I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Air Force Cost Analysis in 2011 Mr. Rich Hartley Deputy Assistant.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation for ASMC PDI 2010 June 4, 2010 Thomas Hessel Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness Requirements and Program.
Advertisements

ACQUISITION PLANNING.
Acquisition Planning and Adequate Market Research National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Acquisition and Grants Office Oversight and Compliance.
Joint Contingency Contracting
Selected Previous Studies Leif E Peterson. Outline Air Force S&E Future Study – 2002 National Defense University – 2008 NRC STEM Study for Air Force –
TARGET AFFORDABILITY AND CONTROL COST GROWTH David G. Ahern Portfolio Systems Acquisition Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Acquisition) April.
LGAP’s Initiatives to Support Procurement in Local Government
RENEWAL & SUCCESSION CONSIDERATIONS Elisa A. Falco, Director of Education & Training.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Proper Use of Non-DoD Contracts SAF/AQCP 6 December 2004.
Recent Trends in DoD Systems and Software Engineering Processes Bruce Amato Acting Deputy Director, Software Engineering and Systems Assurance Office of.
FAI Training & Career Development Initiatives Gloria Sochon Director Federal Acquisition Institute March 17, 2005.
March 5,  Purpose  How it Works  Review Topics  Review Findings  Tips 2.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
1 Navy Center for Earned Value Management (CEVM) January 2007.
OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INTELLIGENCE CI & SECURITY DIRECTORATE, DDI(I&S) Valerie Heil March 20, 2015 UNCLASSIFIED Industrial Security.
DoD Acquisition Domain (Sourcing) (DADS) Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) E-Business/SPS Joint Users’ Conference November 15-19, 2004 Houston, TX.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Staffing and Training.
Mr. Frank J. Anderson, Jr. President, Defense Acquisition University Acquisition Education Challenges and the Human Capital Strategic Plan.
Earned Value Management Systems (EVMS) Defense Support Team (DST) and Report to Congress Mr. Richard Ginman OUSD(A&T)/DPAP Presentation to National Defense.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Implementing Will-Cost & Should-Cost Management Presented by Rebecca.
1 WARFIGHTER SUPPORT STEWARDSHIP EXCELLENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN LEADERSHIP.
NDIA Small Business Division Subcommittee on Improving IP Protection for Small Businesses Mission Statement Overview Alison Brown.
ASMC – Middle Georgia Chapter 9 Feb 2012 Luncheon Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Update Julian “Rob” Roberts Professor of Financial.
Air Armament Center Mr. John Mistretta Technical Director, AAC/EN War-Winning Capabilities…On Time, On Cost Systems Engineering Update AAC.
© MCR, LLC MCR Proprietary - Distribution Limited Earned Value Management Application, Guidance, and Education Neil F. Albert President/CEO MCR, LLC
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense _APBI_JPEO 1 INTRODUCTIONS Preparing Proposals and Responses to Solicitations.
0 Achieving Dominant Capabilities through Technical Excellence and Innovation Better Buying Power 3.0.
Stuart A. Hazlett Deputy Director, OUSD(AT&L) Defense Pricing Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy A Presentation to NCMA Pentagon 8 September 2011.
1 Nunn-McCurdy Unit Cost Reporting NDIA PMSC Meeting August 15-16, 2006.
1 Dr. Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources & Analysis, OUSD(AT&L) Restructure of Business Career Field.
1 1 Nunn-McCurdy Legislation/Program Impacts Della McPhail Chief Financial Officer 308 ARSW DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A: Approved for public release; distribution.
Earned Value Management Presented By: Steve Krivokopich May , 2006.
Earned Value Management Update Nancy L. Spruill Director, Acquisition Resources and Analysis Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Acquisition, Technology.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force AIR FORCE CAUCUS John Heliotis AF DepSO.
Strategic Vision Life Cycle Logistics Functional IPT Mrs. Sue Dryden DASD(Materiel Readiness) January 13, 2012.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of: 02 Mar 051 Partnering with Industry on System Safety & MIL-STD-882D.
1 1 Defense Acquisition Guidebook Progress Update March 27, 2012.
0 2 Nov 2010, V1.4 Steve Skotte, DAU Space Acquisition Performance Learning Director New Space Systems Acquisition Policy.
Life Cycle Cost Savings by Improving Reliability Dr. Charles E. McQueary Director, Operational Test and Evaluation January 15, 2009.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
| 1 Weapon System Acquisition Reform- Product Support Assessment DAU SYMPOSIUM 13 April 2010 Presented by: Basil Gray Where Innovation.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) Information Requirements
Service Acquisition Requirements Review Board (SARRB) Overview 19 June 2012 Presenter: CAPT Scott Hoffman, Deputy Director for Contracts Space and Naval.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
Project Management Career Development Program (PMCDP) development-program Linda Ott.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of:1 Mrs. Marty Evans SE Forum October 15, 2004 Institutionalizing.
Hot Topics 18 March 2016 DoD Instruction : Defense Acquisition of Services 1.
BBP Mar 13 Better Buying Power 2.0 Achieve Affordable Programs Mandate affordability as a requirement Institute a system of investment planning to derive.
1 Consent to Subcontract Breakout Session # D12 Name: Rita Wells Daniel Johnson Anthony Simmons Date:July 12, 2011 Time:11:15 – 12:30.
MORS Special Meeting: Risk, Trade Space, & Analytics for Acquisition
Lesson Objectives Determine the key Requirements Manager activities and the role of the ICD leading up to the MDD and during Materiel Solution Analysis.
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities July 12, 2016.
Implementing Will-Cost & Should-Cost Management
Consent to Subcontract
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Milestone A to Milestone B Requirements Management Activities
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Commercial Item Group Overview.
MDD to Milestone A Requirements Management Activities
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Materiel Development Decision (MDD) to Milestone A (MS A)
Department of the Navy (DON) Professional Development
Information Required for Milestone and Decision Reviews
PPBE JEOPARDY!.
CARD: Basically must be prepared any time an independent estimate (ICE or CCA) is to be done
CARD: Basically must be prepared any time an independent estimate (ICE or CCA) is to be done
Purpose Provide an update on recent major changes to law, policy, and guidance that affect the way we conduct IA&E activities National Defense Authorization.
Presentation transcript:

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 Air Force Cost Analysis in 2011 Mr. Rich Hartley Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air Force (Cost and Economics)

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Setting the Stage “ Nobody can afford wishful thinking anymore. We certainly learned that with the F-35. We will pinpoint what we have to have and it will neither be lowball nor wishful thinking.” -- Gen Norton Schwartz, Air Force Chief of Staff Aviation Week & Space Technology, May 17,

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Overview WSARA Cost in the AF POM DoD efficiency agenda Should cost, Red Team Reviews, etc Special studies, BCAs, etc. Training, education and development Closing thoughts 3

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e WSARA CAPE Influence “With concurrence of the DCAPE” Full funding consistent with SCP Documentation Annual report on cost MDAP issue team MS-A Certifications CSDR VAMOSC MAIS 4

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Cost in AF POM AFPD 65-5 Annual A8 call Portfolio cost risk analysis Decision support Cost consciousness culture change MDAP issue team Involved 5

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Cost in AF POM (cont) FY11 APOM: 20 Programs, 34% of AF Investment FY12 POM: 48 Programs, 42% of AF Investment Successes: Increased Pgm Office/AFCAA collaboration  stronger estimates Pre-briefed PEOs Excursions with valid cost data Cost conscious decisions  risk reduced MDAP issue team! Lessons Learned: NACAs earlier to influence MAJCOM POMs Increase PEM involvement Acceptance maturing Expand SIPRNET access 6

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 7 NACA 0 - 5% > PB NACA 6 – 24% > PB NACA > 25% of PB G Y R G Portfolio 2 Sub-total (TY$M)FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Subtotal Estimates ,600.2 POM Funding ,302.1 Funding Estimate Delta(162.9)(297.1)(293.9)(302.8)(241.4)(1,298.1) R Portfolio 3 Sub-total (TY$M)FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Subtotal Estimates1,274.41,281.51,021.61,159.01,787.56,524.0 POM Funding1,244.11,216.81,051.31,215.01,182.75,910.0 Funding Estimate Delta(30.3)(64.7) (604.8)(614.0) Y Cost in AF POM Portfolio Cost Risk Assessment Example Portfolio 1 Sub-total (TY$M)FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 Subtotal Estimates POM Funding Funding Estimate Delta (96.8)37.0

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Efficiencies Carter memo Acquisition efficiencies Affordability SECDEF consideration of costs memo FY2011 NDAA 8

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Dr. Carter Memo on Better Buying Power USD/AT&L Memo 3 Nov 2010 Target affordability and controlling cost growth Incentivize productivity & innovation in industry Promote real competition Improve tradecraft in services acquisition Reduce non-productive processes and bureaucracy 9

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 10  Sec 811. Cost Estimates for Program Baselines and Contract Negotiations for MDAPs and MAIS Programs  … estimates developed for baseline descriptions … are not to be used for the purpose of contract negotiations  … estimates [for negotiations and obligations] …based on governments reasonable expectation of successful contractor performance  …the PM and Contracting Officer for each MDAP/MAIS shall ensure that cost analyses and targets developed for the purpose of contract negotiations and the obligations of funds be carried out …[in] a high degree of confidence that the program can be completed without the need for significant adjustment to program budgets  …funds that are made available for a MDAP/MAIS program IAW a cost estimate …but are excess to a cost analysis or target developed …shall remain available for obligation in accordance with the terms of applicable authorizations or appropriations Acts. FY 2011 NDAA Sec 811

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Should Cost, Red Team Reviews, Etc. USD (AT&L) - PM owns should cost SAF/AQ – independent “special study” should costs Completed EELV Global Hawk F-22 Mod JAT F-135 JAT 11 Potential Future B-2 DMS SDB II SBIRS AEHF GPS-MGUE GPS-OCX

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Special Studies & BCAs SECAFs TFE/TFI Civilian PCS Military end strength FM Center of Expertise (COE) 218 projects greater than $3.4B over the FYDP 12

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Other Cost estimate confidence level Joint Space Cost Council / Cost IPTs Revitalize program control Earned Value Management Updating AFIs 13

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Training, Education and Development BUS-CE – curriculum / certification NPS cost masters – distance program Developing AFIT professional development courses Supplement DAU – more robust AT&L Key Leadership Positions (KLPs) AFIT Masters---civilians? 14

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 15 You Can Help  Identify and advocate “real” requirements for the job  Consider past performance, AFPD 65-5 and WSARA  Build relationships with engineering, contracting, and PMA&E  Help build AFIs, handbooks, and training material  Contribute to data collection and methods development  Get reacquainted with documentation

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Closing Thoughts AF FM has fiduciary responsibility to be honest broker Maintain your objectivity Cost estimators, don’t forget Skills are more valuable than ever to the Air Force Estimating is forecasting—leverage past knowledge for future predictors Challenge technical and schedule assumptions—they drive your product 16

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 17

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e NDAA 2011 Sec 811 SEC COST ESTIMATES FOR PROGRAM BASELINES AND CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS FOR MAJOR DEFENSE ACQUISITION AND MAJOR AUTOMATED INFORMATION SYSTEM PROGRAMS. Section 2334 of title 10, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (d)— (A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking ‘‘paragraph (2)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph (3)’’; and (ii) by striking ‘‘, the rationale for selecting such confidence level, and, if such confidence level is less than 80 percent, the justification for selecting a confidence level of less than 80 percent; and’’ and inserting ‘‘and the rationale for selecting such confidence level;’’; (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); and (C) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following new paragraph (2): ‘‘(2) ensure that such confidence level provides a high degree of confidence that the program can be completed without the need for significant adjustment to program budgets; and’’; (2) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and (3) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection (e): ‘‘(e) ESTIMATES FOR PROGRAM BASELINE AND ANALYSES AND TARGETS FOR CONTRACT NEGOTIATION PURPOSES.—(1) The policies, procedures, and guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation in accordance with the requirements of subsection (a) shall provide that— ‘‘(A) cost estimates developed for baseline descriptions and other program purposes conducted pursuant to subsection (a)(6) are not to be used for the purpose of contract negotiations or the obligation of funds; and ‘‘(B) cost analyses and targets developed for the purpose of contract negotiations and the obligation of funds are based on the Government’s reasonable expectation of successful contractor performance in accordance with the contractor’s proposal and previous experience. ‘‘(2) The Program Manager and contracting officer for each major defense acquisition program and major automated information system program shall ensure that cost analyses and targets developed for the purpose of contract negotiations and the obligation of funds are carried out in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (1) and the policies, procedures, and guidance issued by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation. ‘‘(3) Funds that are made available for a major defense acquisition program or major automated information system program in accordance with a cost estimate conducted pursuant to subsection (a)(6), but are excess to a cost analysis or target developed pursuant to paragraph (2), shall remain available for obligation in accordance with the terms of applicable authorization and appropriations Acts. ‘‘(4) Funds described in paragraph (3)— ‘‘(A) may be used— ‘‘(i) to cover any increased program costs identified by a revised cost analysis or target developed pursuant to paragraph (2); ‘‘(ii) to acquire additional end items in accordance with the requirements of section 2308 of this title; or ‘‘(iii) to cover the cost of risk reduction and process improvements; And ‘‘(B) may be reprogrammed, in accordance with established procedures, only if determined to be excess to program needs on the basis of a cost estimate developed with the concurrence of the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.’’. 18