Attorney Work Product Education Code Section 47614 Free use of district facilities by charter school (Proposition 39) Charter Schools Division LOS ANGELES.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Advertisements

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education Special Education Self-
Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education
Campus Improvement Plans
FRANK ESPOSITO DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SOUTH PLAINFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT Effective Communication Pathways in Special Education.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Uniform Monitoring.
VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION AVECO July 14 – 18, 2014 Centralized Certification.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction Independent Study Attendance Accounting, ADA Ratios, and Other Audit Issues California Consortium.
Pesticide Drift and the Area Plan. Pesticide Drift SB 391 was chaptered in September Intent is to deal with the effects of non- occupational exposure.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 LOW INCIDENCE FUNDING GUIDELINES FOR PRESENTATION TO: California Transcribers and Educators.
Legislative Changes to the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (AB 340 and AB 197) Presented by: Contra Costa County Employees’ Retirement Association.
October 21, 2008  Provide accurate and honest information  Listen to and respond to what people want to know  Hear ideas and suggestions of what should.
1 Academic Adjustments & Auxiliary Aids & Documentation Office for Civil Rights US Department of Education This presentation is not to be reproduced in.
Article 42. – Emergency Safety Interventions ESI Regulations K.A.R and As Passed by the Kansas State Board of Education 2.
ATTENDANCE AND CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES Robert Cuen.
Maintenance of Effort (MOE) Excess Cost Presenter Patricia Holcomb-Gray Office of Special Education Programs NJ Department of Education June 3, 2015.
Students with Disabilities Parentally Placed in Nonpublic Elementary or Secondary Schools VESID Special Education Services New York State Education Department.
Chapter 222 of the Acts of 2012 THOMAS J. NUTTALL, ESQ. SULLIVAN, NUTTALL & MACAVOY, P.C PLAIN STREET MARSHFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS (781)
Equitable Services for Private School Students March, 2012 Consultation Process & Meeting Agenda’s Marcia Beckman, Director Elementary & Secondary Education.
The Next Decade: Special Education and Oregon Charter Schools COSA Fall Conference October 2009.
Equitable Services, Part 1 Meaningful Consultation Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University.
Presented by: Gary Quiring, CSIS Implementation Specialist Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team Charter School Closures: CALPADS Requirements 1.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
WCA Facilities Planning February WCA Request 2 Educational Program: The Charter School’s educational program has unique facilities needs. Key.
Office of Special Education Fall Forum 2013 General Initiatives and the Role of Special Education.
Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.
WEE District Plans Writing, Updating and CDE Approval Updated 10/2009.
Chapter 222 of the Acts of 2012, An Act Relative to Students Access to Educational Services and Exclusion from School.
In-District Charter Contractual Agreement All information obtained from Final Agreement between Austin ISD Schools and IDEA Public Schools.
JACK O’CONNELL State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Funding Assistive Technology for Students with Visual Impairments with Low Incidence Funds.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement Texas Education Agency (TEA)
IRSDA Conference What Do the Amendments to Indiana Code Section Mean to You? Kristina Kern Wheeler, General Counsel Ja-Deen L. Johnson, Consumer.
Administrative Penalty Program SB Regulatory Item California Air Resources Board Enforcement Division Public Hearing December 12, 2002 Sacramento,
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
TITLE I COMPARABILITY Determinations & Reporting Title I Technical Assistance Session School Improvement Grant Programs October 6, 2011.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Students with Disabilities: High School to College U.S. Department.
Oregon Public Charter Schools Oregon Department of Education August 2007.
Homeless Students and the Expenditure of Title I Part A Funds Rebecca Derenge, N&D Coordinator.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Effects of the Passage of ABX4 2 on California-Adopted Instructional.
Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate.
Reporting Requirements for IR Charters and Authorizing Agencies v2.0, Reporting Requirements for Charter Schools and Authorizing Agencies.
Charter School Meeting Department of Public Instruction October 20, 2014 Charter School Meeting Department of Public Instruction October 20,
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance.
ASCCC Curriculum Institute 2011 Carolyn Holcroft, Foothill College Michelle Pilati, Rio Hondo College.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
1 Balancing Act: A Board’s Role in Charter School Oversight Presented by: Sue Ann Evans, Dannis Woliver Kelley Moises Aguirre, San Diego Unified School.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office Quality Distance Education Webinar Attendance Accounting And Reporting for Distance Education Courses.
West Virginia Department of Education Introducing ……. Policy 2419: Regulations for the Education of Students with Exceptionalities.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Sample Test Security Training February 11; 2016 Office of the State Superintendent of Education Assessment Team 1.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Private Nonprofit School Participation.
ATTENDANCE AND CONTRACTUAL RESPONSIBILITIES > Pupil Services& Attendance Counselor Copyright-2015 © Los Angeles Unified School District – All rights reserved.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Getting Started: Basic Administrative Requirements Unit 1.
Presented by: Gary Quiring, CSIS Implementation Specialist Fiscal Crisis & Management Assistance Team Charter School Closure Rules: CALPADS Requirements.
BASIC FISCAL REQUIREMENTS DAVID MARX TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©
© 2015 School Services of California, Inc. Charter School Access to District Facilities FAC30 These materials have been prepared by the CASBO Facilities.
Emergency Preparedness. Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rules NFR/LMC §19.326(a) deleted and moved to § for Emergency Preparedness Rules Places.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Seekonk Board of Assessors
Non-Residential Customer Non- Residential - Capacity Evaluation Borough of Conshohocken Authority Customer Informational Meeting June 20, East.
School Business Division NC Department of Public Instruction
Low Incidence Funding CTEBVI Conference April 4, 2014
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Presentation transcript:

Attorney Work Product Education Code Section Free use of district facilities by charter school (Proposition 39) Charter Schools Division LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 333 South Beaudry Avenue, 20 th Floor Los Angeles, CA Charter: (213)  Fax: (213)

2 Education Code Section EDUCATION CODE TITLE 2. ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION DIVISION 4. INSTRUCTION AND SERVICES PART CHARTER SCHOOLS CHAPTER 3. CHARTER SCHOOL OPERATION

Smaller Classes, Safer Schools and Financial Accountability Act of The proposition requires each local K–12 school district to provide charter school facilities sufficient to accommodate the charter school’s students.  “The intent of the people in amending Section is that public school facilities should be shared fairly among all public school pupils, including those in charter schools.”

§ Free use of district facilities by charter school 4 The intent of the people in amending Section is that public school facilities should be shared fairly among all public school pupils, including those in charter schools. District School Program Charter School Program District Facility

§ Free use of district facilities by charter school 5 Each school district shall make available, to each charter school operating in the school district, facilities sufficient for the charter school to accommodate all of the charter school's in-district students in conditions reasonably equivalent to those in which the students would be accommodated if they were attending other public schools of the district. Facilities provided shall be contiguous, furnished, and equipped, and shall remain the property of the school district. The school district shall make reasonable efforts to provide the charter school with facilities near to where the charter school wishes to locate, and shall not move the charter school unnecessarily. Reasonable Equivalence Contiguous Space Furnished & Equipped Reasonable Efforts to Locate No Unnecessary Moves

§ Free use of district facilities by charter school 6 Each year each charter school desiring facilities from a school district in which it is operating shall provide the school district with a reasonable projection of the charter school's average daily classroom attendance by in-district students for the following year. The district shall allocate facilities to the charter school for that following year based upon this projection. If the charter school, during that following year, generates less average daily classroom attendance by in-district students than it projected, the charter school shall reimburse the district for the over- allocated space at rates to be set by the State Board of Education. Annual ADA Projections Over Allocation Penalty

§ Free use of district facilities by charter school 7 The term "operating," as used in this section, shall mean either currently providing public education to in-district students, or having identified at least 80 in-district students who are meaningfully interested in enrolling in the charter school for the following year.

8 State Board of Education Implementing Regulations TITLE 5. EDUCATION DIVISION 1. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION CHAPTER 11. SPECIAL PROGRAMS SUBCHAPTER 19. CHARTER SCHOOLS ARTICLE 3. FACILITIES FOR CHARTER SCHOOLS

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Purpose and Stipulation 9 If a charter school and a school district mutually agree to an alternative to specific compliance with any of the provisions of this article, nothing in this article shall prohibit implementation of that alternative, including, for example, funding in lieu of facilities in an amount commensurate with local rental or lease costs for facilities reasonably equivalent to facilities of the district.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Definitions 10 Operating in the School District. As used in Education Code section 47614(b), a charter school is "operating in the school district" if the charter school meets the requirements of Education Code section 47614(b)(5) regardless of whether the school district is or is proposed to be the authorizing entity for the charter school and whether the charter school has a facility inside the school district's boundaries.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Definitions 11 In-district Students. As used in Education Code section 47614(b), a student attending a charter school is an "in- district student" of a school district if he or she is entitled to attend the schools of the school district and could attend a school district-operated school, except that a student eligible to attend the schools of the school district based on interdistrict attendance pursuant to Education Code section or based on parental employment pursuant to Education Code section 48204(b) shall be considered a student of the school district where he or she resides.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Definitions 12 Contiguous. As used in Education Code section 47614(b), facilities are "contiguous" if they are contained on the school site or immediately adjacent to the school site. If the in-district average daily classroom attendance of the charter school cannot be accommodated on any single school district school site, contiguous facilities also includes facilities located at more than one site, provided that the school district shall minimize the number of sites assigned and shall consider student safety. In evaluating and accommodating a charter school's request for facilities pursuant to Education Code section 47614, the charter school's in-district students must be given the same consideration as students in the district-run schools, subject to the requirement that the facilities provided to the charter school must be contiguous.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Definitions 13 Furnished and Equipped. As used in Education Code section 47614(b), a facility is "furnished and equipped" if it includes reasonably equivalent furnishings necessary to conduct classroom instruction and to provide for student services that directly support classroom instruction as found in the comparison group schools established under section (a), and if it has equipment that is reasonably equivalent to that in the comparison group schools. "Equipment“ means property that does not lose its identity when removed from its location and is not changed materially or consumed immediately (e.g., within one year) by use. Equipment has relatively permanent value, and its purchase increases the total value of a Local Educational Agency's (LEA's) physical properties. Examples include furniture, vehicles, machinery, motion picture film, videotape, furnishings that are not an integral part of the building or building system, and certain intangible assets, such as major software programs. Furnishings and equipment acquired for a school site with non-district resources are excluded when determining reasonable equivalence.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Conditions Reasonably Equivalent 14 The standard for determining whether facilities are sufficient to accommodate charter school students in conditions reasonably equivalent to those in which the students would be accommodated if they were attending public schools of the school district providing facilities shall be a comparison group of district-operated schools with similar grade levels. If none of the district-operated schools has grade levels similar to the charter school, then a contiguous facility within the meaning of subdivision (d) of section shall be an existing facility that is most consistent with the needs of students in the grade levels served at the charter school. The district is not obligated to pay for the modification of an existing school site to accommodate the charter school's grade level configuration.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Conditions Reasonably Equivalent 15 The school district shall allocate and/or provide access to non-teaching station space commensurate with the in- district classroom ADA of the charter school and the per- student amount of non-teaching station space in the comparison group schools. Non-teaching station space is all of the space that is not identified as teaching station space or specialized classroom space and includes, but is not limited to, administrative space, kitchen, multi-purpose room, and play area space. If necessary to implement this paragraph, the district shall negotiate in good faith with the charter school to establish time allocations and schedules so that educational programs of the charter school and school district are least disrupted.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Conditions Reasonably Equivalent 16 The comparison group shall be the school district- operated schools with similar grade levels that serve students living in the high school attendance area, as defined in Education Code section (b), in which the largest number of students of the charter school reside. The number of charter school students residing in a high school attendance area shall be determined using in-district classroom ADA projected for the fiscal year for which facilities are requested.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Conditions Reasonably Equivalent 17 Facilities made available by a school district to a charter school shall be provided in the same ratio of teaching stations (classrooms) to ADA as those provided to students in the school district attending comparison group schools. School district ADA shall be determined using projections for the fiscal year and grade levels for which facilities are requested. Charter school ADA shall be determined using in-district classroom ADA projected for the fiscal year and grade levels for which facilities are requested. The number of teaching stations (classrooms) shall be determined using the classroom inventory prepared pursuant to California Code of Regulations, title 2, section , adjusted to exclude classrooms identified as interim housing. "Interim housing" means the rental or lease of classrooms used to house pupils temporarily displaced as a result of the modernization of classroom facilities, as defined in California Code of Regulations, title 2, section , and classrooms used as emergency housing for schools vacated due to structural deficiencies or natural disasters.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Reimbursement Rates for Over-Allocated Space 18 Space is considered to be over-allocated if (1) the charter school's actual in-district classroom ADA is less than the projected in-district classroom ADA upon which the facility allocation was based and (2) the difference is greater than or equal to a threshold ADA amount of 25 ADA or 10 percent of projected in-district classroom ADA, whichever is greater.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Reimbursement Rates for Over-Allocated Space 19 A charter school must notify the school district when it anticipates that it will have over-allocated space that could be used by the school district. Upon notification by a charter school that the charter school anticipates having over-allocated space, a school district may elect to use the space for school district programs. The school district must notify the charter school whether or not it intends to use the over-allocated space within 30 days of the notification by the charter school. If the school district notifies the charter school that it intends to use all or a portion of the over-allocated space, payments for over-allocated space and pro rata share payments shall be reduced accordingly beginning at the time of the school district notification to use the space. If the school district notifies the charter school that it does not intend to use the space, the charter school must continue to make payments for over-allocated space and pro rata share payments. The school district may, at its sole discretion, reduce the amounts owed by the charter school.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Procedures and Timelines for the Request for, Reimbursement for, and Provision of, Facilities 20 The charter school must report actual ADA to the school district every time that the charter school reports ADA for apportionment purposes. The reports must include in-district and total ADA and in-district and total classroom ADA. The charter school must maintain records documenting the data contained in the reports. These records shall be available on request by the school district.

State Board of Education Implementing Regulations § Procedures and Timelines for the Request for, Reimbursement for, and Provision of, Facilities 21 The charter school shall comply with school district policies regarding the operations and maintenance of the school facility and furnishings and equipment.

Regulatory Timeline 22 Nov 1 Charter facilities requests due Dec 1 District affirms or counters charter in-District ADA calculations Jan 2 Charter operators respond to District in-District ADA calculations Feb 1 District extends preliminary proposals Mar 1 Charter operators respond to preliminary proposal Apr 1 District extends final offers May 1 Charter operators respond to final offers 10 days Charter schools occupy site 10 business days prior to first day of school

23 LAUSD POL-BUL 5532 Attorney Work Product P OLICY ON C O -L OCATIONS FOR D ISTRICT S CHOOL F ACILITIES ’ U SE P URSUANT TO E DUCATION C ODE S ECTION (P ROPOSITION 39)

How are rooms and shared space allocated? 24 Identify programs for the next school year by November 1. (POL-BUL 5532, p.3) The next step is designating classrooms. (POL- BUL 5532, p.9)  Consider student and staff safety  Minimize adverse affects to both the District school or charter school Shared space (POL-BUL 5532, p.6)  Is commensurate with charter student enrollment  Includes all of the space not identified as teaching station space (e.g., administrative space, kitchen, multi- purpose room, and play area space).

How will principals address co-location issues over the course of the year? 25 The co-located District school principal and charter school principal are encouraged to meet in August and then every two weeks thereafter throughout the school year. (POL-BUL 5532, p.7) Specific topics may include:  Site Access & Availability  School Services  Student Meals Program  Classroom usage  Keys  Scheduling  Safety & Security  Resolving Facilities Usage Issues

Are District personnel responsible for providing site access to the charter school? 26 No; during District non-operating hours, the charter school will have access to the space identified in the facility use agreement only. (POL- BUL 5532, p.7) The charter school has separate intrusion alarms. When accessing the District facilities during District non-business hours, the charter school principal is responsible for complying with District policy on opening and closing the site. (POL-BUL 5532, p.8)

How will principals coordinate school calendars? 27 The District school principal and charter school principal should communicate before scheduling activities in order to minimize the impact on either instructional program. Instructional programs at either school take precedence over other activities. (POL-BUL 5532, p.13) At the next Co-location Training, there is an opportunity to align schedules and calendars on a single calendar. (POL-BUL 5532, p.13)

What types of shared services does the charter school receive? 28 The charter school pays the District a per-square-foot facilities cost for, among other things, the maintenance and operations costs of the provided facilities. All District staff assigned to provide the services above must do so for the entire site regardless of charter or District occupied space. (POL-BUL 5532, p.8) The charter school principal will make a formal written request for additional service, repair, or to register a complaint to the District principal. The District principal will then notify the Complex Plant Manager. (POL-BUL 5532, p.9) Any other services requested by the charter school should be directed by to the Innovation & Charter Schools Division. The charter school pays separately for any additional services. (POL-BUL 5532, p.9)

How does the campus coordinate during emergencies? 29 The District Principal is responsible during times of crisis and both parties must follow the safe school plan. (POL-BUL 5532, p.7) During an emergency, the primary Incident Commander should be the District Principal. (POL-BUL 5532, p.13)

– Charter Schools Division Mainline – Prop 39 Voic – Program Manager – Sean Jernigan 30 Prop 39 Contact