BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Citizen Survey and Neighborhood Feedback City of Wichita District IV Spring/Summer 2013.
Advertisements

Consultant: In association with: ETC Institute Leisure Vision Nationally Recognized….Uniquely Local A Presentation for the Citizens Capital Budget Advisory.
Collecting Citizen Input Management Learning Laboratories Presentation to Morrisville, NC January 2014.
Citizens provide values and elect representatives City council provides policy Staff provides service to citizens.
Community Engagement Survey Report Budget Priorities FY
Citizen Survey Results. Mecklenburg County Citizen Survey  Questions on full range of usage, customer satisfaction, needs, unmet needs, and priorities.
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
COMMUNITY SATISFACTION SURVEY BAYSIDE CITY COUNCIL JUNE RESEARCH REPORT - Coordinated by the Department of Planning and Community Development On.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
1 Community Assessment Chapter 13 28/4/2007 Ahmad Adeeb.
1. National Research Center, Inc.2 A turnkey citizen survey service offered by the INTERNATIONAL CITY/COUNTY MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION and NATIONAL RESEARCH.
2008 Citizen Satisfaction Survey Results May 29, 2009.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
A Deeper Understanding of Avery Fitness Center Customers
2004 Budget Presentation City Commission Budget Study Session July 2, 2003.
2014 National Citizen Survey Results Citizen Survey results Implementing Our Vision Background Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time Special.
Albemarle County 2004 Citizen Survey October 6, 2004.
Danville Region Social Capital Survey Center for Survey Research A Unit of the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service University of Virginia Center.
Southern Apache County Community Health Survey Spring 2003.
Big Listening 2010 A summary of surveys 13, 14 and 15.
CICOA Aging & In-Home Solutions July 2013 Results of the 2013 Survey.
Kimball Area Community Survey Results. Methodology Mail survey Sample included Kimball, Banner and western Cheyenne Counties  Random sample of 649 households.
2014 Budget Survey Presentation to Mayor & Council September 25, 2013 Jennifer Kinneman, Manager, Civic Engagement & Corporate Initiatives.
Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St. Boulder, CO (303) The National Citizen Survey™ LOWER PROVIDENCE.
2012 CITY OF MIDDLETON SATISFACTION SURVEY WORKING DRAFT - PROPOSAL.
City of Sarasota 2008 National Citizen Survey Conducted by the National Research Center (NRC) for the City of Sarasota.
2009 Lane County Community Survey Demographic Breakdown.
Jamestown Parks & Recreation Survey Results 2007.
September 2015 Town of the Blue Mountains Citizen Satisfaction Survey.
 Traditional role: council set policy; manager implement and administer policy. (Some overlap)  Studies show that members of City Councils are concentrating.
Long Term Sustainable Funding Committee Colorado Springs, Colorado September 16, 2008 Public Financial Management Two Logan Square, Suite th & Arch.
Community Attitude Study Village of Glen Ellyn.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
NEW FOCUS nf nf 1 Research Strategy and Implementation Telephone: Facsimile: ACN: 066.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Discussion Materials Prepared for City of Williamsburg, Virginia August 9, 2010 Refunding Opportunities Prepared By Davenport & Company LLC Member NYSE.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
City of Indio Community Survey SUMMARY PRESENTATION TO CITY COUNCIL June 16, 2010 Presented by: Rick Sklarz, Senior Researcher.
National Citizen Survey 2010 Results. City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for third time Survey.
WELCOME OPEN HOUSE POSSIBLE ANNEXATION JULY 23, 2015 RECREATION CENTER AND NATATORIUM PEARLAND.
The National Citizen Survey™ Orland Park, IL Summary of Findings May 7, 2012 ©2012 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc Valmont Road,
Redmond Police Functional Plan Update Council Study Session January 14, 2014.
CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD 2015 CITIZEN SURVEY PRESENTATION OF RESULTS.
Citizen Survey Hampton City Council July 8, 2009.
Budget Week Results Public Forum Data March 10, 2010.
Ashland, VA Key Findings January 6, 2015 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
City of Decatur National Citizen Survey 2012 Results City Commission Work Session July 16, 2012.
2016 Community Engagement Survey Results Office of Councilmember Chris Seelbach June 2016 Community Budget Survey.
City of Decatur Citizen Survey Results  Contracted with the National Research Center, Inc. for second time  Survey conducted by mail  1200 randomly.
The National Citizen Survey™ Ashland, VA Summary of Findings November 29, 2011 ©2011 Survey conducted by: National Research Center, Inc th St.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Arapahoe County, CO 2017 Citizen Survey Prepared by: Andrea Rasizer
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
McKinney, TX Key Findings 2017
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
Summary of Findings January, 2009
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
Is That Really a Best Practice or Just You Practicing?
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures June 22, 2017
DirectionFinder® Survey
City of Palo Alto Healthy Cities Performance Measures August 24, 2017
Key Findings – Special Topics 2018
2014 National Citizen Survey Results
The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA
Summary of Findings May 26, 2009
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
Listening to the Voices Of Residents Can you really hear them?
2010 DirectionFinder® Survey City of Blue Springs, Missouri
Customer Satisfaction Survey Report For City of El Segundo – Residents
Presentation transcript:

BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey

National Citizen Survey  Collaborative effort between the National Research Center (NRC) & International City/County Management Association (ICMA)  The City of BG participates in ICMA’s Center for Performance Measurement  Survey focuses on community characteristics, local government services, and issues of public trust  Also measures resident behaviors relating to civic engagement

Additional Information – Survey Process  City staff reviewed standard NCS form menu and customized  We included services not provided by the City as well (library, utilities, transit)  NRC mailed questionnaires to a representative sample of 1200 BG households (100 were undelivered)  Multi-contact notification was delivered via postcard and then survey sent twice on City letterhead/envelopes

Additional Information – Survey Process  The adult with the most recent birthday was asked to complete the survey – this was done to get a representative sample  There was a 24% response rate (20 to 40% is typical) 263 of the 1200 surveys were completed and returned.

Why Survey?  Immediate Benefits – Provides useful information for:  Planning  Resource Allocation  Performance Measurements  Program and Policy Evaluation

Why Survey?  Long Term Benefits – Provides useful information for:  Improved Services  More Civic Engagement  Better Community Quality of Life  Stronger Public Trust

Understanding the Results  The Survey Contains a Margin of Error of 5%  If 75% of respondents rate a service as “excellent or good” then the range of likely responses from the entire community is between 70% and 80%  Data is statistically weighted to reflect proper community demographics including rent/own

Understanding the Results – Comparisons  Nationally, public safety services tend to be rated higher than transportation services  It is better to compare BG’s services to similar services provided by other jurisdictions rather than comparing one service to another within our City.  In order for a comparison from a previous survey to be “significant,” the +/- needs to be more then 8%  Overall, our comparisons in 2010 were better then 2008

Understanding the Results – Benchmarking  A benchmark is a standard by which something can be measured or judged  NRC has a database of survey results from 500 jurisdictions that can be used as a benchmark  Bowling Green chose to compare to:  The entire database of 500 jurisdictions  And the southern region specifically - with 136 jurisdictions in 16 states

Understanding the Results – Benchmarking  77% of residents rated the overall quality of life in BG as excellent (E) or good (G) which is above or similar to the national and southern region benchmarks

Understanding the Results – Benchmarking  31 community characteristics and 37 City services were surveyed and compared to the benchmark data  For the 31 community characteristics surveyed, BG was rated “above” the benchmark in 16 categories; “similar” in 9 categories and “below” in 6 categories  For the 37 City services surveyed, BG was rated “above” the benchmark in 17 areas; “similar” in 17 areas and “below” in 3 areas

Overall Community Quality - % rated as Excellent or Good  BG as a place to live – 81%  Your neighborhood as a place to live – 67%  BG as a place to raise children – 85%  BG as a place to work – 67%  BG as a place to retire – 69%  The overall quality of life in BG – 78%

Service Quality - % rated as Excellent or Good  BG Police Department Services – 76%  BG Fire Department Services – 94%  Street Repair – 41%  Street Cleaning – 62%  Street Lighting – 68%  Snow Removal – 63%  Sidewalk Maintenance – 51%  Storm Drainage – 53%

Service Quality - % rated as Excellent or Good  City Parks – 87%  Recreation Programs or Classes – 76%  Recreation Centers or Facilities – 76%  Code Enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) – 50%  Animal Control – 64%  Public Information Services – 72%  Cleanliness of BG – 73%

Community Characteristics - % rated as Excellent or Good  Overall Appearance of BG – 74%  Cleanliness of BG – 73%  Recreational Opportunities – 67%  Opportunities to Volunteer – 77%  Opportunities for Employment – 49%  Opportunities to Participate in Community Matters – 62%  Ease of Walking in BG – 43%

Community Characteristics - % rated as Excellent or Good  Availability of Paths and Walking Trails in BG – 45%  Traffic Flow on Major Streets – 28%  Overall Image or Reputation of BG – 80%

Government Services Overall - % rated as Excellent or Good  The City of Bowling Green – 74%  The Federal Government – 48%  The State Government – 49%  Warren County Government – 64%

Areas for Improvement – services or characteristics that rated below average  Street Repair  Sidewalk Maintenance  Overall Cleanliness of BG  Traffic Flow  Fire Services  Strom Water drainage  Police Services  Citizens Attending Local Meetings

Areas We Are Excelling – services or characteristics that rated above average  Overall Image/Reputation of BG  Services provided by BG  City Recreation Centers  Street Lighting  Public Education  City Parks  Safety in Bowling Green’s Downtown area during the day

Additional Information – Contact  The information presented in this power point does not include all survey questions and responses.  To view the survey in its entirety, visit  For more information or if you have questions, please contact Kim Lancaster at or