Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act By Paul Fleischut SENNIGER POWERS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Auditing Your IP David Bradin Friday, February 4 © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.
Advertisements

Intellectual Property Policy and Procedures
Managing Intellectual Property in the New Electronic Economy Scott Johnson McKee, Voorhees, & Sease, P.L.C.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Institut for Produktion og Ledelse Danmarks Tekniske Universitet John Heebøll Greenhouse+ Intellectual Property Agenda: Intellectual Property Law: the.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION OFFICE OF PATENT COUNSEL March 16, 2001.
INTRODUCTION TO PATENT RIGHTS The Business of Intellectual Property
The America Invents Act (AIA) - Rules and Implications of First to File, Prior Art, and Non-obviousness -
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Introduction to the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement Act of 2004 CREATE Act Prepared by Office of Sponsored Programs & Research Administration.
Intellectual Property March 4, 2015 Don Keach Director, Intellectual Property Development and Technology Transfer Office Copyright University of Kentucky.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Patents Copyright © Jeffrey Pittman. Pittman - Cyberlaw & E- Commerce 2 Legal Framework of Patents The U.S. Constitution, Article 1, Section 8:
1 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ESE Senior Design Lecture Laboratory Notebooks and Patent Protection of Intellectual Property September William H.
Intellectual Property Workshop Patents and WPI’s Policies November 12, 2003 William W. Durgin Associate Provost for Academic Affairs Vice President for.
Patent Overview by Jeff Woller. Why have Patents? Patents make some people rich – but, does that seem like something the government should protect? Do.
Intellectual Property Patent Primer Michael Pratt Executive Director, Business Development November 1, 2011.
Patents 101 April 1, 2002 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School February 16, 2009 Patent – Novelty.
Lauren MacLanahan Office of Technology Licensing GTRC.
Intellectual Property
Protecting Your Idea Stephen R. Cook, Esq. Assistant Clinical Professor of Law University of Akron School of Law University of Akron School of Law
December 8, Changes to Patent Fees Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2005 (H.R. 4818)(upon enactment) and 35 U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by.
0 Charles R. Macedo, Esq. Partner. 1 Brief Overview of Priority Under AIA Implications for Public Disclosures and Private Disclosures Role of Provisional.
Technology Transfer at Rice
Are software patents “... anything under the sun made by man...”? © 2006 Peter S. Menell Professor Peter S. Menell Boalt Hall School of Law Berkeley Center.
Intellectual Property What is intellectual property? What is intellectual property? US IP protection- US IP protection- Patent application process Patent.
Patents Ryan Dickey. Patent Law What is a patent? Congress says: The right to stop people from using your invention. Who can you stop? “whoever without.
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. | 600 Atlantic Avenue | Boston, Massachusetts | | fax | wolfgreenfield.com Prior Art Changes.
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Patent Law Presented by: Walker & Mann, LLP Walker & Mann, LLP 9421 Haven Ave., Suite 200 Rancho Cucamonga, Ca Office.
Preserving US Patent Rights in Light of §103(c) in Collaborations James Anglehart Patent Agent, Partner The purpose of this document is to provide general.
Christopher J. Fildes Fildes & Outland, P.C. Derivation Proceedings and Prior User Rights.
New York Washington, DC Silicon Valley May 8, 2010 Charles Weiss Kenyon & Kenyon LLP (212) Southern Area Entrepreneur's.
Where is the GOVERNMENT?. U.S. Constitution: Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 states, “The Congress shall have Power…To promote the Progress of Science.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
Who is this guy? Patent Law What is a patent? Congress says: The right to stop people from using your invention. Who can you stop? “whoever without.
Josiah Hernandez Patentability Requirements. Useful Having utilitarian or commercial value Novel No one else has done it before If someone has done it.
Copyright Basics Fundamentals you should know Slides produced by the Copyright Education & Consultation Program.
© 2007 West Legal Studies in Business, A Division of Thomson Learning Chapter 5 Intellectual Property.
Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University, Atlanta 1.
The Basics of Intellectual Property Law Understanding IP by A. David Spevack, Office of Naval Research.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
Side 1 Andrew Chin AndrewChin.com A Quick Survey of the America Invents Act Patent Law October 12, 2011.
Federal & State IP Laws The Preemption Doctrine Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
11/18/2015Powell Patent Law Associates, LLC1 PATENT BASICS Marvin J Powell, Esquire
1 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel March 2012 Columbia University Office of the General Counsel Patenting Biotech: Strategies and Tips.
Developing/Protecting Your Idea Peter H. Durant Nixon Peabody LLP March 30/31, 2005 Copyright © 2005 Nixon Peabody LLP.
Patent Law Jody Blanke, Professor Computer Information Systems and Law Mercer University, Atlanta.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
Prosecution Group Luncheon September, America Invents Act Passed House and Senate (HR 1249) Presidential Signature expected Friday Most provisions.
Welcome and Thank You © Gordon & Rees LLP Constitutional Foundation Article 1; Section 8 Congress shall have the Power to... Promote the Progress.
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
Double Patenting Deborah Reynolds SPE Art Unit 1632 Detailee, TC1600 Practice Specialist
Lecture 27 Intellectual Property. Intellectual Property simply defined is any form of knowledge or expression created with one's intellect. It includes.
What the America Invents Act (AIA) Means for Scientists’ Tech Transfer Activities.
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
Introduction to Patents (and other Intellectual Property)
Patents 101 March 28, 2006 And now, for something new, useful and not obvious.
America Invents Act: Litigation Related Provisions
Export Controls – Export Provisions in Research Agreements
Patent, Trademark & Trade Secret Law
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
Presentation transcript:

Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act By Paul Fleischut SENNIGER POWERS

U.S. CONSTITUTION Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8: … to promote the Progress of Science and the useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.

PRIOR ART – 102(a) Publications and patents prior to invention Products prior to invention Processes prior to invention Except that “concealed” products and process do not constitute prior art Except that “concealed” products and process do not constitute prior art

102(a) 12/04 4/05 9/05 12/04 4/05 9/ | | |-  ----| | |-  | Your File pat app. | Your File pat app. | invention | invention 3d party 3d party process, product, patent, or publication process, product, patent, or publication

MORE PRIOR ART – 102(b) Publications more than a year before patent application filing Publications more than a year before patent application filing 6/04 8/04 9/05 6/04 8/04 9/ | | |-  ----| | |-  | 3d party File pat app. | 3d party File pat app. | publication | publication Your Your invention invention

MORE PRIOR ART – 102(b) On sale by inventor more than a year before application filing On sale by inventor more than a year before application filing 6/04 8/04 9/05 6/04 8/04 9/ | | |-  ----| | |-  | You offer File pat app. | You offer File pat app. | product for sale | product for sale Your Your invention invention

MORE PRIOR ART - 102(e)2 Patent applications by others before your invention 3/05 6/05 9/05 3/05 6/05 9/ | | |-  ----| | |-  | Your invention File pat app. | Your invention File pat app. | 3d party 3d party files patent application files patent application

MORE PRIOR ART – 102(g)2 Invention made in the U.S. by another before your invention, who did not abandon, suppress, or conceal the invention Invention made in the U.S. by another before your invention, who did not abandon, suppress, or conceal the invention 3/05 6/05 9/05 3/05 6/05 9/ | | |-  ----| | |-  | Your invention File pat app. | Your invention File pat app. 3d party 3d party invention invention

MORE PRIOR ART – 102(g)2 This can be so-called “secret” prior art Can be embodied in personal communications, inventor notebooks, confidential s, unpublished patent applications, etc., even if unknown to the public

OBVIOUSNESS Section 103 Not patentable if the differences between the invention and the prior art are such that the invention as a whole would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art Section 103(c) Safe harbor for secret prior art under common ownership

CREATE Act - New 103(c) Secret prior art can no longer form the basis of an obviousness rejection against a subsequent joint invention IF: a Joint Research Agreement (JRA) is in place prior to the making of the joint invention the claimed invention was made pursuant to the JRA the secret prior art was generated by one of the parties to the JRA under the scope of the JRA the patent application discloses names of parties to JRA

Pitfalls and Tips Prior research of those not party to JRA remains prior art vs collaborative invention list anyone conducting inventive activity amend JRA if new collaborator joins with consultants, make clear work is on behalf of parties to JRA

Pitfalls and Tips Research outside scope of activity in JRA is not shielded by 103(c) Draft broadly enough to capture full subject matter arising from collaborative efforts But not so broadly or vaguely to contribute more to the joint effort than desired Periodically review scope against current activity Promptly amend scope before expansion of project

Pitfalls and Tips Timing is crucial JRA in place before collaborative research Amending Review existing JRAs for adherence to 103(c) – consider amending to make clear intended to qualify Review pending collaborative patent applications and issued patents for adherence to 103(c) – amend applications or submit Certificate of Correction on issued patents to list all JRA parties. Consider broadening reissue applications if claims of collaborative issued patent were narrowed in response to prior art now exempted under 103(c) safe harbor.

Questions and Comments??