EMODNet Chemistry Steering Committee 20-21 January 2014 Rome Giordano Giorgi

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Towards the UKs MSFD Initial Assessment and Data Management M. Charlesworth (BODC)
Advertisements

EMODNet Chemistry support to MSFD data reporting Examples from IT and Black Sea Giordano Giorgi (ISPRA) TG DIKE, 4 July 2013.
A roadmap for art 19.3 Trine Christiansen March 19, 2013.
1 MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY MSFD regional data work flow: schema and examples Document: DIKE TSG1 WP4 MSFD.
Twinning Project RO2006/IB/EN/09 1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status
Marine Pilot How the Marine Pilot is organized and current status
MARINE STRATEGY FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (MSFD) STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION Summary of MSFD Requirements; EU project management arrangements; Descriptors of most.
The ISO 9002 Quality Assurance Management System
The integrated management of human activities under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive Carlos Berrozpe Garcia European Commission (DG ENV) Greenwich,
(16 JUNE 2015) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive 17th March 2010, Newcastle North Sea Stakeholders Conference Leo de Vrees European Commission (DG Environment,
MSFD Interactions EMODNET Chemistry 2 Kick-off meeting Giordano Giorgi Trieste (Italy), 3-5 June 2013.
Implementation process at EU level Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – submitted to EMECO meeting -
(03 JUNE 2013) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
Annual Meeting, June , Istanbul, Turkey WP3: Data validation and MSFD interaction EMODnet Chemistry Partner WP coordinator: ISPRA.
Prof. György BAZSA, former president Hungarian Accreditation Committee (HAC) CUBRIK Workshop IV Beograd, 13 March, 2012 European Standards and Guidelines.
Validation of Non-formal Adult Education courses REACTION No CP LT-GRUNDTVIG-G1.
(18 JUNE 2014) WP Leader: Neil Holdsworth, ICES EMODnet Chemistry II ( ) WP5 Analysis and Recommendations.
CCSSO Criteria for High-Quality Assessments Technical Issues and Practical Application of Assessment Quality Criteria.
Annual Meeting, June , Split, Croatia WP3: QA/QC Validation – MSFD Interactions current status EMODnet Chemistry Partner contribution: ISPRA.
Expert Workshop, June , Split, Croatia Output from TG Data for MSFD implementation EMODnet Chemistry Giordano Giorgi - ISPRA.
Recommendation 2001/331/EC: Review and relation to sectoral inspection requirements Miroslav Angelov European Commission DG Environment, Unit A 1 Enforcement,
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheBukarest National Reference Laboratory for Air.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 CMA developments and state.
ISO MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT. ISO Environmental Management Systems2 Lesson Learning Goals At the end of this lesson you should be.
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive “good environmental status” and the Water Framework Directive “good ecological/chemical status/potential” ECOSTAT.
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000 François Kremer DG ENV.B.3 Expert Group Natura 2000 Management Meeting of 23 November 2011
Counselor dr. Otilia Mihail Ministry of Environment, Water and Forest Constanta 17 June
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Need for continuous exchanges on chemical monitoring issues, in the light of the on-going.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Monitoring Fact Sheets DIKE TSG1 04. July 2013, Copenhagen Proposal for the use of web-based monitoring “fact sheets” for the purpose of MSFD reporting.
1 AMPS 4 22/ Brussels Discussion Paper As of , Bullet 4 Analytical Methods for Operational and Surveillance Monitoring Of WFD PS.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
1 EUROPEAN TOPIC CENTRE ON WATER EUROWATERNET Towards an Index of Quality of the National Data in Waterbase.
Dedicated maps on contaminants
EMODnet Chemistry 3 Kick-off Meeting May 2017
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD CIS SCG meeting of 11 March 2009.
Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Progress Works, recommendations and future work programme
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Proposal for MSFD risk-based approach project in OSPAR region
Standardisation - What to expect from it?
European Commission DG Environment
Draft examples of possible GES Decision criteria Descriptor 9
IMPLEMENTING DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC CONCERNING MINIMUM PERFORMANCE CRITERIA FOR CHEMICAL MONITORING METHODS AND THE QUALITY OF ANALYTICAL RESULTS via a.
Chemical Status : Open issues on reporting obligation
MSFD list of criteria elements
DG ENV/MSFD 2018 call for proposals
Meeting of the WFD CIS Working Group on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT)
Preliminary methodology for the assessment of Member States’ reporting on Programme of Measures (Article 16) WG DIKE Sarine Barsoumian (12/10/2015, Brussels)
MSFD list of criteria elements
Information on projects
Marine Strategy Framework Directive: implementation process at EU level Gert Verreet – WFD WG Reporting - 31 March 2009.
1.
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU Overview of main changes
Setting conservation objectives for Natura 2000
European Commission, DG Environment, Marine Unit
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Marine Strategy Framework Directive reporting: progress and next steps
Assessment scales and aggregation
Preparatory meeting for the establishment of the Project Coordination Group (PCG) for the implementation of the MSFD 13 November :00-13:30 European.
Access to and standards for data from MSFD reporting
Uli Claussen Co-lead ECOSTAT
How can EMODNet Chemistry engage in support to MSFD data reporting
Presentation transcript:

EMODNet Chemistry Steering Committee January 2014 Rome Giordano Giorgi

Requirements of Art of MSFD Member States shall provide the Commission with access and use rights in respect of data and information resulting from the initial assessments made pursuant to Article 8 and from the monitoring programmes established pursuant to Article 11. Art context MSFD assessments under Article 8 are needed to assess the progress towards achieving Good Environmental Status (GES) and to assess progress with environmental targets. These assessments are typically based on characteristics, related to the 11 Descriptors of GES, their associated criteria or indicators The indicators and assessments are in turn dependent upon data

MSFD coherence and consistency Member States need to achieve coherence and consistency within and between the MSFD regions and subregions Consistency in the data used for indicators and assessments will be a key element in achieving overall coherence in delivery of the directive Coherence in data will help lead to consistent outcomes for the assessments of environmental status

Identifying a prioritized list of data sets for 2018 Contaminants, Nutrients Define a number of data sets that could support indicators and assessments at the regional/sub-regional scale Focus on data for indicators which have a high degree of commonality at subregional, regional or EU levels Establish methods to aggregate the data into subregional, regional or EU level

New Working Group TG Data Accessing data and information according to MSFD Art. 19.3, in the context of WISE-Marine and associated to INSPIRE, EMODnet, and other relevant processes and projects TG Data is also related to activities undertaken in EMODnet projects. Invitations will be extended, when appropriate, to the Marine Observation and Data Expert Group (MODEG) Proposal: develop a MSFD “modelling toolbox” and related data needs for the assessments and future scenario-building by developing or refining indicators and assessment techniques, better understanding of the relationships between pressures and impacts and development of models 1 st meeting: April 2014

QA/QC – Directive 2009/90/EC Methods of analysis Member States shall ensure that all methods of analysis, including laboratory, field and on-line methods, used for the purposes of chemical monitoring programmes carried out under Directive 2000/60/EC are validated and documented in accordance with EN ISO/IEC standard or other equivalent standards accepted at international level.

QA/QC – Directive 2009/90/EC Minimum performance criteria for methods of analysis 1.Member States shall ensure that the minimum performance criteria for all methods of analysis applied are based on an uncertainty of measurement of 50 % or below (k = 2) estimated at the level of relevant environmental quality standards and a limit of quantification equal or below a value of 30 % of the relevant environmental quality standards. 2.In the absence of relevant environmental quality standard for a given parameter, or in the absence of method of analysis meeting the minimum performance criteria set out before, Member States shall ensure that monitoring is carried out using best available techniques not entailing excessive costs.

QA/QC – Directive 2009/90/EC Calculation of mean values 1.Where the amounts of physico-chemical or chemical measurands in a given sample are below the limit of quantification, the measurement results shall be set to half of the value of the limit of quantification concerned for the calculation of mean values. 2.Where a calculated mean value of the measurement results is below the limits of quantification, the value shall be referred to as ‘less than limit of quantification’. 3.P. 1 shall not apply to measurands that are total sums of a given group of physico-chemical parameters or chemical measurands, including their relevant metabolites, degradation and reaction products. In those cases, results below the limit of quantification of the individual substances shall be set to zero.

QA/QC – Directive 2009/90/EC Quality assurance and control 1.Member States shall ensure that laboratories or parties contracted by laboratories demonstrate their competences in analysing relevant physico-chemical or chemical measurands by: (a) participation in proficiency testing programmes covering the methods of analysis, and (b) analysis of available reference materials that are representative of collected samples which contain appropriate levels of concentrations in relation to relevant environmental quality standards

QA/QC – Directive 2009/90/EC Proficiency testing programme 1.ISO/IEC guide 43-1 on proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons - Part 1: Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes provides an appropriate guide. The results of those programmes should be evaluated on the basis of the internationally recognised scoring systems 1.ISO on statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons provides appropriate standards.

Thank You