planning and Environment.
2013 ADC INSTALLATION INNOVATION FORUM | PAGE 2 Legal Authorities for Partnerships and Shared Services Jennifer Curtin January 16, 2013.
Program Alternatives under 36 CFR Part 800 Dave Berwick Army Affairs Coordinator Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century (MAP-21) – ROW Impacts Dianna Nausley, HQ RES Assistant Program Administrator Washington State Department.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
North Dakota Association of County Engineers 2015 Annual Conference January 22, 2015 FHWA Update.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
U.S. 421 Bridge DES# Thursday, July 17, :30 p.m. Frankfort Community Public Library 208 West Clinton Street, Frankfort, IN.
FINANCIAL PLAN AND FINANCIAL CONSTRAINT FOR FTIPS AND FSTIP FINANCIAL PLAN AND REVENUE ASSUMPTIONS 2013 FTIP/FSTIP WORKSHOP January 17, 2012 Wade Hobbs,
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
Emergency Relief for Federally Owned Roads (ERFO) U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration December 2013.
Transportation Alternatives. MAP-21 & TAP MAP-21 requires the following with respect to the allocation & selection of projects: ◦TAP funds sub-allocated.
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Financial Management For Project Administrators. How Feds View Themselves.
MAP-21: Bridges and Structures Moderated By Joey Hartmann Team Leader, Office of Bridge Technology Federal Highway Administration HIBT Webinar on MAP-21.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
Design Standards For Local Agency Bridges Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference May, 2006 Design Standards For Local Agency Bridges Statewide.
Funding Levels Similar funding levels to the Transportation Enhancement Activities under SAFETEA-LU: FY 2013: $808,760,000 FY 2014: $819,900,000 Total.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
Trail Funding Sources & General Information
Federal Highway Administration Emergency Relief (ER) Program Brian Hogge Field Operations Team Leader July 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
HIGHWAY/UTILITY PROGRAM OVERVIEW ROADWAY CONFERENCE APRIL 20, 2009.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
Tolling and Pricing Opportunities Under the Federal-aid Highway Program January 2006.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Applicable Documents and KRS Statutes  FHWA Utility Relocation and Accommodation Guidelines  KRS  23CFR  23CFR  23CFR
State Road 5 over Eel River Bridge Rehabilitation DES# South Whitley Community Public Library Thursday, February 5, :30 p.m. Please silence.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
1 Accommodating Utilities in Highway Rights-of-Way Federal Agency Update IRWA/AI Conference Las Vegas, NV January 13, 2009.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Projects of National and Regional Significance Program.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Public-Private Partnerships at POEs Spring 2014 Transportation Border Working Group 1.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Bridge Maintenance and Inspection Responsibilities Technical.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
BUILDING STRONG ® Levee Safety Program  Levee Safety Program Implementation Guidance provided by HQUSACE in 2007 (Post Hurricane Katrina) ► Designate.
TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 2016 Project Scoring Update Workshop.
Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation NEPA&CEQ.
Leveraging Financial Resources Federal Highway Administration Funding Shana V. Baker Office of Metropolitan Planning Federal Highway Administration
FTA Real Estate March 26, 2014 Christopher S. Van Wyk Director FTA Environmental Office.
Update on ADA Issues Brooke Struve, PE Design Program Manager Federal Highway Administration AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Annual Meeting—July 13-17, 2008.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Office of Real Estate 2045 Morse Road E2 Columbus Ohio /9/2016.
CITY PLANNING ACADEMY HISTORIC PRESERVATION CITY OF SACRAMENTO PRESERVATION OFFICE Community Development Department March 23, 2016.
Local Bridge Hydraulics 101 Planning & Funding Considerations
Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor
Contract Support Costs
Contract Support Costs
ODOT’s Responsibilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act
Presentation transcript:

Update on Historic Bridges MaryAnn Naber Federal Highway Administration June 17, 2008

FHWA Projects

Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program 23 U.S.C. Section Congress finds and declares that it is in the vital interest of the United States that a highway bridge program be carried out to enable States to improve the condition of their highway bridges over waterways … through replacement and rehabilitation of bridges that the States and the Secretary determine are structurally deficient or functionally obsolete and through systematic preventive maintenance of bridges.

144 (d) Participation (1) Bridge replacement and rehabilitation (1) Bridge replacement and rehabilitation (A) replacing the bridge with a comparable facility; or (A) replacing the bridge with a comparable facility; or (B) rehabilitating the bridge (B) rehabilitating the bridge Based on structurally deficient and functionally obsolete highway bridges Based on structurally deficient and functionally obsolete highway bridges SR < 50 for replacement SR < 50 for replacement SR <80 for rehabilitation SR <80 for rehabilitation Bridges to be rehabbed must have potential for an extended service life Bridges to be rehabbed must have potential for an extended service life Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program

144 (d) Participation (2) Types of Assistance (2) Types of Assistance (A) Painting (A) Painting (B) Seismic retrofit * (B) Seismic retrofit * (C) Systematic preventive maintenance * (C) Systematic preventive maintenance * (D) Installation of scour countermeasures * (D) Installation of scour countermeasures * (E) Application of environmentally acceptable, minimally corrosive anti-icing and de-icing compositions (E) Application of environmentally acceptable, minimally corrosive anti-icing and de-icing compositions * Does not have to be eligible for replacement or rehab Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program

Historic Bridge Program 23 U.S.C. 144 (o) 23 U.S.C. 144 (o) (1) Coordination - encourages the inventory, retention, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, and future study of historic bridges (1) Coordination - encourages the inventory, retention, rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, and future study of historic bridges (2) Inventory (2) Inventory (5) Historic bridge defined - any bridge that is listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places. (5) Historic bridge defined - any bridge that is listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places.

Historic Bridge Program (3) Eligibility - Reasonable costs associated with actions to preserve or reduce the impact of a project on the historic integrity of historic bridges shall be eligible as reimbursable project costs under this title if the load capacity and safety features of the bridge are adequate to serve the intended use for the life of the bridge (3) Eligibility - Reasonable costs associated with actions to preserve or reduce the impact of a project on the historic integrity of historic bridges shall be eligible as reimbursable project costs under this title if the load capacity and safety features of the bridge are adequate to serve the intended use for the life of the bridge Except for a bridge which is no longer used for motorized vehicular traffic, the costs eligible as reimbursable project costs pursuant to this subsection shall not exceed the estimated cost of demolition of such bridge. Except for a bridge which is no longer used for motorized vehicular traffic, the costs eligible as reimbursable project costs pursuant to this subsection shall not exceed the estimated cost of demolition of such bridge.

Historic Bridge Program 144 (o) (4) Preservation – A State proposing to demolish a historic bridge for a replacement project shall first make the bridge available for donation to a State, locality, or responsible private entity who agrees to: 144 (o) (4) Preservation – A State proposing to demolish a historic bridge for a replacement project shall first make the bridge available for donation to a State, locality, or responsible private entity who agrees to: (A) maintain the bridge and its historic significance; and (A) maintain the bridge and its historic significance; and (B) assume all future legal and financial responsibility. (B) assume all future legal and financial responsibility.

Historic Bridge Program 144 (o) (4) Preservation, continued Costs to preserve the historic bridge shall be eligible as reimbursable project costs under this chapter up to an amount not to exceed the cost of demolition. Costs to preserve the historic bridge shall be eligible as reimbursable project costs under this chapter up to an amount not to exceed the cost of demolition. Any bridge preserved pursuant to this paragraph shall thereafter not be eligible for any other funds authorized pursuant to this title (Title 23) Any bridge preserved pursuant to this paragraph shall thereafter not be eligible for any other funds authorized pursuant to this title (Title 23)

Rehabilitation?

Section 4(f) 23 U.S.C. 138 and 49 U.S.C. 303 The Secretary of Transportation may approve a project that uses a Section 4(f) resource only if: The Secretary of Transportation may approve a project that uses a Section 4(f) resource only if: There is no prudent and feasible alternative to such use, and There is no prudent and feasible alternative to such use, and The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the resource; OR The project includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the resource; OR The use is determined to be de minimis The use is determined to be de minimis A proposed action will use a historic bridge when the action will impair the integrity of the bridge either by rehabilitation or demolition A proposed action will use a historic bridge when the action will impair the integrity of the bridge either by rehabilitation or demolition

Programmatic 4(f) Evaluation 1983 Programmatic Evaluation may be applied when none of the following are prudent and feasible: 1983 Programmatic Evaluation may be applied when none of the following are prudent and feasible: 1. Do nothing 1. Do nothing 2. Build replacement on new location without affecting historic integrity of a historic bridge 2. Build replacement on new location without affecting historic integrity of a historic bridge 3. Rehab historic bridge without affecting its historic integrity 3. Rehab historic bridge without affecting its historic integrity The Bridge is not a National Historic Landmark, AND The Bridge is not a National Historic Landmark, AND Agreement has been reached under Section 106 Agreement has been reached under Section 106

Tools to preserve historic bridges Maintenance Maintenance Rehabilitation Rehabilitation Adoption Adoption Relocation Relocation Management plans Management plans Programmatic Programmatic Agreements Agreements Standard treatments Standard treatments Historic Bridge Alliance Historic Bridge Alliance

“If it’s in a coffee table book, don’t even think about replacing it!” -- Frank Nelson, ODOT

For more information:  FHWA Environmental Website  FHWA Historic Preservation Website  AASHTO Center for Environmental Excellence  Historic Bridge Alliance  National Historic Preservation Act  36 CFR Part 800 – Section 106 regs