1 Thinking About Crime: Goals for the Near Future Anthony N. Doob Centre of Criminology University of Toronto Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Getting Tough on Crime, Getting Tough on the Causes of Crime: The Impacts of Penal Populism on the Criminal Justice Practitioner
Advertisements

Children in Prison From Convention to National Legislation: Legal Implementation of International Standards Bragi Guðbrandsson Government Agency for Child.
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
PROCESSING OF YOUTHFUL AND JUVENILE OFFENDERS IN NORTH CAROLINA Youth Accountability Planning Task Force December 10, 2009.
 General Deterrence To discourage the general community from committing crimes in the future  Specific Deterrence To discourage a particular offender.
Sentencing A declaration, or decision, by a Court of Law to punish a convicted criminal.
+ Youth and Crime. + Beliefs... Society should concentrate on preventing crime and devoting more resources to the rehabilitation of young people who break.
 Why would the Canadian Justice system have a separate system just for youth?  What age should “youth” be considered?  Is a separate system beneficial?
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
In whose interests? Restricting the freedom of movement of potential offenders with intellectual disabilites Jim Simpson
Older Offenders & Criminal Justice
Chapter 11 Punishment and Sentencing
Sentencing and Parole in Canada
QUIZ C HALLENGING A TTITUDE AND P ERCEPTIONS. Children living / working on the streets are a social threat, and are to be blamed for an increase in juvenile.
Sentencing in Canada Imposing a Sentence.
Punishment & Sentencing Chapter 10 in Your Textbook John Massey Criminal Justice.
YCJA THE YOUTH CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM. JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY ROLE IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Provides public education about the law, especially the.
Presentation by Bob Dechert Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Member of Parliament for Mississauga-Erindale.
Sexual Offender Treatment in Estonia: the Current Situation and Future Perspective Kaire Tamm Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department.
Chapter 15: Criminal Justice Process ~ Sentencing & Corrections Objective: The student should be able to list the various options to sentencing & identify.
What Are We Learning Today? What is the intention of the Youth Criminal Justice Act?
YCJA - Senior High Handout
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003) Law 12 MUNDY 2009.
Youth Justice vs. Adult Justice
Criminal Law and Young People
To what extent is the justice system fair and equitable for youth?
Chapter 40 Rehabilitation. Objectives Identify the major factors that affect criminal behavior Explain the role of correctional treatment programs in.
1 THE MINISTRY OF THE SOLICITOR GENERAL Office of the Correctional Investigator Royal Canadian Mounted Police Solicitor General Department National Parole.
Community-Based Corrections Generally CBC Generally Offender Selection The State of Modern CBC.
The Custodial Detention of Children and the Youth Justice Review Una Convery and Linda Moore Knowledge Exchange Seminar 21 March 2013.
Revisiting ‘A unique punishment’ Professor Jacqueline Tombs Glasgow Caledonian University.
Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress October, 2011 COMMUNITY ALTERNATIVES A PARTNERSHIP APPROACH TO PUBLIC SAFETY David Pisapio, Correctional.
CRIMINAL LAW SUMMER 2011 TA SESSION NOTES Chapter 1 Punishment and Its Rationales.
Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.
Chapter 4 Sentencing and punishment. In this chapter, you will look at the purposes and process of sentencing and the different factors affecting a sentencing.
Emma Grimley OVERVIEW: JUVENILE JUSTICE.  Combination of rules, institutions, and people involved in the control, punishment and rehabilitation of young.
AS Level Law Machinery of Justice Sentencing. AS Level Law What you need to know and discuss: the need for a criminal justice system the main aims of.
(POST – TRIAL). The Act states that the sentencing judge is obliged to consider the following when sentencing:  Maximum penalty  Current sentencing.
The criminal courts: Procedure and sentencing Sentencing.
1. Explain retribution to deter crime At one time the primary reason for punishing a criminal was RETRIBUTION. This is the idea behind the saying “an.
Introduction to a virtual tour Case study for VELS.
PAROLE. Parole  The release of an inmate into the community before the full sentence is served.
Criminal Justice Process:
YOUTH JUSTICE.
By the end of this chapter, you should be able to:  LO1 Identify the sentencing principles that guide the judiciary in Canada  LO2 Describe the adult.
AGES OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY The Youth Justice System.
judge decides on a punishment.
Youth Criminal Justice Act. to prevent youth crime to have meaningful consequences and ensure accountability for youth crime to improve rehabilitation.
Youth Criminal Justice Act. The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) was passed by parliament in Applies to young people from the age of 12 to 17.
Grade 11 Canadian Law Youth Criminal Justice Act.
Criminal Law Sentencing Youth Justice May Sentencing The Goal of sentencing is Deterrence Rehabilitation Retribution Segregation Taking into account.
Chapter 9b Sentencing and Incarceration. Imprisonment – general facts Up to 6 months for most summary convictions 2 years to life for indictable convictions.
1 Blair, Annice et al. ed. Law in Action: Understanding Canadian Law. 2 nd edition. Toronto: Pearson, 2009.
The Young Offenders Act April 1984 National system for dealing with youth.
Learning with Purpose Sex Offender Policy and Practice in the United States Andrew J. Harris University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Canada’s Justice System Chapter 2 Review. No one, no matter how important or powerful, is above the law - not the government; not the Prime Minister;
Social Studies 9.  Unit 1 focuses on the structure of the Canadian federal government. This includes: ◦ The separation and division of powers within.
Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) To Cover by June 5th: -What is the difference btw the Y.O.A and the Y.C.J.A. (and why?) -Age restrictions/limitations.
3 FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES TO JUSTICE: RETRIBUTIVE REHABILITATIVE RESTORATIVE Unit 1: What does justice look like?
The Youth Justice System. Youth Justice System For centuries, youths were treated the same as adults under the law. For centuries, youths were treated.
Amendments to the Youth Criminal Justice Act: Bill C-10, Part 4
Crime and Deviance.
Criminal Law and Young People
The Legislative Branch
Youth Justice: A balanced approach
The Youth Criminal Justice System
Criminal Justice Process: Sentencing & Corrections
Youth and Crime: Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA – 2003)
CLU 3MR Lesson 65.
Presentation transcript:

1 Thinking About Crime: Goals for the Near Future Anthony N. Doob Centre of Criminology University of Toronto Canadian Criminal Justice Association Congress: Halifax 29 October 2009

2 The Agenda (Conclusions) Address crime problems where it matters Address crime problems where it matters Don’t focus on the criminal justice system Don’t focus on the criminal justice system Keep ‘recent’ patterns in mind when considering options Keep ‘recent’ patterns in mind when considering options Serious problems with ‘deterrence’ and ‘incapacitation’ models of crime control Serious problems with ‘deterrence’ and ‘incapacitation’ models of crime control Don’t focus solely on ‘early detection’ as the solution Don’t focus solely on ‘early detection’ as the solution Punishment/imprisonment doesn’t explain ‘crime’ Punishment/imprisonment doesn’t explain ‘crime’ Controlling imprisonment Controlling imprisonment Canada’s history Canada’s history Current problems (remand) Current problems (remand) Address real problems Address real problems Sentencing (including conditional release) Sentencing (including conditional release) Think about ‘crime’ and ‘punishment’ separately Think about ‘crime’ and ‘punishment’ separately

3 Start by looking at crime Jurisdictional variation within Canada Jurisdictional variation within Canada No evidence of important increases – though look carefully at variation across provinces/ territories (and cities, and locations within cities?) No evidence of important increases – though look carefully at variation across provinces/ territories (and cities, and locations within cities?) Crime ‘is’ local – neighbourhood effects Crime ‘is’ local – neighbourhood effects Provincial (and more local) variation Provincial (and more local) variation

4

5

6

7 Addressing Crime: Popular Approaches (1) Deterrence by way of harsher sentences Deterrence by way of harsher sentences Studies on changes in sentencing Studies on changes in sentencing Studies on knowledge of relative severity Studies on knowledge of relative severity Impaired driving Impaired driving The new 5 year minimum sentences The new 5 year minimum sentences The logic of the deterrent impact of harsher sentences The logic of the deterrent impact of harsher sentences Thinking about consequences of being punished Thinking about consequences of being punished Perceive reasonable likelihood of apprehension and offend rather than focus on avoiding apprehension Perceive reasonable likelihood of apprehension and offend rather than focus on avoiding apprehension Even if expect ‘normal punishment’ would offend Even if expect ‘normal punishment’ would offend Know about the increase in punishment Know about the increase in punishment Would have offended ‘for lower penalty’ – not for ‘increased’ penalty Would have offended ‘for lower penalty’ – not for ‘increased’ penalty Be careful about ‘testimonials’ from anyone on general or specific deterrence Be careful about ‘testimonials’ from anyone on general or specific deterrence

8 Addressing Crime: Popular Approaches (2) Incapacitation Incapacitation Distribution of crime Distribution of crime Be wary of the assertion ‘majority of crime committed by small portion of people’ Be wary of the assertion ‘majority of crime committed by small portion of people’ Only those apprehended Only those apprehended Always retrospective assertions Always retrospective assertions Intervention in the lives of ‘at risk’ youths Intervention in the lives of ‘at risk’ youths problem of identifying problem of identifying crime is broadly distributed crime is broadly distributed focus of policy vs. work on the individual focus of policy vs. work on the individual analogy with disease: prevention vs. treatment analogy with disease: prevention vs. treatment Could these account for the patterns of crime in the past 20 years?

9 The public policy debate on addressing crime “Tough or not” “Tough or not” Inherently useless debate Inherently useless debate Not driven by facts Not driven by facts Would never tolerate it in areas like health Would never tolerate it in areas like health Rarely deals with empirical realities Rarely deals with empirical realities Almost never deals with ‘opportunity costs’ Almost never deals with ‘opportunity costs’ Avoids Avoids Real problems of crime and crime prevention Real problems of crime and crime prevention Real debates/ issues (e.g., opportunity costs) Real debates/ issues (e.g., opportunity costs)

10 Looking at “punishment” in the context of “crime” Comparisons (on crime and punishment) Comparisons (on crime and punishment) Not ‘ideal’ sophisticated research Not ‘ideal’ sophisticated research Helps put assertions in context Helps put assertions in context

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19 What does “stability” mean? Types of prisoners (sentenced, remand) Types of prisoners (sentenced, remand) Distribution of prisoners across jurisdictions (provinces/ territories) Distribution of prisoners across jurisdictions (provinces/ territories) Relative number of prisoners in provincial and federal institutions Relative number of prisoners in provincial and federal institutions Trends and provincial policies Trends and provincial policies

20

21

22

23

24

Platform (Federal Conservatives) “Stand up for Canada… “Stand up for Security” “A Conservative government will protect our communities from crime by insisting on tougher sentences for serious and repeat crime and by tightening parole…. “A Conservative government will protect our communities from crime by insisting on tougher sentences for serious and repeat crime and by tightening parole…. “A Conservative government will “A Conservative government will Introduce mandatory minimum prison sentences for… weapons offences…. Introduce mandatory minimum prison sentences for… weapons offences…. End conditional sentences for serious crimes… End conditional sentences for serious crimes… Work for a constitutional amendment to forbid prisoners in federal institutions from voting in elections. Work for a constitutional amendment to forbid prisoners in federal institutions from voting in elections. [and 11 other items in the area of crime] [and 11 other items in the area of crime]

26 Themes in Government Press Releases Related to Specific Bills ( – 39 th Parliament, 1 st Session) “Our new government has made safe streets and communities a key priority…(C-9) “Our new government has made safe streets and communities a key priority…(C-9) “We will restore confidence… and make our streets safer…” (C- 10) “We will restore confidence… and make our streets safer…” (C- 10) “It is time to implement effective preventative measures to safeguard communities..” (C-27) “It is time to implement effective preventative measures to safeguard communities..” (C-27) “Protecting our children and youth from sexual exploitation is a key priority….” (C-22) “Protecting our children and youth from sexual exploitation is a key priority….” (C-22) “Strengthening sentencing measures… prohibiting [conditional sentences] for those convicted of impaired driving causing…(C- 23) “Strengthening sentencing measures… prohibiting [conditional sentences] for those convicted of impaired driving causing…(C- 23) “Protecting Canadians must be the first priority of our bail system… (C-35) “Protecting Canadians must be the first priority of our bail system… (C-35)

27 Federal Crime Legislation, 2 nd Session, 39 th Parliament [October 2007 to September 2008] Tough on Crime Tough on Crime C-2: “Tackling Violent Crime Bill” (Mandatory Minimum sentences, age of consent, drug impaired driving, bail, dang. offenders) – Royal Assent C-2: “Tackling Violent Crime Bill” (Mandatory Minimum sentences, age of consent, drug impaired driving, bail, dang. offenders) – Royal Assent C-25: Youth Criminal Justice Act: Deterrence and Denunciation; Bail. C-25: Youth Criminal Justice Act: Deterrence and Denunciation; Bail. C-26: Drug: Mandatory Minimums C-26: Drug: Mandatory Minimums

28 C-2: Mandatory Minimum Press release: “The use of a firearm in committing a serious offence will be subject to a significant sentence. If, for example, an offence is gang related, or if a restricted or prohibited firearm such as a handgun is used, the minimum penalty will be Press release: “The use of a firearm in committing a serious offence will be subject to a significant sentence. If, for example, an offence is gang related, or if a restricted or prohibited firearm such as a handgun is used, the minimum penalty will be 5 years on a first offence….” 5 years on a first offence….” No mention No mention Current 4 year minimum Current 4 year minimum Absence of change for rifles, shotguns Absence of change for rifles, shotguns

29 Conservative Platform, October 2008 “Protecting the safety & security of Canadians” Prevent gangs Prevent gangs Responsibility & Rehabilitation for YOs – deterrence based sentencing Responsibility & Rehabilitation for YOs – deterrence based sentencing Replace automatic release with earned parole Replace automatic release with earned parole Ending House Arrest for Serious Crimes Ending House Arrest for Serious Crimes Eliminating the ‘Faint hope’ clause Eliminating the ‘Faint hope’ clause Getting tough with gangs and org. crime Getting tough with gangs and org. crime Allowing Canadian victims to sue terrorists Allowing Canadian victims to sue terrorists Mandatory minimums on drug offences Mandatory minimums on drug offences Protecting pregnant women against violence Protecting pregnant women against violence Tougher penalties for Impaired – death Tougher penalties for Impaired – death End ineffective long-gun registry End ineffective long-gun registry All sex offenders in national registry, DNA sampling, All sex offenders in national registry, DNA sampling,

30 Will these make us safe? Empirical evidence: “Deterrence based sentencing” “Deterrence based sentencing” Controlled re-entry of prisoners Controlled re-entry of prisoners Harsher sentences Harsher sentences Mandatory minimums Mandatory minimums Registration (DNA, Sex offender registries) Registration (DNA, Sex offender registries)

31 Final Example: C-25 “Truth in Sentencing Act” (2009) Government position: 1 day credit off sentence for each day in presentence custody Government position: 1 day credit off sentence for each day in presentence custody Justice Minister on the need to pass this bill: “I’m just telling them to fight crime in this country.” Justice Minister on the need to pass this bill: “I’m just telling them to fight crime in this country.” Issue Issue Fighting crime Fighting crime Increasing punitiveness Increasing punitiveness Reflecting conditions of imprisonment Reflecting conditions of imprisonment Equity (Equivalence of pre- and post-sentence time Equity (Equivalence of pre- and post-sentence time

32 Making ‘time’ equivalent Typical 90 day sentence Typical 90 day sentence 30 days of remission 30 days of remission Serve 60 days of a 90 day sentence Serve 60 days of a 90 day sentence Credit for time served in sentenced custody: 1.5 days for each day served Credit for time served in sentenced custody: 1.5 days for each day served 60 days in prison x 1.5 = 90 days sentence Imagine a prisoner ‘deserving’ a 90 day sentence who has spent 60 days in pretrial detention. Imagine a prisoner ‘deserving’ a 90 day sentence who has spent 60 days in pretrial detention. 60 days in pretrial detention x 1.5 = 90 days 60 days in pretrial detention x 1.5 = 90 days “Conditions” muddy the issue “Conditions” muddy the issue

33 Ultimate problem raised by C-25 Meaning of a sentence of imprisonment Meaning of a sentence of imprisonment Time served (in reality) - approximately 1/3 to 2/3 (or in rare cases 100%) Time served (in reality) - approximately 1/3 to 2/3 (or in rare cases 100%) Gradual release/ re-entry Gradual release/ re-entry Most to those least in need Most to those least in need Discretionary release almost ‘requires’ risk averse decisions Discretionary release almost ‘requires’ risk averse decisions Contrast with YCJA Contrast with YCJA

34 Conclusion Crime – serious problem not amenable to ‘one-off’ solutions Crime – serious problem not amenable to ‘one-off’ solutions General social (e.g., schools) policies General social (e.g., schools) policies Don’t focus on ‘crime prevention’ programs alone Don’t focus on ‘crime prevention’ programs alone Don’t focus on criminal justice system Don’t focus on criminal justice system Punishment and Imprisonment Punishment and Imprisonment Incoherent set of principles (e.g., sentencing and conditional release Incoherent set of principles (e.g., sentencing and conditional release Parliament appears not to care about fair, predictable, coherent punishment system Parliament appears not to care about fair, predictable, coherent punishment system Punishment (e.g., imprisonment rate) is under policy control Punishment (e.g., imprisonment rate) is under policy control Not simply a case of harsh or lenient, tough or soft on crime. Not simply a case of harsh or lenient, tough or soft on crime. Issue: Coherent policy Issue: Coherent policy Left off the political agenda: Doing something about crime Left off the political agenda: Doing something about crime

35 End